docs/master

annotate discussion.roff @ 133:02660c14f6a8

Further re-ordering of the sections.
author markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
date Tue, 03 Jul 2012 16:50:41 +0200
parents 7c741bc8f719
children edf46861132b
rev   line source
meillo@58 1 .H0 "Discussion
meillo@0 2 .P
meillo@58 3 This main chapter discusses the practical work done in the mmh project.
meillo@104 4 It is structured along the goals to achieve.
meillo@104 5 The concrete work done
meillo@58 6 is described in the examples of how the general goals were achieved.
meillo@87 7 The discussion compares the current version of mmh with the state of
meillo@87 8 nmh just before the mmh project started, i.e. Fall 2011.
meillo@87 9 Current changes of nmh will be mentioned only as side notes.
meillo@87 10 .\" XXX where do I discuss the parallel development of nmh?
meillo@58 11
meillo@58 12
meillo@58 13
meillo@133 14 .\" --------------------------------------------------------------
meillo@125 15 .H1 "Streamlining
meillo@58 16
meillo@0 17 .P
meillo@58 18 MH had been considered an all-in-one system for mail handling.
meillo@58 19 The community around nmh has a similar understanding.
meillo@87 20 In fundamental difference, mmh shall be a MUA only.
meillo@87 21 I believe that the development of all-in-one mail systems is obsolete.
meillo@87 22 Today, email is too complex to be fully covered by single projects.
meillo@87 23 Such a project won't be able to excel in all aspects.
meillo@87 24 Instead, the aspects of email should be covered my multiple projects,
meillo@87 25 which then can be combined to form a complete system.
meillo@87 26 Excellent implementations for the various aspects of email exist already.
meillo@87 27 Just to name three examples: Postfix is a specialized MTA,
meillo@87 28 Procmail is a specialized MDA, and Fetchmail is a specialized MRA.
meillo@89 29 I believe that it is best to use such specialized tools instead of
meillo@87 30 providing the same function again as a side-component in the project.
meillo@58 31 .P
meillo@87 32 Doing something well, requires to focus on a small set of specific aspects.
meillo@87 33 Under the assumption that focused development produces better results
meillo@100 34 in the particular area, specialized projects will be superior
meillo@87 35 in their field of focus.
meillo@87 36 Hence, all-in-one mail system projects \(en no matter if monolithic
meillo@87 37 or modular \(en will never be the best choice in any of the fields.
meillo@87 38 Even in providing the best consistent all-in-one system they are likely
meillo@87 39 to be beaten by projects that focus only on integrating existing mail
meillo@89 40 components to a homogeneous system.
meillo@87 41 .P
meillo@87 42 The limiting resource in Free Software community development
meillo@87 43 is usually man power.
meillo@87 44 If the development power is spread over a large development area,
meillo@87 45 it becomes even more difficult to compete with the specialists in the
meillo@87 46 various fields.
meillo@87 47 The concrete situation for MH-based mail systems is even tougher,
meillo@87 48 given the small and aged community, including both developers and users,
meillo@87 49 it has.
meillo@87 50 .P
meillo@87 51 In consequence, I believe that the available development resources
meillo@100 52 should focus on the point where MH is most unique.
meillo@87 53 This is clearly the user interface \(en the MUA.
meillo@125 54 Peripheral parts should be removed to streamline mmh for the MUA task.
meillo@60 55
meillo@60 56
meillo@100 57 .H2 "Mail Transfer Facilities
meillo@60 58 .P
meillo@60 59 In contrast to nmh, which also provides mail submission and mail retrieval
meillo@87 60 agents, mmh is a MUA only.
meillo@100 61 This general difference initiated the development of mmh.
meillo@66 62 Removing the mail transfer facilities had been the first work task
meillo@76 63 in the mmh project.
meillo@60 64 .P
meillo@105 65 Focusing on one mail agent role only is motivated by Eric Allman's
meillo@105 66 experience with Sendmail.
meillo@105 67 He identified limiting Sendmail the MTA task had be one reason for
meillo@105 68 its success:
meillo@105 69 .[ [
meillo@105 70 costales sendmail
meillo@105 71 .], p. xviii]
meillo@105 72 .QS
meillo@105 73 Second, I limited myself to the routing function \(en
meillo@110 74 I wouldn't write user agents or delivery back-ends.
meillo@105 75 This was a departure of the dominant through of the time,
meillo@105 76 in which routing logic, local delivery, and often the network code
meillo@105 77 were incorporated directly into the user agents.
meillo@105 78 .QE
meillo@105 79 .P
meillo@105 80 In mmh, the Mail Submission Agent (MSA) is called
meillo@105 81 \fIMessage Transfer Service\fP (MTS).
meillo@105 82 This facility, implemented by the
meillo@105 83 .Pn post
meillo@105 84 command, established network connections and spoke SMTP to submit
meillo@60 85 messages for relay to the outside world.
meillo@105 86 The changes in email demanded changes in this part of nmh too.
meillo@89 87 Encryption and authentication for network connections
meillo@87 88 needed to be supported, hence TLS and SASL were introduced into nmh.
meillo@87 89 This added complexity to nmh without improving it in its core functions.
meillo@87 90 Also, keeping up with recent developments in the field of
meillo@87 91 mail transfer requires development power and specialists.
meillo@87 92 In mmh this whole facility was simply cut off.
meillo@76 93 .Ci f6aa95b724fd8c791164abe7ee5468bf5c34f226
meillo@76 94 .Ci fecd5d34f65597a4dfa16aeabea7d74b191532c3
meillo@76 95 .Ci 156d35f6425bea4c1ed3c4c79783dc613379c65b
meillo@87 96 Instead, mmh depends on an external MSA.
meillo@60 97 The only outgoing interface available to mmh is the
meillo@60 98 .Pn sendmail
meillo@87 99 command, which almost any MSA provides.
meillo@87 100 If not, a wrapper program can be written.
meillo@87 101 It must read the message from the standard input, extract the
meillo@87 102 recipient addresses from the message header, and hand the message
meillo@87 103 over to the MSA.
meillo@87 104 For example, a wrapper script for qmail would be:
meillo@87 105 .VS
meillo@87 106 #!/bin/sh
meillo@87 107 # ignore command line arguments
meillo@87 108 exec qmail-inject
meillo@87 109 VE
meillo@87 110 The requirement to parse the recipient addresses out of the message header
meillo@87 111 is likely to be removed in the future.
meillo@87 112 Then mmh would give the recipient addresses as command line arguments.
meillo@100 113 This appears to be the better interface.
meillo@87 114 .\" XXX implement it
meillo@60 115 .P
meillo@60 116 To retrieve mail, the
meillo@60 117 .Pn inc
meillo@100 118 command acted as Mail Retrieval Agent (MRA).
meillo@100 119 It established network connections
meillo@76 120 and spoke POP3 to retrieve mail from remote servers.
meillo@76 121 As with mail submission, the network connections required encryption and
meillo@87 122 authentication, thus TLS and SASL were added.
meillo@87 123 Support for message retrieval through IMAP will become necessary
meillo@100 124 to be added soon, too, and likewise for any other changes in mail transfer.
meillo@100 125 Not so for mmh because it has dropped the support for retrieving mail
meillo@100 126 from remote locations.
meillo@76 127 .Ci ab7b48411962d26439f92f35ed084d3d6275459c
meillo@76 128 Instead, it depends on an external tool to cover this task.
meillo@100 129 In mmh exist two paths for messages to enter mmh's mail storage:
meillo@100 130 (1) Mail can be incorporated with
meillo@60 131 .Pn inc
meillo@87 132 from the system maildrop, or (2) with
meillo@60 133 .Pn rcvstore
meillo@87 134 by reading them, one at a time, from the standard input.
meillo@60 135 .P
meillo@60 136 With the removal of the MSA and MRA, mmh converted from an all-in-one
meillo@87 137 mail system to being a MUA only.
meillo@60 138 Now, of course, mmh depends on third-party software.
meillo@87 139 An external MSA is required to transfer mail to the outside world;
meillo@60 140 an external MRA is required to retrieve mail from remote machines.
meillo@60 141 There exist excellent implementations of such software,
meillo@76 142 which do this specific task likely better than the internal
meillo@87 143 versions had done it.
meillo@87 144 Also, the best suiting programs can be freely chosen.
meillo@60 145 .P
meillo@60 146 As it had already been possible to use an external MSA or MRA,
meillo@60 147 why not keep the internal version for convenience?
meillo@76 148 The question whether there is sense in having a fall-back pager in all
meillo@76 149 the command line tools, for the cases when
meillo@60 150 .Pn more
meillo@60 151 or
meillo@60 152 .Pn less
meillo@76 153 aren't available, appears to be ridiculous.
meillo@100 154 Of course, MSAs and MRAs are more complex than text pagers
meillo@87 155 and not necessarily available but still the concept of orthogonal
meillo@87 156 design holds: ``Write programs that do one thing and do it well.''
meillo@87 157 .[
meillo@87 158 mcilroy unix phil
meillo@87 159 p. 53
meillo@87 160 .]
meillo@87 161 .[
meillo@87 162 mcilroy bstj foreword
meillo@87 163 .]
meillo@87 164 Here, this part of the Unix philosophy was applied not only
meillo@87 165 to the programs but to the project itself.
meillo@87 166 In other words:
meillo@87 167 ``Develop projects that focus on one thing and do it well.''
meillo@87 168 Projects grown complex should be split for the same reasons programs grown
meillo@87 169 complex should be split.
meillo@100 170 If it is conceptionally more elegant to have the MSA and MRA as
meillo@87 171 separate projects then they should be separated.
meillo@87 172 This is the case here, in my opinion.
meillo@87 173 The RFCs propose this separation by clearly distinguishing the different
meillo@87 174 mail handling tasks.
meillo@87 175 .[
meillo@87 176 rfc 821
meillo@87 177 .]
meillo@87 178 The small interfaces between the mail agents support the separation.
meillo@76 179 .P
meillo@87 180 In the beginning, email had been small and simple.
meillo@100 181 At that time,
meillo@60 182 .Pn /bin/mail
meillo@100 183 had covered anything there was to email and still had been small
meillo@100 184 and simple.
meillo@100 185 Later, the essential complexity of email increased.
meillo@87 186 (Essential complexity is the complexity defined by the problem itself.\0
meillo@87 187 .[[
meillo@87 188 brooks no silver bullet
meillo@87 189 .]])
meillo@87 190 Email systems reacted to this change: They grew.
meillo@100 191 RFCs started to introduce the concept of mail agents to separate the
meillo@100 192 various tasks because they became more extensive and new tasks appeared.
meillo@100 193 As the mail systems grew even more, parts were split off.
meillo@100 194 In nmh, for instance, the POP server, which was included in the original
meillo@100 195 MH, was removed.
meillo@100 196 Now is the time to go one step further and split the MSA and MRA off, too.
meillo@87 197 Not only does this decrease the code size of the project,
meillo@87 198 but, more important, it unburdens mmh of the whole field of
meillo@87 199 message transfer with all its implications for the project.
meillo@100 200 There is no more need to concern with changes in network transfer.
meillo@76 201 This independence is received by depending on an external program
meillo@76 202 that covers the field.
meillo@76 203 Today, this is a reasonable exchange.
meillo@60 204 .P
meillo@100 205 Functionality can be added in three different ways:
meillo@87 206 .BU
meillo@87 207 Implementing the function originally in the project.
meillo@87 208 .BU
meillo@87 209 Depending on a library that provides the function.
meillo@87 210 .BU
meillo@87 211 Depending on a program that provides the function.
meillo@87 212 .P
meillo@87 213 Whereas adding the function originally to the project increases the
meillo@76 214 code size most and requires most maintenance and development work,
meillo@87 215 it makes the project most independent of other software.
meillo@87 216 Using libraries or external programs require less maintenance work
meillo@87 217 but introduces dependencies on external software.
meillo@87 218 Programs have the smallest interfaces and provide the best separation
meillo@87 219 but possibly limit the information exchange.
meillo@87 220 External libraries are stronger connected than external programs,
meillo@87 221 thus information can be exchanged more flexible.
meillo@87 222 Adding code to a project increases maintenance work.
meillo@87 223 .\" XXX ref
meillo@100 224 Implementing complex functions originally in the project adds
meillo@87 225 a lot of code.
meillo@87 226 This should be avoided if possible.
meillo@66 227 Hence, the dependencies only change in kind, not in their existence.
meillo@66 228 In mmh, library dependencies on
meillo@66 229 .Pn libsasl2
meillo@66 230 and
meillo@66 231 .Pn libcrypto /\c
meillo@66 232 .Pn libssl
meillo@66 233 were treated against program dependencies on an MSA and an MRA.
meillo@87 234 This also meant treating build-time dependencies against run-time
meillo@87 235 dependencies.
meillo@66 236 Besides program dependencies providing the stronger separation
meillo@66 237 and being more flexible, they also allowed
meillo@66 238 over 6\|000 lines of code to be removed from mmh.
meillo@66 239 This made mmh's code base about 12\|% smaller.
meillo@87 240 Reducing the project's code size by such an amount without actually
meillo@87 241 losing functionality is a convincing argument.
meillo@87 242 Actually, as external MSAs and MRAs are likely superior to the
meillo@87 243 project's internal versions, the common user even gains functionality.
meillo@66 244 .P
meillo@76 245 Users of MH should not have problems to set up an external MSA and MRA.
meillo@60 246 Also, the popular MSAs and MRAs have large communities and a lot
meillo@60 247 of documentation available.
meillo@87 248 Choices for MSAs range from full-featured MTAs like
meillo@60 249 .I Postfix
meillo@87 250 over mid-size MTAs like
meillo@60 251 .I masqmail
meillo@60 252 and
meillo@60 253 .I dma
meillo@60 254 to small forwarders like
meillo@60 255 .I ssmtp
meillo@60 256 and
meillo@60 257 .I nullmailer .
meillo@60 258 Choices for MRAs include
meillo@60 259 .I fetchmail ,
meillo@60 260 .I getmail ,
meillo@60 261 .I mpop
meillo@60 262 and
meillo@60 263 .I fdm .
meillo@60 264
meillo@60 265
meillo@100 266 .H2 "Non-MUA Tools
meillo@60 267 .P
meillo@87 268 One goal of mmh is to remove the tools that are not part of the MUA's task.
meillo@89 269 Further more, any tools that don't improve the MUA's job significantly
meillo@87 270 should be removed.
meillo@87 271 Loosely related and rarely used tools distract from the lean appearance.
meillo@87 272 They require maintenance work without adding much to the core task.
meillo@125 273 By removing these tools, the project shall become more streamlined
meillo@87 274 and focused.
meillo@76 275 In mmh the following tools are not available anymore:
meillo@62 276 .BU
meillo@58 277 .Pn conflict
meillo@87 278 was removed
meillo@76 279 .Ci 8b235097cbd11d728c07b966cf131aa7133ce5a9
meillo@87 280 because it is a mail system maintenance tool that is not MUA-related.
meillo@87 281 It even checked
meillo@58 282 .Fn /etc/passwd
meillo@58 283 and
meillo@58 284 .Fn /etc/group
meillo@87 285 for consistency, which is completely unrelated to email.
meillo@87 286 A tool like
meillo@87 287 .Pn conflict
meillo@87 288 is surely useful, but it should not be shipped with mmh.
meillo@76 289 .\" XXX historic reasons?
meillo@62 290 .BU
meillo@58 291 .Pn rcvtty
meillo@87 292 was removed
meillo@87 293 .Ci 14767c94b3827be7c867196467ed7aea5f6f49b0
meillo@89 294 because its use case of writing to the user's terminal
meillo@76 295 on receiving of mail is obsolete.
meillo@87 296 If users like to be informed of new mail, the shell's
meillo@58 297 .Ev MAILPATH
meillo@87 298 variable or graphical notifications are technically more appealing.
meillo@100 299 Writing directly to terminals is hardly ever wanted today.
meillo@62 300 If though one wants to have it this way, the standard tool
meillo@58 301 .Pn write
meillo@58 302 can be used in a way similar to:
meillo@82 303 .VS
meillo@58 304 scan -file - | write `id -un`
meillo@82 305 VE
meillo@62 306 .BU
meillo@58 307 .Pn viamail
meillo@87 308 was removed
meillo@87 309 .Ci eda72d6a7a7c20ff123043fb7f19c509ea01f932
meillo@87 310 when the new attachment system was activated, because
meillo@58 311 .Pn forw
meillo@76 312 could then cover the task itself.
meillo@62 313 The program
meillo@58 314 .Pn sendfiles
meillo@62 315 was rewritten as a shell script wrapper around
meillo@58 316 .Pn forw .
meillo@76 317 .Ci 0e82199cf3c991a173e0ac8aa776efdb3ded61e6
meillo@62 318 .BU
meillo@58 319 .Pn msgchk
meillo@87 320 was removed
meillo@87 321 .Ci bb9360ead7eb7a3fedcce2eeedfc660014e41dbe ,
meillo@87 322 because it lost its use case when POP support was removed.
meillo@76 323 A call to
meillo@58 324 .Pn msgchk
meillo@87 325 provided hardly more information than:
meillo@82 326 .VS
meillo@58 327 ls -l /var/mail/meillo
meillo@82 328 VE
meillo@100 329 It did distinguish between old and new mail, but
meillo@100 330 this detail information can be retrieved with
meillo@76 331 .Pn stat (1),
meillo@62 332 too.
meillo@100 333 A small shell script could be written to print the information
meillo@76 334 in a similar way, if truly necessary.
meillo@76 335 As mmh's
meillo@76 336 .Pn inc
meillo@87 337 only incorporates mail from the user's local maildrop,
meillo@62 338 and thus no data transfers over slow networks are involved,
meillo@76 339 there's hardly any need to check for new mail before incorporating it.
meillo@62 340 .BU
meillo@58 341 .Pn msh
meillo@87 342 was removed
meillo@76 343 .Ci 916690191222433a6923a4be54b0d8f6ac01bd02
meillo@87 344 because the tool was in conflict with the philosophy of MH.
meillo@76 345 It provided an interactive shell to access the features of MH,
meillo@76 346 but it wasn't just a shell, tailored to the needs of mail handling.
meillo@76 347 Instead it was one large program that had several MH tools built in.
meillo@76 348 This conflicts with the major feature of MH of being a tool chest.
meillo@76 349 .Pn msh 's
meillo@76 350 main use case had been accessing Bulletin Boards, which have seized to
meillo@62 351 be popular.
meillo@62 352 .P
meillo@62 353 Removing
meillo@58 354 .Pn msh ,
meillo@76 355 together with the truly archaic code relicts
meillo@58 356 .Pn vmh
meillo@58 357 and
meillo@58 358 .Pn wmh ,
meillo@62 359 saved more than 7\|000 lines of C code \(en
meillo@66 360 about 15\|% of the project's original source code amount.
meillo@100 361 Having less code \(en with equal readability, of course \(en
meillo@76 362 for the same functionality is an advantage.
meillo@63 363 Less code means less bugs and less maintenance work.
meillo@76 364 As
meillo@63 365 .Pn rcvtty
meillo@63 366 and
meillo@63 367 .Pn msgchk
meillo@87 368 are assumed to be rarely used and can be implemented in different ways,
meillo@87 369 why should one keep them?
meillo@125 370 Removing them streamlines mmh.
meillo@63 371 .Pn viamail 's
meillo@63 372 use case is now partly obsolete and partly covered by
meillo@63 373 .Pn forw ,
meillo@76 374 hence there's no reason to still maintain it.
meillo@63 375 .Pn conflict
meillo@76 376 is not related to the mail client, and
meillo@63 377 .Pn msh
meillo@63 378 conflicts with the basic concept of MH.
meillo@76 379 Theses two tools might still be useful, but they should not be part of mmh.
meillo@63 380 .P
meillo@76 381 Finally, there's
meillo@76 382 .Pn slocal .
meillo@76 383 .Pn slocal
meillo@76 384 is an MDA and thus not directly MUA-related.
meillo@100 385 It should be removed from mmh, because including it conflicts with
meillo@100 386 the idea that mmh is a MUA only.
meillo@100 387 .Pn slocal
meillo@100 388 should rather become a separate project.
meillo@87 389 However,
meillo@76 390 .Pn slocal
meillo@76 391 provides rule-based processing of messages, like filing them into
meillo@76 392 different folders, which is otherwise not available in mmh.
meillo@87 393 Although
meillo@76 394 .Pn slocal
meillo@87 395 does neither pull in dependencies nor does it include a separate
meillo@100 396 technical area (cf. Sec. XXX), still,
meillo@100 397 it accounts for about 1\|000 lines of code that need to be maintained.
meillo@76 398 As
meillo@76 399 .Pn slocal
meillo@76 400 is almost self-standing, it should be split off into a separate project.
meillo@76 401 This would cut the strong connection between the MUA mmh and the MDA
meillo@76 402 .Pn slocal .
meillo@87 403 For anyone not using MH,
meillo@87 404 .Pn slocal
meillo@87 405 would become yet another independent MDA, like
meillo@87 406 .I procmail .
meillo@100 407 Then
meillo@87 408 .Pn slocal
meillo@100 409 could be installed without the complete MH system.
meillo@76 410 Likewise, mmh users could decide to use
meillo@76 411 .I procmail
meillo@87 412 without having a second, unused MDA,
meillo@87 413 .Pn slocal ,
meillo@76 414 installed.
meillo@100 415 That appears to be conceptionally the best solution.
meillo@76 416 Yet,
meillo@76 417 .Pn slocal
meillo@87 418 is not split off.
meillo@100 419 I defer the decision over
meillo@78 420 .Pn slocal
meillo@100 421 in need for deeper investigation.
meillo@100 422 In the meanwhile, it remains part of mmh.
meillo@100 423 That does not hurt because
meillo@100 424 .Pn slocal
meillo@100 425 is unrelated to the rest of the project.
meillo@0 426
meillo@58 427
meillo@133 428
meillo@133 429 .H2 "\fLshow\fP and \fPmhshow\fP
meillo@131 430 .P
meillo@133 431 Since the very beginning, already in the first concept paper,
meillo@58 432 .Pn show
meillo@62 433 had been MH's message display program.
meillo@58 434 .Pn show
meillo@76 435 mapped message numbers and sequences to files and invoked
meillo@58 436 .Pn mhl
meillo@89 437 to have the files formatted.
meillo@88 438 With MIME, this approach wasn't sufficient anymore.
meillo@100 439 MIME messages can consist of multiple parts. Some parts are not
meillo@100 440 directly displayable and text content might be encoded in
meillo@58 441 foreign charsets.
meillo@58 442 .Pn show 's
meillo@76 443 understanding of messages and
meillo@58 444 .Pn mhl 's
meillo@88 445 display capabilities couldn't cope with the task any longer.
meillo@62 446 .P
meillo@88 447 Instead of extending these tools, additional tools were written from
meillo@88 448 scratch and added to the MH tool chest.
meillo@88 449 Doing so is encouraged by the tool chest approach.
meillo@88 450 Modular design is a great advantage for extending a system,
meillo@88 451 as new tools can be added without interfering with existing ones.
meillo@62 452 First, the new MIME features were added in form of the single program
meillo@58 453 .Pn mhn .
meillo@58 454 The command
meillo@82 455 .Cl "mhn -show 42
meillo@58 456 would show the MIME message numbered 42.
meillo@58 457 With the 1.0 release of nmh in February 1999, Richard Coleman finished
meillo@58 458 the split of
meillo@58 459 .Pn mhn
meillo@88 460 into a set of specialized tools, which together covered the
meillo@88 461 multiple aspects of MIME.
meillo@88 462 One of them was
meillo@69 463 .Pn mhshow ,
meillo@88 464 which replaced
meillo@88 465 .Cl "mhn -show" .
meillo@88 466 It was capable of displaying MIME messages appropriately.
meillo@62 467 .P
meillo@88 468 From then on, two message display tools were part of nmh,
meillo@76 469 .Pn show
meillo@76 470 and
meillo@76 471 .Pn mhshow .
meillo@88 472 To ease the life of users,
meillo@69 473 .Pn show
meillo@69 474 was extended to automatically hand the job over to
meillo@69 475 .Pn mhshow
meillo@69 476 if displaying the message would be beyond
meillo@69 477 .Pn show 's
meillo@69 478 abilities.
meillo@88 479 In consequence, the user would simply invoke
meillo@69 480 .Pn show
meillo@69 481 (possibly through
meillo@69 482 .Pn next
meillo@69 483 or
meillo@69 484 .Pn prev )
meillo@69 485 and get the message printed with either
meillo@69 486 .Pn show
meillo@69 487 or
meillo@69 488 .Pn mhshow ,
meillo@69 489 whatever was more appropriate.
meillo@69 490 .P
meillo@69 491 Having two similar tools for essentially the same task is redundant.
meillo@88 492 Usually,
meillo@88 493 users wouldn't distinguish between
meillo@88 494 .Pn show
meillo@88 495 and
meillo@88 496 .Pn mhshow
meillo@88 497 in their daily mail reading.
meillo@88 498 Having two separate display programs was therefore mainly unnecessary
meillo@88 499 from a user's point of view.
meillo@88 500 Besides, the development of both programs needed to be in sync,
meillo@76 501 to ensure that the programs behaved in a similar way,
meillo@76 502 because they were used like a single tool.
meillo@76 503 Different behavior would have surprised the user.
meillo@69 504 .P
meillo@69 505 Today, non-MIME messages are rather seen to be a special case of
meillo@100 506 MIME messages, although it is the other way round.
meillo@69 507 As
meillo@69 508 .Pn mhshow
meillo@88 509 had already be able to display non-MIME messages, it appeared natural
meillo@69 510 to drop
meillo@69 511 .Pn show
meillo@69 512 in favor of using
meillo@69 513 .Pn mhshow
meillo@69 514 exclusively.
meillo@88 515 .Ci 4c1efddfd499300c7e74263e57d8aa137e84c853
meillo@88 516 Removing
meillo@88 517 .Pn show
meillo@88 518 is no loss in function, because functionally
meillo@88 519 .Pn mhshow
meillo@88 520 covers it completely.
meillo@88 521 The old behavior of
meillo@88 522 .Pn show
meillo@88 523 can still be emulated with the simple command line:
meillo@88 524 .VS
meillo@88 525 mhl `mhpath c`
meillo@88 526 VE
meillo@88 527 .P
meillo@76 528 For convenience,
meillo@76 529 .Pn mhshow
meillo@88 530 was renamed to
meillo@88 531 .Pn show
meillo@88 532 after
meillo@88 533 .Pn show
meillo@88 534 was gone.
meillo@88 535 It is clear that such a rename may confuse future developers when
meillo@88 536 trying to understand the history.
meillo@88 537 Nevertheless, I consider the convenience on the user's side,
meillo@88 538 to call
meillo@88 539 .Pn show
meillo@88 540 when they want a message to be displayed, to outweigh the inconvenience
meillo@88 541 on the developer's side when understanding the project history.
meillo@69 542 .P
meillo@88 543 To prepare for the transition,
meillo@69 544 .Pn mhshow
meillo@69 545 was reworked to behave more like
meillo@69 546 .Pn show
meillo@69 547 first.
meillo@88 548 (cf. Sec. XXX)
meillo@88 549 Once the tools behaved more alike, the replacing appeared to be
meillo@88 550 even more natural.
meillo@88 551 Today, mmh's new
meillo@69 552 .Pn show
meillo@88 553 became the one single message display program again, with the difference
meillo@88 554 that today it handles MIME messages as well as non-MIME messages.
meillo@88 555 The outcome of the transition is one program less to maintain,
meillo@88 556 no second display program for users to deal with,
meillo@88 557 and less system complexity.
meillo@69 558 .P
meillo@88 559 Still, removing the old
meillo@69 560 .Pn show
meillo@88 561 hurts in one regard: It had been such a simple program.
meillo@88 562 Its lean elegance is missing to the new
meillo@69 563 .Pn show .
meillo@88 564 But there is no chance;
meillo@88 565 supporting MIME demands for higher essential complexity.
meillo@58 566
meillo@58 567
meillo@133 568 .H2 "Scan Listings
meillo@131 569 .P
meillo@131 570 FIXME XXX
meillo@131 571
meillo@131 572 .P
meillo@131 573 commit c20e315f9fb9f0f0955749726dbf4fd897cd9f48
meillo@131 574 Author: markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
meillo@131 575 Date: Fri Dec 9 21:56:44 2011 +0100
meillo@131 576
meillo@131 577 Adjusted the default scan listing: remove the body preview
meillo@131 578 The original listing is still available as etc/scan.nmh
meillo@131 579
meillo@131 580 commit 70b2643e0da8485174480c644ad9785c84f5bff4
meillo@131 581 Author: markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
meillo@131 582 Date: Mon Jan 30 16:16:26 2012 +0100
meillo@131 583
meillo@131 584 Scan listings shall not contain body content. Hence, removed this feature.
meillo@131 585 Scan listings shall operator on message headers and non-message information
meillo@131 586 only. Displaying the beginning of the body complicates everything too much.
meillo@131 587 That's no surprise, because it's something completely different. If you
meillo@131 588 want to examine the body, then use show(1)/mhshow(1).
meillo@131 589 Changed the default scan formats accordingly.
meillo@131 590
meillo@131 591
meillo@131 592
meillo@133 593
meillo@100 594 .H2 "Configure Options
meillo@58 595 .P
meillo@76 596 Customization is a double-edged sword.
meillo@76 597 It allows better suiting setups, but not for free.
meillo@76 598 There is the cost of code complexity to be able to customize.
meillo@76 599 There is the cost of less tested setups, because there are
meillo@72 600 more possible setups and especially corner-cases.
meillo@76 601 And, there is the cost of choice itself.
meillo@76 602 The code complexity directly affects the developers.
meillo@72 603 Less tested code affects both, users and developers.
meillo@76 604 The problem of choice affects the users, for once by having to
meillo@100 605 choose, but also by more complex interfaces that require more documentation.
meillo@72 606 Whenever options add little advantages, they should be considered for
meillo@72 607 removal.
meillo@72 608 I have reduced the number of project-specific configure options from
meillo@72 609 fifteen to three.
meillo@74 610
meillo@76 611 .U3 "Mail Transfer Facilities
meillo@74 612 .P
meillo@85 613 With the removal of the mail transfer facilities five configure
meillo@85 614 options vanished:
meillo@85 615 .P
meillo@85 616 The switches
meillo@85 617 .Sw --with-tls
meillo@85 618 and
meillo@85 619 .Sw --with-cyrus-sasl
meillo@89 620 had activated the support for transfer encryption and authentication.
meillo@85 621 This is not needed anymore.
meillo@85 622 .Ci fecd5d34f65597a4dfa16aeabea7d74b191532c3
meillo@85 623 .Ci 156d35f6425bea4c1ed3c4c79783dc613379c65b
meillo@85 624 .P
meillo@85 625 The configure switch
meillo@85 626 .Sw --enable-pop
meillo@85 627 activated the message retrieval facility.
meillo@85 628 The code area that would be conditionally compiled in for TLS and SASL
meillo@85 629 support had been small.
meillo@85 630 The conditionally compiled code area for POP support had been much larger.
meillo@85 631 Whereas the code base changes would only slightly change on toggling
meillo@85 632 TLS or SASL support, it changed much on toggling POP support.
meillo@85 633 The changes in the code base could hardly be overviewed.
meillo@85 634 By having POP support togglable a second code base had been created,
meillo@85 635 one that needed to be tested.
meillo@85 636 This situation is basically similar for the conditional TLS and SASL
meillo@85 637 code, but there the changes are minor and can yet be overviewed.
meillo@85 638 Still, conditional compilation of a code base creates variations
meillo@85 639 of the original program.
meillo@85 640 More variations require more testing and maintenance work.
meillo@85 641 .P
meillo@85 642 Two other options only specified default configuration values:
meillo@100 643 .Sw --with-mts
meillo@100 644 defined the default transport service, either
meillo@100 645 .Ar smtp
meillo@100 646 or
meillo@100 647 .Ar sendmail .
meillo@85 648 In mmh this fixed to
meillo@85 649 .Ar sendmail .
meillo@85 650 .Ci f6aa95b724fd8c791164abe7ee5468bf5c34f226
meillo@85 651 With
meillo@100 652 .Sw --with-smtpservers
meillo@85 653 default SMTP servers for the
meillo@85 654 .Ar smtp
meillo@85 655 transport service could be specified.
meillo@72 656 .Ci 128545e06224233b7e91fc4c83f8830252fe16c9
meillo@85 657 Both of them became irrelevant.
meillo@72 658
meillo@74 659 .U3 "Backup Prefix
meillo@74 660 .P
meillo@76 661 The backup prefix is the string that was prepended to message
meillo@76 662 filenames to tag them as deleted.
meillo@76 663 By default it had been the comma character `\f(CW,\fP'.
meillo@78 664 In July 2000, Kimmo Suominen introduced
meillo@78 665 the configure option
meillo@78 666 .Sw --with-hash-backup
meillo@78 667 to change the default to the hash symbol `\f(CW#\fP'.
meillo@78 668 The choice was probably personal preference, because first, the
meillo@78 669 option was named
meillo@78 670 .Sw --with-backup-prefix.
meillo@78 671 and had the prefix symbol as argument.
meillo@100 672 But giving the hash symbol as argument caused too many problems
meillo@100 673 for Autoconf,
meillo@100 674 thus the option was limited to use the hash symbol as the default prefix.
meillo@100 675 This supports the assumption, that the choice for the hash was
meillo@100 676 personal preference only.
meillo@100 677 Being related or not, words that start with the hash symbol
meillo@78 678 introduce a comment in the Unix shell.
meillo@72 679 Thus, the command line
meillo@72 680 .Cl "rm #13 #15
meillo@72 681 calls
meillo@72 682 .Pn rm
meillo@72 683 without arguments because the first hash symbol starts the comment
meillo@72 684 that reaches until the end of the line.
meillo@72 685 To delete the backup files,
meillo@72 686 .Cl "rm ./#13 ./#15"
meillo@72 687 needs to be used.
meillo@100 688 Using the hash as backup prefix can be seen as a precaution against
meillo@78 689 data loss.
meillo@78 690 .P
meillo@72 691 I removed the configure option but added the profile entry
meillo@72 692 .Pe backup-prefix ,
meillo@72 693 which allows to specify an arbitrary string as backup prefix.
meillo@72 694 .Ci 6c40d481d661d532dd527eaf34cebb6d3f8ed086
meillo@76 695 Profile entries are the common method to change mmh's behavior.
meillo@76 696 This change did not remove the choice but moved it to a location where
meillo@72 697 it suited better.
meillo@76 698 .P
meillo@78 699 Eventually, however, the new trash folder concept
meillo@78 700 .Cf "Sec. XXX
meillo@78 701 obsoleted the concept of the backup prefix completely.
meillo@78 702 .Ci 8edc5aaf86f9f77124664f6801bc6c6cdf258173
meillo@133 703 .Ci ca0b3e830b86700d9e5e31b1784de2bdcaf58fc5
meillo@133 704
meillo@76 705
meillo@76 706 .U3 "Editor and Pager
meillo@74 707 .P
meillo@74 708 The two configure options
meillo@74 709 .CW --with-editor=EDITOR
meillo@74 710 .CW --with-pager=PAGER
meillo@74 711 were used to specify the default editor and pager at configure time.
meillo@109 712 Doing so at configure time made sense in the eighties,
meillo@76 713 when the set of available editors and pagers varied much across
meillo@76 714 different systems.
meillo@89 715 Today, the situation is more homogeneous.
meillo@74 716 The programs
meillo@74 717 .Pn vi
meillo@74 718 and
meillo@74 719 .Pn more
meillo@76 720 can be expected to be available on every Unix system,
meillo@74 721 as they are specified by POSIX since two decades.
meillo@74 722 (The specifications for
meillo@74 723 .Pn vi
meillo@74 724 and
meillo@74 725 .Pn more
meillo@74 726 appeared in
meillo@74 727 .[
meillo@74 728 posix 1987
meillo@74 729 .]
meillo@74 730 and,
meillo@74 731 .[
meillo@74 732 posix 1992
meillo@74 733 .]
meillo@74 734 respectively.)
meillo@74 735 As a first step, these two tools were hard-coded as defaults.
meillo@74 736 .Ci 5d43a99db70c12a673028c7758c20cbe3e13ef5f
meillo@74 737 Not changed were the
meillo@74 738 .Pe editor
meillo@74 739 and
meillo@74 740 .Pe moreproc
meillo@76 741 profile entries, which allowed the user to override the system defaults.
meillo@74 742 Later, the concept was reworked to respect the standard environment
meillo@74 743 variables
meillo@74 744 .Ev VISUAL
meillo@74 745 and
meillo@74 746 .Ev PAGER
meillo@76 747 if they are set.
meillo@74 748 Today, mmh determines the editor to use in the following order,
meillo@74 749 taking the first available and non-empty item:
meillo@74 750 .IP (1)
meillo@74 751 Environment variable
meillo@74 752 .Ev MMHEDITOR
meillo@74 753 .IP (2)
meillo@74 754 Profile entry
meillo@74 755 .Pe Editor
meillo@74 756 .IP (3)
meillo@74 757 Environment variable
meillo@74 758 .Ev VISUAL
meillo@74 759 .IP (4)
meillo@74 760 Environment variable
meillo@74 761 .Ev EDITOR
meillo@74 762 .IP (5)
meillo@74 763 Command
meillo@74 764 .Pn vi .
meillo@74 765 .P
meillo@76 766 .Ci f85f4b7ae62e3d05a945dcd46ead51f0a2a89a9b
meillo@76 767 .P
meillo@89 768 The pager to use is determined in a similar order,
meillo@74 769 also taking the first available and non-empty item:
meillo@74 770 .IP (1)
meillo@74 771 Environment variable
meillo@74 772 .Ev MMHPAGER
meillo@74 773 .IP (2)
meillo@74 774 Profile entry
meillo@74 775 .Pe Pager
meillo@74 776 (replaces
meillo@74 777 .Pe moreproc )
meillo@74 778 .IP (3)
meillo@74 779 Environment variable
meillo@74 780 .Ev PAGER
meillo@74 781 .IP (4)
meillo@74 782 Command
meillo@74 783 .Pn more .
meillo@74 784 .P
meillo@74 785 .Ci 0c4214ea2aec6497d0d67b436bbee9bc1d225f1e
meillo@74 786 .P
meillo@76 787 By respecting the
meillo@74 788 .Ev VISUAL /\c
meillo@74 789 .Ev EDITOR
meillo@74 790 and
meillo@74 791 .Ev PAGER
meillo@76 792 environment variables,
meillo@76 793 the new behavior confirms better to the common style on Unix systems.
meillo@76 794 Additionally, the new approach is more uniform and clearer to users.
meillo@72 795
meillo@72 796
meillo@76 797 .U3 "ndbm
meillo@72 798 .P
meillo@74 799 .Pn slocal
meillo@78 800 used to depend on
meillo@74 801 .I ndbm ,
meillo@74 802 a database library.
meillo@76 803 The database is used to store the `\fLMessage-ID\fP's of all
meillo@76 804 messages delivered.
meillo@74 805 This enables
meillo@74 806 .Pn slocal
meillo@74 807 to suppress delivering the same message to the same user twice.
meillo@74 808 (This features was enabled by the
meillo@74 809 .Sw -suppressdup
meillo@74 810 switch.)
meillo@74 811 .P
meillo@100 812 A variety of versions of the database library exist.
meillo@78 813 .[
meillo@78 814 wolter unix incompat notes dbm
meillo@78 815 .]
meillo@74 816 Complicated autoconf code was needed to detect them correctly.
meillo@74 817 Further more, the configure switches
meillo@74 818 .Sw --with-ndbm=ARG
meillo@74 819 and
meillo@74 820 .Sw --with-ndbmheader=ARG
meillo@74 821 were added to help with difficult setups that would
meillo@78 822 not be detected automatically or correctly.
meillo@74 823 .P
meillo@74 824 By removing the suppress duplicates feature of
meillo@74 825 .Pn slocal ,
meillo@74 826 the dependency on
meillo@74 827 .I ndbm
meillo@78 828 vanished and 120 lines of complex autoconf code could be saved.
meillo@74 829 .Ci ecd6d6a20cb7a1507e3a20d6c4cb3a1cf14c6bbf
meillo@89 830 The change removed functionality too, but that is minor to the
meillo@78 831 improvement by dropping the dependency and the complex autoconf code.
meillo@72 832
meillo@74 833 .U3 "mh-e Support
meillo@72 834 .P
meillo@74 835 The configure option
meillo@74 836 .Sw --disable-mhe
meillo@74 837 was removed when the mh-e support was reworked.
meillo@74 838 Mh-e is the Emacs front-end to MH.
meillo@76 839 It requires MH to provide minor additional functions.
meillo@76 840 The
meillo@76 841 .Sw --disable-mhe
meillo@76 842 configure option could switch these extensions off.
meillo@76 843 After removing the support for old versions of mh-e,
meillo@74 844 only the
meillo@74 845 .Sw -build
meillo@76 846 switches of
meillo@74 847 .Pn forw
meillo@74 848 and
meillo@74 849 .Pn repl
meillo@76 850 are left to be mh-e extensions.
meillo@76 851 They are now always built in because they add little code and complexity.
meillo@76 852 In consequence, the
meillo@74 853 .Sw --disable-mhe
meillo@76 854 configure option was removed
meillo@72 855 .Ci a7ce7b4a580d77b6c2c4d980812beb589aa4c643
meillo@74 856 Removing the option removed a second code setup that would have
meillo@74 857 needed to be tested.
meillo@76 858 This change was first done in nmh and thereafter merged into mmh.
meillo@76 859 .P
meillo@76 860 The interface changes in mmh require mh-e to be adjusted in order
meillo@76 861 to be able to use mmh as back-end.
meillo@76 862 This will require minor changes to mh-e, but removing the
meillo@76 863 .Sw -build
meillo@76 864 switches would require more rework.
meillo@72 865
meillo@74 866 .U3 "Masquerading
meillo@72 867 .P
meillo@74 868 The configure option
meillo@74 869 .Sw --enable-masquerade
meillo@76 870 could take up to three arguments:
meillo@76 871 `draft_from', `mmailid', and `username_extension'.
meillo@74 872 They activated different types of address masquerading.
meillo@74 873 All of them were implemented in the SMTP-speaking
meillo@74 874 .Pn post
meillo@76 875 command, which provided an MSA.
meillo@76 876 Address masquerading is an MTA's task and mmh does not cover
meillo@76 877 this field anymore.
meillo@76 878 Hence, true masquerading needs to be implemented in the external MTA.
meillo@74 879 .P
meillo@74 880 The
meillo@74 881 .I mmailid
meillo@74 882 masquerading type is the oldest one of the three and the only one
meillo@74 883 available in the original MH.
meillo@74 884 It provided a
meillo@74 885 .I username
meillo@74 886 to
meillo@74 887 .I fakeusername
meillo@76 888 mapping, based on the password file's GECOS field.
meillo@74 889 The man page
meillo@74 890 .Mp mh-tailor(5)
meillo@74 891 described the use case as being the following:
meillo@98 892 .QS
meillo@74 893 This is useful if you want the messages you send to always
meillo@74 894 appear to come from the name of an MTA alias rather than your
meillo@74 895 actual account name. For instance, many organizations set up
meillo@74 896 `First.Last' sendmail aliases for all users. If this is
meillo@74 897 the case, the GECOS field for each user should look like:
meillo@74 898 ``First [Middle] Last <First.Last>''
meillo@98 899 .QE
meillo@74 900 .P
meillo@74 901 As mmh sends outgoing mail via the local MTA only,
meillo@76 902 the best location to do such global rewrites is there.
meillo@74 903 Besides, the MTA is conceptionally the right location because it
meillo@74 904 does the reverse mapping for incoming mail (aliasing), too.
meillo@76 905 Further more, masquerading set up there is readily available for all
meillo@74 906 mail software on the system.
meillo@76 907 Hence, mmailid masquerading was removed.
meillo@74 908 .Ci 0836c8000ccb34b59410ef1c15b1b7feac70ce5f
meillo@74 909 .P
meillo@74 910 The
meillo@74 911 .I username_extension
meillo@76 912 masquerading type did not replace the username but would append a suffix,
meillo@76 913 specified by the
meillo@74 914 .Ev USERNAME_EXTENSION
meillo@76 915 environment variable, to it.
meillo@76 916 This provided support for the
meillo@74 917 .I user-extension
meillo@74 918 feature of qmail and the similar
meillo@74 919 .I "plussed user
meillo@74 920 processing of sendmail.
meillo@74 921 The decision to remove this username_extension masquerading was
meillo@74 922 motivated by the fact that
meillo@74 923 .Pn spost
meillo@76 924 hadn't supported it already.
meillo@76 925 .Ci 2abae0bfd0ad5bf898461e50aa4b466d641f23d9
meillo@76 926 Username extensions are possible in mmh, but less convenient to use.
meillo@76 927 .\" XXX format file %(getenv USERNAME_EXTENSION)
meillo@74 928 .P
meillo@74 929 The
meillo@74 930 .I draft_from
meillo@74 931 masquerading type instructed
meillo@74 932 .Pn post
meillo@84 933 to use the value of the
meillo@84 934 .Hd From
meillo@84 935 header field as SMTP envelope sender.
meillo@76 936 Sender addresses could be replaced completely.
meillo@74 937 .Ci b14ea6073f77b4359aaf3fddd0e105989db9
meillo@76 938 Mmh offers a kind of masquerading similar in effect, but
meillo@74 939 with technical differences.
meillo@76 940 As mmh does not transfer messages itself, the local MTA has final control
meillo@76 941 over the sender's address. Any masquerading mmh introduces may be reverted
meillo@76 942 by the MTA.
meillo@76 943 In times of pedantic spam checking, an MTA will take care to use
meillo@76 944 sensible envelope sender addresses to keep its own reputation up.
meillo@84 945 Nonetheless, the MUA can set the
meillo@84 946 .Hd From
meillo@84 947 header field and thereby propose
meillo@76 948 a sender address to the MTA.
meillo@74 949 The MTA may then decide to take that one or generate the canonical sender
meillo@74 950 address for use as envelope sender address.
meillo@74 951 .P
meillo@74 952 In mmh, the MTA will always extract the recipient and sender from the
meillo@84 953 message header (\c
meillo@74 954 .Pn sendmail 's
meillo@74 955 .Sw -t
meillo@74 956 switch).
meillo@84 957 The
meillo@84 958 .Hd From
meillo@84 959 header field of the draft may be set arbitrary by the user.
meillo@74 960 If it is missing, the canonical sender address will be generated by the MTA.
meillo@74 961
meillo@74 962 .U3 "Remaining Options
meillo@74 963 .P
meillo@74 964 Two configure options remain in mmh.
meillo@74 965 One is the locking method to use:
meillo@74 966 .Sw --with-locking=[dot|fcntl|flock|lockf] .
meillo@76 967 The idea of removing all methods except the portable dot locking
meillo@76 968 and having that one as the default is appealing, but this change
meillo@76 969 requires deeper technical investigation into the topic.
meillo@76 970 The other option,
meillo@74 971 .Sw --enable-debug ,
meillo@74 972 compiles the programs with debugging symbols and does not strip them.
meillo@74 973 This option is likely to stay.
meillo@72 974
meillo@72 975
meillo@58 976
meillo@63 977
meillo@100 978 .H2 "Command Line Switches
meillo@58 979 .P
meillo@93 980 The command line switches of MH tools follow the X Window style.
meillo@93 981 They are words, introduced by a single dash.
meillo@93 982 For example:
meillo@93 983 .Cl "-truncate" .
meillo@93 984 Every program in mmh has two generic switches:
meillo@93 985 .Sw -help ,
meillo@93 986 to print a short message on how to use the program, and
meillo@93 987 .Sw -Version ,
meillo@93 988 to tell what version of mmh the program belongs to.
meillo@93 989 .P
meillo@93 990 Switches change the behavior of programs.
meillo@93 991 Programs that do one thing in one way require no switches.
meillo@93 992 In most cases, doing something in exactly one way is too limiting.
meillo@97 993 If there is basically one task to accomplish, but it should be done
meillo@93 994 in various ways, switches are a good approach to alter the behavior
meillo@93 995 of a program.
meillo@93 996 Changing the behavior of programs provides flexibility and customization
meillo@97 997 to users, but at the same time it complicates the code, documentation and
meillo@93 998 usage of the program.
meillo@97 999 .\" XXX: Ref
meillo@93 1000 Therefore, the number of switches should be kept small.
meillo@93 1001 A small set of well-chosen switches does no harm.
meillo@93 1002 But usually, the number of switches increases over time.
meillo@93 1003 Already in 1985, Rose and Romine have identified this as a major
meillo@93 1004 problem of MH:
meillo@93 1005 .[ [
meillo@93 1006 rose romine real work
meillo@93 1007 .], p. 12]
meillo@98 1008 .QS
meillo@93 1009 A complaint often heard about systems which undergo substantial development
meillo@93 1010 by many people over a number of years, is that more and more options are
meillo@93 1011 introduced which add little to the functionality but greatly increase the
meillo@93 1012 amount of information a user needs to know in order to get useful work done.
meillo@93 1013 This is usually referred to as creeping featurism.
meillo@93 1014 .QP
meillo@93 1015 Unfortunately MH, having undergone six years of off-and-on development by
meillo@93 1016 ten or so well-meaning programmers (the present authors included),
meillo@93 1017 suffers mightily from this.
meillo@98 1018 .QE
meillo@93 1019 .P
meillo@97 1020 Being reluctant to adding new switches \(en or `options',
meillo@97 1021 as Rose and Romine call them \(en is one part of a counter-action,
meillo@97 1022 the other part is removing hardly used switches.
meillo@97 1023 Nmh's tools had lots of switches already implemented,
meillo@97 1024 hence, cleaning up by removing some of them was the more important part
meillo@97 1025 of the counter-action.
meillo@93 1026 Removing existing functionality is always difficult because it
meillo@93 1027 breaks programs that use these functions.
meillo@93 1028 Also, for every obsolete feature, there'll always be someone who still
meillo@93 1029 uses it and thus opposes its removal.
meillo@93 1030 This puts the developer into the position,
meillo@93 1031 where sensible improvements to style are regarded as destructive acts.
meillo@97 1032 Yet, living with the featurism is far worse, in my eyes, because
meillo@97 1033 future needs will demand adding further features,
meillo@93 1034 worsening the situation more and more.
meillo@93 1035 Rose and Romine added in a footnote,
meillo@93 1036 ``[...]
meillo@93 1037 .Pn send
meillo@93 1038 will no doubt acquire an endless number of switches in the years to come.''
meillo@97 1039 Although clearly humorous, the comment points to the nature of the problem.
meillo@97 1040 Refusing to add any new switches would encounter the problem at its root,
meillo@97 1041 but this is not practical.
meillo@97 1042 New needs will require new switches and it would be unwise to block
meillo@97 1043 them strictly.
meillo@97 1044 Nevertheless, removing obsolete switches still is an effective approach
meillo@97 1045 to deal with the problem.
meillo@97 1046 Working on an experimental branch without an established user base,
meillo@97 1047 eased my work because I did not offend users when I removed existing
meillo@110 1048 functions.
meillo@93 1049 .P
meillo@93 1050 Rose and Romine counted 24 visible and 9 more hidden switches for
meillo@93 1051 .Pn send .
meillo@97 1052 In nmh, they increased up to 32 visible and 12 hidden ones.
meillo@97 1053 At the time of writing, no more than 7 visible switches and 1 hidden switch
meillo@97 1054 have remained in mmh's
meillo@97 1055 .Pn send .
meillo@97 1056 (These numbers include two generic switches, help and version.)
meillo@93 1057 .P
meillo@97 1058 Fig. XXX
meillo@93 1059 .\" XXX Ref
meillo@97 1060 displays the number of switches for each of the tools that is available
meillo@97 1061 in both, nmh and mmh.
meillo@100 1062 The tools are sorted by the number of switches they had in nmh.
meillo@100 1063 Visible and hidden switches were counted,
meillo@97 1064 but not the generic help and version switches.
meillo@93 1065 Whereas in the beginning of the project, the average tool had 11 switches,
meillo@93 1066 now it has no more than 5 \(en only half as many.
meillo@93 1067 If the `no' switches and similar inverse variant are folded onto
meillo@100 1068 their counter-parts, the average tool had 8 switches in pre-mmh times and
meillo@100 1069 has 4 now.
meillo@93 1070 The total number of functional switches in mmh dropped from 465
meillo@93 1071 to 234.
meillo@58 1072
meillo@93 1073 .KS
meillo@93 1074 .in 1c
meillo@93 1075 .so input/switches.grap
meillo@93 1076 .KE
meillo@58 1077
meillo@93 1078 .P
meillo@93 1079 A part of the switches vanished after functions were removed.
meillo@93 1080 This was the case for network mail transfer, for instance.
meillo@97 1081 Sometimes, however, the work flow was the other way:
meillo@97 1082 I looked through the
meillo@97 1083 .Mp mh-chart (7)
meillo@97 1084 man page to identify the tools with apparently too many switches.
meillo@97 1085 Then considering the value of each of the switches by examining
meillo@97 1086 the tool's man page and source code, aided by recherche and testing.
meillo@97 1087 This way, the removal of functions was suggested by the aim to reduce
meillo@97 1088 the number of switches per command.
meillo@97 1089
meillo@58 1090
meillo@93 1091 .U3 "Draft Folder Facility
meillo@93 1092 .P
meillo@100 1093 A change early in the project was the complete transition from
meillo@93 1094 the single draft message to the draft folder facility.
meillo@97 1095 .Ci 337338b404931f06f0db2119c9e145e8ca5a9860
meillo@109 1096 The draft folder facility was introduced in the mid-eighties, when
meillo@100 1097 Rose and Romine called it a ``relatively new feature''.
meillo@93 1098 .[
meillo@93 1099 rose romine real work
meillo@93 1100 .]
meillo@110 1101 Since then, the facility had existed but was inactive by default.
meillo@93 1102 The default activation and the related rework of the tools made it
meillo@93 1103 possible to remove the
meillo@93 1104 .Sw -[no]draftfolder ,
meillo@93 1105 and
meillo@93 1106 .Sw -draftmessage
meillo@93 1107 switches from
meillo@93 1108 .Pn comp ,
meillo@93 1109 .Pn repl ,
meillo@93 1110 .Pn forw ,
meillo@93 1111 .Pn dist ,
meillo@93 1112 .Pn whatnow ,
meillo@93 1113 and
meillo@93 1114 .Pn send .
meillo@97 1115 .Ci 337338b404931f06f0db2119c9e145e8ca5a9860
meillo@97 1116 The only flexibility removed with this change is having multiple
meillo@97 1117 draft folders within one profile.
meillo@97 1118 I consider this a theoretical problem only.
meillo@93 1119 In the same go, the
meillo@93 1120 .Sw -draft
meillo@93 1121 switch of
meillo@93 1122 .Pn anno ,
meillo@93 1123 .Pn refile ,
meillo@93 1124 and
meillo@93 1125 .Pn send
meillo@93 1126 was removed.
meillo@93 1127 The special-casing of `the' draft message became irrelevant after
meillo@93 1128 the rework of the draft system.
meillo@93 1129 (See Sec. XXX.)
meillo@95 1130 Equally,
meillo@95 1131 .Pn comp
meillo@95 1132 lost its
meillo@95 1133 .Sw -file
meillo@95 1134 switch.
meillo@95 1135 The draft folder facility, together with the
meillo@95 1136 .Sw -form
meillo@95 1137 switch, are sufficient.
meillo@93 1138
meillo@95 1139
meillo@102 1140 .U3 "In Place Editing
meillo@93 1141 .P
meillo@93 1142 .Pn anno
meillo@93 1143 had the switches
meillo@93 1144 .Sw -[no]inplace
meillo@100 1145 to either annotate the message in place and thus preserve hard links,
meillo@93 1146 or annotate a copy to replace the original message, breaking hard links.
meillo@97 1147 Following the assumption that linked messages should truly be the
meillo@97 1148 same message, and annotating it should not break the link, the
meillo@93 1149 .Sw -[no]inplace
meillo@93 1150 switches were removed and the previous default
meillo@93 1151 .Sw -inplace
meillo@93 1152 was made the only behavior.
meillo@97 1153 .Ci c8195849d2e366c569271abb0f5f60f4ebf0b4d0
meillo@93 1154 The
meillo@93 1155 .Sw -[no]inplace
meillo@93 1156 switches of
meillo@93 1157 .Pn repl ,
meillo@93 1158 .Pn forw ,
meillo@93 1159 and
meillo@93 1160 .Pn dist
meillo@93 1161 could be removed, too, as they were simply passed through to
meillo@93 1162 .Pn anno .
meillo@93 1163 .P
meillo@93 1164 .Pn burst
meillo@93 1165 also had
meillo@93 1166 .Sw -[no]inplace
meillo@95 1167 switches, but with different meaning.
meillo@95 1168 With
meillo@95 1169 .Sw -inplace ,
meillo@95 1170 the digest had been replaced by the table of contents (i.e. the
meillo@110 1171 introduction text) and the burst messages were placed right
meillo@95 1172 after this message, renumbering all following messages.
meillo@95 1173 Also, any trailing text of the digest was lost, though,
meillo@95 1174 in practice, it usually consists of an end-of-digest marker only.
meillo@95 1175 Nontheless, this behavior appeared less elegant than the
meillo@95 1176 .Sw -noinplace
meillo@95 1177 behavior, which already had been the default.
meillo@95 1178 Nmh's
meillo@95 1179 .Mp burst (1)
meillo@95 1180 man page reads:
meillo@95 1181 .sp \n(PDu
meillo@98 1182 .QS
meillo@93 1183 If -noinplace is given, each digest is preserved, no table
meillo@93 1184 of contents is produced, and the messages contained within
meillo@93 1185 the digest are placed at the end of the folder. Other messages
meillo@93 1186 are not tampered with in any way.
meillo@98 1187 .QE
meillo@95 1188 .LP
meillo@93 1189 The decision to drop the
meillo@93 1190 .Sw -inplace
meillo@95 1191 behavior was supported by the code complexity and the possible data loss
meillo@95 1192 it caused.
meillo@93 1193 .Sw -noinplace
meillo@95 1194 was chosen to be the definitive behavior.
meillo@97 1195 .Ci 68a686adeb39223a5e1ad35e4a24890ec053679d
meillo@93 1196
meillo@95 1197
meillo@95 1198 .U3 "Forms and Format Strings
meillo@93 1199 .P
meillo@95 1200 Historically, the tools that had
meillo@95 1201 .Sw -form
meillo@95 1202 switches to supply a form file had
meillo@95 1203 .Sw -format
meillo@95 1204 switches as well to supply the contents of a form file as a string
meillo@95 1205 on the command line directly.
meillo@95 1206 In consequence, the following two lines equaled:
meillo@95 1207 .VS
meillo@95 1208 scan -form scan.mailx
meillo@95 1209 scan -format "`cat .../scan.mailx`"
meillo@95 1210 VE
meillo@95 1211 The
meillo@95 1212 .Sw -format
meillo@95 1213 switches were dropped in favor for extending the
meillo@95 1214 .Sw -form
meillo@95 1215 switches.
meillo@97 1216 .Ci f51956be123db66b00138f80464d06f030dbb88d
meillo@95 1217 If their argument starts with an equal sign (`='),
meillo@95 1218 then the rest of the argument is taken as a format string,
meillo@95 1219 otherwise the arguments is treated as the name of a format file.
meillo@95 1220 Thus, now the following two lines equal:
meillo@95 1221 .VS
meillo@95 1222 scan -form scan.mailx
meillo@95 1223 scan -form "=`cat .../scan.mailx`"
meillo@95 1224 VE
meillo@95 1225 This rework removed the prefix collision between
meillo@95 1226 .Sw -form
meillo@95 1227 and
meillo@95 1228 .Sw -format .
meillo@95 1229 Now, typing
meillo@95 1230 .Sw -fo
meillo@95 1231 suffices to specify form or format string.
meillo@95 1232 .P
meillo@95 1233 The different meaning of
meillo@95 1234 .Sw -format
meillo@95 1235 for
meillo@95 1236 .Pn repl
meillo@95 1237 and
meillo@95 1238 .Pn forw
meillo@95 1239 was removed in mmh.
meillo@95 1240 .Pn forw
meillo@95 1241 was completely switched to MIME-type forwarding, thus removing the
meillo@95 1242 .Sw -[no]format .
meillo@97 1243 .Ci 6e271608b7b9c23771523f88d23a4d3593010cf1
meillo@95 1244 For
meillo@95 1245 .Pn repl ,
meillo@95 1246 the
meillo@95 1247 .Sw -[no]format
meillo@95 1248 switches were reworked to
meillo@95 1249 .Sw -[no]filter
meillo@95 1250 switches.
meillo@97 1251 .Ci 67411b1f95d6ec987b4c732459e1ba8a8ac192c6
meillo@95 1252 The
meillo@95 1253 .Sw -format
meillo@95 1254 switches of
meillo@95 1255 .Pn send
meillo@95 1256 and
meillo@95 1257 .Pn post ,
meillo@95 1258 which had a third meaning,
meillo@95 1259 were removed likewise.
meillo@97 1260 .Ci f3cb7cde0e6f10451b6848678d95860d512224b9
meillo@95 1261 Eventually, the ambiguity of the
meillo@95 1262 .Sw -format
meillo@95 1263 switches was resolved by not anymore having any such switch in mmh.
meillo@95 1264
meillo@95 1265
meillo@95 1266 .U3 "MIME Tools
meillo@95 1267 .P
meillo@95 1268 The MIME tools, which were once part of
meillo@100 1269 .Pn mhn
meillo@100 1270 [sic!],
meillo@95 1271 had several switches that added little practical value to the programs.
meillo@95 1272 The
meillo@95 1273 .Sw -[no]realsize
meillo@95 1274 switches of
meillo@95 1275 .Pn mhbuild
meillo@95 1276 and
meillo@95 1277 .Pn mhlist
meillo@97 1278 were removed, doing real size calculations always now
meillo@97 1279 .Ci 8d8f1c3abc586c005c904e52c4adbfe694d2201c ,
meillo@97 1280 as
meillo@95 1281 ``This provides an accurate count at the expense of a small delay.''
meillo@95 1282 This small delay is not noticable on modern systems.
meillo@95 1283 .P
meillo@95 1284 The
meillo@95 1285 .Sw -[no]check
meillo@95 1286 switches were removed together with the support for
meillo@95 1287 .Hd Content-MD5
meillo@95 1288 header fields.
meillo@95 1289 .[
meillo@95 1290 rfc 1864
meillo@95 1291 .]
meillo@97 1292 .Ci 31dc797eb5178970d68962ca8939da3fd9a8efda
meillo@95 1293 (See Sec. XXX)
meillo@95 1294 .P
meillo@95 1295 The
meillo@95 1296 .Sw -[no]ebcdicsafe
meillo@95 1297 and
meillo@95 1298 .Sw -[no]rfc934mode
meillo@95 1299 switches of
meillo@95 1300 .Pn mhbuild
meillo@95 1301 were removed because they are considered obsolete.
meillo@97 1302 .Ci 01a3480928da485b4d6109d36d751dfa71799d58
meillo@97 1303 .Ci 3363e2624dce0eb8164cf8b3f1ab385c8ff72e88
meillo@95 1304 .P
meillo@95 1305 Content caching of external MIME parts, activated with the
meillo@95 1306 .Sw -rcache
meillo@95 1307 and
meillo@95 1308 .Sw -wcache
meillo@95 1309 switches was completely removed.
meillo@97 1310 .Ci d1fefd9f614e4dc3cda16da6c69133c1b2005269
meillo@97 1311 External MIME parts are rare today, having a caching facility
meillo@96 1312 for them is appears to be unnecessary.
meillo@95 1313 .P
meillo@95 1314 In pre-MIME times,
meillo@95 1315 .Pn mhl
meillo@95 1316 had covered many tasks that are part of MIME handling today.
meillo@95 1317 Therefore,
meillo@95 1318 .Pn mhl
meillo@95 1319 could be simplified to a large extend, reducing the number of its
meillo@95 1320 switches from 21 to 6.
meillo@97 1321 .Ci 350ad6d3542a07639213cf2a4fe524e829c1e7b6
meillo@97 1322 .Ci 0e46503be3c855bddaeae3843e1b659279c35d70
meillo@95 1323
meillo@95 1324
meillo@95 1325 .U3 "Mail Transfer Switches
meillo@95 1326 .P
meillo@95 1327 With the removal of the mail transfer facilities, a lot of switches
meillo@95 1328 vanished automatically.
meillo@95 1329 .Pn inc
meillo@95 1330 lost 9 switches, namely
meillo@95 1331 .Sw -host ,
meillo@95 1332 .Sw -port ,
meillo@95 1333 .Sw -user ,
meillo@95 1334 .Sw -proxy ,
meillo@95 1335 .Sw -snoop ,
meillo@95 1336 .Sw -[no]pack ,
meillo@95 1337 as well as
meillo@95 1338 .Sw -sasl
meillo@95 1339 and
meillo@95 1340 .Sw -saslmech .
meillo@95 1341 .Pn send
meillo@95 1342 and
meillo@95 1343 .Pn post
meillo@95 1344 lost 11 switches each, namely
meillo@95 1345 .Sw -server ,
meillo@95 1346 .Sw -port ,
meillo@95 1347 .Sw -client ,
meillo@95 1348 .Sw -user ,
meillo@95 1349 .Sw -mail ,
meillo@95 1350 .Sw -saml ,
meillo@95 1351 .Sw -send ,
meillo@95 1352 .Sw -soml ,
meillo@95 1353 .Sw -snoop ,
meillo@95 1354 as well as
meillo@95 1355 .Sw -sasl ,
meillo@95 1356 .Sw -saslmech ,
meillo@95 1357 and
meillo@95 1358 .Sw -tls .
meillo@95 1359 .Pn send
meillo@95 1360 had the switches only to pass them further to
meillo@95 1361 .Pn post ,
meillo@95 1362 because the user would invoke
meillo@95 1363 .Pn post
meillo@95 1364 not directly, but through
meillo@95 1365 .Pn send .
meillo@95 1366 All these switches, except
meillo@95 1367 .Sw -snoop
meillo@95 1368 were usually defined as default switches in the user's profile,
meillo@95 1369 but hardly given in interactive usage.
meillo@95 1370 .P
meillo@95 1371 Of course, those switches did not really ``vanish'', but the configuration
meillo@95 1372 they did was handed over to external MSAs and MRAs.
meillo@95 1373 Instead of setting up the mail transfer in mmh, it is set up in
meillo@95 1374 external tools.
meillo@95 1375 Yet, this simplifies mmh.
meillo@95 1376 Specialized external tools will likely have simple configuration files.
meillo@95 1377 Hence, instead of having one complicated central configuration file,
meillo@95 1378 the configuration of each domain is separate.
meillo@95 1379 Although the user needs to learn to configure each of the tools,
meillo@95 1380 each configuration is likely much simpler.
meillo@95 1381
meillo@95 1382
meillo@95 1383 .U3 "Maildrop Formats
meillo@95 1384 .P
meillo@95 1385 With the removal of MMDF maildrop format support,
meillo@95 1386 .Pn packf
meillo@95 1387 and
meillo@95 1388 .Pn rcvpack
meillo@95 1389 no longer needed their
meillo@95 1390 .Sw -mbox
meillo@95 1391 and
meillo@95 1392 .Sw -mmdf
meillo@95 1393 switches.
meillo@95 1394 .Sw -mbox
meillo@95 1395 is the sole behavior now.
meillo@97 1396 .Ci 3916ab66ad5d183705ac12357621ea8661afd3c0
meillo@95 1397 In the same go,
meillo@95 1398 .Pn packf
meillo@97 1399 and
meillo@97 1400 .Pn rcvpack
meillo@97 1401 were reworked (see Sec. XXX) and their
meillo@95 1402 .Sw -file
meillo@95 1403 switch became unnecessary.
meillo@97 1404 .Ci ca1023716d4c2ab890696f3e41fa0d94267a940e
meillo@95 1405
meillo@95 1406
meillo@95 1407 .U3 "Terminal Magic
meillo@95 1408 .P
meillo@95 1409 Mmh's tools will no longer clear the screen (\c
meillo@95 1410 .Pn scan 's
meillo@95 1411 and
meillo@95 1412 .Pn mhl 's
meillo@95 1413 .Sw -[no]clear
meillo@97 1414 switches
meillo@97 1415 .Ci e57b17343dcb3ff373ef4dd089fbe778f0c7c270
meillo@97 1416 .Ci 943765e7ac5693ae177fd8d2b5a2440e53ce816e ).
meillo@95 1417 Neither will
meillo@95 1418 .Pn mhl
meillo@95 1419 ring the bell (\c
meillo@97 1420 .Sw -[no]bell
meillo@97 1421 .Ci e11983f44e59d8de236affa5b0d0d3067c192e24 )
meillo@95 1422 nor page the output itself (\c
meillo@97 1423 .Sw -length
meillo@97 1424 .Ci 5b9d883db0318ed2b84bb82dee880d7381f99188 ).
meillo@95 1425 .P
meillo@95 1426 Generally, the pager to use is no longer specified with the
meillo@95 1427 .Sw -[no]moreproc
meillo@95 1428 command line switches for
meillo@95 1429 .Pn mhl
meillo@95 1430 and
meillo@95 1431 .Pn show /\c
meillo@95 1432 .Pn mhshow .
meillo@97 1433 .Ci 39e87a75b5c2d3572ec72e717720b44af291e88a
meillo@95 1434 .P
meillo@95 1435 .Pn prompter
meillo@95 1436 lost its
meillo@95 1437 .Sw -erase
meillo@95 1438 and
meillo@95 1439 .Sw -kill
meillo@95 1440 switches because today the terminal cares for the line editing keys.
meillo@95 1441
meillo@95 1442
meillo@95 1443 .U3 "Header Printing
meillo@95 1444 .P
meillo@95 1445 .Pn folder 's
meillo@95 1446 data output is self-explaining enough that
meillo@95 1447 displaying the header line makes few sense.
meillo@95 1448 Hence, the
meillo@95 1449 .Sw -[no]header
meillo@95 1450 switch was removed and headers are never printed.
meillo@97 1451 .Ci 601cc73d1fa05ce96faa728f036d6c51b91701c7
meillo@95 1452 .P
meillo@95 1453 In
meillo@95 1454 .Pn mhlist ,
meillo@95 1455 the
meillo@95 1456 .Sw -[no]header
meillo@95 1457 switches were removed, too.
meillo@97 1458 .Ci b24f96523aaf60e44e04a3ffb1d22e69a13a602f
meillo@95 1459 But in this case headers are always printed,
meillo@95 1460 because the output is not self-explaining.
meillo@95 1461 .P
meillo@95 1462 .Pn scan
meillo@95 1463 also had
meillo@95 1464 .Sw -[no]header
meillo@95 1465 switches.
meillo@95 1466 Printing the header had been sensible until the introduction of
meillo@95 1467 format strings made it impossible to display the column headings.
meillo@95 1468 Only the folder name and the current date remained to be printed.
meillo@95 1469 As this information can be perfectly retrieved by
meillo@95 1470 .Pn folder
meillo@95 1471 and
meillo@95 1472 .Pn date ,
meillo@95 1473 consequently, the switches were removed.
meillo@97 1474 .Ci c477dc5d1d03fa6d9a8ab3dd3508c63cbddc044e
meillo@95 1475 .P
meillo@95 1476 By removing all
meillo@95 1477 .Sw -header
meillo@95 1478 switches, the collision with
meillo@95 1479 .Sw -help
meillo@95 1480 on the first two letters was resolved.
meillo@95 1481 Currently,
meillo@95 1482 .Sw -h
meillo@95 1483 evaluates to
meillo@95 1484 .Sw -help
meillo@95 1485 for all tools of mmh.
meillo@95 1486
meillo@95 1487
meillo@95 1488 .U3 "Suppressing Edits or the WhatNow Shell
meillo@95 1489 .P
meillo@95 1490 The
meillo@95 1491 .Sw -noedit
meillo@100 1492 switch of
meillo@95 1493 .Pn comp ,
meillo@95 1494 .Pn repl ,
meillo@95 1495 .Pn forw ,
meillo@95 1496 .Pn dist ,
meillo@95 1497 and
meillo@95 1498 .Pn whatnow
meillo@95 1499 was removed, but it can now be replaced by specifying
meillo@95 1500 .Sw -editor
meillo@95 1501 with an empty argument.
meillo@97 1502 .Ci 75fca31a5b9d5c1a99c74ab14c94438d8852fba9
meillo@95 1503 (Specifying
meillo@95 1504 .Cl "-editor true
meillo@95 1505 is nearly the same, only differing by the previous editor being set.)
meillo@95 1506 .P
meillo@95 1507 The more important change is the removal of the
meillo@95 1508 .Sw -nowhatnowproc
meillo@95 1509 switch.
meillo@97 1510 .Ci ee4f43cf2ef0084ec698e4e87159a94c01940622
meillo@95 1511 This switch had introduced an awkward behavior, as explained in nmh's
meillo@95 1512 man page for
meillo@95 1513 .Mp comp (1):
meillo@98 1514 .QS
meillo@98 1515 The \-editor editor switch indicates the editor to use for
meillo@98 1516 the initial edit. Upon exiting from the editor, comp will
meillo@98 1517 invoke the whatnow program. See whatnow(1) for a discussion
meillo@98 1518 of available options. The invocation of this program can be
meillo@98 1519 inhibited by using the \-nowhatnowproc switch. (In truth of
meillo@98 1520 fact, it is the whatnow program which starts the initial
meillo@98 1521 edit. Hence, \-nowhatnowproc will prevent any edit from
meillo@95 1522 occurring.)
meillo@98 1523 .QE
meillo@95 1524 .P
meillo@95 1525 Effectively, the
meillo@95 1526 .Sw -nowhatnowproc
meillo@100 1527 switch creates only a draft message.
meillo@95 1528 As
meillo@95 1529 .Cl "-whatnowproc true
meillo@95 1530 causes the same behavior, the
meillo@95 1531 .Sw -nowhatnowproc
meillo@95 1532 switch was removed for being redundant.
meillo@100 1533 Likely, the
meillo@95 1534 .Sw -nowhatnowproc
meillo@100 1535 switch was intended to be used by front-ends.
meillo@95 1536
meillo@95 1537
meillo@95 1538 .U3 "Compatibility Switches
meillo@95 1539 .BU
meillo@95 1540 The hidden
meillo@95 1541 .Sw -[no]total
meillo@95 1542 switches of
meillo@95 1543 .Pn flist .
meillo@95 1544 They were simply the inverse of the visible
meillo@95 1545 .Sw -[no]fast
meillo@95 1546 switches:
meillo@95 1547 .Sw -total
meillo@95 1548 was
meillo@95 1549 .Sw -nofast
meillo@95 1550 and
meillo@95 1551 .Sw -nototal
meillo@95 1552 was
meillo@95 1553 .Sw -fast .
meillo@95 1554 I removed the
meillo@95 1555 .Sw -[no]total
meillo@95 1556 legacy.
meillo@97 1557 .Ci ea21fe2c4bd23c639bef251398fae809875732ec
meillo@95 1558 .BU
meillo@95 1559 The
meillo@95 1560 .Sw -subject
meillo@95 1561 switch of
meillo@95 1562 .Pn sortm
meillo@95 1563 existed for compatibility only.
meillo@95 1564 It can be fully replaced by
meillo@95 1565 .Cl "-textfield subject
meillo@95 1566 thus it was removed.
meillo@97 1567 .Ci 00140a3c86e9def69d98ba2ffd4d6e50ef6326ea
meillo@95 1568
meillo@95 1569
meillo@95 1570 .U3 "Various
meillo@95 1571 .BU
meillo@96 1572 In order to avoid prefix collisions among switch names, the
meillo@95 1573 .Sw -version
meillo@95 1574 switch was renamed to
meillo@95 1575 .Sw -Version
meillo@95 1576 (with capital `V').
meillo@97 1577 .Ci 32b2354dbaf4bf934936eb5b102a4a3d2fdd209a
meillo@95 1578 Every program has the
meillo@95 1579 .Sw -version
meillo@95 1580 switch but its first three letters collided with the
meillo@95 1581 .Sw -verbose
meillo@95 1582 switch, present in many programs.
meillo@95 1583 The rename solved this problem once for all.
meillo@95 1584 Although this rename breaks a basic interface, having the
meillo@95 1585 .Sw -V
meillo@95 1586 abbreviation to display the version information, isn't all too bad.
meillo@95 1587 .BU
meillo@95 1588 .Sw -[no]preserve
meillo@95 1589 of
meillo@95 1590 .Pn refile
meillo@95 1591 was removed because what use was it anyway?
meillo@98 1592 .QS
meillo@95 1593 Normally when a message is refiled, for each destination
meillo@95 1594 folder it is assigned the number which is one above the current
meillo@95 1595 highest message number in that folder. Use of the
meillo@95 1596 \-preserv [sic!] switch will override this message renaming, and try
meillo@95 1597 to preserve the number of the message. If a conflict for a
meillo@95 1598 particular folder occurs when using the \-preserve switch,
meillo@95 1599 then refile will use the next available message number which
meillo@95 1600 is above the message number you wish to preserve.
meillo@98 1601 .QE
meillo@95 1602 .BU
meillo@95 1603 The removal of the
meillo@95 1604 .Sw -[no]reverse
meillo@95 1605 switches of
meillo@95 1606 .Pn scan
meillo@97 1607 .Ci 8edc5aaf86f9f77124664f6801bc6c6cdf258173
meillo@95 1608 is a bug fix, supported by the comments
meillo@95 1609 ``\-[no]reverse under #ifdef BERK (I really HATE this)''
meillo@95 1610 by Rose and
meillo@95 1611 ``Lists messages in reverse order with the `\-reverse' switch.
meillo@95 1612 This should be considered a bug.'' by Romine in the documentation.
meillo@97 1613 The question remains why neither Rose and Romine had fixed this
meillo@109 1614 bug in the eighties when they wrote these comments nor has anyone
meillo@95 1615 thereafter.
meillo@93 1616
meillo@93 1617
meillo@93 1618 .ig
meillo@93 1619
meillo@95 1620 forw: [no]dashstuffing(mhl)
meillo@93 1621
meillo@95 1622 mhshow: [no]pause [no]serialonly
meillo@93 1623
meillo@93 1624 mhmail: resent queued
meillo@93 1625 inc: snoop, (pop)
meillo@93 1626
meillo@95 1627 mhl: [no]faceproc folder sleep
meillo@95 1628 [no]dashstuffing(forw) digest list volume number issue number
meillo@93 1629
meillo@95 1630 prompter: [no]doteof
meillo@93 1631
meillo@93 1632 refile: [no]preserve [no]unlink [no]rmmproc
meillo@93 1633
meillo@95 1634 send: [no]forward [no]mime [no]msgid
meillo@93 1635 [no]push split [no]unique (sasl) width snoop [no]dashstuffing
meillo@93 1636 attach attachformat
meillo@93 1637 whatnow: (noedit) attach
meillo@93 1638
meillo@93 1639 slocal: [no]suppressdups
meillo@93 1640
meillo@95 1641 spost: [no]filter [no]backup width [no]push idanno
meillo@93 1642 [no]check(whom) whom(whom)
meillo@93 1643
meillo@93 1644 whom: ???
meillo@93 1645
meillo@95 1646 ..
meillo@93 1647
meillo@93 1648
meillo@93 1649 .ig
meillo@93 1650
meillo@93 1651 .P
meillo@93 1652 In the best case, all switches are unambiguous on the first character,
meillo@93 1653 or on the three-letter prefix for the `no' variants.
meillo@96 1654 Reducing switch prefix collisions, shortens the necessary prefix length
meillo@93 1655 the user must type.
meillo@93 1656 Having less switches helps best.
meillo@93 1657
meillo@93 1658 ..
meillo@58 1659
meillo@95 1660
meillo@102 1661 .\" XXX: whatnow prompt commands
meillo@102 1662
meillo@102 1663
meillo@95 1664
meillo@95 1665
meillo@133 1666 .\" --------------------------------------------------------------
meillo@74 1667 .H1 "Modernizing
meillo@102 1668 .P
meillo@118 1669 In the over thirty years of MH's existence, its code base was
meillo@118 1670 extended more and more.
meillo@118 1671 New features entered the project and became alternatives to the
meillo@118 1672 existing behavior.
meillo@118 1673 Relicts from several decades have gathered in the code base,
meillo@118 1674 but seldom obsolete features were dropped.
meillo@118 1675 This section describes the removing of old code
meillo@118 1676 and the modernizing of the default setup.
meillo@118 1677 It focuses on the functional aspect only;
meillo@118 1678 the non-functional aspects of code style are discussed in
meillo@118 1679 .\" FIXME REF
meillo@118 1680 Sec. XXX.
meillo@58 1681
meillo@58 1682
meillo@100 1683 .H2 "Code Relicts
meillo@0 1684 .P
meillo@109 1685 My position to drop obsolete functions of mmh, in order to remove old code,
meillo@104 1686 is much more revolutional than the nmh community likes to have it.
meillo@104 1687 Working on an experimental version, I was able to quickly drop
meillo@104 1688 functionality I considered ancient.
meillo@104 1689 The need for consensus with peers would have slowed this process down.
meillo@104 1690 Without the need to justify my decisions, I was able to rush forward.
meillo@110 1691 In December 2011, Paul Vixie motivated the nmh developers to just
meillo@104 1692 do the work:
meillo@104 1693 .[
meillo@104 1694 paul vixie edginess nmh-workers
meillo@104 1695 .]
meillo@104 1696 .QS
meillo@104 1697 let's stop walking on egg shells with this code base. there's no need to
meillo@104 1698 discuss whether to keep using vfork, just note in [sic!] passing, [...]
meillo@104 1699 we don't need a separate branch for removing vmh
meillo@104 1700 or ridding ourselves of #ifdef's or removing posix replacement functions
meillo@104 1701 or depending on pure ansi/posix "libc".
meillo@104 1702 .QP
meillo@104 1703 these things should each be a day or two of work and the "main branch"
meillo@104 1704 should just be modern. [...]
meillo@104 1705 let's push forward, aggressively.
meillo@104 1706 .QE
meillo@104 1707 .LP
meillo@104 1708 I did so already in the months before.
meillo@104 1709 I pushed forward.
meillo@104 1710 I simply dropped the cruft.
meillo@104 1711 .P
meillo@104 1712 The decision to drop a feature was based on literature research and
meillo@104 1713 careful thinking, but whether having had contact to this particular
meillo@104 1714 feature within my own computer life served as a rule of thumb.
meillo@109 1715 Always, I explained my reasons in the commit messages
meillo@109 1716 in the version control system.
meillo@104 1717 Hence, others can comprehend my view and argue for undoing the change
meillo@104 1718 if I have missed an important aspect.
meillo@109 1719 I was quick in dropping parts.
meillo@109 1720 I rather re-included falsely dropped parts than going a slower pace.
meillo@109 1721 Mmh is experimental work; it required tough decisions.
meillo@12 1722
meillo@102 1723
meillo@104 1724 .U3 "Forking
meillo@12 1725 .P
meillo@109 1726 Being a tool chest, MH creates many processes.
meillo@104 1727 In earlier times
meillo@104 1728 .Fu fork()
meillo@104 1729 had been an expensive system call, because the process's image needed
meillo@104 1730 to be duplicated completely at once.
meillo@109 1731 This was especially painful in the common case when the image gets
meillo@104 1732 replaced by a call to
meillo@104 1733 .Fu exec()
meillo@104 1734 right after having forked the child process.
meillo@104 1735 The
meillo@104 1736 .Fu vfork()
meillo@104 1737 system call was invented to speed up this particular case.
meillo@104 1738 It completely omits the duplication of the image.
meillo@104 1739 On old systems this resulted in significant speed ups.
meillo@104 1740 Therefore MH used
meillo@104 1741 .Fu vfork()
meillo@104 1742 whenever possible.
meillo@12 1743 .P
meillo@104 1744 Modern memory management units support copy-on-write semantics, which make
meillo@104 1745 .Fu fork()
meillo@104 1746 almost as fast as
meillo@104 1747 .Fu vfork() .
meillo@104 1748 The man page of
meillo@104 1749 .Mp vfork (2)
meillo@104 1750 in FreeBSD 8.0 states:
meillo@104 1751 .QS
meillo@104 1752 This system call will be eliminated when proper system sharing mechanisms
meillo@104 1753 are implemented. Users should not depend on the memory sharing semantics
meillo@104 1754 of vfork() as it will, in that case, be made synonymous to fork(2).
meillo@104 1755 .QE
meillo@104 1756 .LP
meillo@104 1757 Vixie supports the removal with the note that ``the last
meillo@104 1758 system on which fork was so slow that an mh user would notice it, was
meillo@104 1759 Eunice. that was 1987''.
meillo@104 1760 .[
meillo@104 1761 nmh-workers vixie edginess
meillo@104 1762 .]
meillo@104 1763 I replaced all calls to
meillo@104 1764 .Fu vfork()
meillo@104 1765 with calls to
meillo@104 1766 .Fu fork() .
meillo@109 1767 .Ci 40821f5c1316e9205a08375e7075909cc9968e7d
meillo@104 1768 .P
meillo@104 1769 Related to the costs of
meillo@104 1770 .Fu fork()
meillo@104 1771 is the probability of its success.
meillo@109 1772 In the eighties, on heavy loaded systems, calls to
meillo@104 1773 .Fu fork()
meillo@104 1774 were prone to failure.
meillo@104 1775 Hence, many of the
meillo@104 1776 .Fu fork()
meillo@104 1777 calls in the code were wrapped into loops to retry the
meillo@104 1778 .Fu fork()
meillo@109 1779 several times, to increase the changes to succeed, eventually.
meillo@109 1780 On modern systems, a failing
meillo@104 1781 .Fu fork()
meillo@109 1782 call is unusual.
meillo@104 1783 Hence, in the rare case when
meillo@104 1784 .Fu fork()
meillo@104 1785 fails, mmh programs simply abort.
meillo@109 1786 .Ci 5fbf37ee68e018998ada61eeab73e035b26834b6
meillo@12 1787
meillo@12 1788
meillo@109 1789 .U3 "Header Fields
meillo@104 1790 .BU
meillo@84 1791 The
meillo@84 1792 .Hd Encrypted
meillo@104 1793 header field was introduced by RFC\|822,
meillo@109 1794 but already marked as legacy in RFC\|2822.
meillo@109 1795 Today, OpenPGP provides the basis for standardized exchange of encrypted
meillo@104 1796 messages [RFC\|4880, RFC\|3156].
meillo@109 1797 Hence, the support for
meillo@104 1798 .Hd Encrypted
meillo@104 1799 header fields is removed in mmh.
meillo@109 1800 .Ci 064527f7b57ab050e5af13e15ad99aeeab125857
meillo@104 1801 .BU
meillo@84 1802 Native support for
meillo@84 1803 .Hd Face
meillo@104 1804 header fields has been removed, as well.
meillo@109 1805 .Ci 8e5be81f784682822f5e868c1bf3c8624682bd23
meillo@104 1806 This feature is similar to the
meillo@84 1807 .Hd X-Face
meillo@84 1808 header field in its intent,
meillo@21 1809 but takes a different approach to store the image.
meillo@84 1810 Instead of encoding the image data directly into the header field,
meillo@109 1811 it contains the hostname and UDP port where the image
meillo@109 1812 date can be retrieved.
meillo@109 1813 There exists even a third Face system,
meillo@109 1814 which is the successor of
meillo@109 1815 .Hd X-Face ,
meillo@109 1816 although it re-uses the
meillo@104 1817 .Hd Face
meillo@109 1818 header field.
meillo@109 1819 It was invented in 2005 and supports colored PNG images.
meillo@104 1820 None of the Face systems described here is popular today.
meillo@104 1821 Hence, mmh has no direct support for them.
meillo@104 1822 .BU
meillo@104 1823 The
meillo@104 1824 .Hd Content-MD5
meillo@104 1825 header field was introduced by RFC\|1864.
meillo@104 1826 It provides detection of data corruption during the transfer.
meillo@104 1827 But it can not ensure verbatim end-to-end delivery of the contents
meillo@104 1828 [RFC\|1864].
meillo@104 1829 The proper approach to verify content integrity in an
meillo@104 1830 end-to-end relationship is the use of digital cryptography.
meillo@104 1831 .\" XXX (RFCs FIXME).
meillo@104 1832 On the other hand, transfer protocols should detect corruption during
meillo@109 1833 the transmission.
meillo@109 1834 The TCP includes a checksum field therefore.
meillo@104 1835 These two approaches in combinations render the
meillo@104 1836 .Hd Content-MD5
meillo@104 1837 header field superfluous.
meillo@109 1838 Not a single one out of 4\|200 messages from two decades
meillo@109 1839 in an nmh-workers mailing list archive contains a
meillo@104 1840 .Hd Content-MD5
meillo@104 1841 header field.
meillo@104 1842 Neither did any of the 60\|000 messages in my personal mail storage.
meillo@104 1843 Removing the support for this header field,
meillo@104 1844 removed the last place where MD5 computation was needed.
meillo@109 1845 .Ci 31dc797eb5178970d68962ca8939da3fd9a8efda
meillo@104 1846 Hence, the MD5 code could be removed as well.
meillo@104 1847 Over 500 lines of code vanished by this one change.
meillo@104 1848
meillo@104 1849
meillo@104 1850 .U3 "MMDF maildrop support
meillo@21 1851 .P
meillo@104 1852 This type of format is conceptionally similar to the mbox format,
meillo@104 1853 but uses a different message delimiter (`\fL^A^A^A^A\fP' instead of
meillo@104 1854 `\fLFrom\0\fP').
meillo@104 1855 Mbox is the de-facto standard maildrop format on Unix,
meillo@109 1856 whereas the MMDF maildrop format became forgotten.
meillo@104 1857 I did drop MMDF maildrop format support.
meillo@109 1858 Mbox is the only packed mailbox format supported in mmh.
meillo@104 1859 .P
meillo@109 1860 The simplifications within the code were moderate.
meillo@109 1861 Mainly, the reading and writing of MMDF mailbox files was removed.
meillo@109 1862 But also, switches of
meillo@109 1863 .Pn packf
meillo@104 1864 and
meillo@109 1865 .Pn rcvpack
meillo@109 1866 could be removed.
meillo@109 1867 .Ci 3916ab66ad5d183705ac12357621ea8661afd3c0
meillo@109 1868 In the message parsing function
meillo@109 1869 .Fn sbr/m_getfld.c ,
meillo@109 1870 knowledge of MMDF packed mail boxes was removed.
meillo@109 1871 .Ci 684ec30d81e1223a282764452f4902ed4ad1c754
meillo@109 1872 Further code structure simplifications may be possible there,
meillo@109 1873 because only one single packed mailbox format is left to be supported.
meillo@104 1874 I have not worked on them yet because
meillo@104 1875 .Fu m_getfld()
meillo@104 1876 is heavily optimized and thus dangerous to touch.
meillo@104 1877 The risk of damaging the intricate workings of the optimized code is
meillo@104 1878 too high.
meillo@104 1879 .\" XXX: move somewhere else
meillo@104 1880 This problem is know to the developers of nmh, too.
meillo@109 1881 They also avoid touching this minefield.
meillo@104 1882
meillo@12 1883
meillo@101 1884 .U3 "Prompter's Control Keys
meillo@20 1885 .P
meillo@20 1886 The program
meillo@20 1887 .Pn prompter
meillo@104 1888 queries the user to fill in a message form.
meillo@104 1889 When used by
meillo@20 1890 .Pn comp
meillo@104 1891 as
meillo@104 1892 .Cl "comp -editor prompter" ,
meillo@20 1893 the resulting behavior is similar to
meillo@20 1894 .Pn mailx .
meillo@51 1895 Apparently,
meillo@20 1896 .Pn prompter
meillo@104 1897 hadn't been touched lately.
meillo@104 1898 Otherwise it's hardly explainable why it
meillo@20 1899 still offered the switches
meillo@84 1900 .Sw -erase
meillo@84 1901 .Ar chr
meillo@20 1902 and
meillo@84 1903 .Sw -kill
meillo@84 1904 .Ar chr
meillo@20 1905 to name the characters for command line editing.
meillo@21 1906 The times when this had been necessary are long time gone.
meillo@20 1907 Today these things work out-of-the-box, and if not, are configured
meillo@20 1908 with the standard tool
meillo@20 1909 .Pn stty .
meillo@104 1910 The switches are removed now
meillo@104 1911 .Ci 0bd9750710cdbab80cfb4036dd87af20afe1552f .
meillo@20 1912
meillo@104 1913
meillo@109 1914 .U3 "Hardcopy Terminal Support
meillo@21 1915 .P
meillo@109 1916 More of a funny anecdote is a check for being connected to a
meillo@109 1917 hardcopy terminal.
meillo@109 1918 It remained in the code until Spring 2012, when I finally removed it
meillo@104 1919 .Ci b7764c4a6b71d37918a97594d866258f154017ca .
meillo@109 1920 I would be truly happy to see such a terminal in action today,
meillo@109 1921 maybe even being able to work on it.
meillo@109 1922 But I fear my chances are null.
meillo@21 1923 .P
meillo@109 1924 The check only prevented a pager to be placed between the printing
meillo@104 1925 program (\c
meillo@104 1926 .Pn mhl )
meillo@104 1927 and the terminal.
meillo@109 1928 In nmh, this could have been ensured statically with the
meillo@104 1929 .Sw -nomoreproc
meillo@109 1930 at the command line, too.
meillo@121 1931 In mmh, setting the profile entry
meillo@104 1932 .Pe Pager
meillo@104 1933 or the environment variable
meillo@104 1934 .Ev PAGER
meillo@104 1935 to
meillo@109 1936 .Pn cat
meillo@109 1937 does the job.
meillo@104 1938
meillo@104 1939
meillo@21 1940
meillo@12 1941
meillo@58 1942 .H2 "Attachments
meillo@22 1943 .P
meillo@101 1944 The mind model of email attachments is unrelated to MIME.
meillo@101 1945 Although the MIME RFCs (2045 through 2049) define the technical
meillo@109 1946 requirements for having attachments, they do not mention the word
meillo@101 1947 ``attachment''.
meillo@101 1948 Instead of attachments, MIME talks about ``multi-part message bodies''
meillo@101 1949 [RFC\|2045], a more general concept.
meillo@101 1950 Multi-part messages are messages
meillo@101 1951 ``in which one or more different
meillo@101 1952 sets of data are combined in a single body''
meillo@101 1953 [RFC\|2046].
meillo@101 1954 MIME keeps its descriptions generic;
meillo@101 1955 it does not imply specific usage models.
meillo@109 1956 One usage model became prevalent: attachments.
meillo@101 1957 The idea is having a main text document with files of arbitrary kind
meillo@101 1958 attached to it.
meillo@101 1959 In MIME terms, this is a multi-part message having a text part first
meillo@110 1960 and parts of arbitrary type following.
meillo@101 1961 .P
meillo@101 1962 MH's MIME support is a direct implementation of the RFCs.
meillo@101 1963 The perception of the topic described in the RFCs is clearly visible
meillo@101 1964 in MH's implementation.
meillo@109 1965 In result, MH had all the MIME features but no idea of attachments.
meillo@109 1966 But users don't need all the MIME features,
meillo@109 1967 they want convenient attachment handling.
meillo@109 1968
meillo@102 1969
meillo@102 1970 .U3 "Composing MIME Messages
meillo@102 1971 .P
meillo@102 1972 In order to improve the situation on the message composing side,
meillo@102 1973 Jon Steinhart had added an attachment system to nmh in 2002.
meillo@101 1974 .Ci 7480dbc14bc90f2d872d434205c0784704213252
meillo@102 1975 In the file
meillo@102 1976 .Fn docs/README-ATTACHMENTS ,
meillo@102 1977 he described his motivation to do so as such:
meillo@101 1978 .QS
meillo@101 1979 Although nmh contains the necessary functionality for MIME message handing,
meillo@101 1980 the interface to this functionality is pretty obtuse.
meillo@101 1981 There's no way that I'm ever going to convince my partner to write
meillo@101 1982 .Pn mhbuild
meillo@101 1983 composition files!
meillo@101 1984 .QE
meillo@102 1985 .LP
meillo@102 1986 With this change, the mind model of attachments entered nmh.
meillo@102 1987 In the same document:
meillo@101 1988 .QS
meillo@101 1989 These changes simplify the task of managing attachments on draft files.
meillo@101 1990 They allow attachments to be added, listed, and deleted.
meillo@101 1991 MIME messages are automatically created when drafts with attachments
meillo@101 1992 are sent.
meillo@101 1993 .QE
meillo@102 1994 .LP
meillo@102 1995 Unfortunately, the attachment system,
meillo@102 1996 like any new facilities in nmh,
meillo@110 1997 was inactive by default.
meillo@101 1998 .P
meillo@101 1999 During my work in Argentina, I tried to improve the attachment system.
meillo@102 2000 But, because of great opposition in the nmh community,
meillo@102 2001 my patch died as a proposal on the mailing list, after long discussions.
meillo@101 2002 .[
meillo@101 2003 nmh-workers attachment proposal
meillo@101 2004 .]
meillo@110 2005 In January 2012, I extended the patch and applied it to mmh.
meillo@101 2006 .Ci 8ff284ff9167eff8f5349481529332d59ed913b1
meillo@102 2007 In mmh, the attachment system is active by default.
meillo@102 2008 Instead of command line switches, the
meillo@102 2009 .Pe Attachment-Header
meillo@102 2010 profile entry is used to specify
meillo@102 2011 the name of the attachment header field.
meillo@102 2012 It is pre-defined to
meillo@102 2013 .Hd Attach .
meillo@101 2014 .P
meillo@101 2015 To add an attachment to a draft, simply add an attachment header:
meillo@101 2016 .VS
meillo@101 2017 To: bob
meillo@101 2018 Subject: The file you wanted
meillo@101 2019 Attach: /path/to/the/file-bob-wanted
meillo@101 2020 --------
meillo@101 2021 Here it is.
meillo@101 2022 VE
meillo@101 2023 The header field can be added to the draft manually in the editor,
meillo@102 2024 or by using the `attach' command at the WhatNow prompt, or
meillo@102 2025 non-interactively with
meillo@101 2026 .Pn anno :
meillo@101 2027 .VS
meillo@102 2028 anno -append -nodate -component Attach -text /path/to/attachment
meillo@101 2029 VE
meillo@102 2030 Drafts with attachment headers are converted to MIME automatically by
meillo@102 2031 .Pn send .
meillo@102 2032 The conversion to MIME is invisible to the user.
meillo@102 2033 The draft stored in the draft folder is always in source form, with
meillo@101 2034 attachment headers.
meillo@101 2035 If the MIMEification fails, for instance because the file to attach
meillo@101 2036 is not accessible, the original draft is not changed.
meillo@101 2037 .P
meillo@102 2038 The attachment system handles the forwarding of messages, too.
meillo@101 2039 If the attachment header value starts with a plus character (`+'),
meillo@101 2040 like in
meillo@101 2041 .Cl "Attach: +bob 30 42" ,
meillo@101 2042 The given messages in the specified folder will be attached.
meillo@101 2043 This allowed to simplify
meillo@101 2044 .Pn forw .
meillo@101 2045 .Ci f41f04cf4ceca7355232cf7413e59afafccc9550
meillo@101 2046 .P
meillo@101 2047 Closely related to attachments is non-ASCII text content,
meillo@101 2048 because it requires MIME too.
meillo@102 2049 In nmh, the user needed to call `mime' at the WhatNow prompt
meillo@101 2050 to have the draft converted to MIME.
meillo@102 2051 This was necessary whenever the draft contained non-ASCII characters.
meillo@101 2052 If the user did not call `mime', a broken message would be sent.
meillo@101 2053 Therefore, the
meillo@101 2054 .Pe automimeproc
meillo@101 2055 profile entry could be specified to have the `mime' command invoked
meillo@102 2056 automatically each time.
meillo@101 2057 Unfortunately, this approach conflicted with with attachment system
meillo@101 2058 because the draft would already be in MIME format at the time
meillo@101 2059 when the attachment system wanted to MIMEify it.
meillo@102 2060 To use nmh's attachment system, `mime' must not be called at the
meillo@102 2061 WhatNow prompt and
meillo@101 2062 .Pe automimeproc
meillo@102 2063 must not be set in the profile.
meillo@101 2064 But then the case of non-ASCII text without attachment headers was
meillo@101 2065 not caught.
meillo@102 2066 All in all, the solution was complex and irritating.
meillo@102 2067 My patch from December 2010 would have simplified the situation.
meillo@102 2068 .P
meillo@101 2069 Mmh's current solution is even more elaborate.
meillo@101 2070 Any necessary MIMEification is done automatically.
meillo@101 2071 There is no `mime' command at the WhatNow prompt anymore.
meillo@102 2072 The draft will be converted automatically to MIME when either an
meillo@102 2073 attachment header or non-ASCII text is present.
meillo@101 2074 Further more, the special meaning of the hash character (`#')
meillo@102 2075 at line beginnings in the draft message is removed.
meillo@102 2076 Users need not at all deal with the whole topic.
meillo@101 2077 .P
meillo@102 2078 Although the new approach does not anymore support arbitrary MIME
meillo@102 2079 compositions directly, the full power of
meillo@101 2080 .Pn mhbuild
meillo@101 2081 can still be accessed.
meillo@102 2082 Given no attachment headers are included, the user can create
meillo@101 2083 .Pn mhbuild
meillo@102 2084 composition drafts like in nmh.
meillo@101 2085 Then, at the WhatNow prompt, he needs to invoke
meillo@101 2086 .Cl "edit mhbuild
meillo@101 2087 to convert it to MIME.
meillo@110 2088 Because the resulting draft does neither contain non-ASCII characters
meillo@102 2089 nor has it attachment headers, the attachment system will not touch it.
meillo@101 2090 .P
meillo@121 2091 The approach taken in mmh is tailored towards todays most common case:
meillo@101 2092 a text part with possibly attachments.
meillo@102 2093 This case is simplified a lot for users.
meillo@102 2094
meillo@112 2095
meillo@102 2096 .U3 "MIME Type Guessing
meillo@102 2097 .P
meillo@102 2098 The use of
meillo@101 2099 .Pn mhbuild
meillo@102 2100 composition drafts had one notable advantage over attachment headers
meillo@102 2101 from the programmer's point of view: The user provides the appropriate
meillo@102 2102 MIME types for files to include.
meillo@102 2103 The attachment system needs to find out the correct MIME type itself.
meillo@102 2104 This is a difficult task, yet it spares the user irritating work.
meillo@102 2105 Determining the correct MIME type of content is partly mechanical,
meillo@102 2106 partly intelligent work.
meillo@102 2107 Forcing the user to find out the correct MIME type,
meillo@102 2108 forces him to do partly mechanical work.
meillo@102 2109 Letting the computer do the work, can lead to bad choices for difficult
meillo@102 2110 content.
meillo@102 2111 For mmh, the latter option was chosen.
meillo@102 2112 .P
meillo@102 2113 Determining the MIME type by the suffix of the file name is a dumb
meillo@102 2114 approach, yet it is simple to implement and provides good results
meillo@102 2115 for the common cases.
meillo@102 2116 Mmh implements this approach in the
meillo@102 2117 .Pn print-mimetype
meillo@102 2118 script.
meillo@112 2119 .Ci 4b5944268ea0da7bb30598a27857304758ea9b44
meillo@102 2120 Using it is the default choice.
meillo@102 2121 .P
meillo@112 2122 A far better, though less portable, approach is the use of
meillo@102 2123 .Pn file .
meillo@102 2124 This standard tool tries to determine the type of files.
meillo@102 2125 Unfortunately, its capabilities and accuracy varies from system to system.
meillo@102 2126 Additionally, its output was only intended for human beings,
meillo@102 2127 but not to be used by programs.
meillo@102 2128 It varies much.
meillo@102 2129 Nevertheless, modern versions of GNU
meillo@102 2130 .Pn file ,
meillo@102 2131 which is prevalent on the popular GNU/Linux systems,
meillo@102 2132 provides MIME type output in machine-readable form.
meillo@102 2133 Although this solution is highly system-dependent,
meillo@102 2134 it solves the difficult problem well.
meillo@102 2135 On systems where GNU
meillo@102 2136 .Pn file ,
meillo@102 2137 version 5.04 or higher, is available it should be used.
meillo@102 2138 One needs to specify the following profile entry to do so:
meillo@112 2139 .Ci 3baec236a39c5c89a9bda8dbd988d643a21decc6
meillo@102 2140 .VS
meillo@102 2141 Mime-Type-Query: file -b --mime
meillo@102 2142 VE
meillo@102 2143 .LP
meillo@102 2144 Other versions of
meillo@102 2145 .Pn file
meillo@102 2146 might possibly be usable with wrapper scripts to reformat the output.
meillo@102 2147 The diversity among
meillo@102 2148 .Pn file
meillo@102 2149 implementations is great; one needs to check the local variant.
meillo@102 2150 .P
meillo@102 2151 If no MIME type can be determined, text content gets sent as
meillo@102 2152 `text/plain' and anything else under the generic fall-back type
meillo@102 2153 `application/octet-stream'.
meillo@102 2154 It is not possible in mmh to override the automatic MIME type guessing
meillo@102 2155 for a specific file.
meillo@102 2156 To do so, the user would need to know in advance for which file
meillo@102 2157 the automatic guessing does fail, or the system would require interaction.
meillo@102 2158 I consider both cases impractical.
meillo@102 2159 The existing solution should be sufficient.
meillo@102 2160 If not, the user may always fall back to
meillo@102 2161 .Pn mhbuild
meillo@102 2162 composition drafts and ignore the attachment system.
meillo@101 2163
meillo@102 2164
meillo@102 2165 .U3 "Storing Attachments
meillo@102 2166 .P
meillo@108 2167 Extracting MIME parts of a message and storing them to disk is done by
meillo@108 2168 .Pn mhstore .
meillo@108 2169 The program has two operation modes,
meillo@108 2170 .Sw -auto
meillo@108 2171 and
meillo@108 2172 .Sw -noauto .
meillo@108 2173 With the former one, each part is stored under the filename given in the
meillo@108 2174 MIME part's meta information, if available.
meillo@108 2175 This naming information is usually available for modern attachments.
meillo@108 2176 If no filename is available, this MIME part is stored as if
meillo@108 2177 .Sw -noauto
meillo@108 2178 would have been specified.
meillo@108 2179 In the
meillo@108 2180 .Sw -noauto
meillo@108 2181 mode, the parts are processed according to rules, defined by
meillo@108 2182 .Pe mhstore-store-*
meillo@108 2183 profile entries.
meillo@108 2184 These rules define generic filename templates for storing
meillo@108 2185 or commands to post-process the contents in arbitrary ways.
meillo@108 2186 If no matching rule is available the part is stored under a generic
meillo@108 2187 filename, built from message number, MIME part number, and MIME type.
meillo@108 2188 .P
meillo@108 2189 The
meillo@108 2190 .Sw -noauto
meillo@108 2191 mode had been the default in nmh because it was considered safe,
meillo@108 2192 in contrast to the
meillo@108 2193 .Sw -auto
meillo@108 2194 mode.
meillo@108 2195 In mmh,
meillo@108 2196 .Sw -auto
meillo@108 2197 is not dangerous anymore.
meillo@108 2198 Two changes were necessary:
meillo@108 2199 .BU
meillo@108 2200 Any directory path is removed from the proposed filename.
meillo@108 2201 Thus, the files are always stored in the expected directory.
meillo@108 2202 .Ci 41b6eadbcecf63c9a66aa5e582011987494abefb
meillo@108 2203 .BU
meillo@108 2204 Tar files are not extracted automatically any more.
meillo@108 2205 Thus, the rest of the file system will not be touched.
meillo@108 2206 .Ci 94c80042eae3383c812d9552089953f9846b1bb6
meillo@108 2207 .LP
meillo@108 2208 Now, the outcome of mmh's
meillo@108 2209 .Cl "mhstore -auto
meillo@110 2210 can be foreseen from the output of
meillo@108 2211 .Cl "mhlist -verbose" .
meillo@108 2212 .P
meillo@108 2213 The
meillo@108 2214 .Sw -noauto
meillo@108 2215 mode is seen to be more powerful but less convenient.
meillo@108 2216 On the other hand,
meillo@108 2217 .Sw -auto
meillo@108 2218 is safe now and
meillo@108 2219 storing attachments under their original name is intuitive.
meillo@108 2220 Hence,
meillo@108 2221 .Sw -auto
meillo@108 2222 serves better as the default option.
meillo@108 2223 .Ci 3410b680416c49a7617491af38bc1929855a331d
meillo@108 2224 .P
meillo@108 2225 Files are stored into the directory given by the
meillo@108 2226 .Pe Nmh-Storage
meillo@108 2227 profile entry, if set, or
meillo@108 2228 into the current working directory, otherwise.
meillo@108 2229 Storing to different directories is only possible with
meillo@108 2230 .Pe mhstore-store-*
meillo@108 2231 profile entries.
meillo@108 2232 .P
meillo@108 2233 Still, in both modes, existing files get overwritten silently.
meillo@108 2234 This can be considered a bug.
meillo@108 2235 Yet, each other behavior has its draw-backs, too.
meillo@108 2236 Refusing to replace files requires adding a
meillo@108 2237 .Sw -force
meillo@108 2238 option.
meillo@108 2239 Users will likely need to invoke
meillo@108 2240 .Pn mhstore
meillo@108 2241 a second time with
meillo@108 2242 .Sw -force
meillo@108 2243 then.
meillo@108 2244 Eventually, only the user can decide in the concrete case.
meillo@108 2245 This requires interaction, which I like to avoid if possible.
meillo@108 2246 Appending a unique suffix to the filename is another bad option.
meillo@108 2247 For now, the behavior remains as it is.
meillo@108 2248 .P
meillo@108 2249 In mmh, only MIME parts of type message are special in
meillo@108 2250 .Pn mhstore 's
meillo@108 2251 .Sw -auto
meillo@108 2252 mode.
meillo@108 2253 Instead of storing message/rfc822 parts as files to disk,
meillo@108 2254 they are stored as messages into the current mail folder.
meillo@108 2255 The same applies to message/partial, only, the parts are reassembled
meillo@108 2256 automatically before.
meillo@108 2257 Parts of type message/external-body are not automatically retrieved
meillo@108 2258 anymore. Instead, Information on how to retrieve them is output.
meillo@108 2259 Not supporting this rare case saved nearly one thousand lines of code.
meillo@108 2260 .Ci 55e1d8c654ee0f7c45b9361ce34617983b454c32
meillo@108 2261 .\" XXX mention somewhere else too: (The profile entry `nmh-access-ftp'
meillo@108 2262 .\" and sbr/ruserpass.c for reading ~/.netrc are gone now.)
meillo@108 2263 Not special anymore is `application/octet-stream; type=tar'.
meillo@108 2264 Automatically extracting such MIME parts had been the dangerous part
meillo@108 2265 of the
meillo@108 2266 .Sw -auto
meillo@108 2267 mode.
meillo@108 2268 .Ci 94c80042eae3383c812d9552089953f9846b1bb6
meillo@108 2269
meillo@102 2270
meillo@102 2271
meillo@102 2272 .U3 "Showing MIME Messages
meillo@102 2273 .P
meillo@114 2274 The program
meillo@114 2275 .Pn mhshow
meillo@114 2276 had been written to display MIME messages.
meillo@114 2277 It implemented the conceptional view of the MIME RFCs.
meillo@114 2278 Nmh's
meillo@114 2279 .Pn mhshow
meillo@114 2280 handled each MIME part independently, presenting them separately
meillo@114 2281 to the user.
meillo@114 2282 This does not match today's understanding of email attachments,
meillo@114 2283 where displaying a message is seen to be a single, integrated operation.
meillo@114 2284 Today, email messages are expected to consist of a main text part
meillo@114 2285 plus possibly attachments.
meillo@114 2286 They are not any more seen to be arbitrary MIME hierarchies with
meillo@114 2287 information on how to display the individual parts.
meillo@114 2288 I adjusted
meillo@114 2289 .Pn mhshow 's
meillo@114 2290 behavior to the modern view on the topic.
meillo@114 2291 .P
meillo@114 2292 Note that this section completely ignores the original
meillo@114 2293 .Pn show
meillo@114 2294 program, because it was not capable to display MIME messages
meillo@114 2295 and is no longer part of mmh.
meillo@114 2296 Although
meillo@114 2297 .Pn mhshow
meillo@114 2298 was renamed to
meillo@114 2299 .Pn show
meillo@114 2300 in mmh, this section uses the name
meillo@114 2301 .Pn mhshow ,
meillo@114 2302 in order to avoid confusion.
meillo@114 2303 .P
meillo@114 2304 In mmh, the basic idea is that
meillo@114 2305 .Pn mhshow
meillo@114 2306 should display a message in one single pager session.
meillo@114 2307 Therefore,
meillo@114 2308 .Pn mhshow
meillo@114 2309 invokes a pager session for all its output,
meillo@114 2310 whenever it prints to a terminal.
meillo@114 2311 .Ci a4197ea6ffc5c1550e8b52d5a654bcaaaee04a4e
meillo@114 2312 In consequence,
meillo@114 2313 .Pn mhl
meillo@114 2314 does no more invoke a pager.
meillo@114 2315 .Ci 0e46503be3c855bddaeae3843e1b659279c35d70
meillo@114 2316 With
meillo@114 2317 .Pn mhshow
meillo@114 2318 replacing the original
meillo@114 2319 .Pn show ,
meillo@114 2320 output from
meillo@114 2321 .Pn mhl
meillo@114 2322 does not go to the terminal directly, but through
meillo@114 2323 .Pn mhshow .
meillo@114 2324 Hence,
meillo@114 2325 .Pn mhl
meillo@114 2326 does not need to invoke a pager.
meillo@114 2327 The one and only job of
meillo@114 2328 .Pn mhl
meillo@114 2329 is to format messages or parts of them.
meillo@114 2330 The only place in mmh, where a pager is invoked is
meillo@114 2331 .Pn mhshow .
meillo@114 2332 .P
meillo@114 2333 .Pe mhshow-show-*
meillo@114 2334 profile entries can be used to display MIME parts in a specific way.
meillo@114 2335 For instance, PDF and Postscript files could be converted to plain text
meillo@114 2336 to display them in the terminal.
meillo@114 2337 In mmh, the displaying of MIME parts will always be done serially.
meillo@114 2338 The request to display the MIME type `multipart/parallel' in parallel
meillo@114 2339 is ignored.
meillo@114 2340 It is simply treated as `multipart/mixed'.
meillo@114 2341 .Ci d0581ba306a7299113a346f9b4c46ce97bc4cef6
meillo@114 2342 This could already be requested with the, now removed,
meillo@114 2343 .Sw -serialonly
meillo@114 2344 switch of
meillo@114 2345 .Pn mhshow .
meillo@114 2346 As MIME parts are always processed exclusively , i.e. serially,
meillo@114 2347 the `%e' escape in
meillo@114 2348 .Pe mhshow-show-*
meillo@114 2349 profile entries became useless and was thus removed.
meillo@114 2350 .Ci a20d405db09b7ccca74d3e8c57550883da49e1ae
meillo@114 2351 .P
meillo@114 2352 In the intended setup, only text content would be displayed.
meillo@114 2353 Non-text content would be converted to text by appropriate
meillo@114 2354 .Pe mhshow-show-*
meillo@114 2355 profile entries before, if possible and wanted.
meillo@114 2356 All output would be displayed in a single pager session.
meillo@114 2357 Other kinds of attachments are ignored.
meillo@114 2358 With
meillo@114 2359 .Pe mhshow-show-*
meillo@114 2360 profile entries for them, they can be displayed serially along
meillo@114 2361 the message.
meillo@114 2362 For parallel display, the attachments need to be stored to disk first.
meillo@114 2363 .P
meillo@114 2364 To display text content in foreign charsets, they need to be converted
meillo@114 2365 to the native charset.
meillo@114 2366 Therefore,
meillo@114 2367 .Pe mhshow-charset-*
meillo@114 2368 profile entries used to be needed.
meillo@121 2369 In mmh, the conversion is done automatically by piping the text through
meillo@114 2370 the
meillo@114 2371 .Pn iconv
meillo@114 2372 command, if necessary.
meillo@114 2373 .Ci 2433122c20baccb10b70b49c04c6b0497b5b3b60
meillo@114 2374 Custom
meillo@114 2375 .Pe mhshow-show-*
meillo@114 2376 rules for textual content might need a
meillo@114 2377 .Cl "iconv -f %c %f |
meillo@114 2378 prefix to have the text converted to the native charset.
meillo@114 2379 .P
meillo@121 2380 Although the conversion of foreign charsets to the native one
meillo@114 2381 has improved, it is not consistent enough.
meillo@114 2382 Further work needs to be done and
meillo@114 2383 the basic concepts in this field need to be re-thought.
meillo@114 2384 Though, the default setup of mmh displays message in foreign charsets
meillo@114 2385 correctly without the need to configure anything.
meillo@114 2386
meillo@114 2387
meillo@114 2388 .ig
meillo@114 2389
meillo@114 2390 .P
meillo@114 2391 mhshow/mhstore: Removed support for retrieving message/external-body parts.
meillo@114 2392 These tools won't download the contents automatically anymore. Instead,
meillo@114 2393 they print the information needed to get the contents. If someone should
meillo@114 2394 really receive one of those rare message/external-body messages, he can
meillo@114 2395 do the job manually. We save nearly a thousand lines of code. That's worth
meillo@114 2396 it!
meillo@114 2397 (The profile entry `nmh-access-ftp' and sbr/ruserpass.c for reading
meillo@114 2398 ~/.netrc are gone now.)
meillo@114 2399 .Ci 55e1d8c654ee0f7c45b9361ce34617983b454c32
meillo@114 2400
meillo@114 2401 ..
meillo@102 2402
meillo@58 2403
meillo@58 2404
meillo@58 2405 .H2 "Digital Cryptography
meillo@22 2406 .P
meillo@58 2407 Signing and encryption.
meillo@112 2408 .P
meillo@112 2409 FIXME
meillo@58 2410
meillo@58 2411
meillo@102 2412
meillo@133 2413 .H2 "Draft and Trash Folder
meillo@131 2414 .P
meillo@58 2415
meillo@131 2416 .U3 "Draft Folder
meillo@131 2417 .P
meillo@131 2418 In the beginning, MH had the concept of a draft message.
meillo@131 2419 This is the file
meillo@131 2420 .Fn draft
meillo@131 2421 in the MH directory, which is treated special.
meillo@131 2422 On composing a message, this draft file was used.
meillo@131 2423 As the draft file was one particular file, only one draft could be
meillo@131 2424 managed at any time.
meillo@131 2425 When starting to compose another message before the former one was sent,
meillo@131 2426 the user had to decide among:
meillo@131 2427 .BU
meillo@131 2428 Use the old draft to finish and send it before starting with a new one.
meillo@131 2429 .BU
meillo@131 2430 Discard the old draft, replacing it with the new one.
meillo@131 2431 .BU
meillo@131 2432 Preserve the old draft by refiling it to a folder.
meillo@131 2433 .P
meillo@131 2434 This was, it was only possible to work in alternation on multiple drafts.
meillo@131 2435 Therefore, the current draft needed to be refiled to a folder and
meillo@131 2436 another one re-using for editing.
meillo@131 2437 Working on multiple drafts at the same time was impossible.
meillo@131 2438 The usual approach of switching to a different MH context did not
meillo@131 2439 change anything.
meillo@131 2440 .P
meillo@131 2441 The draft folder facility exists to
meillo@131 2442 allow true parallel editing of drafts, in a straight forward way.
meillo@131 2443 It was introduced by Marshall T. Rose, already in 1984.
meillo@131 2444 Similar to other new features, the draft folder was inactive by default.
meillo@131 2445 Even in nmh, the highly useful draft folder was not available
meillo@131 2446 out-of-the-box.
meillo@131 2447 At least, Richard Coleman added the man page
meillo@131 2448 .Mp mh-draft (5)
meillo@131 2449 to better document the feature.
meillo@131 2450 .P
meillo@131 2451 Not using the draft folder facility has the single advantage of having
meillo@131 2452 the draft file at a static location.
meillo@131 2453 This is simple in simple cases but the concept does not scale for more
meillo@131 2454 complex cases.
meillo@131 2455 The concept of the draft message is too limited for the problem.
meillo@131 2456 Therefore the draft folder was introduced.
meillo@131 2457 It is the more powerful and more natural concept.
meillo@131 2458 The draft folder is a folder like any other folder in MH.
meillo@131 2459 Its messages can be listed like any other messages.
meillo@131 2460 A draft message is no longer a special case.
meillo@131 2461 Tools do not need special switches to work on the draft message.
meillo@131 2462 Hence corner-cases were removed.
meillo@131 2463 .P
meillo@131 2464 The trivial part of the work was activating the draft folder with a
meillo@131 2465 default name.
meillo@131 2466 I chose the name
meillo@131 2467 .Fn +drafts
meillo@131 2468 for obvious reasons.
meillo@131 2469 In consequence, the command line switches
meillo@131 2470 .Sw -draftfolder
meillo@131 2471 and
meillo@131 2472 .Sw -draftmessage
meillo@131 2473 could be removed.
meillo@131 2474 More difficult but also more improving was updating the tools to the
meillo@131 2475 new concept.
meillo@131 2476 For nearly three decades, the tools needed to support two draft handling
meillo@131 2477 approaches.
meillo@131 2478 By fully switching to the draft folder, the tools could be simplified
meillo@131 2479 by dropping the awkward draft message handling code.
meillo@131 2480 .Sw -draft
meillo@131 2481 switches were removed because operating on a draft message is no longer
meillo@131 2482 special.
meillo@131 2483 It became indistinguishable to operating on any other message.
meillo@131 2484 There is no more need to query the user for draft handling.
meillo@131 2485 It is always possible to add another new draft.
meillo@131 2486 Refiling drafts is without difference to refiling other messages.
meillo@131 2487 All these special cases are gone.
meillo@131 2488 Yet, one draft-related switch remained.
meillo@131 2489 .Pn comp
meillo@131 2490 still has
meillo@131 2491 .Sw -[no]use
meillo@131 2492 for switching between two modes:
meillo@131 2493 .BU
meillo@131 2494 .Sw -use :
meillo@131 2495 Modify an existing draft.
meillo@131 2496 .BU
meillo@131 2497 .Sw -nouse :
meillo@131 2498 Compose a new draft, possibly taking some existing message as a form.
meillo@131 2499 .P
meillo@131 2500 In either case, the behavior of
meillo@131 2501 .Pn comp
meillo@131 2502 is deterministic.
meillo@131 2503 .P
meillo@131 2504 .Pn send
meillo@131 2505 now operates on the current message in the draft folder by default.
meillo@131 2506 As message and folder can both be overridden by specifying them on
meillo@131 2507 the command line, it is possible to send any message in the mail storage
meillo@131 2508 by simply specifying its number and folder.
meillo@131 2509 In contrast to the other tools,
meillo@131 2510 .Pn send
meillo@131 2511 takes the draft folder as its default folder.
meillo@131 2512 .P
meillo@131 2513 Dropping the draft message concept in favor for the draft folder concept,
meillo@131 2514 removed special cases with regular cases.
meillo@131 2515 This simplified the source code of the tools, as well as the concepts.
meillo@131 2516 In mmh, draft management does not break with the MH concepts
meillo@131 2517 but applies them.
meillo@133 2518 .Cl "scan +drafts" ,
meillo@133 2519 for instance, is a truly natural request.
meillo@131 2520 Most of the work was already done by Rose in the eighties.
meillo@133 2521 The original improvement of mmh is dropping the old draft message approach
meillo@133 2522 and thus simplifying the tools, the documentation and the system as a whole.
meillo@131 2523 Although my part in the draft handling improvement was small,
meillo@133 2524 it was an important one.
meillo@131 2525
meillo@131 2526
meillo@131 2527 .U3 "Trash Folder
meillo@131 2528 .P
meillo@131 2529 Similar to the situation for drafts is the situation for removed messages.
meillo@131 2530 Historically, a message was ``deleted'' by prepending a specific
meillo@131 2531 \fIbackup prefix\fP, usually the comma character,
meillo@131 2532 to the file name.
meillo@131 2533 The specific message would vanish from MH because only files with
meillo@131 2534 non-digit characters in their name are not treated as messages.
meillo@131 2535 Although files remained in the file system,
meillo@131 2536 the messages were no more visible in MH.
meillo@131 2537 To truly delete them, a maintenance job is needed.
meillo@131 2538 Usually a cron job is installed to delete them after a grace time.
meillo@131 2539 For instance:
meillo@131 2540 .VS
meillo@131 2541 find $HOME/Mail -type f -name ',*' -ctime +7 -delete
meillo@131 2542 VE
meillo@131 2543 In such a setup, the original message can be restored
meillo@131 2544 within the grace time interval by stripping the
meillo@131 2545 the backup prefix from the file name.
meillo@131 2546 But one can not rely on this statement.
meillo@131 2547 If the last message of a folder with six messages (1-6) is removed,
meillo@131 2548 message
meillo@131 2549 .Fn 6 ,
meillo@131 2550 becomes file
meillo@131 2551 .Fn ,6 .
meillo@131 2552 If then a new message enters the same folder, it will be given
meillo@131 2553 the number one higher than the highest existing message.
meillo@131 2554 In this case the message is named
meillo@131 2555 .Fn 6
meillo@131 2556 then.
meillo@131 2557 If this message is removed as well,
meillo@131 2558 then the backup of the former message gets overwritten.
meillo@131 2559 Hence, the ability to restore removed messages does not only depend on
meillo@131 2560 the ``sweeping cron job'' but also on the removing of further messages.
meillo@131 2561 It is undesirable to have such obscure and complex mechanisms.
meillo@131 2562 The user should be given a small set of clear assertions.
meillo@131 2563 ``Removed files are restorable within a seven-day grace time.''
meillo@131 2564 is such a clear assertion.
meillo@131 2565 With the addition ``... unless a message with the same name in the
meillo@131 2566 same folder is removed before.'' the statement becomes complex.
meillo@131 2567 A user will hardly be able to keep track of any removal to know
meillo@131 2568 if the assertion still holds true for a specific file.
meillo@131 2569 The the real mechanism is practically obscure to the user.
meillo@131 2570 The consequences of further removals are not obvious.
meillo@131 2571 .P
meillo@131 2572 Further more, the backup files are scattered within the whole mail storage.
meillo@131 2573 This complicates managing them.
meillo@131 2574 It is possible, with help of
meillo@131 2575 .Pn find ,
meillo@131 2576 but everything would be more convenient
meillo@131 2577 if the deleted messages would be collected in one place.
meillo@131 2578 .P
meillo@131 2579 The profile entry
meillo@131 2580 .Pe rmmproc
meillo@131 2581 (previously named
meillo@131 2582 .Pe Delete-Prog )
meillo@131 2583 was introduced very early to improve the situation.
meillo@131 2584 It could be set to any command, which would be executed to removed
meillo@131 2585 the specified messages.
meillo@131 2586 This would override the default action, described above.
meillo@131 2587 Refiling the to-be-removed files to a garbage folder is the usual example.
meillo@131 2588 Nmh's man page
meillo@131 2589 .Mp rmm (1)
meillo@131 2590 proposes to set the
meillo@131 2591 .Pe rmmproc
meillo@131 2592 to
meillo@131 2593 .Cl "refile +d
meillo@131 2594 to move messages to the garbage folder,
meillo@131 2595 .Fn +d ,
meillo@131 2596 instead of renaming them with the backup prefix.
meillo@131 2597 The man page proposes additionally the expunge command
meillo@131 2598 .Cl "rm `mhpath +d all`
meillo@131 2599 to empty the garbage folder.
meillo@131 2600 .P
meillo@131 2601 Removing messages in such a way has advantages.
meillo@131 2602 The mail storage is prevented from being cluttered with removed messages
meillo@131 2603 because they are all collected in one place.
meillo@131 2604 Existing and removed messages are thus separated more strictly.
meillo@131 2605 No backup files are silently overwritten.
meillo@131 2606 Most important is the ability to keep removed messages in the MH domain.
meillo@131 2607 Messages in the trash folder can be listed like those in any other folder.
meillo@131 2608 Deleted messages can be displayed like any other messages.
meillo@131 2609 Restoring a deleted messages can be done with
meillo@131 2610 .Pn refile .
meillo@131 2611 All operations on deleted files are still covered by the MH tools.
meillo@131 2612 The trash folder is just like any other folder in the mail storage.
meillo@131 2613 .P
meillo@131 2614 Similar to the draft folder case, I dropped the old backup prefix approach
meillo@131 2615 in favor for replacing it by the better suiting trash folder system.
meillo@131 2616 Hence,
meillo@131 2617 .Pn rmm
meillo@131 2618 calls
meillo@131 2619 .Pn refile
meillo@131 2620 to move the to-be-removed message to the trash folder,
meillo@131 2621 .Fn +trash
meillo@131 2622 by default.
meillo@131 2623 To sweep it clean, one can use
meillo@131 2624 .Cl "rmm -unlink +trash a" ,
meillo@131 2625 where the
meillo@131 2626 .Sw -unlink
meillo@131 2627 switch causes the files to be unlinked.
meillo@131 2628 .P
meillo@131 2629 Dropping the legacy approach and completely converting to the new approach
meillo@131 2630 simplified the code base.
meillo@131 2631 The relationship between
meillo@131 2632 .Pn rmm
meillo@131 2633 and
meillo@131 2634 .Pn refile
meillo@131 2635 was inverted.
meillo@131 2636 In mmh,
meillo@131 2637 .Pn rmm
meillo@131 2638 invokes
meillo@131 2639 .Pn refile ,
meillo@131 2640 which used to be the other way round.
meillo@131 2641 Yet, the relationship is simpler now.
meillo@131 2642 No more can loops, like described in nmh's man page for
meillo@131 2643 .Mp refile (1),
meillo@131 2644 occur:
meillo@131 2645 .QS
meillo@131 2646 Since
meillo@131 2647 .Pn refile
meillo@131 2648 uses your
meillo@131 2649 .Pe rmmproc
meillo@131 2650 to delete the message, the
meillo@131 2651 .Pe rmmproc
meillo@131 2652 must NOT call
meillo@131 2653 .Pn refile
meillo@131 2654 without specifying
meillo@131 2655 .Sw -normmproc
meillo@131 2656 or you will create an infinite loop.
meillo@131 2657 .QE
meillo@131 2658 .LP
meillo@131 2659 .Pn rmm
meillo@131 2660 either unlinks a message with
meillo@131 2661 .Fu unlink()
meillo@131 2662 or invokes
meillo@131 2663 .Pn refile
meillo@131 2664 to move it to the trash folder.
meillo@131 2665 .Pn refile
meillo@131 2666 does not invoke any tools.
meillo@131 2667 .P
meillo@131 2668
meillo@131 2669
meillo@131 2670
meillo@131 2671 Keeping unused alternative in the code is a bad choice as they likely
meillo@131 2672 gather bugs, by not being constantly tested.
meillo@131 2673 Also, the increased code
meillo@131 2674 size and more conditions crease the maintenance costs.
meillo@131 2675
meillo@131 2676 By generalizing the message removal in a way that it becomes covered
meillo@131 2677 by the MH concepts makes the whole system more powerful.
meillo@131 2678
meillo@131 2679
meillo@131 2680
meillo@131 2681
meillo@133 2682 .H2 "Modern Defaults
meillo@133 2683 .P
meillo@133 2684 Nmh has a bunch of convenience-improving features inactive by default,
meillo@133 2685 although one can expect every new user wanting to have them active.
meillo@133 2686 The reason they are inactive by default is the wish to stay compatible
meillo@133 2687 with old versions.
meillo@133 2688 But what is the definition for old versions.
meillo@133 2689 Still, the highly useful draft folder facility is not active by default
meillo@133 2690 although it had been introduced over twenty-five years ago
meillo@133 2691 .[
meillo@133 2692 rose romine real work
meillo@133 2693 .]
meillo@133 2694 \(en the community seems not to care.
meillo@133 2695 This is one of several examples that require new users to build up
meillo@133 2696 their profile before they can access the modern features of nmh.
meillo@133 2697 Without an extensively built-up profile, the setup is hardly usable
meillo@133 2698 for modern emailing.
meillo@133 2699 The point is not the customization of the setup,
meillo@133 2700 but the activating of generally useful facilities.
meillo@133 2701 .P
meillo@133 2702 Yet, the real problem lies less in enabling the features, as this is
meillo@133 2703 straight forward as soon as one knows what he wants.
meillo@133 2704 The real problem is that new users need deep insights into the project
meillo@133 2705 before they find out what they are missing and that nmh actually
meillo@133 2706 provides it already, it just was not activated.
meillo@133 2707 To give an example, I needed one year of using nmh
meillo@133 2708 before I became aware of the existence of the attachment system.
meillo@133 2709 One could argue that this fact disqualifies my reading of the
meillo@133 2710 documentation.
meillo@133 2711 If I would have installed nmh from source back then, I could agree.
meillo@133 2712 Yet, I had used a prepackaged version and had expected that it would
meillo@133 2713 just work.
meillo@133 2714 Nevertheless, I had been convinced by the concepts of MH already
meillo@133 2715 and I am a software developer,
meillo@133 2716 still I required a lot of time to discover the cool features.
meillo@133 2717 How can we expect users to be even more advanced than me,
meillo@133 2718 just to allow them use MH in a convenient and modern way?
meillo@133 2719 Unless they are strongly convinced of the concepts, they will fail.
meillo@133 2720 I have seen friends of me giving up disappointed
meillo@133 2721 before they truly used the system,
meillo@133 2722 although they had been motivated in the beginning.
meillo@133 2723 They suffer hard enough to get used to the toolchest approach,
meillo@133 2724 we should spare them further inconveniences.
meillo@133 2725 .P
meillo@133 2726 Maintaining compatibility for its own sake is for no good.
meillo@133 2727 If any MH implementation would be the back-end of widespread
meillo@133 2728 email clients with large user bases, compatibility would be more
meillo@133 2729 important.
meillo@133 2730 Yet, it appears as if this is not the case.
meillo@133 2731 Hence, compatibility is hardly important for technical reasons.
meillo@133 2732 Its importance originates rather from personal reasons.
meillo@133 2733 Nmh's user base is small and old.
meillo@133 2734 Changing the interfaces would cause inconvenience to long-term users of MH.
meillo@133 2735 It would force them to change their many years old MH configurations.
meillo@133 2736 I do understand this aspect, but it keeps new users from using MH.
meillo@133 2737 By sticking to the old users, new users are kept away.
meillo@133 2738 Yet, the future lies in new users.
meillo@133 2739 Hence, mmh invites new users by providing a convenient and modern setup,
meillo@133 2740 readily usable out-of-the-box.
meillo@133 2741 .P
meillo@133 2742 In mmh, all modern features are active by default.
meillo@133 2743 In consequence, a setup with a profile that defines only the path to the
meillo@133 2744 mail storage, is already convenient to use.
meillo@133 2745 Again, Paul Vixie's ``edginess'' appeal supports the direction I took:
meillo@133 2746 ``the `main branch' should just be modern''.
meillo@133 2747 .[
meillo@133 2748 paul vixie edginess nmh-workers
meillo@133 2749 .]
meillo@133 2750 .P
meillo@133 2751 Modern features that are active in mmh by default include:
meillo@133 2752 .BU
meillo@133 2753 The attachment system (\c
meillo@133 2754 .Hd Attach ).
meillo@133 2755 .Ci 8ff284ff9167eff8f5349481529332d59ed913b1
meillo@133 2756 .BU
meillo@133 2757 The draft folder facility (\c
meillo@133 2758 .Fn +drafts ).
meillo@133 2759 .Ci 337338b404931f06f0db2119c9e145e8ca5a9860
meillo@133 2760 .BU
meillo@133 2761 The unseen sequence (`u')
meillo@133 2762 .Ci c2360569e1d8d3678e294eb7c1354cb8bf7501c1
meillo@133 2763 and the sequence negation prefix (`!').
meillo@133 2764 .Ci db74c2bd004b2dc9bf8086a6d8bf773ac051f3cc
meillo@133 2765 .BU
meillo@133 2766 Quoting the original message in the reply.
meillo@133 2767 .Ci 67411b1f95d6ec987b4c732459e1ba8a8ac192c6
meillo@133 2768 .BU
meillo@133 2769 Forwarding messages using MIME.
meillo@133 2770 .Ci 6e271608b7b9c23771523f88d23a4d3593010cf1
meillo@131 2771
meillo@133 2772
meillo@133 2773
meillo@133 2774
meillo@133 2775
meillo@133 2776 .\" --------------------------------------------------------------
meillo@131 2777 .H1 "Styling
meillo@22 2778 .P
meillo@118 2779 Kernighan and Pike have emphasized the importance of style in the
meillo@118 2780 preface of their book:
meillo@118 2781 .[ [
meillo@118 2782 kernighan pike practice of programming
meillo@118 2783 .], p. x]
meillo@118 2784 .QS
meillo@118 2785 Chapter 1 discusses programming style.
meillo@118 2786 Good style is so important to good programming that we have chose
meillo@118 2787 to cover it first.
meillo@118 2788 .QE
meillo@118 2789 This section covers changes in mmh that were motivated by the desire
meillo@118 2790 to improve on style.
meillo@118 2791 Many of them follow the rules given in the quoted book.
meillo@118 2792 .[
meillo@118 2793 kernighan pike practice of programming
meillo@118 2794 .]
meillo@118 2795
meillo@118 2796
meillo@127 2797
meillo@127 2798
meillo@127 2799 .H2 "Code Style
meillo@118 2800 .P
meillo@118 2801 .U3 "Indentation Style
meillo@118 2802 .P
meillo@118 2803 Indentation styles are the holy cow of programmers.
meillo@118 2804 Again Kernighan and Pike:
meillo@118 2805 .[ [
meillo@118 2806 kernighan pike practice of programming
meillo@118 2807 .], p. 10]
meillo@118 2808 .QS
meillo@118 2809 Programmers have always argued about the layout of programs,
meillo@118 2810 but the specific style is much less important than its consistent
meillo@118 2811 application.
meillo@121 2812 Pick one style, preferably ours, use it consistently, and don't waste
meillo@118 2813 time arguing.
meillo@118 2814 .QE
meillo@118 2815 .P
meillo@118 2816 I agree that the constant application is most important,
meillo@118 2817 but I believe that some styles have advantages over others.
meillo@118 2818 For instance the indentation with tab characters only.
meillo@118 2819 Tab characters directly map to the nesting level \(en
meillo@118 2820 one tab, one level.
meillo@118 2821 Tab characters are flexible because developers can adjust them to
meillo@118 2822 whatever width they like to have.
meillo@118 2823 There is no more need to run
meillo@118 2824 .Pn unexpand
meillo@118 2825 or
meillo@118 2826 .Pn entab
meillo@118 2827 programs to ensure the correct mixture of leading tabs and spaces.
meillo@118 2828 The simple rules are: (1) Leading whitespace must consist of tabs only.
meillo@118 2829 (2) Any other whitespace should consist of spaces.
meillo@121 2830 These two rules ensure the integrity of the visual appearance.
meillo@121 2831 Although reformatting existing code should be avoided, I did it.
meillo@118 2832 I did not waste time arguing; I just did it.
meillo@118 2833 .Ci a485ed478abbd599d8c9aab48934e7a26733ecb1
meillo@118 2834
meillo@118 2835 .U3 "Comments
meillo@118 2836 .P
meillo@118 2837 Section 1.6 of
meillo@118 2838 .[ [
meillo@118 2839 kernighan pike practice of programming
meillo@118 2840 .], p. 23]
meillo@118 2841 demands: ``Don't belabor the obvious.''
meillo@122 2842 Hence, I simply removed all the comments in the following code excerpt:
meillo@118 2843 .VS
meillo@120 2844 context_replace(curfolder, folder); /* update current folder */
meillo@120 2845 seq_setcur(mp, mp->lowsel); /* update current message */
meillo@120 2846 seq_save(mp); /* synchronize message sequences */
meillo@120 2847 folder_free(mp); /* free folder/message structure */
meillo@120 2848 context_save(); /* save the context file */
meillo@120 2849
meillo@120 2850 [...]
meillo@120 2851
meillo@120 2852 int c; /* current character */
meillo@120 2853 char *cp; /* miscellaneous character pointer */
meillo@120 2854
meillo@120 2855 [...]
meillo@120 2856
meillo@120 2857 /* NUL-terminate the field */
meillo@120 2858 *cp = '\0';
meillo@118 2859 VE
meillo@120 2860 .Ci 426543622b377fc5d091455cba685e114b6df674
meillo@118 2861 .P
meillo@118 2862 The names of the functions explain enough already.
meillo@118 2863
meillo@118 2864 .U3 "Names
meillo@118 2865 .P
meillo@118 2866 Kernighan and Pike suggest:
meillo@118 2867 ``Use active names for functions''.
meillo@118 2868 .[ [
meillo@118 2869 kernighan pike practice of programming
meillo@118 2870 .], p. 4]
meillo@118 2871 One application of this rule was the rename of
meillo@118 2872 .Fu check_charset()
meillo@118 2873 to
meillo@118 2874 .Fu is_native_charset() .
meillo@118 2875 .Ci 8d77b48284c58c135a6b2787e721597346ab056d
meillo@118 2876 The same change fixed a violation of ``Be accurate'' as well.
meillo@118 2877 The code did not match the expectation the function suggested,
meillo@118 2878 as it, for whatever reason, only compared the first ten characters
meillo@118 2879 of the charset name.
meillo@118 2880 .P
meillo@118 2881 More important than using active names is using descriptive names.
meillo@118 2882 Renaming the obscure function
meillo@118 2883 .Fu m_unknown()
meillo@118 2884 was a delightful event.
meillo@118 2885 .Ci 611d68d19204d7cbf5bd585391249cb5bafca846
meillo@118 2886 .P
meillo@118 2887 Magic numbers are generally considered bad style.
meillo@118 2888 Obviously, Kernighan and Pike agree:
meillo@118 2889 ``Give names to magic numbers''.
meillo@118 2890 .[ [
meillo@118 2891 kernighan pike practice of programming
meillo@118 2892 .], p. 19]
meillo@118 2893 One such change was naming the type of input \(en mbox or mail folder \(en
meillo@118 2894 to be scanned:
meillo@118 2895 .VS
meillo@118 2896 #define SCN_MBOX (-1)
meillo@118 2897 #define SCN_FOLD 0
meillo@118 2898 VE
meillo@118 2899 .Ci 7ffb36d28e517a6f3a10272056fc127592ab1c19
meillo@118 2900 .P
meillo@118 2901 The argument
meillo@118 2902 .Ar outnum
meillo@118 2903 of the function
meillo@118 2904 .Fu scan()
meillo@118 2905 in
meillo@118 2906 .Fn uip/scansbr.c
meillo@118 2907 defines the number of the message to be created.
meillo@118 2908 If no message is to be created, the argument is misused to transport
meillo@118 2909 program logic.
meillo@118 2910 This lead to obscure code.
meillo@118 2911 I improved the clarity of the code by introducing two variables:
meillo@118 2912 .VS
meillo@118 2913 int incing = (outnum > 0);
meillo@118 2914 int ismbox = (outnum != 0);
meillo@118 2915 VE
meillo@118 2916 They cover the magic values and are used for conditions.
meillo@118 2917 The variable
meillo@118 2918 .Ar outnum
meillo@118 2919 is only used when it holds an ordinary message number.
meillo@118 2920 .Ci b8b075c77be7794f3ae9ff0e8cedb12b48fd139f
meillo@118 2921 The clarity improvement of the change showed detours in the program logic
meillo@118 2922 of related code parts.
meillo@118 2923 Having the new variables with descriptive names, a more
meillo@121 2924 straight forward implementation became apparent.
meillo@118 2925 Before the clarification was done,
meillo@118 2926 the possibility to improve had not be seen.
meillo@118 2927 .Ci aa60b0ab5e804f8befa890c0a6df0e3143ce0723
meillo@118 2928
meillo@133 2929
meillo@133 2930
meillo@133 2931 .H2 "Structural Rework
meillo@133 2932 .P
meillo@133 2933
meillo@118 2934 .U3 "Rework of \f(CWanno\fP
meillo@118 2935 .P
meillo@118 2936 At the end of their chapter on style,
meillo@118 2937 Kernighan and Pike ask: ``But why worry about style?''
meillo@121 2938 The following example of my rework of
meillo@118 2939 .Pn anno
meillo@121 2940 provides an answer why style is important in the first place.
meillo@118 2941 .P
meillo@120 2942 Until 2002,
meillo@120 2943 .Pn anno
meillo@120 2944 had six functional command line switches,
meillo@120 2945 .Sw -component
meillo@120 2946 and
meillo@120 2947 .Sw -text ,
meillo@120 2948 which took an argument each,
meillo@120 2949 and the two pairs of flags,
meillo@120 2950 .Sw -[no]date
meillo@120 2951 and
meillo@120 2952 .Sw -[no]inplace.,
meillo@120 2953 .Sw -component
meillo@120 2954 and
meillo@120 2955 .Sw -text ,
meillo@120 2956 which took an argument each,
meillo@120 2957 and the two pairs of flags,
meillo@120 2958 .Sw -[no]date
meillo@120 2959 and
meillo@120 2960 .Sw -[no]inplace .
meillo@120 2961 Then Jon Steinhart introduced his attachment system.
meillo@120 2962 In need for more advanced annotation handling, he extended
meillo@120 2963 .Pn anno .
meillo@120 2964 He added five more switches:
meillo@120 2965 .Sw -draft ,
meillo@120 2966 .Sw -list ,
meillo@120 2967 .Sw -delete ,
meillo@120 2968 .Sw -append ,
meillo@120 2969 and
meillo@120 2970 .Sw -number ,
meillo@120 2971 the last one taking an argument.
meillo@121 2972 .Ci 7480dbc14bc90f2d872d434205c0784704213252
meillo@120 2973 Later,
meillo@120 2974 .Sw -[no]preserve
meillo@120 2975 was added.
meillo@121 2976 .Ci d9b1d57351d104d7ec1a5621f090657dcce8cb7f
meillo@120 2977 Then, the Synopsis section of the man page
meillo@120 2978 .Mp anno (1)
meillo@120 2979 read:
meillo@120 2980 .VS
meillo@120 2981 anno [+folder] [msgs] [-component field] [-inplace | -noinplace]
meillo@120 2982 [-date | -nodate] [-draft] [-append] [-list] [-delete]
meillo@120 2983 [-number [num|all]] [-preserve | -nopreserve] [-version]
meillo@120 2984 [-help] [-text body]
meillo@120 2985 VE
meillo@120 2986 .LP
meillo@120 2987 The implementation followed the same structure.
meillo@120 2988 Problems became visible when
meillo@120 2989 .Cl "anno -list -number 42
meillo@120 2990 worked on the current message instead on message number 42,
meillo@120 2991 and
meillo@120 2992 .Cl "anno -list -number l:5
meillo@124 2993 did not work on the last five messages but failed with the mysterious
meillo@120 2994 error message: ``anno: missing argument to -list''.
meillo@121 2995 Yet, the invocation matched the specification in the man page.
meillo@120 2996 There, the correct use of
meillo@120 2997 .Sw -number
meillo@120 2998 was defined as being
meillo@120 2999 .Cl "[-number [num|all]]
meillo@120 3000 and the textual description for the combination with
meillo@120 3001 .Sw -list
meillo@120 3002 read:
meillo@120 3003 .QS
meillo@120 3004 The -list option produces a listing of the field bodies for
meillo@120 3005 header fields with names matching the specified component,
meillo@120 3006 one per line. The listing is numbered, starting at 1, if
meillo@120 3007 the -number option is also used.
meillo@120 3008 .QE
meillo@120 3009 .LP
meillo@120 3010 The problem was manifold.
meillo@120 3011 The code required a numeric argument to the
meillo@120 3012 .Sw -number
meillo@120 3013 switch.
meillo@120 3014 If it was missing or non-numeric,
meillo@120 3015 .Pn anno
meillo@120 3016 aborted with an error message that had an off-by-one error,
meillo@120 3017 printing the switch one before the failing one.
meillo@120 3018 Semantically, the argument to the
meillo@120 3019 .Sw -number
meillo@120 3020 switch is only necessary in combination with
meillo@120 3021 .Sw -delete ,
meillo@120 3022 but not with
meillo@120 3023 .Sw -list .
meillo@120 3024 In the former case it is even necessary.
meillo@120 3025 .P
meillo@120 3026 Trying to fix these problems on the surface would not have solved it truly.
meillo@120 3027 The problems discovered originate from a discrepance between the semantic
meillo@120 3028 structure of the problem and the structure implemented in the program.
meillo@120 3029 Such structural differences can not be cured on the surface.
meillo@120 3030 They need to be solved by adjusting the structure of the implementation
meillo@120 3031 to the structure of the problem.
meillo@120 3032 .P
meillo@120 3033 In 2002, the new switches
meillo@120 3034 .Sw -list
meillo@120 3035 and
meillo@120 3036 .Sw -delete
meillo@120 3037 were added in the same way, the
meillo@120 3038 .Sw -number
meillo@120 3039 switch for instance had been added.
meillo@120 3040 Yet, they are of structural different type.
meillo@120 3041 Semantically,
meillo@120 3042 .Sw -list
meillo@120 3043 and
meillo@120 3044 .Sw -delete
meillo@120 3045 introduce modes of operation.
meillo@120 3046 Historically,
meillo@120 3047 .Pn anno
meillo@120 3048 had only one operation mode: adding header fields.
meillo@120 3049 With the extension, it got two moder modes:
meillo@120 3050 listing and deleting header fields.
meillo@120 3051 The structure of the code changes did not pay respect to this
meillo@120 3052 fundamental change to
meillo@120 3053 .Pn anno 's
meillo@120 3054 behavior.
meillo@120 3055 Neither the implementation nor the documentation did clearly
meillo@120 3056 define them as being exclusive modes of operation.
meillo@120 3057 Having identified the problem, I solved it by putting structure into
meillo@120 3058 .Pn anno
meillo@120 3059 and its documentation.
meillo@120 3060 .Ci d54c8db8bdf01e8381890f7729bc0ef4a055ea11
meillo@120 3061 .P
meillo@120 3062 The difference is visible in both, the code and the documentation.
meillo@121 3063 The following code excerpt:
meillo@120 3064 .VS
meillo@120 3065 int delete = -2; /* delete header element if set */
meillo@120 3066 int list = 0; /* list header elements if set */
meillo@120 3067 [...]
meillo@121 3068 case DELETESW: /* delete annotations */
meillo@121 3069 delete = 0;
meillo@121 3070 continue;
meillo@121 3071 case LISTSW: /* produce a listing */
meillo@121 3072 list = 1;
meillo@121 3073 continue;
meillo@120 3074 VE
meillo@121 3075 .LP
meillo@121 3076 was replaced by:
meillo@120 3077 .VS
meillo@120 3078 static enum { MODE_ADD, MODE_DEL, MODE_LIST } mode = MODE_ADD;
meillo@120 3079 [...]
meillo@121 3080 case DELETESW: /* delete annotations */
meillo@121 3081 mode = MODE_DEL;
meillo@121 3082 continue;
meillo@121 3083 case LISTSW: /* produce a listing */
meillo@121 3084 mode = MODE_LIST;
meillo@121 3085 continue;
meillo@120 3086 VE
meillo@120 3087 .LP
meillo@121 3088 The replacement code does not only reflect the problem's structure better,
meillo@121 3089 it is easier to understand as well.
meillo@121 3090 The same applies to the documentation.
meillo@120 3091 The man page was completely reorganized to propagate the same structure.
meillo@121 3092 This is visible in the Synopsis section:
meillo@120 3093 .VS
meillo@120 3094 anno [+folder] [msgs] [-component field] [-text body]
meillo@120 3095 [-append] [-date | -nodate] [-preserve | -nopreserve]
meillo@120 3096 [-Version] [-help]
meillo@120 3097
meillo@120 3098 anno -delete [+folder] [msgs] [-component field] [-text
meillo@120 3099 body] [-number num | all ] [-preserve | -nopreserve]
meillo@120 3100 [-Version] [-help]
meillo@120 3101
meillo@120 3102 anno -list [+folder] [msgs] [-component field] [-number]
meillo@120 3103 [-Version] [-help]
meillo@120 3104 VE
meillo@121 3105 .\" XXX think about explaining the -preserve rework?
meillo@118 3106
meillo@58 3107
meillo@58 3108
meillo@133 3109 .U3 "Path Conversion
meillo@133 3110 .P
meillo@133 3111 FIXME! XXX
meillo@133 3112
meillo@133 3113
meillo@133 3114 commit d39e2c447b0d163a5a63f480b23d06edb7a73aa0
meillo@133 3115 Author: markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
meillo@133 3116 Date: Fri Dec 9 16:34:57 2011 +0100
meillo@133 3117
meillo@133 3118 Completely reworked the path convertion functions
meillo@133 3119 Moved everything (from sbr/getfolder.c and sbr/m_maildir.c) into
meillo@133 3120 sbr/path.c, but actually replaced the code almost completely.
meillo@133 3121 See h/prototypes.h for the function changes.
meillo@133 3122 sbr/path.c provides explaining comments on the functions.
meillo@133 3123 None of them allocates memory automatically.
meillo@133 3124
meillo@133 3125 Additionally:
meillo@133 3126 - Like for other ``files'', `inc -audit file' places file relative
meillo@133 3127 to the cwd, not relative to the mh-dir. This is for consistency.
meillo@133 3128 - Replaced add(foo, NULL) with getcpy(foo), which ist clearer.
meillo@133 3129
meillo@133 3130
meillo@133 3131
meillo@133 3132
meillo@133 3133
meillo@133 3134 .H2 "Profile Reading
meillo@133 3135 .P
meillo@133 3136 FIXME XXX
meillo@133 3137
meillo@133 3138 commit 3e017a7abbdf69bf0dff7a4073275961eda1ded8
meillo@133 3139 Author: markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
meillo@133 3140 Date: Wed Jun 27 14:23:35 2012 +0200
meillo@133 3141
meillo@133 3142 spost: Read profile and context now. Removed -library switch.
meillo@133 3143 spost is a full part of the mmh toolchest, hence, it shall read the
meillo@133 3144 profile/context. This will remove the need to pass profile information
meillo@133 3145 from send to spost via command line switches.
meillo@133 3146 In January 2012, there had been a discussion on the nmh-workers ML
meillo@133 3147 whether post should read the profile/context. There wasn't a clear
meillo@133 3148 answer. It behavior was mainly motivated by the historic situation,
meillo@133 3149 it seems. My opinion on the topic goes into the direction that every
meillo@133 3150 tool that is part of the mmh toolchest should read the profile. That
meillo@133 3151 is a clear and simple concept. Using MH tools without wanting to
meillo@133 3152 interact with MH (like mhmail had been) is no more a practical problem.
meillo@133 3153
meillo@133 3154 commit 32d4f9daaa70519be3072479232ff7be0500d009
meillo@133 3155 Author: markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
meillo@133 3156 Date: Wed Jun 27 13:15:47 2012 +0200
meillo@133 3157
meillo@133 3158 mhmail: Read the context!
meillo@133 3159 mhmail will change from a mailx-replacment to an alternative to
meillo@133 3160 `comp -ed prompter', thus being a send front-end. Hence, mhmail
meillo@133 3161 should not stay outside the profile/context respecting mmh toolchest.
meillo@133 3162
meillo@133 3163
meillo@133 3164 slocal
meillo@133 3165
meillo@133 3166
meillo@133 3167
meillo@127 3168
meillo@121 3169 .H2 "Standard Libraries
meillo@22 3170 .P
meillo@121 3171 MH is one decade older than the POSIX and ANSI C standards.
meillo@121 3172 Hence, MH included own implementations of functions
meillo@121 3173 that are standardized and thus widely available today,
meillo@121 3174 but were not back then.
meillo@121 3175 Today, twenty years after the POSIX and ANSI C were published,
meillo@121 3176 developers can expect system to comply with these standards.
meillo@121 3177 In consequence, MH-specific replacements for standard functions
meillo@121 3178 can and should be dropped.
meillo@121 3179 Kernighan and Pike advise: ``Use standard libraries.''
meillo@121 3180 .[ [
meillo@121 3181 kernighan pike practice of programming
meillo@121 3182 .], p. 196]
meillo@121 3183 Actually, MH had followed this advice in history,
meillo@121 3184 but it had not adjusted to the changes in this field.
meillo@121 3185 The
meillo@121 3186 .Fu snprintf()
meillo@121 3187 function, for instance, was standardized with C99 and is available
meillo@121 3188 almost everywhere because of its high usefulness.
meillo@123 3189 In project's own implementation of
meillo@121 3190 .Fu snprintf()
meillo@123 3191 was dropped in March 2012 in favor for using the one of the
meillo@123 3192 standard library.
meillo@123 3193 .Ci 0052f1024deb0a0a2fc2e5bacf93d45a5a9c9b32
meillo@123 3194 Such decisions limit the portability of mmh
meillo@121 3195 if systems don't support these standardized and widespread functions.
meillo@123 3196 This compromise is made because mmh focuses on the future.
meillo@121 3197 .P
meillo@123 3198 I am not yet thirty years old and my C and Unix experience comprises
meillo@123 3199 only half a dozen years.
meillo@121 3200 Hence, I need to learn about the history in retrospective.
meillo@121 3201 I have not used those ancient constructs myself.
meillo@121 3202 I have not suffered from their incompatibilities.
meillo@121 3203 I have not longed for standardization.
meillo@121 3204 All my programming experience is from a time when ANSI C and POSIX
meillo@121 3205 were well established already.
meillo@121 3206 I have only read a lot of books about the (good) old times.
meillo@121 3207 This puts me in a difficult positions when working with old code.
meillo@123 3208 I need to freshly acquire knowledge about old code constructs and ancient
meillo@123 3209 programming styles, whereas older programmers know these things by
meillo@123 3210 heart from their own experience.
meillo@121 3211 .P
meillo@123 3212 Being aware of the situation, I rather let people with more historic
meillo@123 3213 experience replace ancient code constructs with standardized ones.
meillo@121 3214 Lyndon Nerenberg covered large parts of this task for the nmh project.
meillo@121 3215 He converted project-specific functions to POSIX replacements,
meillo@121 3216 also removing the conditionals compilation of now standardized features.
meillo@123 3217 Ken Hornstein and David Levine had their part in the work, too.
meillo@121 3218 Often, I only needed to pull over changes from nmh into mmh.
meillo@121 3219 These changes include many commits; these are among them:
meillo@121 3220 .Ci 768b5edd9623b7238e12ec8dfc409b82a1ed9e2d
meillo@121 3221 .Ci 0052f1024deb0a0a2fc2e5bacf93d45a5a9c9b32 .
meillo@102 3222 .P
meillo@123 3223 During my own work, I tidied up the \fIMH standard library\fP,
meillo@123 3224 .Fn libmh.a ,
meillo@123 3225 which is located in the
meillo@123 3226 .Fn sbr
meillo@123 3227 (``subroutines'') directory in the source tree.
meillo@123 3228 The MH library includes functions that mmh tools usually need.
meillo@123 3229 Among them are MH-specific functions for profile, context, sequence,
meillo@123 3230 and folder handling, but as well
meillo@123 3231 MH-independent functions, such as auxiliary string functions,
meillo@123 3232 portability interfaces and error-checking wrappers for critical
meillo@123 3233 functions of the standard library.
meillo@123 3234 .P
meillo@123 3235 I have replaced the
meillo@121 3236 .Fu atooi()
meillo@121 3237 function with calls to
meillo@123 3238 .Fu strtoul()
meillo@121 3239 with the third parameter \(en the base \(en set to eight.
meillo@121 3240 .Fu strtoul()
meillo@123 3241 is part of C89 and thus considered safe to use.
meillo@121 3242 .Ci c490c51b3c0f8871b6953bd0c74551404f840a74
meillo@102 3243 .P
meillo@121 3244 I did remove project-included fallback implementations of
meillo@121 3245 .Fu memmove()
meillo@121 3246 and
meillo@121 3247 .Fu strerror() ,
meillo@121 3248 although Peter Maydell had re-included them into nmh in 2008
meillo@121 3249 to support SunOS 4.
meillo@121 3250 Nevertheless, these functions are part of ANSI C.
meillo@121 3251 Systems that do not even provide full ANSI C support should not
meillo@121 3252 put a load on mmh.
meillo@121 3253 .Ci b067ff5c465a5d243ce5a19e562085a9a1a97215
meillo@121 3254 .P
meillo@121 3255 The
meillo@121 3256 .Fu copy()
meillo@121 3257 function copies the string in argument one to the location in two.
meillo@121 3258 In contrast to
meillo@121 3259 .Fu strcpy() ,
meillo@121 3260 it returns a pointer to the terminating null-byte in the destination area.
meillo@123 3261 The code was adjusted to replace
meillo@121 3262 .Fu copy()
meillo@123 3263 with
meillo@121 3264 .Fu strcpy() ,
meillo@121 3265 except within
meillo@121 3266 .Fu concat() ,
meillo@121 3267 where
meillo@121 3268 .Fu copy()
meillo@123 3269 was more convenient.
meillo@123 3270 Therefore, the definition of
meillo@121 3271 .Fu copy()
meillo@123 3272 was moved into the source file of
meillo@121 3273 .Fu concat()
meillo@123 3274 and its visibility is now limited to it.
meillo@121 3275 .Ci 552fd7253e5ee9e554c5c7a8248a6322aa4363bb
meillo@121 3276 .P
meillo@121 3277 The function
meillo@121 3278 .Fu r1bindex()
meillo@121 3279 had been a generalized version of
meillo@121 3280 .Fu basename()
meillo@121 3281 with minor differences.
meillo@121 3282 As all calls to
meillo@121 3283 .Fu r1bindex()
meillo@121 3284 had the slash (`/') as delimiter anyway,
meillo@121 3285 replacing
meillo@121 3286 .Fu r1bindex()
meillo@121 3287 with the more specific and better-named function
meillo@121 3288 .Fu basename()
meillo@121 3289 became desirable.
meillo@121 3290 Unfortunately, many of the 54 calls to
meillo@121 3291 .Fu r1bindex()
meillo@123 3292 depended on a special behavior,
meillo@121 3293 which differed from the POSIX specification for
meillo@121 3294 .Fu basename() .
meillo@121 3295 Hence,
meillo@121 3296 .Fu r1bindex()
meillo@121 3297 was kept but renamed to
meillo@123 3298 .Fu mhbasename() ,
meillo@123 3299 fixing the delimiter to the slash.
meillo@121 3300 .Ci 240013872c392fe644bd4f79382d9f5314b4ea60
meillo@121 3301 For possible uses of
meillo@121 3302 .Fu r1bindex()
meillo@121 3303 with a different delimiter,
meillo@121 3304 the ANSI C function
meillo@121 3305 .Fu strrchr()
meillo@121 3306 provides the core functionality.
meillo@121 3307 .P
meillo@121 3308 The
meillo@121 3309 .Fu ssequal()
meillo@121 3310 function \(en apparently for ``substring equal'' \(en
meillo@121 3311 was renamed to
meillo@121 3312 .Fu isprefix() ,
meillo@121 3313 because this is what it actually checks.
meillo@121 3314 .Ci c20b4fa14515c7ab388ce35411d89a7a92300711
meillo@121 3315 Its source file had included the following comments, no joke.
meillo@121 3316 .VS
meillo@121 3317 /*
meillo@121 3318 * THIS CODE DOES NOT WORK AS ADVERTISED.
meillo@121 3319 * It is actually checking if s1 is a PREFIX of s2.
meillo@121 3320 * All calls to this function need to be checked to see
meillo@121 3321 * if that needs to be changed. Prefix checking is cheaper, so
meillo@121 3322 * should be kept if it's sufficient.
meillo@121 3323 */
meillo@121 3324
meillo@121 3325 /*
meillo@121 3326 * Check if s1 is a substring of s2.
meillo@121 3327 * If yes, then return 1, else return 0.
meillo@121 3328 */
meillo@121 3329 VE
meillo@123 3330 Two months later, it was completely removed by replacing it with
meillo@123 3331 .Fu strncmp() .
meillo@123 3332 .Ci b0b1dd37ff515578cf7cba51625189eb34a196cb
meillo@121 3333
meillo@102 3334
meillo@102 3335
meillo@102 3336
meillo@133 3337
meillo@133 3338 .H2 "User Data Locations
meillo@133 3339 .P
meillo@133 3340 In nmh, a personal setup consists of the MH profile and the MH directory.
meillo@133 3341 The profile is a file named
meillo@133 3342 .Fn \&.mh_profile
meillo@133 3343 in the user's home directory.
meillo@133 3344 It contains the static configuration.
meillo@133 3345 It also contains the location of the MH directory in the profile entry
meillo@133 3346 .Pe Path .
meillo@133 3347 The MH directory contains the mail storage and is the first
meillo@133 3348 place to search for personal forms, scan formats, and similar
meillo@133 3349 configuration files.
meillo@133 3350 The location of the MH directory can be chosen freely by the user.
meillo@133 3351 The default and usual name is a directory named
meillo@133 3352 .Fn Mail
meillo@133 3353 in the home directory.
meillo@133 3354 .P
meillo@133 3355 The way MH data is splitted between profile and MH directory is a legacy.
meillo@133 3356 It is only sensible in a situation where the profile is the only
meillo@133 3357 configuration file.
meillo@133 3358 Why else should the mail storage and the configuration files be intermixed?
meillo@133 3359 They are different kinds of data:
meillo@133 3360 The data to be operated on and the configuration to change how
meillo@133 3361 tools operate.
meillo@133 3362 Splitting the configuration between the profile and the MH directory
meillo@133 3363 is bad.
meillo@133 3364 Merging the mail storage and the configuration in one directory is bad
meillo@133 3365 as well.
meillo@133 3366 As the mail storage and the configuration were not separated sensibly
meillo@133 3367 in the first place, I did it now.
meillo@133 3368 .P
meillo@133 3369 Personal mmh data is grouped by type, resulting in two distinct parts:
meillo@133 3370 The mail storage and the configuration.
meillo@133 3371 In mmh, the mail storage directory still contains all the messages,
meillo@133 3372 but, in exception of public sequences files, nothing else.
meillo@133 3373 In difference to nmh, the auxiliary configuration files are no longer
meillo@133 3374 located there.
meillo@133 3375 Therefore, the directory is no longer called the user's \fIMH directory\fP
meillo@133 3376 but his \fImail storage\fP.
meillo@133 3377 Its location is still user-chosen, with the default name
meillo@133 3378 .Fn Mail ,
meillo@133 3379 in the user's home directory.
meillo@133 3380 In mmh, the configuration is grouped together in
meillo@133 3381 the hidden directory
meillo@133 3382 .Fn \&.mmh
meillo@133 3383 in the user's home directory.
meillo@133 3384 This \fImmh directory\fP contains the context file, personal forms,
meillo@133 3385 scan formats, and the like, but also the user's profile, now named
meillo@133 3386 .Fn profile .
meillo@133 3387 The location of the profile is no longer fixed to
meillo@133 3388 .Fn $HOME/.mh_profile
meillo@133 3389 but to
meillo@133 3390 .Fn $HOME/.mmh/profile .
meillo@133 3391 Having both, the file
meillo@133 3392 .Fn $HOME/.mh_profile
meillo@133 3393 and the configuration directory
meillo@133 3394 .Fn $HOME/.mmh
meillo@133 3395 appeared to be inconsistent.
meillo@133 3396 The approach chosen for mmh is consistent, simple, and familiar to
meillo@133 3397 Unix users.
meillo@133 3398 .P
meillo@133 3399 MH allows users to have multiiple MH setups.
meillo@133 3400 Therefore, it is necessary to select a different profile.
meillo@133 3401 The profile is the single entry point to access the rest of a
meillo@133 3402 personal MH setup.
meillo@133 3403 In nmh, the environment variable
meillo@133 3404 .Ev MH
meillo@133 3405 could be used to specifiy a different profile.
meillo@133 3406 To operate in the same MH setup with a separate context,
meillo@133 3407 the
meillo@133 3408 .Ev MHCONTEXT
meillo@133 3409 environment variable could be used.
meillo@133 3410 This allows having own current folders and current messages in
meillo@133 3411 each terminal, for instance.
meillo@133 3412 In mmh, three environment variables are used.
meillo@133 3413 .Ev MMH
meillo@133 3414 overrides the default location of the mmh directory (\c
meillo@133 3415 .Fn .mmh ).
meillo@133 3416 .Ev MMHP
meillo@133 3417 and
meillo@133 3418 .Ev MMHC
meillo@133 3419 override the paths to the profile and context files, respectively.
meillo@133 3420 This approach allows the set of personal configuration files to be chosen
meillo@133 3421 independently from the profile, context, and mail storage.
meillo@133 3422 .P
meillo@133 3423 The separation of the files by type is sensible and convenient.
meillo@133 3424 The new approach has no functional disadvantages,
meillo@133 3425 as every setup I can imagine can be implemented with both approaches,
meillo@133 3426 possibly even easier with the new approach.
meillo@133 3427 The main achievement of the change is the clear and sensible split
meillo@133 3428 between mail storage and configuration.
meillo@133 3429
meillo@133 3430
meillo@133 3431
meillo@133 3432
meillo@133 3433
meillo@118 3434 .H2 "Modularization
meillo@118 3435 .P
meillo@123 3436 The source code of the mmh tools is located in the
meillo@122 3437 .Fn uip
meillo@123 3438 (``user interface programs'') directory.
meillo@123 3439 Each tools has a source file with the same name.
meillo@122 3440 For example,
meillo@122 3441 .Pn rmm
meillo@122 3442 is built from
meillo@122 3443 .Fn uip/rmm.c .
meillo@123 3444 Some source files are used for multiple programs.
meillo@122 3445 For example
meillo@122 3446 .Fn uip/scansbr.c
meillo@123 3447 is used for both,
meillo@122 3448 .Pn scan
meillo@122 3449 and
meillo@122 3450 .Pn inc .
meillo@122 3451 In nmh, 49 tools were built from 76 source files.
meillo@123 3452 This is a ratio of 1.6 source files per program.
meillo@123 3453 32 programs depended on multiple source files;
meillo@123 3454 17 programs depended on one source file only.
meillo@122 3455 In mmh, 39 tools are built from 51 source files.
meillo@123 3456 This is a ratio of 1.3 source files per program.
meillo@123 3457 18 programs depend on multiple source files;
meillo@123 3458 21 programs depend on one source file only.
meillo@123 3459 (These numbers and the ones in the following text ignore the MH library
meillo@123 3460 as well as shell scripts and multiple names for the same program.)
meillo@122 3461 .P
meillo@123 3462 Splitting the source code of a large program into multiple files can
meillo@122 3463 increase the readability of its source code.
meillo@124 3464 Most of the mmh tools, however, are simple and straight-forward programs.
meillo@122 3465 With the exception of the MIME handling tools,
meillo@122 3466 .Pn pick
meillo@122 3467 is the largest tools.
meillo@122 3468 It contains 1\|037 lines of source code (measured with
meillo@122 3469 .Pn sloccount ), excluding the MH library.
meillo@122 3470 Only the MIME handling tools (\c
meillo@122 3471 .Pn mhbuild ,
meillo@122 3472 .Pn mhstore ,
meillo@122 3473 .Pn show ,
meillo@122 3474 etc.)
meillo@122 3475 are larger.
meillo@122 3476 Splitting programs with less than 1\|000 lines of code into multiple
meillo@123 3477 source files seldom leads to better readability.
meillo@123 3478 For such tools, splitting makes sense
meillo@122 3479 when parts of the code are reused in other programs,
meillo@122 3480 and the reused code fragment is not general enough
meillo@122 3481 for including it in the MH library,
meillo@124 3482 or, if the code has dependencies on a library that only few programs need.
meillo@122 3483 .Fn uip/packsbr.c ,
meillo@122 3484 for instance, provides the core program logic for the
meillo@122 3485 .Pn packf
meillo@122 3486 and
meillo@122 3487 .Pn rcvpack
meillo@122 3488 programs.
meillo@122 3489 .Fn uip/packf.c
meillo@122 3490 and
meillo@122 3491 .Fn uip/rcvpack.c
meillo@122 3492 mainly wrap the core function appropriately.
meillo@122 3493 No other tools use the folder packing functions.
meillo@123 3494 As another example,
meillo@123 3495 .Fn uip/termsbr.c
meillo@123 3496 provides termcap support, which requires linking with a termcap or
meillo@123 3497 curses library.
meillo@123 3498 Including
meillo@123 3499 .Fn uip/termsbr.c
meillo@123 3500 into the MH library would require every program to be linked with
meillo@123 3501 termcap or curses, although only few of the programs require it.
meillo@122 3502 .P
meillo@122 3503 The task of MIME handling is complex enough that splitting its code
meillo@122 3504 into multiple source files improves the readability.
meillo@122 3505 The program
meillo@122 3506 .Pn mhstore ,
meillo@122 3507 for instance, is compiled out of seven source files with 2\|500
meillo@122 3508 lines of code in summary.
meillo@122 3509 The main code file
meillo@122 3510 .Fn uip/mhstore.c
meillo@123 3511 consists of 800 lines; the other 1\|700 lines of code are reused in
meillo@123 3512 other MIME handling tools.
meillo@123 3513 It seems to be worthwhile to bundle the generic MIME handling code into
meillo@123 3514 a MH-MIME library, as a companion to the MH standard library.
meillo@122 3515 This is left open for the future.
meillo@122 3516 .P
meillo@123 3517 The work already done, focussed on the non-MIME tools.
meillo@122 3518 The amount of code compiled into each program was reduced.
meillo@123 3519 This eases the understanding of the code base.
meillo@122 3520 In nmh,
meillo@122 3521 .Pn comp
meillo@122 3522 was built from six source files:
meillo@122 3523 .Fn comp.c ,
meillo@122 3524 .Fn whatnowproc.c ,
meillo@122 3525 .Fn whatnowsbr.c ,
meillo@122 3526 .Fn sendsbr.c ,
meillo@122 3527 .Fn annosbr.c ,
meillo@122 3528 and
meillo@122 3529 .Fn distsbr.c .
meillo@122 3530 In mmh, it builds from only two:
meillo@122 3531 .Fn comp.c
meillo@122 3532 and
meillo@122 3533 .Fn whatnowproc.c .
meillo@123 3534 In nmh's
meillo@123 3535 .Pn comp ,
meillo@123 3536 the core function of
meillo@122 3537 .Pn whatnow ,
meillo@122 3538 .Pn send ,
meillo@122 3539 and
meillo@122 3540 .Pn anno
meillo@123 3541 were compiled into
meillo@122 3542 .Pn comp .
meillo@123 3543 This saved the need to execute these programs with
meillo@122 3544 .Fu fork()
meillo@122 3545 and
meillo@122 3546 .Fu exec() ,
meillo@122 3547 two expensive system calls.
meillo@122 3548 Whereis this approach improved the time performance,
meillo@122 3549 it interweaved the source code.
meillo@122 3550 Core functionalities were not encapsulated into programs but into
meillo@122 3551 function, which were then wrapped by programs.
meillo@122 3552 For example,
meillo@122 3553 .Fn uip/annosbr.c
meillo@122 3554 included the function
meillo@122 3555 .Fu annotate() .
meillo@122 3556 Each program that wanted to annotate messages, included the source file
meillo@123 3557 .Fn uip/annosbr.c
meillo@123 3558 and called
meillo@123 3559 .Fu annotate() .
meillo@123 3560 Because the function
meillo@123 3561 .Fu annotate()
meillo@123 3562 was used like the tool
meillo@123 3563 .Pn anno ,
meillo@123 3564 it had seven parameters, reflecting the command line switches of the tool.
meillo@122 3565 When another pair of command line switches was added to
meillo@122 3566 .Pn anno ,
meillo@122 3567 a rather ugly hack was implemented to avoid adding another parameter
meillo@122 3568 to the function.
meillo@122 3569 .Ci d9b1d57351d104d7ec1a5621f090657dcce8cb7f
meillo@122 3570 .P
meillo@122 3571 Separation simplifies the understanding of program code
meillo@122 3572 because the area influenced by any particular statement is smaller.
meillo@122 3573 The separating on the program-level is more strict than the separation
meillo@122 3574 on the function level.
meillo@122 3575 In mmh, the relevant code of
meillo@122 3576 .Pn comp
meillo@122 3577 comprises the two files
meillo@122 3578 .Fn uip/comp.c
meillo@122 3579 and
meillo@122 3580 .Fn uip/whatnowproc.c ,
meillo@123 3581 together 210 lines of code.
meillo@122 3582 In nmh,
meillo@122 3583 .Pn comp
meillo@122 3584 comprises six files with 2\|450 lines.
meillo@123 3585 Not all of the code in these six files was actually used by
meillo@122 3586 .Pn comp ,
meillo@123 3587 but the code reader needed to read all of the code first to know which
meillo@123 3588 parts were used.
meillo@122 3589 .P
meillo@123 3590 As I have read a lot in the code base during the last two years,
meillo@123 3591 I learned about the easy and the difficult parts.
meillo@123 3592 Code is easy to understand if:
meillo@123 3593 .BU
meillo@123 3594 The influenced code area is small
meillo@123 3595 .BU
meillo@124 3596 The boundaries are strictly defined
meillo@123 3597 .BU
meillo@123 3598 The code is written straight-forward
meillo@123 3599 .P
meillo@123 3600 .\" XXX move this paragraph somewhere else?
meillo@123 3601 Reading
meillo@122 3602 .Pn rmm 's
meillo@122 3603 source code in
meillo@122 3604 .Fn uip/rmm.c
meillo@122 3605 is my recommendation for a beginner's entry point into the code base of nmh.
meillo@122 3606 The reasons are that the task of
meillo@122 3607 .Pn rmm
meillo@122 3608 is straight forward and it consists of one small source code file only,
meillo@122 3609 yet its source includes code constructs typical for MH tools.
meillo@122 3610 With the introduction of the trash folder in mmh,
meillo@122 3611 .Pn rmm
meillo@122 3612 became a bit more complex, because it invokes
meillo@122 3613 .Pn refile .
meillo@122 3614 Still, it is a good example for a simple tool with clear sources.
meillo@122 3615 .P
meillo@122 3616 Understanding
meillo@122 3617 .Pn comp
meillo@122 3618 requires to read 210 lines of code in mmh, but ten times as much in nmh.
meillo@123 3619 Due to the aforementioned hack in
meillo@122 3620 .Pn anno
meillo@122 3621 to save the additional parameter, information passed through the program's
meillo@122 3622 source base in obscure ways.
meillo@123 3623 Thus, understanding
meillo@122 3624 .Pn comp ,
meillo@123 3625 required understanding the inner workings of
meillo@122 3626 .Fn uip/annosbr.c
meillo@122 3627 first.
meillo@123 3628 To be sure to fully understand a program, its whole source code needs
meillo@122 3629 to be examined.
meillo@123 3630 Not doing so is a leap of faith, assuming that the developers
meillo@122 3631 have avoided obscure programming techniques.
meillo@122 3632 By separating the tools on the program-level, the boundaries are
meillo@122 3633 clearly visible and technically enforced.
meillo@122 3634 The interfaces are calls to
meillo@122 3635 .Fu exec()
meillo@122 3636 rather than arbitrary function calls.
meillo@123 3637 .P
meillo@123 3638 But the real problem is another:
meillo@123 3639 Nmh violates the golden ``one tool, one job'' rule of the Unix philosophy.
meillo@123 3640 Understanding
meillo@122 3641 .Pn comp
meillo@123 3642 requires understanding
meillo@123 3643 .Fn uip/annosbr.c
meillo@123 3644 and
meillo@123 3645 .Fn uip/sendsbr.c
meillo@123 3646 because
meillo@123 3647 .Pn comp
meillo@123 3648 does annotate and send messages.
meillo@123 3649 In nmh, there surely exists the tool
meillo@122 3650 .Pn send ,
meillo@123 3651 which does (almost) only send messages.
meillo@123 3652 But
meillo@122 3653 .Pn comp
meillo@123 3654 and
meillo@122 3655 .Pn repl
meillo@122 3656 and
meillo@122 3657 .Pn forw
meillo@122 3658 and
meillo@122 3659 .Pn dist
meillo@122 3660 and
meillo@122 3661 .Pn whatnow
meillo@122 3662 and
meillo@123 3663 .Pn viamail ,
meillo@123 3664 they all (!) have the same message sending function included, too.
meillo@123 3665 In result,
meillo@123 3666 .Pn comp
meillo@123 3667 sends messages without using
meillo@123 3668 .Pn send .
meillo@123 3669 The situation is the same as if
meillo@123 3670 .Pn grep
meillo@123 3671 would page without
meillo@123 3672 .Pn more
meillo@123 3673 just because both programs are part of the same code base.
meillo@123 3674 .P
meillo@122 3675 The clear separation on the surface \(en the toolchest approach \(en
meillo@123 3676 is violated on the level below.
meillo@122 3677 This violation is for the sake of time performance.
meillo@122 3678 On systems where
meillo@122 3679 .Fu fork()
meillo@122 3680 and
meillo@122 3681 .Fu exec()
meillo@122 3682 are expensive, the quicker response might be noticable.
meillo@124 3683 In the old times, sacrificing readability and conceptional beauty for
meillo@124 3684 speed might even have been a must to prevent MH from being unusably slow.
meillo@122 3685 Whatever the reasons had been, today they are gone.
meillo@123 3686 No longer should we sacrifice readability or conceptional beauty.
meillo@122 3687 No longer should we violate the Unix philosophy's ``one tool, one job''
meillo@122 3688 guideline.
meillo@123 3689 No longer should we keep speed improvements that became unnecessary.
meillo@122 3690 .P
meillo@123 3691 Therefore, mmh's
meillo@123 3692 .Pn comp
meillo@123 3693 does no longer send messages.
meillo@123 3694 In mmh, different jobs are divided among separate programs that
meillo@122 3695 invoke each other as needed.
meillo@123 3696 In consequence,
meillo@123 3697 .Pn comp
meillo@123 3698 invokes
meillo@123 3699 .Pn whatnow
meillo@123 3700 which thereafter invokes
meillo@123 3701 .Pn send .
meillo@123 3702 The clear separation on the surface is maintained on the level below.
meillo@123 3703 Human users and the tools use the same interface \(en
meillo@123 3704 annotations, for example, are made by invoking
meillo@123 3705 .Pn anno ,
meillo@123 3706 no matter if requested by programs or by human beings.
meillo@123 3707 The decrease of tools built from multiple source files and thus
meillo@123 3708 the decrease of
meillo@123 3709 .Fn uip/*sbr.c
meillo@123 3710 files confirm the improvement.
meillo@123 3711 .P
meillo@123 3712 One disadvantage needs to be taken with this change:
meillo@123 3713 The compiler can no longer check the integrity of the interfaces.
meillo@123 3714 By changing the command line interfaces of tools, it is
meillo@123 3715 the developer's job to adjust the invocations of these tools as well.
meillo@123 3716 As this is a manual task and regression tests, which could detect such
meillo@124 3717 problems, are not available yet, it is prone to errors.
meillo@123 3718 These errors will not be detected at compile time but at run time.
meillo@123 3719 Installing regression tests is a task left to do.
meillo@123 3720 In the best case, a uniform way of invoking tools from other tools
meillo@123 3721 can be developed to allow automated testing at compile time.