docs/master

annotate discussion.roff @ 131:7c741bc8f719

Reorganized: Converted 4-parted discussion into 3-parted discussion.
author markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
date Tue, 03 Jul 2012 11:11:12 +0200
parents 0b9aa74ced4d
children 02660c14f6a8
rev   line source
meillo@58 1 .H0 "Discussion
meillo@0 2 .P
meillo@58 3 This main chapter discusses the practical work done in the mmh project.
meillo@104 4 It is structured along the goals to achieve.
meillo@104 5 The concrete work done
meillo@58 6 is described in the examples of how the general goals were achieved.
meillo@87 7 The discussion compares the current version of mmh with the state of
meillo@87 8 nmh just before the mmh project started, i.e. Fall 2011.
meillo@87 9 Current changes of nmh will be mentioned only as side notes.
meillo@87 10 .\" XXX where do I discuss the parallel development of nmh?
meillo@58 11
meillo@58 12
meillo@58 13
meillo@125 14 .H1 "Streamlining
meillo@58 15
meillo@0 16 .P
meillo@58 17 MH had been considered an all-in-one system for mail handling.
meillo@58 18 The community around nmh has a similar understanding.
meillo@87 19 In fundamental difference, mmh shall be a MUA only.
meillo@87 20 I believe that the development of all-in-one mail systems is obsolete.
meillo@87 21 Today, email is too complex to be fully covered by single projects.
meillo@87 22 Such a project won't be able to excel in all aspects.
meillo@87 23 Instead, the aspects of email should be covered my multiple projects,
meillo@87 24 which then can be combined to form a complete system.
meillo@87 25 Excellent implementations for the various aspects of email exist already.
meillo@87 26 Just to name three examples: Postfix is a specialized MTA,
meillo@87 27 Procmail is a specialized MDA, and Fetchmail is a specialized MRA.
meillo@89 28 I believe that it is best to use such specialized tools instead of
meillo@87 29 providing the same function again as a side-component in the project.
meillo@58 30 .P
meillo@87 31 Doing something well, requires to focus on a small set of specific aspects.
meillo@87 32 Under the assumption that focused development produces better results
meillo@100 33 in the particular area, specialized projects will be superior
meillo@87 34 in their field of focus.
meillo@87 35 Hence, all-in-one mail system projects \(en no matter if monolithic
meillo@87 36 or modular \(en will never be the best choice in any of the fields.
meillo@87 37 Even in providing the best consistent all-in-one system they are likely
meillo@87 38 to be beaten by projects that focus only on integrating existing mail
meillo@89 39 components to a homogeneous system.
meillo@87 40 .P
meillo@87 41 The limiting resource in Free Software community development
meillo@87 42 is usually man power.
meillo@87 43 If the development power is spread over a large development area,
meillo@87 44 it becomes even more difficult to compete with the specialists in the
meillo@87 45 various fields.
meillo@87 46 The concrete situation for MH-based mail systems is even tougher,
meillo@87 47 given the small and aged community, including both developers and users,
meillo@87 48 it has.
meillo@87 49 .P
meillo@87 50 In consequence, I believe that the available development resources
meillo@100 51 should focus on the point where MH is most unique.
meillo@87 52 This is clearly the user interface \(en the MUA.
meillo@125 53 Peripheral parts should be removed to streamline mmh for the MUA task.
meillo@60 54
meillo@60 55
meillo@100 56 .H2 "Mail Transfer Facilities
meillo@60 57 .P
meillo@60 58 In contrast to nmh, which also provides mail submission and mail retrieval
meillo@87 59 agents, mmh is a MUA only.
meillo@100 60 This general difference initiated the development of mmh.
meillo@66 61 Removing the mail transfer facilities had been the first work task
meillo@76 62 in the mmh project.
meillo@60 63 .P
meillo@105 64 Focusing on one mail agent role only is motivated by Eric Allman's
meillo@105 65 experience with Sendmail.
meillo@105 66 He identified limiting Sendmail the MTA task had be one reason for
meillo@105 67 its success:
meillo@105 68 .[ [
meillo@105 69 costales sendmail
meillo@105 70 .], p. xviii]
meillo@105 71 .QS
meillo@105 72 Second, I limited myself to the routing function \(en
meillo@110 73 I wouldn't write user agents or delivery back-ends.
meillo@105 74 This was a departure of the dominant through of the time,
meillo@105 75 in which routing logic, local delivery, and often the network code
meillo@105 76 were incorporated directly into the user agents.
meillo@105 77 .QE
meillo@105 78 .P
meillo@105 79 In mmh, the Mail Submission Agent (MSA) is called
meillo@105 80 \fIMessage Transfer Service\fP (MTS).
meillo@105 81 This facility, implemented by the
meillo@105 82 .Pn post
meillo@105 83 command, established network connections and spoke SMTP to submit
meillo@60 84 messages for relay to the outside world.
meillo@105 85 The changes in email demanded changes in this part of nmh too.
meillo@89 86 Encryption and authentication for network connections
meillo@87 87 needed to be supported, hence TLS and SASL were introduced into nmh.
meillo@87 88 This added complexity to nmh without improving it in its core functions.
meillo@87 89 Also, keeping up with recent developments in the field of
meillo@87 90 mail transfer requires development power and specialists.
meillo@87 91 In mmh this whole facility was simply cut off.
meillo@76 92 .Ci f6aa95b724fd8c791164abe7ee5468bf5c34f226
meillo@76 93 .Ci fecd5d34f65597a4dfa16aeabea7d74b191532c3
meillo@76 94 .Ci 156d35f6425bea4c1ed3c4c79783dc613379c65b
meillo@87 95 Instead, mmh depends on an external MSA.
meillo@60 96 The only outgoing interface available to mmh is the
meillo@60 97 .Pn sendmail
meillo@87 98 command, which almost any MSA provides.
meillo@87 99 If not, a wrapper program can be written.
meillo@87 100 It must read the message from the standard input, extract the
meillo@87 101 recipient addresses from the message header, and hand the message
meillo@87 102 over to the MSA.
meillo@87 103 For example, a wrapper script for qmail would be:
meillo@87 104 .VS
meillo@87 105 #!/bin/sh
meillo@87 106 # ignore command line arguments
meillo@87 107 exec qmail-inject
meillo@87 108 VE
meillo@87 109 The requirement to parse the recipient addresses out of the message header
meillo@87 110 is likely to be removed in the future.
meillo@87 111 Then mmh would give the recipient addresses as command line arguments.
meillo@100 112 This appears to be the better interface.
meillo@87 113 .\" XXX implement it
meillo@60 114 .P
meillo@60 115 To retrieve mail, the
meillo@60 116 .Pn inc
meillo@100 117 command acted as Mail Retrieval Agent (MRA).
meillo@100 118 It established network connections
meillo@76 119 and spoke POP3 to retrieve mail from remote servers.
meillo@76 120 As with mail submission, the network connections required encryption and
meillo@87 121 authentication, thus TLS and SASL were added.
meillo@87 122 Support for message retrieval through IMAP will become necessary
meillo@100 123 to be added soon, too, and likewise for any other changes in mail transfer.
meillo@100 124 Not so for mmh because it has dropped the support for retrieving mail
meillo@100 125 from remote locations.
meillo@76 126 .Ci ab7b48411962d26439f92f35ed084d3d6275459c
meillo@76 127 Instead, it depends on an external tool to cover this task.
meillo@100 128 In mmh exist two paths for messages to enter mmh's mail storage:
meillo@100 129 (1) Mail can be incorporated with
meillo@60 130 .Pn inc
meillo@87 131 from the system maildrop, or (2) with
meillo@60 132 .Pn rcvstore
meillo@87 133 by reading them, one at a time, from the standard input.
meillo@60 134 .P
meillo@60 135 With the removal of the MSA and MRA, mmh converted from an all-in-one
meillo@87 136 mail system to being a MUA only.
meillo@60 137 Now, of course, mmh depends on third-party software.
meillo@87 138 An external MSA is required to transfer mail to the outside world;
meillo@60 139 an external MRA is required to retrieve mail from remote machines.
meillo@60 140 There exist excellent implementations of such software,
meillo@76 141 which do this specific task likely better than the internal
meillo@87 142 versions had done it.
meillo@87 143 Also, the best suiting programs can be freely chosen.
meillo@60 144 .P
meillo@60 145 As it had already been possible to use an external MSA or MRA,
meillo@60 146 why not keep the internal version for convenience?
meillo@76 147 The question whether there is sense in having a fall-back pager in all
meillo@76 148 the command line tools, for the cases when
meillo@60 149 .Pn more
meillo@60 150 or
meillo@60 151 .Pn less
meillo@76 152 aren't available, appears to be ridiculous.
meillo@100 153 Of course, MSAs and MRAs are more complex than text pagers
meillo@87 154 and not necessarily available but still the concept of orthogonal
meillo@87 155 design holds: ``Write programs that do one thing and do it well.''
meillo@87 156 .[
meillo@87 157 mcilroy unix phil
meillo@87 158 p. 53
meillo@87 159 .]
meillo@87 160 .[
meillo@87 161 mcilroy bstj foreword
meillo@87 162 .]
meillo@87 163 Here, this part of the Unix philosophy was applied not only
meillo@87 164 to the programs but to the project itself.
meillo@87 165 In other words:
meillo@87 166 ``Develop projects that focus on one thing and do it well.''
meillo@87 167 Projects grown complex should be split for the same reasons programs grown
meillo@87 168 complex should be split.
meillo@100 169 If it is conceptionally more elegant to have the MSA and MRA as
meillo@87 170 separate projects then they should be separated.
meillo@87 171 This is the case here, in my opinion.
meillo@87 172 The RFCs propose this separation by clearly distinguishing the different
meillo@87 173 mail handling tasks.
meillo@87 174 .[
meillo@87 175 rfc 821
meillo@87 176 .]
meillo@87 177 The small interfaces between the mail agents support the separation.
meillo@76 178 .P
meillo@87 179 In the beginning, email had been small and simple.
meillo@100 180 At that time,
meillo@60 181 .Pn /bin/mail
meillo@100 182 had covered anything there was to email and still had been small
meillo@100 183 and simple.
meillo@100 184 Later, the essential complexity of email increased.
meillo@87 185 (Essential complexity is the complexity defined by the problem itself.\0
meillo@87 186 .[[
meillo@87 187 brooks no silver bullet
meillo@87 188 .]])
meillo@87 189 Email systems reacted to this change: They grew.
meillo@100 190 RFCs started to introduce the concept of mail agents to separate the
meillo@100 191 various tasks because they became more extensive and new tasks appeared.
meillo@100 192 As the mail systems grew even more, parts were split off.
meillo@100 193 In nmh, for instance, the POP server, which was included in the original
meillo@100 194 MH, was removed.
meillo@100 195 Now is the time to go one step further and split the MSA and MRA off, too.
meillo@87 196 Not only does this decrease the code size of the project,
meillo@87 197 but, more important, it unburdens mmh of the whole field of
meillo@87 198 message transfer with all its implications for the project.
meillo@100 199 There is no more need to concern with changes in network transfer.
meillo@76 200 This independence is received by depending on an external program
meillo@76 201 that covers the field.
meillo@76 202 Today, this is a reasonable exchange.
meillo@60 203 .P
meillo@100 204 Functionality can be added in three different ways:
meillo@87 205 .BU
meillo@87 206 Implementing the function originally in the project.
meillo@87 207 .BU
meillo@87 208 Depending on a library that provides the function.
meillo@87 209 .BU
meillo@87 210 Depending on a program that provides the function.
meillo@87 211 .P
meillo@87 212 Whereas adding the function originally to the project increases the
meillo@76 213 code size most and requires most maintenance and development work,
meillo@87 214 it makes the project most independent of other software.
meillo@87 215 Using libraries or external programs require less maintenance work
meillo@87 216 but introduces dependencies on external software.
meillo@87 217 Programs have the smallest interfaces and provide the best separation
meillo@87 218 but possibly limit the information exchange.
meillo@87 219 External libraries are stronger connected than external programs,
meillo@87 220 thus information can be exchanged more flexible.
meillo@87 221 Adding code to a project increases maintenance work.
meillo@87 222 .\" XXX ref
meillo@100 223 Implementing complex functions originally in the project adds
meillo@87 224 a lot of code.
meillo@87 225 This should be avoided if possible.
meillo@66 226 Hence, the dependencies only change in kind, not in their existence.
meillo@66 227 In mmh, library dependencies on
meillo@66 228 .Pn libsasl2
meillo@66 229 and
meillo@66 230 .Pn libcrypto /\c
meillo@66 231 .Pn libssl
meillo@66 232 were treated against program dependencies on an MSA and an MRA.
meillo@87 233 This also meant treating build-time dependencies against run-time
meillo@87 234 dependencies.
meillo@66 235 Besides program dependencies providing the stronger separation
meillo@66 236 and being more flexible, they also allowed
meillo@66 237 over 6\|000 lines of code to be removed from mmh.
meillo@66 238 This made mmh's code base about 12\|% smaller.
meillo@87 239 Reducing the project's code size by such an amount without actually
meillo@87 240 losing functionality is a convincing argument.
meillo@87 241 Actually, as external MSAs and MRAs are likely superior to the
meillo@87 242 project's internal versions, the common user even gains functionality.
meillo@66 243 .P
meillo@76 244 Users of MH should not have problems to set up an external MSA and MRA.
meillo@60 245 Also, the popular MSAs and MRAs have large communities and a lot
meillo@60 246 of documentation available.
meillo@87 247 Choices for MSAs range from full-featured MTAs like
meillo@60 248 .I Postfix
meillo@87 249 over mid-size MTAs like
meillo@60 250 .I masqmail
meillo@60 251 and
meillo@60 252 .I dma
meillo@60 253 to small forwarders like
meillo@60 254 .I ssmtp
meillo@60 255 and
meillo@60 256 .I nullmailer .
meillo@60 257 Choices for MRAs include
meillo@60 258 .I fetchmail ,
meillo@60 259 .I getmail ,
meillo@60 260 .I mpop
meillo@60 261 and
meillo@60 262 .I fdm .
meillo@60 263
meillo@60 264
meillo@100 265 .H2 "Non-MUA Tools
meillo@60 266 .P
meillo@87 267 One goal of mmh is to remove the tools that are not part of the MUA's task.
meillo@89 268 Further more, any tools that don't improve the MUA's job significantly
meillo@87 269 should be removed.
meillo@87 270 Loosely related and rarely used tools distract from the lean appearance.
meillo@87 271 They require maintenance work without adding much to the core task.
meillo@125 272 By removing these tools, the project shall become more streamlined
meillo@87 273 and focused.
meillo@76 274 In mmh the following tools are not available anymore:
meillo@62 275 .BU
meillo@58 276 .Pn conflict
meillo@87 277 was removed
meillo@76 278 .Ci 8b235097cbd11d728c07b966cf131aa7133ce5a9
meillo@87 279 because it is a mail system maintenance tool that is not MUA-related.
meillo@87 280 It even checked
meillo@58 281 .Fn /etc/passwd
meillo@58 282 and
meillo@58 283 .Fn /etc/group
meillo@87 284 for consistency, which is completely unrelated to email.
meillo@87 285 A tool like
meillo@87 286 .Pn conflict
meillo@87 287 is surely useful, but it should not be shipped with mmh.
meillo@76 288 .\" XXX historic reasons?
meillo@62 289 .BU
meillo@58 290 .Pn rcvtty
meillo@87 291 was removed
meillo@87 292 .Ci 14767c94b3827be7c867196467ed7aea5f6f49b0
meillo@89 293 because its use case of writing to the user's terminal
meillo@76 294 on receiving of mail is obsolete.
meillo@87 295 If users like to be informed of new mail, the shell's
meillo@58 296 .Ev MAILPATH
meillo@87 297 variable or graphical notifications are technically more appealing.
meillo@100 298 Writing directly to terminals is hardly ever wanted today.
meillo@62 299 If though one wants to have it this way, the standard tool
meillo@58 300 .Pn write
meillo@58 301 can be used in a way similar to:
meillo@82 302 .VS
meillo@58 303 scan -file - | write `id -un`
meillo@82 304 VE
meillo@62 305 .BU
meillo@58 306 .Pn viamail
meillo@87 307 was removed
meillo@87 308 .Ci eda72d6a7a7c20ff123043fb7f19c509ea01f932
meillo@87 309 when the new attachment system was activated, because
meillo@58 310 .Pn forw
meillo@76 311 could then cover the task itself.
meillo@62 312 The program
meillo@58 313 .Pn sendfiles
meillo@62 314 was rewritten as a shell script wrapper around
meillo@58 315 .Pn forw .
meillo@76 316 .Ci 0e82199cf3c991a173e0ac8aa776efdb3ded61e6
meillo@62 317 .BU
meillo@58 318 .Pn msgchk
meillo@87 319 was removed
meillo@87 320 .Ci bb9360ead7eb7a3fedcce2eeedfc660014e41dbe ,
meillo@87 321 because it lost its use case when POP support was removed.
meillo@76 322 A call to
meillo@58 323 .Pn msgchk
meillo@87 324 provided hardly more information than:
meillo@82 325 .VS
meillo@58 326 ls -l /var/mail/meillo
meillo@82 327 VE
meillo@100 328 It did distinguish between old and new mail, but
meillo@100 329 this detail information can be retrieved with
meillo@76 330 .Pn stat (1),
meillo@62 331 too.
meillo@100 332 A small shell script could be written to print the information
meillo@76 333 in a similar way, if truly necessary.
meillo@76 334 As mmh's
meillo@76 335 .Pn inc
meillo@87 336 only incorporates mail from the user's local maildrop,
meillo@62 337 and thus no data transfers over slow networks are involved,
meillo@76 338 there's hardly any need to check for new mail before incorporating it.
meillo@62 339 .BU
meillo@58 340 .Pn msh
meillo@87 341 was removed
meillo@76 342 .Ci 916690191222433a6923a4be54b0d8f6ac01bd02
meillo@87 343 because the tool was in conflict with the philosophy of MH.
meillo@76 344 It provided an interactive shell to access the features of MH,
meillo@76 345 but it wasn't just a shell, tailored to the needs of mail handling.
meillo@76 346 Instead it was one large program that had several MH tools built in.
meillo@76 347 This conflicts with the major feature of MH of being a tool chest.
meillo@76 348 .Pn msh 's
meillo@76 349 main use case had been accessing Bulletin Boards, which have seized to
meillo@62 350 be popular.
meillo@62 351 .P
meillo@62 352 Removing
meillo@58 353 .Pn msh ,
meillo@76 354 together with the truly archaic code relicts
meillo@58 355 .Pn vmh
meillo@58 356 and
meillo@58 357 .Pn wmh ,
meillo@62 358 saved more than 7\|000 lines of C code \(en
meillo@66 359 about 15\|% of the project's original source code amount.
meillo@100 360 Having less code \(en with equal readability, of course \(en
meillo@76 361 for the same functionality is an advantage.
meillo@63 362 Less code means less bugs and less maintenance work.
meillo@76 363 As
meillo@63 364 .Pn rcvtty
meillo@63 365 and
meillo@63 366 .Pn msgchk
meillo@87 367 are assumed to be rarely used and can be implemented in different ways,
meillo@87 368 why should one keep them?
meillo@125 369 Removing them streamlines mmh.
meillo@63 370 .Pn viamail 's
meillo@63 371 use case is now partly obsolete and partly covered by
meillo@63 372 .Pn forw ,
meillo@76 373 hence there's no reason to still maintain it.
meillo@63 374 .Pn conflict
meillo@76 375 is not related to the mail client, and
meillo@63 376 .Pn msh
meillo@63 377 conflicts with the basic concept of MH.
meillo@76 378 Theses two tools might still be useful, but they should not be part of mmh.
meillo@63 379 .P
meillo@76 380 Finally, there's
meillo@76 381 .Pn slocal .
meillo@76 382 .Pn slocal
meillo@76 383 is an MDA and thus not directly MUA-related.
meillo@100 384 It should be removed from mmh, because including it conflicts with
meillo@100 385 the idea that mmh is a MUA only.
meillo@100 386 .Pn slocal
meillo@100 387 should rather become a separate project.
meillo@87 388 However,
meillo@76 389 .Pn slocal
meillo@76 390 provides rule-based processing of messages, like filing them into
meillo@76 391 different folders, which is otherwise not available in mmh.
meillo@87 392 Although
meillo@76 393 .Pn slocal
meillo@87 394 does neither pull in dependencies nor does it include a separate
meillo@100 395 technical area (cf. Sec. XXX), still,
meillo@100 396 it accounts for about 1\|000 lines of code that need to be maintained.
meillo@76 397 As
meillo@76 398 .Pn slocal
meillo@76 399 is almost self-standing, it should be split off into a separate project.
meillo@76 400 This would cut the strong connection between the MUA mmh and the MDA
meillo@76 401 .Pn slocal .
meillo@87 402 For anyone not using MH,
meillo@87 403 .Pn slocal
meillo@87 404 would become yet another independent MDA, like
meillo@87 405 .I procmail .
meillo@100 406 Then
meillo@87 407 .Pn slocal
meillo@100 408 could be installed without the complete MH system.
meillo@76 409 Likewise, mmh users could decide to use
meillo@76 410 .I procmail
meillo@87 411 without having a second, unused MDA,
meillo@87 412 .Pn slocal ,
meillo@76 413 installed.
meillo@100 414 That appears to be conceptionally the best solution.
meillo@76 415 Yet,
meillo@76 416 .Pn slocal
meillo@87 417 is not split off.
meillo@100 418 I defer the decision over
meillo@78 419 .Pn slocal
meillo@100 420 in need for deeper investigation.
meillo@100 421 In the meanwhile, it remains part of mmh.
meillo@100 422 That does not hurt because
meillo@100 423 .Pn slocal
meillo@100 424 is unrelated to the rest of the project.
meillo@0 425
meillo@58 426
meillo@131 427 .H3 "Profile Reading
meillo@131 428 .P
meillo@131 429 FIXME XXX
meillo@131 430
meillo@131 431 commit 3e017a7abbdf69bf0dff7a4073275961eda1ded8
meillo@131 432 Author: markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
meillo@131 433 Date: Wed Jun 27 14:23:35 2012 +0200
meillo@131 434
meillo@131 435 spost: Read profile and context now. Removed -library switch.
meillo@131 436 spost is a full part of the mmh toolchest, hence, it shall read the
meillo@131 437 profile/context. This will remove the need to pass profile information
meillo@131 438 from send to spost via command line switches.
meillo@131 439 In January 2012, there had been a discussion on the nmh-workers ML
meillo@131 440 whether post should read the profile/context. There wasn't a clear
meillo@131 441 answer. It behavior was mainly motivated by the historic situation,
meillo@131 442 it seems. My opinion on the topic goes into the direction that every
meillo@131 443 tool that is part of the mmh toolchest should read the profile. That
meillo@131 444 is a clear and simple concept. Using MH tools without wanting to
meillo@131 445 interact with MH (like mhmail had been) is no more a practical problem.
meillo@131 446
meillo@131 447 commit 32d4f9daaa70519be3072479232ff7be0500d009
meillo@131 448 Author: markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
meillo@131 449 Date: Wed Jun 27 13:15:47 2012 +0200
meillo@131 450
meillo@131 451 mhmail: Read the context!
meillo@131 452 mhmail will change from a mailx-replacment to an alternative to
meillo@131 453 `comp -ed prompter', thus being a send front-end. Hence, mhmail
meillo@131 454 should not stay outside the profile/context respecting mmh toolchest.
meillo@131 455
meillo@131 456
meillo@131 457 slocal
meillo@131 458
meillo@131 459
meillo@131 460
meillo@131 461
meillo@131 462 .H2 "Displaying Messages
meillo@131 463 .P
meillo@131 464 FIXME XXX
meillo@131 465
meillo@131 466 .U3 "\fLshow\fP and \fPmhshow\fP
meillo@58 467 .P
meillo@69 468 Since the very beginning \(en already in the first concept paper \(en
meillo@58 469 .Pn show
meillo@62 470 had been MH's message display program.
meillo@58 471 .Pn show
meillo@76 472 mapped message numbers and sequences to files and invoked
meillo@58 473 .Pn mhl
meillo@89 474 to have the files formatted.
meillo@88 475 With MIME, this approach wasn't sufficient anymore.
meillo@100 476 MIME messages can consist of multiple parts. Some parts are not
meillo@100 477 directly displayable and text content might be encoded in
meillo@58 478 foreign charsets.
meillo@58 479 .Pn show 's
meillo@76 480 understanding of messages and
meillo@58 481 .Pn mhl 's
meillo@88 482 display capabilities couldn't cope with the task any longer.
meillo@62 483 .P
meillo@88 484 Instead of extending these tools, additional tools were written from
meillo@88 485 scratch and added to the MH tool chest.
meillo@88 486 Doing so is encouraged by the tool chest approach.
meillo@88 487 Modular design is a great advantage for extending a system,
meillo@88 488 as new tools can be added without interfering with existing ones.
meillo@62 489 First, the new MIME features were added in form of the single program
meillo@58 490 .Pn mhn .
meillo@58 491 The command
meillo@82 492 .Cl "mhn -show 42
meillo@58 493 would show the MIME message numbered 42.
meillo@58 494 With the 1.0 release of nmh in February 1999, Richard Coleman finished
meillo@58 495 the split of
meillo@58 496 .Pn mhn
meillo@88 497 into a set of specialized tools, which together covered the
meillo@88 498 multiple aspects of MIME.
meillo@88 499 One of them was
meillo@69 500 .Pn mhshow ,
meillo@88 501 which replaced
meillo@88 502 .Cl "mhn -show" .
meillo@88 503 It was capable of displaying MIME messages appropriately.
meillo@62 504 .P
meillo@88 505 From then on, two message display tools were part of nmh,
meillo@76 506 .Pn show
meillo@76 507 and
meillo@76 508 .Pn mhshow .
meillo@88 509 To ease the life of users,
meillo@69 510 .Pn show
meillo@69 511 was extended to automatically hand the job over to
meillo@69 512 .Pn mhshow
meillo@69 513 if displaying the message would be beyond
meillo@69 514 .Pn show 's
meillo@69 515 abilities.
meillo@88 516 In consequence, the user would simply invoke
meillo@69 517 .Pn show
meillo@69 518 (possibly through
meillo@69 519 .Pn next
meillo@69 520 or
meillo@69 521 .Pn prev )
meillo@69 522 and get the message printed with either
meillo@69 523 .Pn show
meillo@69 524 or
meillo@69 525 .Pn mhshow ,
meillo@69 526 whatever was more appropriate.
meillo@69 527 .P
meillo@69 528 Having two similar tools for essentially the same task is redundant.
meillo@88 529 Usually,
meillo@88 530 users wouldn't distinguish between
meillo@88 531 .Pn show
meillo@88 532 and
meillo@88 533 .Pn mhshow
meillo@88 534 in their daily mail reading.
meillo@88 535 Having two separate display programs was therefore mainly unnecessary
meillo@88 536 from a user's point of view.
meillo@88 537 Besides, the development of both programs needed to be in sync,
meillo@76 538 to ensure that the programs behaved in a similar way,
meillo@76 539 because they were used like a single tool.
meillo@76 540 Different behavior would have surprised the user.
meillo@69 541 .P
meillo@69 542 Today, non-MIME messages are rather seen to be a special case of
meillo@100 543 MIME messages, although it is the other way round.
meillo@69 544 As
meillo@69 545 .Pn mhshow
meillo@88 546 had already be able to display non-MIME messages, it appeared natural
meillo@69 547 to drop
meillo@69 548 .Pn show
meillo@69 549 in favor of using
meillo@69 550 .Pn mhshow
meillo@69 551 exclusively.
meillo@88 552 .Ci 4c1efddfd499300c7e74263e57d8aa137e84c853
meillo@88 553 Removing
meillo@88 554 .Pn show
meillo@88 555 is no loss in function, because functionally
meillo@88 556 .Pn mhshow
meillo@88 557 covers it completely.
meillo@88 558 The old behavior of
meillo@88 559 .Pn show
meillo@88 560 can still be emulated with the simple command line:
meillo@88 561 .VS
meillo@88 562 mhl `mhpath c`
meillo@88 563 VE
meillo@88 564 .P
meillo@76 565 For convenience,
meillo@76 566 .Pn mhshow
meillo@88 567 was renamed to
meillo@88 568 .Pn show
meillo@88 569 after
meillo@88 570 .Pn show
meillo@88 571 was gone.
meillo@88 572 It is clear that such a rename may confuse future developers when
meillo@88 573 trying to understand the history.
meillo@88 574 Nevertheless, I consider the convenience on the user's side,
meillo@88 575 to call
meillo@88 576 .Pn show
meillo@88 577 when they want a message to be displayed, to outweigh the inconvenience
meillo@88 578 on the developer's side when understanding the project history.
meillo@69 579 .P
meillo@88 580 To prepare for the transition,
meillo@69 581 .Pn mhshow
meillo@69 582 was reworked to behave more like
meillo@69 583 .Pn show
meillo@69 584 first.
meillo@88 585 (cf. Sec. XXX)
meillo@88 586 Once the tools behaved more alike, the replacing appeared to be
meillo@88 587 even more natural.
meillo@88 588 Today, mmh's new
meillo@69 589 .Pn show
meillo@88 590 became the one single message display program again, with the difference
meillo@88 591 that today it handles MIME messages as well as non-MIME messages.
meillo@88 592 The outcome of the transition is one program less to maintain,
meillo@88 593 no second display program for users to deal with,
meillo@88 594 and less system complexity.
meillo@69 595 .P
meillo@88 596 Still, removing the old
meillo@69 597 .Pn show
meillo@88 598 hurts in one regard: It had been such a simple program.
meillo@88 599 Its lean elegance is missing to the new
meillo@69 600 .Pn show .
meillo@88 601 But there is no chance;
meillo@88 602 supporting MIME demands for higher essential complexity.
meillo@58 603
meillo@58 604
meillo@131 605 .U3 "Scan Listings
meillo@131 606 .P
meillo@131 607 FIXME XXX
meillo@131 608
meillo@131 609 .P
meillo@131 610
meillo@131 611 commit c20e315f9fb9f0f0955749726dbf4fd897cd9f48
meillo@131 612 Author: markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
meillo@131 613 Date: Fri Dec 9 21:56:44 2011 +0100
meillo@131 614
meillo@131 615 Adjusted the default scan listing: remove the body preview
meillo@131 616 The original listing is still available as etc/scan.nmh
meillo@131 617
meillo@131 618 commit 70b2643e0da8485174480c644ad9785c84f5bff4
meillo@131 619 Author: markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
meillo@131 620 Date: Mon Jan 30 16:16:26 2012 +0100
meillo@131 621
meillo@131 622 Scan listings shall not contain body content. Hence, removed this feature.
meillo@131 623 Scan listings shall operator on message headers and non-message information
meillo@131 624 only. Displaying the beginning of the body complicates everything too much.
meillo@131 625 That's no surprise, because it's something completely different. If you
meillo@131 626 want to examine the body, then use show(1)/mhshow(1).
meillo@131 627 Changed the default scan formats accordingly.
meillo@131 628
meillo@131 629
meillo@131 630
meillo@100 631 .H2 "Configure Options
meillo@58 632 .P
meillo@76 633 Customization is a double-edged sword.
meillo@76 634 It allows better suiting setups, but not for free.
meillo@76 635 There is the cost of code complexity to be able to customize.
meillo@76 636 There is the cost of less tested setups, because there are
meillo@72 637 more possible setups and especially corner-cases.
meillo@76 638 And, there is the cost of choice itself.
meillo@76 639 The code complexity directly affects the developers.
meillo@72 640 Less tested code affects both, users and developers.
meillo@76 641 The problem of choice affects the users, for once by having to
meillo@100 642 choose, but also by more complex interfaces that require more documentation.
meillo@72 643 Whenever options add little advantages, they should be considered for
meillo@72 644 removal.
meillo@72 645 I have reduced the number of project-specific configure options from
meillo@72 646 fifteen to three.
meillo@74 647
meillo@76 648 .U3 "Mail Transfer Facilities
meillo@74 649 .P
meillo@85 650 With the removal of the mail transfer facilities five configure
meillo@85 651 options vanished:
meillo@85 652 .P
meillo@85 653 The switches
meillo@85 654 .Sw --with-tls
meillo@85 655 and
meillo@85 656 .Sw --with-cyrus-sasl
meillo@89 657 had activated the support for transfer encryption and authentication.
meillo@85 658 This is not needed anymore.
meillo@85 659 .Ci fecd5d34f65597a4dfa16aeabea7d74b191532c3
meillo@85 660 .Ci 156d35f6425bea4c1ed3c4c79783dc613379c65b
meillo@85 661 .P
meillo@85 662 The configure switch
meillo@85 663 .Sw --enable-pop
meillo@85 664 activated the message retrieval facility.
meillo@85 665 The code area that would be conditionally compiled in for TLS and SASL
meillo@85 666 support had been small.
meillo@85 667 The conditionally compiled code area for POP support had been much larger.
meillo@85 668 Whereas the code base changes would only slightly change on toggling
meillo@85 669 TLS or SASL support, it changed much on toggling POP support.
meillo@85 670 The changes in the code base could hardly be overviewed.
meillo@85 671 By having POP support togglable a second code base had been created,
meillo@85 672 one that needed to be tested.
meillo@85 673 This situation is basically similar for the conditional TLS and SASL
meillo@85 674 code, but there the changes are minor and can yet be overviewed.
meillo@85 675 Still, conditional compilation of a code base creates variations
meillo@85 676 of the original program.
meillo@85 677 More variations require more testing and maintenance work.
meillo@85 678 .P
meillo@85 679 Two other options only specified default configuration values:
meillo@100 680 .Sw --with-mts
meillo@100 681 defined the default transport service, either
meillo@100 682 .Ar smtp
meillo@100 683 or
meillo@100 684 .Ar sendmail .
meillo@85 685 In mmh this fixed to
meillo@85 686 .Ar sendmail .
meillo@85 687 .Ci f6aa95b724fd8c791164abe7ee5468bf5c34f226
meillo@85 688 With
meillo@100 689 .Sw --with-smtpservers
meillo@85 690 default SMTP servers for the
meillo@85 691 .Ar smtp
meillo@85 692 transport service could be specified.
meillo@72 693 .Ci 128545e06224233b7e91fc4c83f8830252fe16c9
meillo@85 694 Both of them became irrelevant.
meillo@72 695
meillo@74 696 .U3 "Backup Prefix
meillo@74 697 .P
meillo@76 698 The backup prefix is the string that was prepended to message
meillo@76 699 filenames to tag them as deleted.
meillo@76 700 By default it had been the comma character `\f(CW,\fP'.
meillo@78 701 In July 2000, Kimmo Suominen introduced
meillo@78 702 the configure option
meillo@78 703 .Sw --with-hash-backup
meillo@78 704 to change the default to the hash symbol `\f(CW#\fP'.
meillo@78 705 The choice was probably personal preference, because first, the
meillo@78 706 option was named
meillo@78 707 .Sw --with-backup-prefix.
meillo@78 708 and had the prefix symbol as argument.
meillo@100 709 But giving the hash symbol as argument caused too many problems
meillo@100 710 for Autoconf,
meillo@100 711 thus the option was limited to use the hash symbol as the default prefix.
meillo@100 712 This supports the assumption, that the choice for the hash was
meillo@100 713 personal preference only.
meillo@100 714 Being related or not, words that start with the hash symbol
meillo@78 715 introduce a comment in the Unix shell.
meillo@72 716 Thus, the command line
meillo@72 717 .Cl "rm #13 #15
meillo@72 718 calls
meillo@72 719 .Pn rm
meillo@72 720 without arguments because the first hash symbol starts the comment
meillo@72 721 that reaches until the end of the line.
meillo@72 722 To delete the backup files,
meillo@72 723 .Cl "rm ./#13 ./#15"
meillo@72 724 needs to be used.
meillo@100 725 Using the hash as backup prefix can be seen as a precaution against
meillo@78 726 data loss.
meillo@78 727 .P
meillo@72 728 I removed the configure option but added the profile entry
meillo@72 729 .Pe backup-prefix ,
meillo@72 730 which allows to specify an arbitrary string as backup prefix.
meillo@72 731 .Ci 6c40d481d661d532dd527eaf34cebb6d3f8ed086
meillo@76 732 Profile entries are the common method to change mmh's behavior.
meillo@76 733 This change did not remove the choice but moved it to a location where
meillo@72 734 it suited better.
meillo@76 735 .P
meillo@78 736 Eventually, however, the new trash folder concept
meillo@78 737 .Cf "Sec. XXX
meillo@78 738 obsoleted the concept of the backup prefix completely.
meillo@78 739 .Ci 8edc5aaf86f9f77124664f6801bc6c6cdf258173
meillo@100 740 .\" (Well, there still are corner-cases to remove until the backup
meillo@100 741 .\" prefix can be laid to rest, eventually.)
meillo@72 742 .\" FIXME: Do this work in the code!
meillo@76 743
meillo@76 744 .U3 "Editor and Pager
meillo@74 745 .P
meillo@74 746 The two configure options
meillo@74 747 .CW --with-editor=EDITOR
meillo@74 748 .CW --with-pager=PAGER
meillo@74 749 were used to specify the default editor and pager at configure time.
meillo@109 750 Doing so at configure time made sense in the eighties,
meillo@76 751 when the set of available editors and pagers varied much across
meillo@76 752 different systems.
meillo@89 753 Today, the situation is more homogeneous.
meillo@74 754 The programs
meillo@74 755 .Pn vi
meillo@74 756 and
meillo@74 757 .Pn more
meillo@76 758 can be expected to be available on every Unix system,
meillo@74 759 as they are specified by POSIX since two decades.
meillo@74 760 (The specifications for
meillo@74 761 .Pn vi
meillo@74 762 and
meillo@74 763 .Pn more
meillo@74 764 appeared in
meillo@74 765 .[
meillo@74 766 posix 1987
meillo@74 767 .]
meillo@74 768 and,
meillo@74 769 .[
meillo@74 770 posix 1992
meillo@74 771 .]
meillo@74 772 respectively.)
meillo@74 773 As a first step, these two tools were hard-coded as defaults.
meillo@74 774 .Ci 5d43a99db70c12a673028c7758c20cbe3e13ef5f
meillo@74 775 Not changed were the
meillo@74 776 .Pe editor
meillo@74 777 and
meillo@74 778 .Pe moreproc
meillo@76 779 profile entries, which allowed the user to override the system defaults.
meillo@74 780 Later, the concept was reworked to respect the standard environment
meillo@74 781 variables
meillo@74 782 .Ev VISUAL
meillo@74 783 and
meillo@74 784 .Ev PAGER
meillo@76 785 if they are set.
meillo@74 786 Today, mmh determines the editor to use in the following order,
meillo@74 787 taking the first available and non-empty item:
meillo@74 788 .IP (1)
meillo@74 789 Environment variable
meillo@74 790 .Ev MMHEDITOR
meillo@74 791 .IP (2)
meillo@74 792 Profile entry
meillo@74 793 .Pe Editor
meillo@74 794 .IP (3)
meillo@74 795 Environment variable
meillo@74 796 .Ev VISUAL
meillo@74 797 .IP (4)
meillo@74 798 Environment variable
meillo@74 799 .Ev EDITOR
meillo@74 800 .IP (5)
meillo@74 801 Command
meillo@74 802 .Pn vi .
meillo@74 803 .P
meillo@76 804 .Ci f85f4b7ae62e3d05a945dcd46ead51f0a2a89a9b
meillo@76 805 .P
meillo@89 806 The pager to use is determined in a similar order,
meillo@74 807 also taking the first available and non-empty item:
meillo@74 808 .IP (1)
meillo@74 809 Environment variable
meillo@74 810 .Ev MMHPAGER
meillo@74 811 .IP (2)
meillo@74 812 Profile entry
meillo@74 813 .Pe Pager
meillo@74 814 (replaces
meillo@74 815 .Pe moreproc )
meillo@74 816 .IP (3)
meillo@74 817 Environment variable
meillo@74 818 .Ev PAGER
meillo@74 819 .IP (4)
meillo@74 820 Command
meillo@74 821 .Pn more .
meillo@74 822 .P
meillo@74 823 .Ci 0c4214ea2aec6497d0d67b436bbee9bc1d225f1e
meillo@74 824 .P
meillo@76 825 By respecting the
meillo@74 826 .Ev VISUAL /\c
meillo@74 827 .Ev EDITOR
meillo@74 828 and
meillo@74 829 .Ev PAGER
meillo@76 830 environment variables,
meillo@76 831 the new behavior confirms better to the common style on Unix systems.
meillo@76 832 Additionally, the new approach is more uniform and clearer to users.
meillo@72 833
meillo@72 834
meillo@76 835 .U3 "ndbm
meillo@72 836 .P
meillo@74 837 .Pn slocal
meillo@78 838 used to depend on
meillo@74 839 .I ndbm ,
meillo@74 840 a database library.
meillo@76 841 The database is used to store the `\fLMessage-ID\fP's of all
meillo@76 842 messages delivered.
meillo@74 843 This enables
meillo@74 844 .Pn slocal
meillo@74 845 to suppress delivering the same message to the same user twice.
meillo@74 846 (This features was enabled by the
meillo@74 847 .Sw -suppressdup
meillo@74 848 switch.)
meillo@74 849 .P
meillo@100 850 A variety of versions of the database library exist.
meillo@78 851 .[
meillo@78 852 wolter unix incompat notes dbm
meillo@78 853 .]
meillo@74 854 Complicated autoconf code was needed to detect them correctly.
meillo@74 855 Further more, the configure switches
meillo@74 856 .Sw --with-ndbm=ARG
meillo@74 857 and
meillo@74 858 .Sw --with-ndbmheader=ARG
meillo@74 859 were added to help with difficult setups that would
meillo@78 860 not be detected automatically or correctly.
meillo@74 861 .P
meillo@74 862 By removing the suppress duplicates feature of
meillo@74 863 .Pn slocal ,
meillo@74 864 the dependency on
meillo@74 865 .I ndbm
meillo@78 866 vanished and 120 lines of complex autoconf code could be saved.
meillo@74 867 .Ci ecd6d6a20cb7a1507e3a20d6c4cb3a1cf14c6bbf
meillo@89 868 The change removed functionality too, but that is minor to the
meillo@78 869 improvement by dropping the dependency and the complex autoconf code.
meillo@72 870
meillo@74 871 .U3 "mh-e Support
meillo@72 872 .P
meillo@74 873 The configure option
meillo@74 874 .Sw --disable-mhe
meillo@74 875 was removed when the mh-e support was reworked.
meillo@74 876 Mh-e is the Emacs front-end to MH.
meillo@76 877 It requires MH to provide minor additional functions.
meillo@76 878 The
meillo@76 879 .Sw --disable-mhe
meillo@76 880 configure option could switch these extensions off.
meillo@76 881 After removing the support for old versions of mh-e,
meillo@74 882 only the
meillo@74 883 .Sw -build
meillo@76 884 switches of
meillo@74 885 .Pn forw
meillo@74 886 and
meillo@74 887 .Pn repl
meillo@76 888 are left to be mh-e extensions.
meillo@76 889 They are now always built in because they add little code and complexity.
meillo@76 890 In consequence, the
meillo@74 891 .Sw --disable-mhe
meillo@76 892 configure option was removed
meillo@72 893 .Ci a7ce7b4a580d77b6c2c4d980812beb589aa4c643
meillo@74 894 Removing the option removed a second code setup that would have
meillo@74 895 needed to be tested.
meillo@76 896 This change was first done in nmh and thereafter merged into mmh.
meillo@76 897 .P
meillo@76 898 The interface changes in mmh require mh-e to be adjusted in order
meillo@76 899 to be able to use mmh as back-end.
meillo@76 900 This will require minor changes to mh-e, but removing the
meillo@76 901 .Sw -build
meillo@76 902 switches would require more rework.
meillo@72 903
meillo@74 904 .U3 "Masquerading
meillo@72 905 .P
meillo@74 906 The configure option
meillo@74 907 .Sw --enable-masquerade
meillo@76 908 could take up to three arguments:
meillo@76 909 `draft_from', `mmailid', and `username_extension'.
meillo@74 910 They activated different types of address masquerading.
meillo@74 911 All of them were implemented in the SMTP-speaking
meillo@74 912 .Pn post
meillo@76 913 command, which provided an MSA.
meillo@76 914 Address masquerading is an MTA's task and mmh does not cover
meillo@76 915 this field anymore.
meillo@76 916 Hence, true masquerading needs to be implemented in the external MTA.
meillo@74 917 .P
meillo@74 918 The
meillo@74 919 .I mmailid
meillo@74 920 masquerading type is the oldest one of the three and the only one
meillo@74 921 available in the original MH.
meillo@74 922 It provided a
meillo@74 923 .I username
meillo@74 924 to
meillo@74 925 .I fakeusername
meillo@76 926 mapping, based on the password file's GECOS field.
meillo@74 927 The man page
meillo@74 928 .Mp mh-tailor(5)
meillo@74 929 described the use case as being the following:
meillo@98 930 .QS
meillo@74 931 This is useful if you want the messages you send to always
meillo@74 932 appear to come from the name of an MTA alias rather than your
meillo@74 933 actual account name. For instance, many organizations set up
meillo@74 934 `First.Last' sendmail aliases for all users. If this is
meillo@74 935 the case, the GECOS field for each user should look like:
meillo@74 936 ``First [Middle] Last <First.Last>''
meillo@98 937 .QE
meillo@74 938 .P
meillo@74 939 As mmh sends outgoing mail via the local MTA only,
meillo@76 940 the best location to do such global rewrites is there.
meillo@74 941 Besides, the MTA is conceptionally the right location because it
meillo@74 942 does the reverse mapping for incoming mail (aliasing), too.
meillo@76 943 Further more, masquerading set up there is readily available for all
meillo@74 944 mail software on the system.
meillo@76 945 Hence, mmailid masquerading was removed.
meillo@74 946 .Ci 0836c8000ccb34b59410ef1c15b1b7feac70ce5f
meillo@74 947 .P
meillo@74 948 The
meillo@74 949 .I username_extension
meillo@76 950 masquerading type did not replace the username but would append a suffix,
meillo@76 951 specified by the
meillo@74 952 .Ev USERNAME_EXTENSION
meillo@76 953 environment variable, to it.
meillo@76 954 This provided support for the
meillo@74 955 .I user-extension
meillo@74 956 feature of qmail and the similar
meillo@74 957 .I "plussed user
meillo@74 958 processing of sendmail.
meillo@74 959 The decision to remove this username_extension masquerading was
meillo@74 960 motivated by the fact that
meillo@74 961 .Pn spost
meillo@76 962 hadn't supported it already.
meillo@76 963 .Ci 2abae0bfd0ad5bf898461e50aa4b466d641f23d9
meillo@76 964 Username extensions are possible in mmh, but less convenient to use.
meillo@76 965 .\" XXX format file %(getenv USERNAME_EXTENSION)
meillo@74 966 .P
meillo@74 967 The
meillo@74 968 .I draft_from
meillo@74 969 masquerading type instructed
meillo@74 970 .Pn post
meillo@84 971 to use the value of the
meillo@84 972 .Hd From
meillo@84 973 header field as SMTP envelope sender.
meillo@76 974 Sender addresses could be replaced completely.
meillo@74 975 .Ci b14ea6073f77b4359aaf3fddd0e105989db9
meillo@76 976 Mmh offers a kind of masquerading similar in effect, but
meillo@74 977 with technical differences.
meillo@76 978 As mmh does not transfer messages itself, the local MTA has final control
meillo@76 979 over the sender's address. Any masquerading mmh introduces may be reverted
meillo@76 980 by the MTA.
meillo@76 981 In times of pedantic spam checking, an MTA will take care to use
meillo@76 982 sensible envelope sender addresses to keep its own reputation up.
meillo@84 983 Nonetheless, the MUA can set the
meillo@84 984 .Hd From
meillo@84 985 header field and thereby propose
meillo@76 986 a sender address to the MTA.
meillo@74 987 The MTA may then decide to take that one or generate the canonical sender
meillo@74 988 address for use as envelope sender address.
meillo@74 989 .P
meillo@74 990 In mmh, the MTA will always extract the recipient and sender from the
meillo@84 991 message header (\c
meillo@74 992 .Pn sendmail 's
meillo@74 993 .Sw -t
meillo@74 994 switch).
meillo@84 995 The
meillo@84 996 .Hd From
meillo@84 997 header field of the draft may be set arbitrary by the user.
meillo@74 998 If it is missing, the canonical sender address will be generated by the MTA.
meillo@74 999
meillo@74 1000 .U3 "Remaining Options
meillo@74 1001 .P
meillo@74 1002 Two configure options remain in mmh.
meillo@74 1003 One is the locking method to use:
meillo@74 1004 .Sw --with-locking=[dot|fcntl|flock|lockf] .
meillo@76 1005 The idea of removing all methods except the portable dot locking
meillo@76 1006 and having that one as the default is appealing, but this change
meillo@76 1007 requires deeper technical investigation into the topic.
meillo@76 1008 The other option,
meillo@74 1009 .Sw --enable-debug ,
meillo@74 1010 compiles the programs with debugging symbols and does not strip them.
meillo@74 1011 This option is likely to stay.
meillo@72 1012
meillo@72 1013
meillo@58 1014
meillo@63 1015
meillo@100 1016 .H2 "Command Line Switches
meillo@58 1017 .P
meillo@93 1018 The command line switches of MH tools follow the X Window style.
meillo@93 1019 They are words, introduced by a single dash.
meillo@93 1020 For example:
meillo@93 1021 .Cl "-truncate" .
meillo@93 1022 Every program in mmh has two generic switches:
meillo@93 1023 .Sw -help ,
meillo@93 1024 to print a short message on how to use the program, and
meillo@93 1025 .Sw -Version ,
meillo@93 1026 to tell what version of mmh the program belongs to.
meillo@93 1027 .P
meillo@93 1028 Switches change the behavior of programs.
meillo@93 1029 Programs that do one thing in one way require no switches.
meillo@93 1030 In most cases, doing something in exactly one way is too limiting.
meillo@97 1031 If there is basically one task to accomplish, but it should be done
meillo@93 1032 in various ways, switches are a good approach to alter the behavior
meillo@93 1033 of a program.
meillo@93 1034 Changing the behavior of programs provides flexibility and customization
meillo@97 1035 to users, but at the same time it complicates the code, documentation and
meillo@93 1036 usage of the program.
meillo@97 1037 .\" XXX: Ref
meillo@93 1038 Therefore, the number of switches should be kept small.
meillo@93 1039 A small set of well-chosen switches does no harm.
meillo@93 1040 But usually, the number of switches increases over time.
meillo@93 1041 Already in 1985, Rose and Romine have identified this as a major
meillo@93 1042 problem of MH:
meillo@93 1043 .[ [
meillo@93 1044 rose romine real work
meillo@93 1045 .], p. 12]
meillo@98 1046 .QS
meillo@93 1047 A complaint often heard about systems which undergo substantial development
meillo@93 1048 by many people over a number of years, is that more and more options are
meillo@93 1049 introduced which add little to the functionality but greatly increase the
meillo@93 1050 amount of information a user needs to know in order to get useful work done.
meillo@93 1051 This is usually referred to as creeping featurism.
meillo@93 1052 .QP
meillo@93 1053 Unfortunately MH, having undergone six years of off-and-on development by
meillo@93 1054 ten or so well-meaning programmers (the present authors included),
meillo@93 1055 suffers mightily from this.
meillo@98 1056 .QE
meillo@93 1057 .P
meillo@97 1058 Being reluctant to adding new switches \(en or `options',
meillo@97 1059 as Rose and Romine call them \(en is one part of a counter-action,
meillo@97 1060 the other part is removing hardly used switches.
meillo@97 1061 Nmh's tools had lots of switches already implemented,
meillo@97 1062 hence, cleaning up by removing some of them was the more important part
meillo@97 1063 of the counter-action.
meillo@93 1064 Removing existing functionality is always difficult because it
meillo@93 1065 breaks programs that use these functions.
meillo@93 1066 Also, for every obsolete feature, there'll always be someone who still
meillo@93 1067 uses it and thus opposes its removal.
meillo@93 1068 This puts the developer into the position,
meillo@93 1069 where sensible improvements to style are regarded as destructive acts.
meillo@97 1070 Yet, living with the featurism is far worse, in my eyes, because
meillo@97 1071 future needs will demand adding further features,
meillo@93 1072 worsening the situation more and more.
meillo@93 1073 Rose and Romine added in a footnote,
meillo@93 1074 ``[...]
meillo@93 1075 .Pn send
meillo@93 1076 will no doubt acquire an endless number of switches in the years to come.''
meillo@97 1077 Although clearly humorous, the comment points to the nature of the problem.
meillo@97 1078 Refusing to add any new switches would encounter the problem at its root,
meillo@97 1079 but this is not practical.
meillo@97 1080 New needs will require new switches and it would be unwise to block
meillo@97 1081 them strictly.
meillo@97 1082 Nevertheless, removing obsolete switches still is an effective approach
meillo@97 1083 to deal with the problem.
meillo@97 1084 Working on an experimental branch without an established user base,
meillo@97 1085 eased my work because I did not offend users when I removed existing
meillo@110 1086 functions.
meillo@93 1087 .P
meillo@93 1088 Rose and Romine counted 24 visible and 9 more hidden switches for
meillo@93 1089 .Pn send .
meillo@97 1090 In nmh, they increased up to 32 visible and 12 hidden ones.
meillo@97 1091 At the time of writing, no more than 7 visible switches and 1 hidden switch
meillo@97 1092 have remained in mmh's
meillo@97 1093 .Pn send .
meillo@97 1094 (These numbers include two generic switches, help and version.)
meillo@93 1095 .P
meillo@97 1096 Fig. XXX
meillo@93 1097 .\" XXX Ref
meillo@97 1098 displays the number of switches for each of the tools that is available
meillo@97 1099 in both, nmh and mmh.
meillo@100 1100 The tools are sorted by the number of switches they had in nmh.
meillo@100 1101 Visible and hidden switches were counted,
meillo@97 1102 but not the generic help and version switches.
meillo@93 1103 Whereas in the beginning of the project, the average tool had 11 switches,
meillo@93 1104 now it has no more than 5 \(en only half as many.
meillo@93 1105 If the `no' switches and similar inverse variant are folded onto
meillo@100 1106 their counter-parts, the average tool had 8 switches in pre-mmh times and
meillo@100 1107 has 4 now.
meillo@93 1108 The total number of functional switches in mmh dropped from 465
meillo@93 1109 to 234.
meillo@58 1110
meillo@93 1111 .KS
meillo@93 1112 .in 1c
meillo@93 1113 .so input/switches.grap
meillo@93 1114 .KE
meillo@58 1115
meillo@93 1116 .P
meillo@93 1117 A part of the switches vanished after functions were removed.
meillo@93 1118 This was the case for network mail transfer, for instance.
meillo@97 1119 Sometimes, however, the work flow was the other way:
meillo@97 1120 I looked through the
meillo@97 1121 .Mp mh-chart (7)
meillo@97 1122 man page to identify the tools with apparently too many switches.
meillo@97 1123 Then considering the value of each of the switches by examining
meillo@97 1124 the tool's man page and source code, aided by recherche and testing.
meillo@97 1125 This way, the removal of functions was suggested by the aim to reduce
meillo@97 1126 the number of switches per command.
meillo@97 1127
meillo@58 1128
meillo@93 1129 .U3 "Draft Folder Facility
meillo@93 1130 .P
meillo@100 1131 A change early in the project was the complete transition from
meillo@93 1132 the single draft message to the draft folder facility.
meillo@97 1133 .Ci 337338b404931f06f0db2119c9e145e8ca5a9860
meillo@109 1134 The draft folder facility was introduced in the mid-eighties, when
meillo@100 1135 Rose and Romine called it a ``relatively new feature''.
meillo@93 1136 .[
meillo@93 1137 rose romine real work
meillo@93 1138 .]
meillo@110 1139 Since then, the facility had existed but was inactive by default.
meillo@93 1140 The default activation and the related rework of the tools made it
meillo@93 1141 possible to remove the
meillo@93 1142 .Sw -[no]draftfolder ,
meillo@93 1143 and
meillo@93 1144 .Sw -draftmessage
meillo@93 1145 switches from
meillo@93 1146 .Pn comp ,
meillo@93 1147 .Pn repl ,
meillo@93 1148 .Pn forw ,
meillo@93 1149 .Pn dist ,
meillo@93 1150 .Pn whatnow ,
meillo@93 1151 and
meillo@93 1152 .Pn send .
meillo@97 1153 .Ci 337338b404931f06f0db2119c9e145e8ca5a9860
meillo@97 1154 The only flexibility removed with this change is having multiple
meillo@97 1155 draft folders within one profile.
meillo@97 1156 I consider this a theoretical problem only.
meillo@93 1157 In the same go, the
meillo@93 1158 .Sw -draft
meillo@93 1159 switch of
meillo@93 1160 .Pn anno ,
meillo@93 1161 .Pn refile ,
meillo@93 1162 and
meillo@93 1163 .Pn send
meillo@93 1164 was removed.
meillo@93 1165 The special-casing of `the' draft message became irrelevant after
meillo@93 1166 the rework of the draft system.
meillo@93 1167 (See Sec. XXX.)
meillo@95 1168 Equally,
meillo@95 1169 .Pn comp
meillo@95 1170 lost its
meillo@95 1171 .Sw -file
meillo@95 1172 switch.
meillo@95 1173 The draft folder facility, together with the
meillo@95 1174 .Sw -form
meillo@95 1175 switch, are sufficient.
meillo@93 1176
meillo@95 1177
meillo@102 1178 .U3 "In Place Editing
meillo@93 1179 .P
meillo@93 1180 .Pn anno
meillo@93 1181 had the switches
meillo@93 1182 .Sw -[no]inplace
meillo@100 1183 to either annotate the message in place and thus preserve hard links,
meillo@93 1184 or annotate a copy to replace the original message, breaking hard links.
meillo@97 1185 Following the assumption that linked messages should truly be the
meillo@97 1186 same message, and annotating it should not break the link, the
meillo@93 1187 .Sw -[no]inplace
meillo@93 1188 switches were removed and the previous default
meillo@93 1189 .Sw -inplace
meillo@93 1190 was made the only behavior.
meillo@97 1191 .Ci c8195849d2e366c569271abb0f5f60f4ebf0b4d0
meillo@93 1192 The
meillo@93 1193 .Sw -[no]inplace
meillo@93 1194 switches of
meillo@93 1195 .Pn repl ,
meillo@93 1196 .Pn forw ,
meillo@93 1197 and
meillo@93 1198 .Pn dist
meillo@93 1199 could be removed, too, as they were simply passed through to
meillo@93 1200 .Pn anno .
meillo@93 1201 .P
meillo@93 1202 .Pn burst
meillo@93 1203 also had
meillo@93 1204 .Sw -[no]inplace
meillo@95 1205 switches, but with different meaning.
meillo@95 1206 With
meillo@95 1207 .Sw -inplace ,
meillo@95 1208 the digest had been replaced by the table of contents (i.e. the
meillo@110 1209 introduction text) and the burst messages were placed right
meillo@95 1210 after this message, renumbering all following messages.
meillo@95 1211 Also, any trailing text of the digest was lost, though,
meillo@95 1212 in practice, it usually consists of an end-of-digest marker only.
meillo@95 1213 Nontheless, this behavior appeared less elegant than the
meillo@95 1214 .Sw -noinplace
meillo@95 1215 behavior, which already had been the default.
meillo@95 1216 Nmh's
meillo@95 1217 .Mp burst (1)
meillo@95 1218 man page reads:
meillo@95 1219 .sp \n(PDu
meillo@98 1220 .QS
meillo@93 1221 If -noinplace is given, each digest is preserved, no table
meillo@93 1222 of contents is produced, and the messages contained within
meillo@93 1223 the digest are placed at the end of the folder. Other messages
meillo@93 1224 are not tampered with in any way.
meillo@98 1225 .QE
meillo@95 1226 .LP
meillo@93 1227 The decision to drop the
meillo@93 1228 .Sw -inplace
meillo@95 1229 behavior was supported by the code complexity and the possible data loss
meillo@95 1230 it caused.
meillo@93 1231 .Sw -noinplace
meillo@95 1232 was chosen to be the definitive behavior.
meillo@97 1233 .Ci 68a686adeb39223a5e1ad35e4a24890ec053679d
meillo@93 1234
meillo@95 1235
meillo@95 1236 .U3 "Forms and Format Strings
meillo@93 1237 .P
meillo@95 1238 Historically, the tools that had
meillo@95 1239 .Sw -form
meillo@95 1240 switches to supply a form file had
meillo@95 1241 .Sw -format
meillo@95 1242 switches as well to supply the contents of a form file as a string
meillo@95 1243 on the command line directly.
meillo@95 1244 In consequence, the following two lines equaled:
meillo@95 1245 .VS
meillo@95 1246 scan -form scan.mailx
meillo@95 1247 scan -format "`cat .../scan.mailx`"
meillo@95 1248 VE
meillo@95 1249 The
meillo@95 1250 .Sw -format
meillo@95 1251 switches were dropped in favor for extending the
meillo@95 1252 .Sw -form
meillo@95 1253 switches.
meillo@97 1254 .Ci f51956be123db66b00138f80464d06f030dbb88d
meillo@95 1255 If their argument starts with an equal sign (`='),
meillo@95 1256 then the rest of the argument is taken as a format string,
meillo@95 1257 otherwise the arguments is treated as the name of a format file.
meillo@95 1258 Thus, now the following two lines equal:
meillo@95 1259 .VS
meillo@95 1260 scan -form scan.mailx
meillo@95 1261 scan -form "=`cat .../scan.mailx`"
meillo@95 1262 VE
meillo@95 1263 This rework removed the prefix collision between
meillo@95 1264 .Sw -form
meillo@95 1265 and
meillo@95 1266 .Sw -format .
meillo@95 1267 Now, typing
meillo@95 1268 .Sw -fo
meillo@95 1269 suffices to specify form or format string.
meillo@95 1270 .P
meillo@95 1271 The different meaning of
meillo@95 1272 .Sw -format
meillo@95 1273 for
meillo@95 1274 .Pn repl
meillo@95 1275 and
meillo@95 1276 .Pn forw
meillo@95 1277 was removed in mmh.
meillo@95 1278 .Pn forw
meillo@95 1279 was completely switched to MIME-type forwarding, thus removing the
meillo@95 1280 .Sw -[no]format .
meillo@97 1281 .Ci 6e271608b7b9c23771523f88d23a4d3593010cf1
meillo@95 1282 For
meillo@95 1283 .Pn repl ,
meillo@95 1284 the
meillo@95 1285 .Sw -[no]format
meillo@95 1286 switches were reworked to
meillo@95 1287 .Sw -[no]filter
meillo@95 1288 switches.
meillo@97 1289 .Ci 67411b1f95d6ec987b4c732459e1ba8a8ac192c6
meillo@95 1290 The
meillo@95 1291 .Sw -format
meillo@95 1292 switches of
meillo@95 1293 .Pn send
meillo@95 1294 and
meillo@95 1295 .Pn post ,
meillo@95 1296 which had a third meaning,
meillo@95 1297 were removed likewise.
meillo@97 1298 .Ci f3cb7cde0e6f10451b6848678d95860d512224b9
meillo@95 1299 Eventually, the ambiguity of the
meillo@95 1300 .Sw -format
meillo@95 1301 switches was resolved by not anymore having any such switch in mmh.
meillo@95 1302
meillo@95 1303
meillo@95 1304 .U3 "MIME Tools
meillo@95 1305 .P
meillo@95 1306 The MIME tools, which were once part of
meillo@100 1307 .Pn mhn
meillo@100 1308 [sic!],
meillo@95 1309 had several switches that added little practical value to the programs.
meillo@95 1310 The
meillo@95 1311 .Sw -[no]realsize
meillo@95 1312 switches of
meillo@95 1313 .Pn mhbuild
meillo@95 1314 and
meillo@95 1315 .Pn mhlist
meillo@97 1316 were removed, doing real size calculations always now
meillo@97 1317 .Ci 8d8f1c3abc586c005c904e52c4adbfe694d2201c ,
meillo@97 1318 as
meillo@95 1319 ``This provides an accurate count at the expense of a small delay.''
meillo@95 1320 This small delay is not noticable on modern systems.
meillo@95 1321 .P
meillo@95 1322 The
meillo@95 1323 .Sw -[no]check
meillo@95 1324 switches were removed together with the support for
meillo@95 1325 .Hd Content-MD5
meillo@95 1326 header fields.
meillo@95 1327 .[
meillo@95 1328 rfc 1864
meillo@95 1329 .]
meillo@97 1330 .Ci 31dc797eb5178970d68962ca8939da3fd9a8efda
meillo@95 1331 (See Sec. XXX)
meillo@95 1332 .P
meillo@95 1333 The
meillo@95 1334 .Sw -[no]ebcdicsafe
meillo@95 1335 and
meillo@95 1336 .Sw -[no]rfc934mode
meillo@95 1337 switches of
meillo@95 1338 .Pn mhbuild
meillo@95 1339 were removed because they are considered obsolete.
meillo@97 1340 .Ci 01a3480928da485b4d6109d36d751dfa71799d58
meillo@97 1341 .Ci 3363e2624dce0eb8164cf8b3f1ab385c8ff72e88
meillo@95 1342 .P
meillo@95 1343 Content caching of external MIME parts, activated with the
meillo@95 1344 .Sw -rcache
meillo@95 1345 and
meillo@95 1346 .Sw -wcache
meillo@95 1347 switches was completely removed.
meillo@97 1348 .Ci d1fefd9f614e4dc3cda16da6c69133c1b2005269
meillo@97 1349 External MIME parts are rare today, having a caching facility
meillo@96 1350 for them is appears to be unnecessary.
meillo@95 1351 .P
meillo@95 1352 In pre-MIME times,
meillo@95 1353 .Pn mhl
meillo@95 1354 had covered many tasks that are part of MIME handling today.
meillo@95 1355 Therefore,
meillo@95 1356 .Pn mhl
meillo@95 1357 could be simplified to a large extend, reducing the number of its
meillo@95 1358 switches from 21 to 6.
meillo@97 1359 .Ci 350ad6d3542a07639213cf2a4fe524e829c1e7b6
meillo@97 1360 .Ci 0e46503be3c855bddaeae3843e1b659279c35d70
meillo@95 1361
meillo@95 1362
meillo@95 1363 .U3 "Mail Transfer Switches
meillo@95 1364 .P
meillo@95 1365 With the removal of the mail transfer facilities, a lot of switches
meillo@95 1366 vanished automatically.
meillo@95 1367 .Pn inc
meillo@95 1368 lost 9 switches, namely
meillo@95 1369 .Sw -host ,
meillo@95 1370 .Sw -port ,
meillo@95 1371 .Sw -user ,
meillo@95 1372 .Sw -proxy ,
meillo@95 1373 .Sw -snoop ,
meillo@95 1374 .Sw -[no]pack ,
meillo@95 1375 as well as
meillo@95 1376 .Sw -sasl
meillo@95 1377 and
meillo@95 1378 .Sw -saslmech .
meillo@95 1379 .Pn send
meillo@95 1380 and
meillo@95 1381 .Pn post
meillo@95 1382 lost 11 switches each, namely
meillo@95 1383 .Sw -server ,
meillo@95 1384 .Sw -port ,
meillo@95 1385 .Sw -client ,
meillo@95 1386 .Sw -user ,
meillo@95 1387 .Sw -mail ,
meillo@95 1388 .Sw -saml ,
meillo@95 1389 .Sw -send ,
meillo@95 1390 .Sw -soml ,
meillo@95 1391 .Sw -snoop ,
meillo@95 1392 as well as
meillo@95 1393 .Sw -sasl ,
meillo@95 1394 .Sw -saslmech ,
meillo@95 1395 and
meillo@95 1396 .Sw -tls .
meillo@95 1397 .Pn send
meillo@95 1398 had the switches only to pass them further to
meillo@95 1399 .Pn post ,
meillo@95 1400 because the user would invoke
meillo@95 1401 .Pn post
meillo@95 1402 not directly, but through
meillo@95 1403 .Pn send .
meillo@95 1404 All these switches, except
meillo@95 1405 .Sw -snoop
meillo@95 1406 were usually defined as default switches in the user's profile,
meillo@95 1407 but hardly given in interactive usage.
meillo@95 1408 .P
meillo@95 1409 Of course, those switches did not really ``vanish'', but the configuration
meillo@95 1410 they did was handed over to external MSAs and MRAs.
meillo@95 1411 Instead of setting up the mail transfer in mmh, it is set up in
meillo@95 1412 external tools.
meillo@95 1413 Yet, this simplifies mmh.
meillo@95 1414 Specialized external tools will likely have simple configuration files.
meillo@95 1415 Hence, instead of having one complicated central configuration file,
meillo@95 1416 the configuration of each domain is separate.
meillo@95 1417 Although the user needs to learn to configure each of the tools,
meillo@95 1418 each configuration is likely much simpler.
meillo@95 1419
meillo@95 1420
meillo@95 1421 .U3 "Maildrop Formats
meillo@95 1422 .P
meillo@95 1423 With the removal of MMDF maildrop format support,
meillo@95 1424 .Pn packf
meillo@95 1425 and
meillo@95 1426 .Pn rcvpack
meillo@95 1427 no longer needed their
meillo@95 1428 .Sw -mbox
meillo@95 1429 and
meillo@95 1430 .Sw -mmdf
meillo@95 1431 switches.
meillo@95 1432 .Sw -mbox
meillo@95 1433 is the sole behavior now.
meillo@97 1434 .Ci 3916ab66ad5d183705ac12357621ea8661afd3c0
meillo@95 1435 In the same go,
meillo@95 1436 .Pn packf
meillo@97 1437 and
meillo@97 1438 .Pn rcvpack
meillo@97 1439 were reworked (see Sec. XXX) and their
meillo@95 1440 .Sw -file
meillo@95 1441 switch became unnecessary.
meillo@97 1442 .Ci ca1023716d4c2ab890696f3e41fa0d94267a940e
meillo@95 1443
meillo@95 1444
meillo@95 1445 .U3 "Terminal Magic
meillo@95 1446 .P
meillo@95 1447 Mmh's tools will no longer clear the screen (\c
meillo@95 1448 .Pn scan 's
meillo@95 1449 and
meillo@95 1450 .Pn mhl 's
meillo@95 1451 .Sw -[no]clear
meillo@97 1452 switches
meillo@97 1453 .Ci e57b17343dcb3ff373ef4dd089fbe778f0c7c270
meillo@97 1454 .Ci 943765e7ac5693ae177fd8d2b5a2440e53ce816e ).
meillo@95 1455 Neither will
meillo@95 1456 .Pn mhl
meillo@95 1457 ring the bell (\c
meillo@97 1458 .Sw -[no]bell
meillo@97 1459 .Ci e11983f44e59d8de236affa5b0d0d3067c192e24 )
meillo@95 1460 nor page the output itself (\c
meillo@97 1461 .Sw -length
meillo@97 1462 .Ci 5b9d883db0318ed2b84bb82dee880d7381f99188 ).
meillo@95 1463 .P
meillo@95 1464 Generally, the pager to use is no longer specified with the
meillo@95 1465 .Sw -[no]moreproc
meillo@95 1466 command line switches for
meillo@95 1467 .Pn mhl
meillo@95 1468 and
meillo@95 1469 .Pn show /\c
meillo@95 1470 .Pn mhshow .
meillo@97 1471 .Ci 39e87a75b5c2d3572ec72e717720b44af291e88a
meillo@95 1472 .P
meillo@95 1473 .Pn prompter
meillo@95 1474 lost its
meillo@95 1475 .Sw -erase
meillo@95 1476 and
meillo@95 1477 .Sw -kill
meillo@95 1478 switches because today the terminal cares for the line editing keys.
meillo@95 1479
meillo@95 1480
meillo@95 1481 .U3 "Header Printing
meillo@95 1482 .P
meillo@95 1483 .Pn folder 's
meillo@95 1484 data output is self-explaining enough that
meillo@95 1485 displaying the header line makes few sense.
meillo@95 1486 Hence, the
meillo@95 1487 .Sw -[no]header
meillo@95 1488 switch was removed and headers are never printed.
meillo@97 1489 .Ci 601cc73d1fa05ce96faa728f036d6c51b91701c7
meillo@95 1490 .P
meillo@95 1491 In
meillo@95 1492 .Pn mhlist ,
meillo@95 1493 the
meillo@95 1494 .Sw -[no]header
meillo@95 1495 switches were removed, too.
meillo@97 1496 .Ci b24f96523aaf60e44e04a3ffb1d22e69a13a602f
meillo@95 1497 But in this case headers are always printed,
meillo@95 1498 because the output is not self-explaining.
meillo@95 1499 .P
meillo@95 1500 .Pn scan
meillo@95 1501 also had
meillo@95 1502 .Sw -[no]header
meillo@95 1503 switches.
meillo@95 1504 Printing the header had been sensible until the introduction of
meillo@95 1505 format strings made it impossible to display the column headings.
meillo@95 1506 Only the folder name and the current date remained to be printed.
meillo@95 1507 As this information can be perfectly retrieved by
meillo@95 1508 .Pn folder
meillo@95 1509 and
meillo@95 1510 .Pn date ,
meillo@95 1511 consequently, the switches were removed.
meillo@97 1512 .Ci c477dc5d1d03fa6d9a8ab3dd3508c63cbddc044e
meillo@95 1513 .P
meillo@95 1514 By removing all
meillo@95 1515 .Sw -header
meillo@95 1516 switches, the collision with
meillo@95 1517 .Sw -help
meillo@95 1518 on the first two letters was resolved.
meillo@95 1519 Currently,
meillo@95 1520 .Sw -h
meillo@95 1521 evaluates to
meillo@95 1522 .Sw -help
meillo@95 1523 for all tools of mmh.
meillo@95 1524
meillo@95 1525
meillo@95 1526 .U3 "Suppressing Edits or the WhatNow Shell
meillo@95 1527 .P
meillo@95 1528 The
meillo@95 1529 .Sw -noedit
meillo@100 1530 switch of
meillo@95 1531 .Pn comp ,
meillo@95 1532 .Pn repl ,
meillo@95 1533 .Pn forw ,
meillo@95 1534 .Pn dist ,
meillo@95 1535 and
meillo@95 1536 .Pn whatnow
meillo@95 1537 was removed, but it can now be replaced by specifying
meillo@95 1538 .Sw -editor
meillo@95 1539 with an empty argument.
meillo@97 1540 .Ci 75fca31a5b9d5c1a99c74ab14c94438d8852fba9
meillo@95 1541 (Specifying
meillo@95 1542 .Cl "-editor true
meillo@95 1543 is nearly the same, only differing by the previous editor being set.)
meillo@95 1544 .P
meillo@95 1545 The more important change is the removal of the
meillo@95 1546 .Sw -nowhatnowproc
meillo@95 1547 switch.
meillo@97 1548 .Ci ee4f43cf2ef0084ec698e4e87159a94c01940622
meillo@95 1549 This switch had introduced an awkward behavior, as explained in nmh's
meillo@95 1550 man page for
meillo@95 1551 .Mp comp (1):
meillo@98 1552 .QS
meillo@98 1553 The \-editor editor switch indicates the editor to use for
meillo@98 1554 the initial edit. Upon exiting from the editor, comp will
meillo@98 1555 invoke the whatnow program. See whatnow(1) for a discussion
meillo@98 1556 of available options. The invocation of this program can be
meillo@98 1557 inhibited by using the \-nowhatnowproc switch. (In truth of
meillo@98 1558 fact, it is the whatnow program which starts the initial
meillo@98 1559 edit. Hence, \-nowhatnowproc will prevent any edit from
meillo@95 1560 occurring.)
meillo@98 1561 .QE
meillo@95 1562 .P
meillo@95 1563 Effectively, the
meillo@95 1564 .Sw -nowhatnowproc
meillo@100 1565 switch creates only a draft message.
meillo@95 1566 As
meillo@95 1567 .Cl "-whatnowproc true
meillo@95 1568 causes the same behavior, the
meillo@95 1569 .Sw -nowhatnowproc
meillo@95 1570 switch was removed for being redundant.
meillo@100 1571 Likely, the
meillo@95 1572 .Sw -nowhatnowproc
meillo@100 1573 switch was intended to be used by front-ends.
meillo@95 1574
meillo@95 1575
meillo@95 1576 .U3 "Compatibility Switches
meillo@95 1577 .BU
meillo@95 1578 The hidden
meillo@95 1579 .Sw -[no]total
meillo@95 1580 switches of
meillo@95 1581 .Pn flist .
meillo@95 1582 They were simply the inverse of the visible
meillo@95 1583 .Sw -[no]fast
meillo@95 1584 switches:
meillo@95 1585 .Sw -total
meillo@95 1586 was
meillo@95 1587 .Sw -nofast
meillo@95 1588 and
meillo@95 1589 .Sw -nototal
meillo@95 1590 was
meillo@95 1591 .Sw -fast .
meillo@95 1592 I removed the
meillo@95 1593 .Sw -[no]total
meillo@95 1594 legacy.
meillo@97 1595 .Ci ea21fe2c4bd23c639bef251398fae809875732ec
meillo@95 1596 .BU
meillo@95 1597 The
meillo@95 1598 .Sw -subject
meillo@95 1599 switch of
meillo@95 1600 .Pn sortm
meillo@95 1601 existed for compatibility only.
meillo@95 1602 It can be fully replaced by
meillo@95 1603 .Cl "-textfield subject
meillo@95 1604 thus it was removed.
meillo@97 1605 .Ci 00140a3c86e9def69d98ba2ffd4d6e50ef6326ea
meillo@95 1606
meillo@95 1607
meillo@95 1608 .U3 "Various
meillo@95 1609 .BU
meillo@96 1610 In order to avoid prefix collisions among switch names, the
meillo@95 1611 .Sw -version
meillo@95 1612 switch was renamed to
meillo@95 1613 .Sw -Version
meillo@95 1614 (with capital `V').
meillo@97 1615 .Ci 32b2354dbaf4bf934936eb5b102a4a3d2fdd209a
meillo@95 1616 Every program has the
meillo@95 1617 .Sw -version
meillo@95 1618 switch but its first three letters collided with the
meillo@95 1619 .Sw -verbose
meillo@95 1620 switch, present in many programs.
meillo@95 1621 The rename solved this problem once for all.
meillo@95 1622 Although this rename breaks a basic interface, having the
meillo@95 1623 .Sw -V
meillo@95 1624 abbreviation to display the version information, isn't all too bad.
meillo@95 1625 .BU
meillo@95 1626 .Sw -[no]preserve
meillo@95 1627 of
meillo@95 1628 .Pn refile
meillo@95 1629 was removed because what use was it anyway?
meillo@98 1630 .QS
meillo@95 1631 Normally when a message is refiled, for each destination
meillo@95 1632 folder it is assigned the number which is one above the current
meillo@95 1633 highest message number in that folder. Use of the
meillo@95 1634 \-preserv [sic!] switch will override this message renaming, and try
meillo@95 1635 to preserve the number of the message. If a conflict for a
meillo@95 1636 particular folder occurs when using the \-preserve switch,
meillo@95 1637 then refile will use the next available message number which
meillo@95 1638 is above the message number you wish to preserve.
meillo@98 1639 .QE
meillo@95 1640 .BU
meillo@95 1641 The removal of the
meillo@95 1642 .Sw -[no]reverse
meillo@95 1643 switches of
meillo@95 1644 .Pn scan
meillo@97 1645 .Ci 8edc5aaf86f9f77124664f6801bc6c6cdf258173
meillo@95 1646 is a bug fix, supported by the comments
meillo@95 1647 ``\-[no]reverse under #ifdef BERK (I really HATE this)''
meillo@95 1648 by Rose and
meillo@95 1649 ``Lists messages in reverse order with the `\-reverse' switch.
meillo@95 1650 This should be considered a bug.'' by Romine in the documentation.
meillo@97 1651 The question remains why neither Rose and Romine had fixed this
meillo@109 1652 bug in the eighties when they wrote these comments nor has anyone
meillo@95 1653 thereafter.
meillo@93 1654
meillo@93 1655
meillo@93 1656 .ig
meillo@93 1657
meillo@95 1658 forw: [no]dashstuffing(mhl)
meillo@93 1659
meillo@95 1660 mhshow: [no]pause [no]serialonly
meillo@93 1661
meillo@93 1662 mhmail: resent queued
meillo@93 1663 inc: snoop, (pop)
meillo@93 1664
meillo@95 1665 mhl: [no]faceproc folder sleep
meillo@95 1666 [no]dashstuffing(forw) digest list volume number issue number
meillo@93 1667
meillo@95 1668 prompter: [no]doteof
meillo@93 1669
meillo@93 1670 refile: [no]preserve [no]unlink [no]rmmproc
meillo@93 1671
meillo@95 1672 send: [no]forward [no]mime [no]msgid
meillo@93 1673 [no]push split [no]unique (sasl) width snoop [no]dashstuffing
meillo@93 1674 attach attachformat
meillo@93 1675 whatnow: (noedit) attach
meillo@93 1676
meillo@93 1677 slocal: [no]suppressdups
meillo@93 1678
meillo@95 1679 spost: [no]filter [no]backup width [no]push idanno
meillo@93 1680 [no]check(whom) whom(whom)
meillo@93 1681
meillo@93 1682 whom: ???
meillo@93 1683
meillo@95 1684 ..
meillo@93 1685
meillo@93 1686
meillo@93 1687 .ig
meillo@93 1688
meillo@93 1689 .P
meillo@93 1690 In the best case, all switches are unambiguous on the first character,
meillo@93 1691 or on the three-letter prefix for the `no' variants.
meillo@96 1692 Reducing switch prefix collisions, shortens the necessary prefix length
meillo@93 1693 the user must type.
meillo@93 1694 Having less switches helps best.
meillo@93 1695
meillo@93 1696 ..
meillo@58 1697
meillo@95 1698
meillo@102 1699 .\" XXX: whatnow prompt commands
meillo@102 1700
meillo@102 1701
meillo@95 1702
meillo@95 1703
meillo@74 1704 .H1 "Modernizing
meillo@102 1705 .P
meillo@118 1706 In the over thirty years of MH's existence, its code base was
meillo@118 1707 extended more and more.
meillo@118 1708 New features entered the project and became alternatives to the
meillo@118 1709 existing behavior.
meillo@118 1710 Relicts from several decades have gathered in the code base,
meillo@118 1711 but seldom obsolete features were dropped.
meillo@118 1712 This section describes the removing of old code
meillo@118 1713 and the modernizing of the default setup.
meillo@118 1714 It focuses on the functional aspect only;
meillo@118 1715 the non-functional aspects of code style are discussed in
meillo@118 1716 .\" FIXME REF
meillo@118 1717 Sec. XXX.
meillo@58 1718
meillo@58 1719
meillo@100 1720 .H2 "Code Relicts
meillo@0 1721 .P
meillo@109 1722 My position to drop obsolete functions of mmh, in order to remove old code,
meillo@104 1723 is much more revolutional than the nmh community likes to have it.
meillo@104 1724 Working on an experimental version, I was able to quickly drop
meillo@104 1725 functionality I considered ancient.
meillo@104 1726 The need for consensus with peers would have slowed this process down.
meillo@104 1727 Without the need to justify my decisions, I was able to rush forward.
meillo@110 1728 In December 2011, Paul Vixie motivated the nmh developers to just
meillo@104 1729 do the work:
meillo@104 1730 .[
meillo@104 1731 paul vixie edginess nmh-workers
meillo@104 1732 .]
meillo@104 1733 .QS
meillo@104 1734 let's stop walking on egg shells with this code base. there's no need to
meillo@104 1735 discuss whether to keep using vfork, just note in [sic!] passing, [...]
meillo@104 1736 we don't need a separate branch for removing vmh
meillo@104 1737 or ridding ourselves of #ifdef's or removing posix replacement functions
meillo@104 1738 or depending on pure ansi/posix "libc".
meillo@104 1739 .QP
meillo@104 1740 these things should each be a day or two of work and the "main branch"
meillo@104 1741 should just be modern. [...]
meillo@104 1742 let's push forward, aggressively.
meillo@104 1743 .QE
meillo@104 1744 .LP
meillo@104 1745 I did so already in the months before.
meillo@104 1746 I pushed forward.
meillo@104 1747 I simply dropped the cruft.
meillo@104 1748 .P
meillo@104 1749 The decision to drop a feature was based on literature research and
meillo@104 1750 careful thinking, but whether having had contact to this particular
meillo@104 1751 feature within my own computer life served as a rule of thumb.
meillo@109 1752 Always, I explained my reasons in the commit messages
meillo@109 1753 in the version control system.
meillo@104 1754 Hence, others can comprehend my view and argue for undoing the change
meillo@104 1755 if I have missed an important aspect.
meillo@109 1756 I was quick in dropping parts.
meillo@109 1757 I rather re-included falsely dropped parts than going a slower pace.
meillo@109 1758 Mmh is experimental work; it required tough decisions.
meillo@12 1759
meillo@102 1760
meillo@104 1761 .U3 "Forking
meillo@12 1762 .P
meillo@109 1763 Being a tool chest, MH creates many processes.
meillo@104 1764 In earlier times
meillo@104 1765 .Fu fork()
meillo@104 1766 had been an expensive system call, because the process's image needed
meillo@104 1767 to be duplicated completely at once.
meillo@109 1768 This was especially painful in the common case when the image gets
meillo@104 1769 replaced by a call to
meillo@104 1770 .Fu exec()
meillo@104 1771 right after having forked the child process.
meillo@104 1772 The
meillo@104 1773 .Fu vfork()
meillo@104 1774 system call was invented to speed up this particular case.
meillo@104 1775 It completely omits the duplication of the image.
meillo@104 1776 On old systems this resulted in significant speed ups.
meillo@104 1777 Therefore MH used
meillo@104 1778 .Fu vfork()
meillo@104 1779 whenever possible.
meillo@12 1780 .P
meillo@104 1781 Modern memory management units support copy-on-write semantics, which make
meillo@104 1782 .Fu fork()
meillo@104 1783 almost as fast as
meillo@104 1784 .Fu vfork() .
meillo@104 1785 The man page of
meillo@104 1786 .Mp vfork (2)
meillo@104 1787 in FreeBSD 8.0 states:
meillo@104 1788 .QS
meillo@104 1789 This system call will be eliminated when proper system sharing mechanisms
meillo@104 1790 are implemented. Users should not depend on the memory sharing semantics
meillo@104 1791 of vfork() as it will, in that case, be made synonymous to fork(2).
meillo@104 1792 .QE
meillo@104 1793 .LP
meillo@104 1794 Vixie supports the removal with the note that ``the last
meillo@104 1795 system on which fork was so slow that an mh user would notice it, was
meillo@104 1796 Eunice. that was 1987''.
meillo@104 1797 .[
meillo@104 1798 nmh-workers vixie edginess
meillo@104 1799 .]
meillo@104 1800 I replaced all calls to
meillo@104 1801 .Fu vfork()
meillo@104 1802 with calls to
meillo@104 1803 .Fu fork() .
meillo@109 1804 .Ci 40821f5c1316e9205a08375e7075909cc9968e7d
meillo@104 1805 .P
meillo@104 1806 Related to the costs of
meillo@104 1807 .Fu fork()
meillo@104 1808 is the probability of its success.
meillo@109 1809 In the eighties, on heavy loaded systems, calls to
meillo@104 1810 .Fu fork()
meillo@104 1811 were prone to failure.
meillo@104 1812 Hence, many of the
meillo@104 1813 .Fu fork()
meillo@104 1814 calls in the code were wrapped into loops to retry the
meillo@104 1815 .Fu fork()
meillo@109 1816 several times, to increase the changes to succeed, eventually.
meillo@109 1817 On modern systems, a failing
meillo@104 1818 .Fu fork()
meillo@109 1819 call is unusual.
meillo@104 1820 Hence, in the rare case when
meillo@104 1821 .Fu fork()
meillo@104 1822 fails, mmh programs simply abort.
meillo@109 1823 .Ci 5fbf37ee68e018998ada61eeab73e035b26834b6
meillo@12 1824
meillo@12 1825
meillo@109 1826 .U3 "Header Fields
meillo@104 1827 .BU
meillo@84 1828 The
meillo@84 1829 .Hd Encrypted
meillo@104 1830 header field was introduced by RFC\|822,
meillo@109 1831 but already marked as legacy in RFC\|2822.
meillo@109 1832 Today, OpenPGP provides the basis for standardized exchange of encrypted
meillo@104 1833 messages [RFC\|4880, RFC\|3156].
meillo@109 1834 Hence, the support for
meillo@104 1835 .Hd Encrypted
meillo@104 1836 header fields is removed in mmh.
meillo@109 1837 .Ci 064527f7b57ab050e5af13e15ad99aeeab125857
meillo@104 1838 .BU
meillo@84 1839 Native support for
meillo@84 1840 .Hd Face
meillo@104 1841 header fields has been removed, as well.
meillo@109 1842 .Ci 8e5be81f784682822f5e868c1bf3c8624682bd23
meillo@104 1843 This feature is similar to the
meillo@84 1844 .Hd X-Face
meillo@84 1845 header field in its intent,
meillo@21 1846 but takes a different approach to store the image.
meillo@84 1847 Instead of encoding the image data directly into the header field,
meillo@109 1848 it contains the hostname and UDP port where the image
meillo@109 1849 date can be retrieved.
meillo@109 1850 There exists even a third Face system,
meillo@109 1851 which is the successor of
meillo@109 1852 .Hd X-Face ,
meillo@109 1853 although it re-uses the
meillo@104 1854 .Hd Face
meillo@109 1855 header field.
meillo@109 1856 It was invented in 2005 and supports colored PNG images.
meillo@104 1857 None of the Face systems described here is popular today.
meillo@104 1858 Hence, mmh has no direct support for them.
meillo@104 1859 .BU
meillo@104 1860 The
meillo@104 1861 .Hd Content-MD5
meillo@104 1862 header field was introduced by RFC\|1864.
meillo@104 1863 It provides detection of data corruption during the transfer.
meillo@104 1864 But it can not ensure verbatim end-to-end delivery of the contents
meillo@104 1865 [RFC\|1864].
meillo@104 1866 The proper approach to verify content integrity in an
meillo@104 1867 end-to-end relationship is the use of digital cryptography.
meillo@104 1868 .\" XXX (RFCs FIXME).
meillo@104 1869 On the other hand, transfer protocols should detect corruption during
meillo@109 1870 the transmission.
meillo@109 1871 The TCP includes a checksum field therefore.
meillo@104 1872 These two approaches in combinations render the
meillo@104 1873 .Hd Content-MD5
meillo@104 1874 header field superfluous.
meillo@109 1875 Not a single one out of 4\|200 messages from two decades
meillo@109 1876 in an nmh-workers mailing list archive contains a
meillo@104 1877 .Hd Content-MD5
meillo@104 1878 header field.
meillo@104 1879 Neither did any of the 60\|000 messages in my personal mail storage.
meillo@104 1880 Removing the support for this header field,
meillo@104 1881 removed the last place where MD5 computation was needed.
meillo@109 1882 .Ci 31dc797eb5178970d68962ca8939da3fd9a8efda
meillo@104 1883 Hence, the MD5 code could be removed as well.
meillo@104 1884 Over 500 lines of code vanished by this one change.
meillo@104 1885
meillo@104 1886
meillo@104 1887 .U3 "MMDF maildrop support
meillo@21 1888 .P
meillo@104 1889 This type of format is conceptionally similar to the mbox format,
meillo@104 1890 but uses a different message delimiter (`\fL^A^A^A^A\fP' instead of
meillo@104 1891 `\fLFrom\0\fP').
meillo@104 1892 Mbox is the de-facto standard maildrop format on Unix,
meillo@109 1893 whereas the MMDF maildrop format became forgotten.
meillo@104 1894 I did drop MMDF maildrop format support.
meillo@109 1895 Mbox is the only packed mailbox format supported in mmh.
meillo@104 1896 .P
meillo@109 1897 The simplifications within the code were moderate.
meillo@109 1898 Mainly, the reading and writing of MMDF mailbox files was removed.
meillo@109 1899 But also, switches of
meillo@109 1900 .Pn packf
meillo@104 1901 and
meillo@109 1902 .Pn rcvpack
meillo@109 1903 could be removed.
meillo@109 1904 .Ci 3916ab66ad5d183705ac12357621ea8661afd3c0
meillo@109 1905 In the message parsing function
meillo@109 1906 .Fn sbr/m_getfld.c ,
meillo@109 1907 knowledge of MMDF packed mail boxes was removed.
meillo@109 1908 .Ci 684ec30d81e1223a282764452f4902ed4ad1c754
meillo@109 1909 Further code structure simplifications may be possible there,
meillo@109 1910 because only one single packed mailbox format is left to be supported.
meillo@104 1911 I have not worked on them yet because
meillo@104 1912 .Fu m_getfld()
meillo@104 1913 is heavily optimized and thus dangerous to touch.
meillo@104 1914 The risk of damaging the intricate workings of the optimized code is
meillo@104 1915 too high.
meillo@104 1916 .\" XXX: move somewhere else
meillo@104 1917 This problem is know to the developers of nmh, too.
meillo@109 1918 They also avoid touching this minefield.
meillo@104 1919
meillo@12 1920
meillo@101 1921 .U3 "Prompter's Control Keys
meillo@20 1922 .P
meillo@20 1923 The program
meillo@20 1924 .Pn prompter
meillo@104 1925 queries the user to fill in a message form.
meillo@104 1926 When used by
meillo@20 1927 .Pn comp
meillo@104 1928 as
meillo@104 1929 .Cl "comp -editor prompter" ,
meillo@20 1930 the resulting behavior is similar to
meillo@20 1931 .Pn mailx .
meillo@51 1932 Apparently,
meillo@20 1933 .Pn prompter
meillo@104 1934 hadn't been touched lately.
meillo@104 1935 Otherwise it's hardly explainable why it
meillo@20 1936 still offered the switches
meillo@84 1937 .Sw -erase
meillo@84 1938 .Ar chr
meillo@20 1939 and
meillo@84 1940 .Sw -kill
meillo@84 1941 .Ar chr
meillo@20 1942 to name the characters for command line editing.
meillo@21 1943 The times when this had been necessary are long time gone.
meillo@20 1944 Today these things work out-of-the-box, and if not, are configured
meillo@20 1945 with the standard tool
meillo@20 1946 .Pn stty .
meillo@104 1947 The switches are removed now
meillo@104 1948 .Ci 0bd9750710cdbab80cfb4036dd87af20afe1552f .
meillo@20 1949
meillo@104 1950
meillo@109 1951 .U3 "Hardcopy Terminal Support
meillo@21 1952 .P
meillo@109 1953 More of a funny anecdote is a check for being connected to a
meillo@109 1954 hardcopy terminal.
meillo@109 1955 It remained in the code until Spring 2012, when I finally removed it
meillo@104 1956 .Ci b7764c4a6b71d37918a97594d866258f154017ca .
meillo@109 1957 I would be truly happy to see such a terminal in action today,
meillo@109 1958 maybe even being able to work on it.
meillo@109 1959 But I fear my chances are null.
meillo@21 1960 .P
meillo@109 1961 The check only prevented a pager to be placed between the printing
meillo@104 1962 program (\c
meillo@104 1963 .Pn mhl )
meillo@104 1964 and the terminal.
meillo@109 1965 In nmh, this could have been ensured statically with the
meillo@104 1966 .Sw -nomoreproc
meillo@109 1967 at the command line, too.
meillo@121 1968 In mmh, setting the profile entry
meillo@104 1969 .Pe Pager
meillo@104 1970 or the environment variable
meillo@104 1971 .Ev PAGER
meillo@104 1972 to
meillo@109 1973 .Pn cat
meillo@109 1974 does the job.
meillo@104 1975
meillo@104 1976
meillo@21 1977
meillo@12 1978
meillo@58 1979 .H2 "Attachments
meillo@22 1980 .P
meillo@101 1981 The mind model of email attachments is unrelated to MIME.
meillo@101 1982 Although the MIME RFCs (2045 through 2049) define the technical
meillo@109 1983 requirements for having attachments, they do not mention the word
meillo@101 1984 ``attachment''.
meillo@101 1985 Instead of attachments, MIME talks about ``multi-part message bodies''
meillo@101 1986 [RFC\|2045], a more general concept.
meillo@101 1987 Multi-part messages are messages
meillo@101 1988 ``in which one or more different
meillo@101 1989 sets of data are combined in a single body''
meillo@101 1990 [RFC\|2046].
meillo@101 1991 MIME keeps its descriptions generic;
meillo@101 1992 it does not imply specific usage models.
meillo@109 1993 One usage model became prevalent: attachments.
meillo@101 1994 The idea is having a main text document with files of arbitrary kind
meillo@101 1995 attached to it.
meillo@101 1996 In MIME terms, this is a multi-part message having a text part first
meillo@110 1997 and parts of arbitrary type following.
meillo@101 1998 .P
meillo@101 1999 MH's MIME support is a direct implementation of the RFCs.
meillo@101 2000 The perception of the topic described in the RFCs is clearly visible
meillo@101 2001 in MH's implementation.
meillo@109 2002 In result, MH had all the MIME features but no idea of attachments.
meillo@109 2003 But users don't need all the MIME features,
meillo@109 2004 they want convenient attachment handling.
meillo@109 2005
meillo@102 2006
meillo@102 2007 .U3 "Composing MIME Messages
meillo@102 2008 .P
meillo@102 2009 In order to improve the situation on the message composing side,
meillo@102 2010 Jon Steinhart had added an attachment system to nmh in 2002.
meillo@101 2011 .Ci 7480dbc14bc90f2d872d434205c0784704213252
meillo@102 2012 In the file
meillo@102 2013 .Fn docs/README-ATTACHMENTS ,
meillo@102 2014 he described his motivation to do so as such:
meillo@101 2015 .QS
meillo@101 2016 Although nmh contains the necessary functionality for MIME message handing,
meillo@101 2017 the interface to this functionality is pretty obtuse.
meillo@101 2018 There's no way that I'm ever going to convince my partner to write
meillo@101 2019 .Pn mhbuild
meillo@101 2020 composition files!
meillo@101 2021 .QE
meillo@102 2022 .LP
meillo@102 2023 With this change, the mind model of attachments entered nmh.
meillo@102 2024 In the same document:
meillo@101 2025 .QS
meillo@101 2026 These changes simplify the task of managing attachments on draft files.
meillo@101 2027 They allow attachments to be added, listed, and deleted.
meillo@101 2028 MIME messages are automatically created when drafts with attachments
meillo@101 2029 are sent.
meillo@101 2030 .QE
meillo@102 2031 .LP
meillo@102 2032 Unfortunately, the attachment system,
meillo@102 2033 like any new facilities in nmh,
meillo@110 2034 was inactive by default.
meillo@101 2035 .P
meillo@101 2036 During my work in Argentina, I tried to improve the attachment system.
meillo@102 2037 But, because of great opposition in the nmh community,
meillo@102 2038 my patch died as a proposal on the mailing list, after long discussions.
meillo@101 2039 .[
meillo@101 2040 nmh-workers attachment proposal
meillo@101 2041 .]
meillo@110 2042 In January 2012, I extended the patch and applied it to mmh.
meillo@101 2043 .Ci 8ff284ff9167eff8f5349481529332d59ed913b1
meillo@102 2044 In mmh, the attachment system is active by default.
meillo@102 2045 Instead of command line switches, the
meillo@102 2046 .Pe Attachment-Header
meillo@102 2047 profile entry is used to specify
meillo@102 2048 the name of the attachment header field.
meillo@102 2049 It is pre-defined to
meillo@102 2050 .Hd Attach .
meillo@101 2051 .P
meillo@101 2052 To add an attachment to a draft, simply add an attachment header:
meillo@101 2053 .VS
meillo@101 2054 To: bob
meillo@101 2055 Subject: The file you wanted
meillo@101 2056 Attach: /path/to/the/file-bob-wanted
meillo@101 2057 --------
meillo@101 2058 Here it is.
meillo@101 2059 VE
meillo@101 2060 The header field can be added to the draft manually in the editor,
meillo@102 2061 or by using the `attach' command at the WhatNow prompt, or
meillo@102 2062 non-interactively with
meillo@101 2063 .Pn anno :
meillo@101 2064 .VS
meillo@102 2065 anno -append -nodate -component Attach -text /path/to/attachment
meillo@101 2066 VE
meillo@102 2067 Drafts with attachment headers are converted to MIME automatically by
meillo@102 2068 .Pn send .
meillo@102 2069 The conversion to MIME is invisible to the user.
meillo@102 2070 The draft stored in the draft folder is always in source form, with
meillo@101 2071 attachment headers.
meillo@101 2072 If the MIMEification fails, for instance because the file to attach
meillo@101 2073 is not accessible, the original draft is not changed.
meillo@101 2074 .P
meillo@102 2075 The attachment system handles the forwarding of messages, too.
meillo@101 2076 If the attachment header value starts with a plus character (`+'),
meillo@101 2077 like in
meillo@101 2078 .Cl "Attach: +bob 30 42" ,
meillo@101 2079 The given messages in the specified folder will be attached.
meillo@101 2080 This allowed to simplify
meillo@101 2081 .Pn forw .
meillo@101 2082 .Ci f41f04cf4ceca7355232cf7413e59afafccc9550
meillo@101 2083 .P
meillo@101 2084 Closely related to attachments is non-ASCII text content,
meillo@101 2085 because it requires MIME too.
meillo@102 2086 In nmh, the user needed to call `mime' at the WhatNow prompt
meillo@101 2087 to have the draft converted to MIME.
meillo@102 2088 This was necessary whenever the draft contained non-ASCII characters.
meillo@101 2089 If the user did not call `mime', a broken message would be sent.
meillo@101 2090 Therefore, the
meillo@101 2091 .Pe automimeproc
meillo@101 2092 profile entry could be specified to have the `mime' command invoked
meillo@102 2093 automatically each time.
meillo@101 2094 Unfortunately, this approach conflicted with with attachment system
meillo@101 2095 because the draft would already be in MIME format at the time
meillo@101 2096 when the attachment system wanted to MIMEify it.
meillo@102 2097 To use nmh's attachment system, `mime' must not be called at the
meillo@102 2098 WhatNow prompt and
meillo@101 2099 .Pe automimeproc
meillo@102 2100 must not be set in the profile.
meillo@101 2101 But then the case of non-ASCII text without attachment headers was
meillo@101 2102 not caught.
meillo@102 2103 All in all, the solution was complex and irritating.
meillo@102 2104 My patch from December 2010 would have simplified the situation.
meillo@102 2105 .P
meillo@101 2106 Mmh's current solution is even more elaborate.
meillo@101 2107 Any necessary MIMEification is done automatically.
meillo@101 2108 There is no `mime' command at the WhatNow prompt anymore.
meillo@102 2109 The draft will be converted automatically to MIME when either an
meillo@102 2110 attachment header or non-ASCII text is present.
meillo@101 2111 Further more, the special meaning of the hash character (`#')
meillo@102 2112 at line beginnings in the draft message is removed.
meillo@102 2113 Users need not at all deal with the whole topic.
meillo@101 2114 .P
meillo@102 2115 Although the new approach does not anymore support arbitrary MIME
meillo@102 2116 compositions directly, the full power of
meillo@101 2117 .Pn mhbuild
meillo@101 2118 can still be accessed.
meillo@102 2119 Given no attachment headers are included, the user can create
meillo@101 2120 .Pn mhbuild
meillo@102 2121 composition drafts like in nmh.
meillo@101 2122 Then, at the WhatNow prompt, he needs to invoke
meillo@101 2123 .Cl "edit mhbuild
meillo@101 2124 to convert it to MIME.
meillo@110 2125 Because the resulting draft does neither contain non-ASCII characters
meillo@102 2126 nor has it attachment headers, the attachment system will not touch it.
meillo@101 2127 .P
meillo@121 2128 The approach taken in mmh is tailored towards todays most common case:
meillo@101 2129 a text part with possibly attachments.
meillo@102 2130 This case is simplified a lot for users.
meillo@102 2131
meillo@112 2132
meillo@102 2133 .U3 "MIME Type Guessing
meillo@102 2134 .P
meillo@102 2135 The use of
meillo@101 2136 .Pn mhbuild
meillo@102 2137 composition drafts had one notable advantage over attachment headers
meillo@102 2138 from the programmer's point of view: The user provides the appropriate
meillo@102 2139 MIME types for files to include.
meillo@102 2140 The attachment system needs to find out the correct MIME type itself.
meillo@102 2141 This is a difficult task, yet it spares the user irritating work.
meillo@102 2142 Determining the correct MIME type of content is partly mechanical,
meillo@102 2143 partly intelligent work.
meillo@102 2144 Forcing the user to find out the correct MIME type,
meillo@102 2145 forces him to do partly mechanical work.
meillo@102 2146 Letting the computer do the work, can lead to bad choices for difficult
meillo@102 2147 content.
meillo@102 2148 For mmh, the latter option was chosen.
meillo@102 2149 .P
meillo@102 2150 Determining the MIME type by the suffix of the file name is a dumb
meillo@102 2151 approach, yet it is simple to implement and provides good results
meillo@102 2152 for the common cases.
meillo@102 2153 Mmh implements this approach in the
meillo@102 2154 .Pn print-mimetype
meillo@102 2155 script.
meillo@112 2156 .Ci 4b5944268ea0da7bb30598a27857304758ea9b44
meillo@102 2157 Using it is the default choice.
meillo@102 2158 .P
meillo@112 2159 A far better, though less portable, approach is the use of
meillo@102 2160 .Pn file .
meillo@102 2161 This standard tool tries to determine the type of files.
meillo@102 2162 Unfortunately, its capabilities and accuracy varies from system to system.
meillo@102 2163 Additionally, its output was only intended for human beings,
meillo@102 2164 but not to be used by programs.
meillo@102 2165 It varies much.
meillo@102 2166 Nevertheless, modern versions of GNU
meillo@102 2167 .Pn file ,
meillo@102 2168 which is prevalent on the popular GNU/Linux systems,
meillo@102 2169 provides MIME type output in machine-readable form.
meillo@102 2170 Although this solution is highly system-dependent,
meillo@102 2171 it solves the difficult problem well.
meillo@102 2172 On systems where GNU
meillo@102 2173 .Pn file ,
meillo@102 2174 version 5.04 or higher, is available it should be used.
meillo@102 2175 One needs to specify the following profile entry to do so:
meillo@112 2176 .Ci 3baec236a39c5c89a9bda8dbd988d643a21decc6
meillo@102 2177 .VS
meillo@102 2178 Mime-Type-Query: file -b --mime
meillo@102 2179 VE
meillo@102 2180 .LP
meillo@102 2181 Other versions of
meillo@102 2182 .Pn file
meillo@102 2183 might possibly be usable with wrapper scripts to reformat the output.
meillo@102 2184 The diversity among
meillo@102 2185 .Pn file
meillo@102 2186 implementations is great; one needs to check the local variant.
meillo@102 2187 .P
meillo@102 2188 If no MIME type can be determined, text content gets sent as
meillo@102 2189 `text/plain' and anything else under the generic fall-back type
meillo@102 2190 `application/octet-stream'.
meillo@102 2191 It is not possible in mmh to override the automatic MIME type guessing
meillo@102 2192 for a specific file.
meillo@102 2193 To do so, the user would need to know in advance for which file
meillo@102 2194 the automatic guessing does fail, or the system would require interaction.
meillo@102 2195 I consider both cases impractical.
meillo@102 2196 The existing solution should be sufficient.
meillo@102 2197 If not, the user may always fall back to
meillo@102 2198 .Pn mhbuild
meillo@102 2199 composition drafts and ignore the attachment system.
meillo@101 2200
meillo@102 2201
meillo@102 2202 .U3 "Storing Attachments
meillo@102 2203 .P
meillo@108 2204 Extracting MIME parts of a message and storing them to disk is done by
meillo@108 2205 .Pn mhstore .
meillo@108 2206 The program has two operation modes,
meillo@108 2207 .Sw -auto
meillo@108 2208 and
meillo@108 2209 .Sw -noauto .
meillo@108 2210 With the former one, each part is stored under the filename given in the
meillo@108 2211 MIME part's meta information, if available.
meillo@108 2212 This naming information is usually available for modern attachments.
meillo@108 2213 If no filename is available, this MIME part is stored as if
meillo@108 2214 .Sw -noauto
meillo@108 2215 would have been specified.
meillo@108 2216 In the
meillo@108 2217 .Sw -noauto
meillo@108 2218 mode, the parts are processed according to rules, defined by
meillo@108 2219 .Pe mhstore-store-*
meillo@108 2220 profile entries.
meillo@108 2221 These rules define generic filename templates for storing
meillo@108 2222 or commands to post-process the contents in arbitrary ways.
meillo@108 2223 If no matching rule is available the part is stored under a generic
meillo@108 2224 filename, built from message number, MIME part number, and MIME type.
meillo@108 2225 .P
meillo@108 2226 The
meillo@108 2227 .Sw -noauto
meillo@108 2228 mode had been the default in nmh because it was considered safe,
meillo@108 2229 in contrast to the
meillo@108 2230 .Sw -auto
meillo@108 2231 mode.
meillo@108 2232 In mmh,
meillo@108 2233 .Sw -auto
meillo@108 2234 is not dangerous anymore.
meillo@108 2235 Two changes were necessary:
meillo@108 2236 .BU
meillo@108 2237 Any directory path is removed from the proposed filename.
meillo@108 2238 Thus, the files are always stored in the expected directory.
meillo@108 2239 .Ci 41b6eadbcecf63c9a66aa5e582011987494abefb
meillo@108 2240 .BU
meillo@108 2241 Tar files are not extracted automatically any more.
meillo@108 2242 Thus, the rest of the file system will not be touched.
meillo@108 2243 .Ci 94c80042eae3383c812d9552089953f9846b1bb6
meillo@108 2244 .LP
meillo@108 2245 Now, the outcome of mmh's
meillo@108 2246 .Cl "mhstore -auto
meillo@110 2247 can be foreseen from the output of
meillo@108 2248 .Cl "mhlist -verbose" .
meillo@108 2249 .P
meillo@108 2250 The
meillo@108 2251 .Sw -noauto
meillo@108 2252 mode is seen to be more powerful but less convenient.
meillo@108 2253 On the other hand,
meillo@108 2254 .Sw -auto
meillo@108 2255 is safe now and
meillo@108 2256 storing attachments under their original name is intuitive.
meillo@108 2257 Hence,
meillo@108 2258 .Sw -auto
meillo@108 2259 serves better as the default option.
meillo@108 2260 .Ci 3410b680416c49a7617491af38bc1929855a331d
meillo@108 2261 .P
meillo@108 2262 Files are stored into the directory given by the
meillo@108 2263 .Pe Nmh-Storage
meillo@108 2264 profile entry, if set, or
meillo@108 2265 into the current working directory, otherwise.
meillo@108 2266 Storing to different directories is only possible with
meillo@108 2267 .Pe mhstore-store-*
meillo@108 2268 profile entries.
meillo@108 2269 .P
meillo@108 2270 Still, in both modes, existing files get overwritten silently.
meillo@108 2271 This can be considered a bug.
meillo@108 2272 Yet, each other behavior has its draw-backs, too.
meillo@108 2273 Refusing to replace files requires adding a
meillo@108 2274 .Sw -force
meillo@108 2275 option.
meillo@108 2276 Users will likely need to invoke
meillo@108 2277 .Pn mhstore
meillo@108 2278 a second time with
meillo@108 2279 .Sw -force
meillo@108 2280 then.
meillo@108 2281 Eventually, only the user can decide in the concrete case.
meillo@108 2282 This requires interaction, which I like to avoid if possible.
meillo@108 2283 Appending a unique suffix to the filename is another bad option.
meillo@108 2284 For now, the behavior remains as it is.
meillo@108 2285 .P
meillo@108 2286 In mmh, only MIME parts of type message are special in
meillo@108 2287 .Pn mhstore 's
meillo@108 2288 .Sw -auto
meillo@108 2289 mode.
meillo@108 2290 Instead of storing message/rfc822 parts as files to disk,
meillo@108 2291 they are stored as messages into the current mail folder.
meillo@108 2292 The same applies to message/partial, only, the parts are reassembled
meillo@108 2293 automatically before.
meillo@108 2294 Parts of type message/external-body are not automatically retrieved
meillo@108 2295 anymore. Instead, Information on how to retrieve them is output.
meillo@108 2296 Not supporting this rare case saved nearly one thousand lines of code.
meillo@108 2297 .Ci 55e1d8c654ee0f7c45b9361ce34617983b454c32
meillo@108 2298 .\" XXX mention somewhere else too: (The profile entry `nmh-access-ftp'
meillo@108 2299 .\" and sbr/ruserpass.c for reading ~/.netrc are gone now.)
meillo@108 2300 Not special anymore is `application/octet-stream; type=tar'.
meillo@108 2301 Automatically extracting such MIME parts had been the dangerous part
meillo@108 2302 of the
meillo@108 2303 .Sw -auto
meillo@108 2304 mode.
meillo@108 2305 .Ci 94c80042eae3383c812d9552089953f9846b1bb6
meillo@108 2306
meillo@102 2307
meillo@102 2308
meillo@102 2309 .U3 "Showing MIME Messages
meillo@102 2310 .P
meillo@114 2311 The program
meillo@114 2312 .Pn mhshow
meillo@114 2313 had been written to display MIME messages.
meillo@114 2314 It implemented the conceptional view of the MIME RFCs.
meillo@114 2315 Nmh's
meillo@114 2316 .Pn mhshow
meillo@114 2317 handled each MIME part independently, presenting them separately
meillo@114 2318 to the user.
meillo@114 2319 This does not match today's understanding of email attachments,
meillo@114 2320 where displaying a message is seen to be a single, integrated operation.
meillo@114 2321 Today, email messages are expected to consist of a main text part
meillo@114 2322 plus possibly attachments.
meillo@114 2323 They are not any more seen to be arbitrary MIME hierarchies with
meillo@114 2324 information on how to display the individual parts.
meillo@114 2325 I adjusted
meillo@114 2326 .Pn mhshow 's
meillo@114 2327 behavior to the modern view on the topic.
meillo@114 2328 .P
meillo@114 2329 Note that this section completely ignores the original
meillo@114 2330 .Pn show
meillo@114 2331 program, because it was not capable to display MIME messages
meillo@114 2332 and is no longer part of mmh.
meillo@114 2333 Although
meillo@114 2334 .Pn mhshow
meillo@114 2335 was renamed to
meillo@114 2336 .Pn show
meillo@114 2337 in mmh, this section uses the name
meillo@114 2338 .Pn mhshow ,
meillo@114 2339 in order to avoid confusion.
meillo@114 2340 .P
meillo@114 2341 In mmh, the basic idea is that
meillo@114 2342 .Pn mhshow
meillo@114 2343 should display a message in one single pager session.
meillo@114 2344 Therefore,
meillo@114 2345 .Pn mhshow
meillo@114 2346 invokes a pager session for all its output,
meillo@114 2347 whenever it prints to a terminal.
meillo@114 2348 .Ci a4197ea6ffc5c1550e8b52d5a654bcaaaee04a4e
meillo@114 2349 In consequence,
meillo@114 2350 .Pn mhl
meillo@114 2351 does no more invoke a pager.
meillo@114 2352 .Ci 0e46503be3c855bddaeae3843e1b659279c35d70
meillo@114 2353 With
meillo@114 2354 .Pn mhshow
meillo@114 2355 replacing the original
meillo@114 2356 .Pn show ,
meillo@114 2357 output from
meillo@114 2358 .Pn mhl
meillo@114 2359 does not go to the terminal directly, but through
meillo@114 2360 .Pn mhshow .
meillo@114 2361 Hence,
meillo@114 2362 .Pn mhl
meillo@114 2363 does not need to invoke a pager.
meillo@114 2364 The one and only job of
meillo@114 2365 .Pn mhl
meillo@114 2366 is to format messages or parts of them.
meillo@114 2367 The only place in mmh, where a pager is invoked is
meillo@114 2368 .Pn mhshow .
meillo@114 2369 .P
meillo@114 2370 .Pe mhshow-show-*
meillo@114 2371 profile entries can be used to display MIME parts in a specific way.
meillo@114 2372 For instance, PDF and Postscript files could be converted to plain text
meillo@114 2373 to display them in the terminal.
meillo@114 2374 In mmh, the displaying of MIME parts will always be done serially.
meillo@114 2375 The request to display the MIME type `multipart/parallel' in parallel
meillo@114 2376 is ignored.
meillo@114 2377 It is simply treated as `multipart/mixed'.
meillo@114 2378 .Ci d0581ba306a7299113a346f9b4c46ce97bc4cef6
meillo@114 2379 This could already be requested with the, now removed,
meillo@114 2380 .Sw -serialonly
meillo@114 2381 switch of
meillo@114 2382 .Pn mhshow .
meillo@114 2383 As MIME parts are always processed exclusively , i.e. serially,
meillo@114 2384 the `%e' escape in
meillo@114 2385 .Pe mhshow-show-*
meillo@114 2386 profile entries became useless and was thus removed.
meillo@114 2387 .Ci a20d405db09b7ccca74d3e8c57550883da49e1ae
meillo@114 2388 .P
meillo@114 2389 In the intended setup, only text content would be displayed.
meillo@114 2390 Non-text content would be converted to text by appropriate
meillo@114 2391 .Pe mhshow-show-*
meillo@114 2392 profile entries before, if possible and wanted.
meillo@114 2393 All output would be displayed in a single pager session.
meillo@114 2394 Other kinds of attachments are ignored.
meillo@114 2395 With
meillo@114 2396 .Pe mhshow-show-*
meillo@114 2397 profile entries for them, they can be displayed serially along
meillo@114 2398 the message.
meillo@114 2399 For parallel display, the attachments need to be stored to disk first.
meillo@114 2400 .P
meillo@114 2401 To display text content in foreign charsets, they need to be converted
meillo@114 2402 to the native charset.
meillo@114 2403 Therefore,
meillo@114 2404 .Pe mhshow-charset-*
meillo@114 2405 profile entries used to be needed.
meillo@121 2406 In mmh, the conversion is done automatically by piping the text through
meillo@114 2407 the
meillo@114 2408 .Pn iconv
meillo@114 2409 command, if necessary.
meillo@114 2410 .Ci 2433122c20baccb10b70b49c04c6b0497b5b3b60
meillo@114 2411 Custom
meillo@114 2412 .Pe mhshow-show-*
meillo@114 2413 rules for textual content might need a
meillo@114 2414 .Cl "iconv -f %c %f |
meillo@114 2415 prefix to have the text converted to the native charset.
meillo@114 2416 .P
meillo@121 2417 Although the conversion of foreign charsets to the native one
meillo@114 2418 has improved, it is not consistent enough.
meillo@114 2419 Further work needs to be done and
meillo@114 2420 the basic concepts in this field need to be re-thought.
meillo@114 2421 Though, the default setup of mmh displays message in foreign charsets
meillo@114 2422 correctly without the need to configure anything.
meillo@114 2423
meillo@114 2424
meillo@114 2425 .ig
meillo@114 2426
meillo@114 2427 .P
meillo@114 2428 mhshow/mhstore: Removed support for retrieving message/external-body parts.
meillo@114 2429 These tools won't download the contents automatically anymore. Instead,
meillo@114 2430 they print the information needed to get the contents. If someone should
meillo@114 2431 really receive one of those rare message/external-body messages, he can
meillo@114 2432 do the job manually. We save nearly a thousand lines of code. That's worth
meillo@114 2433 it!
meillo@114 2434 (The profile entry `nmh-access-ftp' and sbr/ruserpass.c for reading
meillo@114 2435 ~/.netrc are gone now.)
meillo@114 2436 .Ci 55e1d8c654ee0f7c45b9361ce34617983b454c32
meillo@114 2437
meillo@114 2438 ..
meillo@102 2439
meillo@58 2440
meillo@58 2441
meillo@58 2442 .H2 "Digital Cryptography
meillo@22 2443 .P
meillo@58 2444 Signing and encryption.
meillo@112 2445 .P
meillo@112 2446 FIXME
meillo@58 2447
meillo@58 2448
meillo@102 2449
meillo@102 2450 .H2 "Modern Defaults
meillo@22 2451 .P
meillo@116 2452 Nmh has a bunch of convenience-improving features inactive by default,
meillo@116 2453 although one can expect every new user wanting to have them active.
meillo@112 2454 The reason they are inactive by default is the wish to stay compatible
meillo@112 2455 with old versions.
meillo@116 2456 But what is the definition for old versions.
meillo@116 2457 Still, the highly useful draft folder facility is not active by default
meillo@116 2458 although it had been introduced over twenty-five years ago
meillo@112 2459 .[
meillo@112 2460 rose romine real work
meillo@112 2461 .]
meillo@116 2462 \(en the community seems not to care.
meillo@116 2463 This is one of several examples that require new users to build up
meillo@116 2464 their profile before they can access the modern features of nmh.
meillo@116 2465 Without an extensively built-up profile, the setup is hardly usable
meillo@116 2466 for modern emailing.
meillo@116 2467 The point is not the customization of the setup,
meillo@116 2468 but the activating of generally useful facilities.
meillo@112 2469 .P
meillo@116 2470 Yet, the real problem lies less in enabling the features, as this is
meillo@116 2471 straight forward as soon as one knows what he wants.
meillo@116 2472 The real problem is that new users need deep insights into the project
meillo@116 2473 before they find out what they are missing and that nmh actually
meillo@116 2474 provides it already, it just was not activated.
meillo@116 2475 To give an example, I needed one year of using nmh
meillo@102 2476 before I became aware of the existence of the attachment system.
meillo@102 2477 One could argue that this fact disqualifies my reading of the
meillo@102 2478 documentation.
meillo@102 2479 If I would have installed nmh from source back then, I could agree.
meillo@116 2480 Yet, I had used a prepackaged version and had expected that it would
meillo@102 2481 just work.
meillo@121 2482 Nevertheless, I had been convinced by the concepts of MH already
meillo@116 2483 and I am a software developer,
meillo@116 2484 still I required a lot of time to discover the cool features.
meillo@116 2485 How can we expect users to be even more advanced than me,
meillo@116 2486 just to allow them use MH in a convenient and modern way?
meillo@116 2487 Unless they are strongly convinced of the concepts, they will fail.
meillo@116 2488 I have seen friends of me giving up disappointed
meillo@116 2489 before they truly used the system,
meillo@116 2490 although they had been motivated in the beginning.
meillo@116 2491 They suffer hard enough to get used to the toolchest approach,
meillo@116 2492 we should spare them further inconveniences.
meillo@116 2493 .P
meillo@116 2494 Maintaining compatibility for its own sake is for no good.
meillo@116 2495 If any MH implementation would be the back-end of widespread
meillo@116 2496 email clients with large user bases, compatibility would be more
meillo@116 2497 important.
meillo@116 2498 Yet, it appears as if this is not the case.
meillo@116 2499 Hence, compatibility is hardly important for technical reasons.
meillo@116 2500 Its importance originates rather from personal reasons.
meillo@116 2501 Nmh's user base is small and old.
meillo@116 2502 Changing the interfaces would cause inconvenience to long-term users of MH.
meillo@116 2503 It would force them to change their many years old MH configurations.
meillo@116 2504 I do understand this aspect, but it keeps new users from using MH.
meillo@116 2505 By sticking to the old users, new users are kept away.
meillo@116 2506 Yet, the future lies in new users.
meillo@116 2507 Hence, mmh invites new users by providing a convenient and modern setup,
meillo@116 2508 readily usable out-of-the-box.
meillo@116 2509 .P
meillo@116 2510 In mmh, all modern features are active by default.
meillo@116 2511 In consequence, a setup with a profile that defines only the path to the
meillo@116 2512 mail storage, is already convenient to use.
meillo@116 2513 Again, Paul Vixie's ``edginess'' appeal supports the direction I took:
meillo@116 2514 ``the `main branch' should just be modern''.
meillo@116 2515 .[
meillo@116 2516 paul vixie edginess nmh-workers
meillo@116 2517 .]
meillo@116 2518 .P
meillo@116 2519 Modern features that are active in mmh by default include:
meillo@116 2520 .BU
meillo@116 2521 The attachment system (\c
meillo@116 2522 .Hd Attach ).
meillo@116 2523 .Ci 8ff284ff9167eff8f5349481529332d59ed913b1
meillo@116 2524 .BU
meillo@116 2525 The draft folder facility (\c
meillo@116 2526 .Fn +drafts ).
meillo@116 2527 .Ci 337338b404931f06f0db2119c9e145e8ca5a9860
meillo@116 2528 .BU
meillo@116 2529 The unseen sequence (`u')
meillo@116 2530 .Ci c2360569e1d8d3678e294eb7c1354cb8bf7501c1
meillo@116 2531 and the sequence negation prefix (`!').
meillo@116 2532 .Ci db74c2bd004b2dc9bf8086a6d8bf773ac051f3cc
meillo@116 2533 .BU
meillo@116 2534 Quoting the original message in the reply.
meillo@116 2535 .Ci 67411b1f95d6ec987b4c732459e1ba8a8ac192c6
meillo@116 2536 .BU
meillo@116 2537 Forwarding messages using MIME.
meillo@116 2538 .Ci 6e271608b7b9c23771523f88d23a4d3593010cf1
meillo@116 2539
meillo@58 2540
meillo@58 2541
meillo@131 2542 .H2 "Drafts and Trash Folder
meillo@131 2543 .P
meillo@58 2544
meillo@131 2545 .U3 "Draft Folder
meillo@131 2546 .P
meillo@131 2547 In the beginning, MH had the concept of a draft message.
meillo@131 2548 This is the file
meillo@131 2549 .Fn draft
meillo@131 2550 in the MH directory, which is treated special.
meillo@131 2551 On composing a message, this draft file was used.
meillo@131 2552 As the draft file was one particular file, only one draft could be
meillo@131 2553 managed at any time.
meillo@131 2554 When starting to compose another message before the former one was sent,
meillo@131 2555 the user had to decide among:
meillo@131 2556 .BU
meillo@131 2557 Use the old draft to finish and send it before starting with a new one.
meillo@131 2558 .BU
meillo@131 2559 Discard the old draft, replacing it with the new one.
meillo@131 2560 .BU
meillo@131 2561 Preserve the old draft by refiling it to a folder.
meillo@131 2562 .P
meillo@131 2563 This was, it was only possible to work in alternation on multiple drafts.
meillo@131 2564 Therefore, the current draft needed to be refiled to a folder and
meillo@131 2565 another one re-using for editing.
meillo@131 2566 Working on multiple drafts at the same time was impossible.
meillo@131 2567 The usual approach of switching to a different MH context did not
meillo@131 2568 change anything.
meillo@131 2569 .P
meillo@131 2570 The draft folder facility exists to
meillo@131 2571 allow true parallel editing of drafts, in a straight forward way.
meillo@131 2572 It was introduced by Marshall T. Rose, already in 1984.
meillo@131 2573 Similar to other new features, the draft folder was inactive by default.
meillo@131 2574 Even in nmh, the highly useful draft folder was not available
meillo@131 2575 out-of-the-box.
meillo@131 2576 At least, Richard Coleman added the man page
meillo@131 2577 .Mp mh-draft (5)
meillo@131 2578 to better document the feature.
meillo@131 2579 .P
meillo@131 2580 Not using the draft folder facility has the single advantage of having
meillo@131 2581 the draft file at a static location.
meillo@131 2582 This is simple in simple cases but the concept does not scale for more
meillo@131 2583 complex cases.
meillo@131 2584 The concept of the draft message is too limited for the problem.
meillo@131 2585 Therefore the draft folder was introduced.
meillo@131 2586 It is the more powerful and more natural concept.
meillo@131 2587 The draft folder is a folder like any other folder in MH.
meillo@131 2588 Its messages can be listed like any other messages.
meillo@131 2589 A draft message is no longer a special case.
meillo@131 2590 Tools do not need special switches to work on the draft message.
meillo@131 2591 Hence corner-cases were removed.
meillo@131 2592 .P
meillo@131 2593 The trivial part of the work was activating the draft folder with a
meillo@131 2594 default name.
meillo@131 2595 I chose the name
meillo@131 2596 .Fn +drafts
meillo@131 2597 for obvious reasons.
meillo@131 2598 In consequence, the command line switches
meillo@131 2599 .Sw -draftfolder
meillo@131 2600 and
meillo@131 2601 .Sw -draftmessage
meillo@131 2602 could be removed.
meillo@131 2603 More difficult but also more improving was updating the tools to the
meillo@131 2604 new concept.
meillo@131 2605 For nearly three decades, the tools needed to support two draft handling
meillo@131 2606 approaches.
meillo@131 2607 By fully switching to the draft folder, the tools could be simplified
meillo@131 2608 by dropping the awkward draft message handling code.
meillo@131 2609 .Sw -draft
meillo@131 2610 switches were removed because operating on a draft message is no longer
meillo@131 2611 special.
meillo@131 2612 It became indistinguishable to operating on any other message.
meillo@131 2613 There is no more need to query the user for draft handling.
meillo@131 2614 It is always possible to add another new draft.
meillo@131 2615 Refiling drafts is without difference to refiling other messages.
meillo@131 2616 All these special cases are gone.
meillo@131 2617 Yet, one draft-related switch remained.
meillo@131 2618 .Pn comp
meillo@131 2619 still has
meillo@131 2620 .Sw -[no]use
meillo@131 2621 for switching between two modes:
meillo@131 2622 .BU
meillo@131 2623 .Sw -use :
meillo@131 2624 Modify an existing draft.
meillo@131 2625 .BU
meillo@131 2626 .Sw -nouse :
meillo@131 2627 Compose a new draft, possibly taking some existing message as a form.
meillo@131 2628 .P
meillo@131 2629 In either case, the behavior of
meillo@131 2630 .Pn comp
meillo@131 2631 is deterministic.
meillo@131 2632 .P
meillo@131 2633 .Pn send
meillo@131 2634 now operates on the current message in the draft folder by default.
meillo@131 2635 As message and folder can both be overridden by specifying them on
meillo@131 2636 the command line, it is possible to send any message in the mail storage
meillo@131 2637 by simply specifying its number and folder.
meillo@131 2638 In contrast to the other tools,
meillo@131 2639 .Pn send
meillo@131 2640 takes the draft folder as its default folder.
meillo@131 2641 .P
meillo@131 2642 Dropping the draft message concept in favor for the draft folder concept,
meillo@131 2643 removed special cases with regular cases.
meillo@131 2644 This simplified the source code of the tools, as well as the concepts.
meillo@131 2645 In mmh, draft management does not break with the MH concepts
meillo@131 2646 but applies them.
meillo@131 2647 Most of the work was already done by Rose in the eighties.
meillo@131 2648 The original improvement in mmh is dropping the draft message approach
meillo@131 2649 completely and thus simplifying the tools, the documentation and the
meillo@131 2650 system as a whole.
meillo@131 2651 Although my part in the draft handling improvement was small,
meillo@131 2652 it was important.
meillo@131 2653
meillo@131 2654
meillo@131 2655 .U3 "Trash Folder
meillo@131 2656 .P
meillo@131 2657 Similar to the situation for drafts is the situation for removed messages.
meillo@131 2658 Historically, a message was ``deleted'' by prepending a specific
meillo@131 2659 \fIbackup prefix\fP, usually the comma character,
meillo@131 2660 to the file name.
meillo@131 2661 The specific message would vanish from MH because only files with
meillo@131 2662 non-digit characters in their name are not treated as messages.
meillo@131 2663 Although files remained in the file system,
meillo@131 2664 the messages were no more visible in MH.
meillo@131 2665 To truly delete them, a maintenance job is needed.
meillo@131 2666 Usually a cron job is installed to delete them after a grace time.
meillo@131 2667 For instance:
meillo@131 2668 .VS
meillo@131 2669 find $HOME/Mail -type f -name ',*' -ctime +7 -delete
meillo@131 2670 VE
meillo@131 2671 In such a setup, the original message can be restored
meillo@131 2672 within the grace time interval by stripping the
meillo@131 2673 the backup prefix from the file name.
meillo@131 2674 But one can not rely on this statement.
meillo@131 2675 If the last message of a folder with six messages (1-6) is removed,
meillo@131 2676 message
meillo@131 2677 .Fn 6 ,
meillo@131 2678 becomes file
meillo@131 2679 .Fn ,6 .
meillo@131 2680 If then a new message enters the same folder, it will be given
meillo@131 2681 the number one higher than the highest existing message.
meillo@131 2682 In this case the message is named
meillo@131 2683 .Fn 6
meillo@131 2684 then.
meillo@131 2685 If this message is removed as well,
meillo@131 2686 then the backup of the former message gets overwritten.
meillo@131 2687 Hence, the ability to restore removed messages does not only depend on
meillo@131 2688 the ``sweeping cron job'' but also on the removing of further messages.
meillo@131 2689 It is undesirable to have such obscure and complex mechanisms.
meillo@131 2690 The user should be given a small set of clear assertions.
meillo@131 2691 ``Removed files are restorable within a seven-day grace time.''
meillo@131 2692 is such a clear assertion.
meillo@131 2693 With the addition ``... unless a message with the same name in the
meillo@131 2694 same folder is removed before.'' the statement becomes complex.
meillo@131 2695 A user will hardly be able to keep track of any removal to know
meillo@131 2696 if the assertion still holds true for a specific file.
meillo@131 2697 The the real mechanism is practically obscure to the user.
meillo@131 2698 The consequences of further removals are not obvious.
meillo@131 2699 .P
meillo@131 2700 Further more, the backup files are scattered within the whole mail storage.
meillo@131 2701 This complicates managing them.
meillo@131 2702 It is possible, with help of
meillo@131 2703 .Pn find ,
meillo@131 2704 but everything would be more convenient
meillo@131 2705 if the deleted messages would be collected in one place.
meillo@131 2706 .P
meillo@131 2707 The profile entry
meillo@131 2708 .Pe rmmproc
meillo@131 2709 (previously named
meillo@131 2710 .Pe Delete-Prog )
meillo@131 2711 was introduced very early to improve the situation.
meillo@131 2712 It could be set to any command, which would be executed to removed
meillo@131 2713 the specified messages.
meillo@131 2714 This would override the default action, described above.
meillo@131 2715 Refiling the to-be-removed files to a garbage folder is the usual example.
meillo@131 2716 Nmh's man page
meillo@131 2717 .Mp rmm (1)
meillo@131 2718 proposes to set the
meillo@131 2719 .Pe rmmproc
meillo@131 2720 to
meillo@131 2721 .Cl "refile +d
meillo@131 2722 to move messages to the garbage folder,
meillo@131 2723 .Fn +d ,
meillo@131 2724 instead of renaming them with the backup prefix.
meillo@131 2725 The man page proposes additionally the expunge command
meillo@131 2726 .Cl "rm `mhpath +d all`
meillo@131 2727 to empty the garbage folder.
meillo@131 2728 .P
meillo@131 2729 Removing messages in such a way has advantages.
meillo@131 2730 The mail storage is prevented from being cluttered with removed messages
meillo@131 2731 because they are all collected in one place.
meillo@131 2732 Existing and removed messages are thus separated more strictly.
meillo@131 2733 No backup files are silently overwritten.
meillo@131 2734 Most important is the ability to keep removed messages in the MH domain.
meillo@131 2735 Messages in the trash folder can be listed like those in any other folder.
meillo@131 2736 Deleted messages can be displayed like any other messages.
meillo@131 2737 Restoring a deleted messages can be done with
meillo@131 2738 .Pn refile .
meillo@131 2739 All operations on deleted files are still covered by the MH tools.
meillo@131 2740 The trash folder is just like any other folder in the mail storage.
meillo@131 2741 .P
meillo@131 2742 Similar to the draft folder case, I dropped the old backup prefix approach
meillo@131 2743 in favor for replacing it by the better suiting trash folder system.
meillo@131 2744 Hence,
meillo@131 2745 .Pn rmm
meillo@131 2746 calls
meillo@131 2747 .Pn refile
meillo@131 2748 to move the to-be-removed message to the trash folder,
meillo@131 2749 .Fn +trash
meillo@131 2750 by default.
meillo@131 2751 To sweep it clean, one can use
meillo@131 2752 .Cl "rmm -unlink +trash a" ,
meillo@131 2753 where the
meillo@131 2754 .Sw -unlink
meillo@131 2755 switch causes the files to be unlinked.
meillo@131 2756 .P
meillo@131 2757 Dropping the legacy approach and completely converting to the new approach
meillo@131 2758 simplified the code base.
meillo@131 2759 The relationship between
meillo@131 2760 .Pn rmm
meillo@131 2761 and
meillo@131 2762 .Pn refile
meillo@131 2763 was inverted.
meillo@131 2764 In mmh,
meillo@131 2765 .Pn rmm
meillo@131 2766 invokes
meillo@131 2767 .Pn refile ,
meillo@131 2768 which used to be the other way round.
meillo@131 2769 Yet, the relationship is simpler now.
meillo@131 2770 No more can loops, like described in nmh's man page for
meillo@131 2771 .Mp refile (1),
meillo@131 2772 occur:
meillo@131 2773 .QS
meillo@131 2774 Since
meillo@131 2775 .Pn refile
meillo@131 2776 uses your
meillo@131 2777 .Pe rmmproc
meillo@131 2778 to delete the message, the
meillo@131 2779 .Pe rmmproc
meillo@131 2780 must NOT call
meillo@131 2781 .Pn refile
meillo@131 2782 without specifying
meillo@131 2783 .Sw -normmproc
meillo@131 2784 or you will create an infinite loop.
meillo@131 2785 .QE
meillo@131 2786 .LP
meillo@131 2787 .Pn rmm
meillo@131 2788 either unlinks a message with
meillo@131 2789 .Fu unlink()
meillo@131 2790 or invokes
meillo@131 2791 .Pn refile
meillo@131 2792 to move it to the trash folder.
meillo@131 2793 .Pn refile
meillo@131 2794 does not invoke any tools.
meillo@131 2795 .P
meillo@131 2796
meillo@131 2797
meillo@131 2798
meillo@131 2799 Keeping unused alternative in the code is a bad choice as they likely
meillo@131 2800 gather bugs, by not being constantly tested.
meillo@131 2801 Also, the increased code
meillo@131 2802 size and more conditions crease the maintenance costs.
meillo@131 2803
meillo@131 2804 By generalizing the message removal in a way that it becomes covered
meillo@131 2805 by the MH concepts makes the whole system more powerful.
meillo@131 2806
meillo@131 2807
meillo@131 2808
meillo@131 2809
meillo@131 2810
meillo@131 2811 .H1 "Styling
meillo@22 2812 .P
meillo@118 2813 Kernighan and Pike have emphasized the importance of style in the
meillo@118 2814 preface of their book:
meillo@118 2815 .[ [
meillo@118 2816 kernighan pike practice of programming
meillo@118 2817 .], p. x]
meillo@118 2818 .QS
meillo@118 2819 Chapter 1 discusses programming style.
meillo@118 2820 Good style is so important to good programming that we have chose
meillo@118 2821 to cover it first.
meillo@118 2822 .QE
meillo@118 2823 This section covers changes in mmh that were motivated by the desire
meillo@118 2824 to improve on style.
meillo@118 2825 Many of them follow the rules given in the quoted book.
meillo@118 2826 .[
meillo@118 2827 kernighan pike practice of programming
meillo@118 2828 .]
meillo@118 2829
meillo@118 2830
meillo@127 2831
meillo@127 2832
meillo@127 2833 .H2 "Code Style
meillo@118 2834 .P
meillo@118 2835 .U3 "Indentation Style
meillo@118 2836 .P
meillo@118 2837 Indentation styles are the holy cow of programmers.
meillo@118 2838 Again Kernighan and Pike:
meillo@118 2839 .[ [
meillo@118 2840 kernighan pike practice of programming
meillo@118 2841 .], p. 10]
meillo@118 2842 .QS
meillo@118 2843 Programmers have always argued about the layout of programs,
meillo@118 2844 but the specific style is much less important than its consistent
meillo@118 2845 application.
meillo@121 2846 Pick one style, preferably ours, use it consistently, and don't waste
meillo@118 2847 time arguing.
meillo@118 2848 .QE
meillo@118 2849 .P
meillo@118 2850 I agree that the constant application is most important,
meillo@118 2851 but I believe that some styles have advantages over others.
meillo@118 2852 For instance the indentation with tab characters only.
meillo@118 2853 Tab characters directly map to the nesting level \(en
meillo@118 2854 one tab, one level.
meillo@118 2855 Tab characters are flexible because developers can adjust them to
meillo@118 2856 whatever width they like to have.
meillo@118 2857 There is no more need to run
meillo@118 2858 .Pn unexpand
meillo@118 2859 or
meillo@118 2860 .Pn entab
meillo@118 2861 programs to ensure the correct mixture of leading tabs and spaces.
meillo@118 2862 The simple rules are: (1) Leading whitespace must consist of tabs only.
meillo@118 2863 (2) Any other whitespace should consist of spaces.
meillo@121 2864 These two rules ensure the integrity of the visual appearance.
meillo@121 2865 Although reformatting existing code should be avoided, I did it.
meillo@118 2866 I did not waste time arguing; I just did it.
meillo@118 2867 .Ci a485ed478abbd599d8c9aab48934e7a26733ecb1
meillo@118 2868
meillo@118 2869 .U3 "Comments
meillo@118 2870 .P
meillo@118 2871 Section 1.6 of
meillo@118 2872 .[ [
meillo@118 2873 kernighan pike practice of programming
meillo@118 2874 .], p. 23]
meillo@118 2875 demands: ``Don't belabor the obvious.''
meillo@122 2876 Hence, I simply removed all the comments in the following code excerpt:
meillo@118 2877 .VS
meillo@120 2878 context_replace(curfolder, folder); /* update current folder */
meillo@120 2879 seq_setcur(mp, mp->lowsel); /* update current message */
meillo@120 2880 seq_save(mp); /* synchronize message sequences */
meillo@120 2881 folder_free(mp); /* free folder/message structure */
meillo@120 2882 context_save(); /* save the context file */
meillo@120 2883
meillo@120 2884 [...]
meillo@120 2885
meillo@120 2886 int c; /* current character */
meillo@120 2887 char *cp; /* miscellaneous character pointer */
meillo@120 2888
meillo@120 2889 [...]
meillo@120 2890
meillo@120 2891 /* NUL-terminate the field */
meillo@120 2892 *cp = '\0';
meillo@118 2893 VE
meillo@120 2894 .Ci 426543622b377fc5d091455cba685e114b6df674
meillo@118 2895 .P
meillo@118 2896 The names of the functions explain enough already.
meillo@118 2897
meillo@118 2898 .U3 "Names
meillo@118 2899 .P
meillo@118 2900 Kernighan and Pike suggest:
meillo@118 2901 ``Use active names for functions''.
meillo@118 2902 .[ [
meillo@118 2903 kernighan pike practice of programming
meillo@118 2904 .], p. 4]
meillo@118 2905 One application of this rule was the rename of
meillo@118 2906 .Fu check_charset()
meillo@118 2907 to
meillo@118 2908 .Fu is_native_charset() .
meillo@118 2909 .Ci 8d77b48284c58c135a6b2787e721597346ab056d
meillo@118 2910 The same change fixed a violation of ``Be accurate'' as well.
meillo@118 2911 The code did not match the expectation the function suggested,
meillo@118 2912 as it, for whatever reason, only compared the first ten characters
meillo@118 2913 of the charset name.
meillo@118 2914 .P
meillo@118 2915 More important than using active names is using descriptive names.
meillo@118 2916 Renaming the obscure function
meillo@118 2917 .Fu m_unknown()
meillo@118 2918 was a delightful event.
meillo@118 2919 .Ci 611d68d19204d7cbf5bd585391249cb5bafca846
meillo@118 2920 .P
meillo@118 2921 Magic numbers are generally considered bad style.
meillo@118 2922 Obviously, Kernighan and Pike agree:
meillo@118 2923 ``Give names to magic numbers''.
meillo@118 2924 .[ [
meillo@118 2925 kernighan pike practice of programming
meillo@118 2926 .], p. 19]
meillo@118 2927 One such change was naming the type of input \(en mbox or mail folder \(en
meillo@118 2928 to be scanned:
meillo@118 2929 .VS
meillo@118 2930 #define SCN_MBOX (-1)
meillo@118 2931 #define SCN_FOLD 0
meillo@118 2932 VE
meillo@118 2933 .Ci 7ffb36d28e517a6f3a10272056fc127592ab1c19
meillo@118 2934 .P
meillo@118 2935 The argument
meillo@118 2936 .Ar outnum
meillo@118 2937 of the function
meillo@118 2938 .Fu scan()
meillo@118 2939 in
meillo@118 2940 .Fn uip/scansbr.c
meillo@118 2941 defines the number of the message to be created.
meillo@118 2942 If no message is to be created, the argument is misused to transport
meillo@118 2943 program logic.
meillo@118 2944 This lead to obscure code.
meillo@118 2945 I improved the clarity of the code by introducing two variables:
meillo@118 2946 .VS
meillo@118 2947 int incing = (outnum > 0);
meillo@118 2948 int ismbox = (outnum != 0);
meillo@118 2949 VE
meillo@118 2950 They cover the magic values and are used for conditions.
meillo@118 2951 The variable
meillo@118 2952 .Ar outnum
meillo@118 2953 is only used when it holds an ordinary message number.
meillo@118 2954 .Ci b8b075c77be7794f3ae9ff0e8cedb12b48fd139f
meillo@118 2955 The clarity improvement of the change showed detours in the program logic
meillo@118 2956 of related code parts.
meillo@118 2957 Having the new variables with descriptive names, a more
meillo@121 2958 straight forward implementation became apparent.
meillo@118 2959 Before the clarification was done,
meillo@118 2960 the possibility to improve had not be seen.
meillo@118 2961 .Ci aa60b0ab5e804f8befa890c0a6df0e3143ce0723
meillo@118 2962
meillo@118 2963 .U3 "Rework of \f(CWanno\fP
meillo@118 2964 .P
meillo@118 2965 At the end of their chapter on style,
meillo@118 2966 Kernighan and Pike ask: ``But why worry about style?''
meillo@121 2967 The following example of my rework of
meillo@118 2968 .Pn anno
meillo@121 2969 provides an answer why style is important in the first place.
meillo@118 2970 .P
meillo@120 2971 Until 2002,
meillo@120 2972 .Pn anno
meillo@120 2973 had six functional command line switches,
meillo@120 2974 .Sw -component
meillo@120 2975 and
meillo@120 2976 .Sw -text ,
meillo@120 2977 which took an argument each,
meillo@120 2978 and the two pairs of flags,
meillo@120 2979 .Sw -[no]date
meillo@120 2980 and
meillo@120 2981 .Sw -[no]inplace.,
meillo@120 2982 .Sw -component
meillo@120 2983 and
meillo@120 2984 .Sw -text ,
meillo@120 2985 which took an argument each,
meillo@120 2986 and the two pairs of flags,
meillo@120 2987 .Sw -[no]date
meillo@120 2988 and
meillo@120 2989 .Sw -[no]inplace .
meillo@120 2990 Then Jon Steinhart introduced his attachment system.
meillo@120 2991 In need for more advanced annotation handling, he extended
meillo@120 2992 .Pn anno .
meillo@120 2993 He added five more switches:
meillo@120 2994 .Sw -draft ,
meillo@120 2995 .Sw -list ,
meillo@120 2996 .Sw -delete ,
meillo@120 2997 .Sw -append ,
meillo@120 2998 and
meillo@120 2999 .Sw -number ,
meillo@120 3000 the last one taking an argument.
meillo@121 3001 .Ci 7480dbc14bc90f2d872d434205c0784704213252
meillo@120 3002 Later,
meillo@120 3003 .Sw -[no]preserve
meillo@120 3004 was added.
meillo@121 3005 .Ci d9b1d57351d104d7ec1a5621f090657dcce8cb7f
meillo@120 3006 Then, the Synopsis section of the man page
meillo@120 3007 .Mp anno (1)
meillo@120 3008 read:
meillo@120 3009 .VS
meillo@120 3010 anno [+folder] [msgs] [-component field] [-inplace | -noinplace]
meillo@120 3011 [-date | -nodate] [-draft] [-append] [-list] [-delete]
meillo@120 3012 [-number [num|all]] [-preserve | -nopreserve] [-version]
meillo@120 3013 [-help] [-text body]
meillo@120 3014 VE
meillo@120 3015 .LP
meillo@120 3016 The implementation followed the same structure.
meillo@120 3017 Problems became visible when
meillo@120 3018 .Cl "anno -list -number 42
meillo@120 3019 worked on the current message instead on message number 42,
meillo@120 3020 and
meillo@120 3021 .Cl "anno -list -number l:5
meillo@124 3022 did not work on the last five messages but failed with the mysterious
meillo@120 3023 error message: ``anno: missing argument to -list''.
meillo@121 3024 Yet, the invocation matched the specification in the man page.
meillo@120 3025 There, the correct use of
meillo@120 3026 .Sw -number
meillo@120 3027 was defined as being
meillo@120 3028 .Cl "[-number [num|all]]
meillo@120 3029 and the textual description for the combination with
meillo@120 3030 .Sw -list
meillo@120 3031 read:
meillo@120 3032 .QS
meillo@120 3033 The -list option produces a listing of the field bodies for
meillo@120 3034 header fields with names matching the specified component,
meillo@120 3035 one per line. The listing is numbered, starting at 1, if
meillo@120 3036 the -number option is also used.
meillo@120 3037 .QE
meillo@120 3038 .LP
meillo@120 3039 The problem was manifold.
meillo@120 3040 The code required a numeric argument to the
meillo@120 3041 .Sw -number
meillo@120 3042 switch.
meillo@120 3043 If it was missing or non-numeric,
meillo@120 3044 .Pn anno
meillo@120 3045 aborted with an error message that had an off-by-one error,
meillo@120 3046 printing the switch one before the failing one.
meillo@120 3047 Semantically, the argument to the
meillo@120 3048 .Sw -number
meillo@120 3049 switch is only necessary in combination with
meillo@120 3050 .Sw -delete ,
meillo@120 3051 but not with
meillo@120 3052 .Sw -list .
meillo@120 3053 In the former case it is even necessary.
meillo@120 3054 .P
meillo@120 3055 Trying to fix these problems on the surface would not have solved it truly.
meillo@120 3056 The problems discovered originate from a discrepance between the semantic
meillo@120 3057 structure of the problem and the structure implemented in the program.
meillo@120 3058 Such structural differences can not be cured on the surface.
meillo@120 3059 They need to be solved by adjusting the structure of the implementation
meillo@120 3060 to the structure of the problem.
meillo@120 3061 .P
meillo@120 3062 In 2002, the new switches
meillo@120 3063 .Sw -list
meillo@120 3064 and
meillo@120 3065 .Sw -delete
meillo@120 3066 were added in the same way, the
meillo@120 3067 .Sw -number
meillo@120 3068 switch for instance had been added.
meillo@120 3069 Yet, they are of structural different type.
meillo@120 3070 Semantically,
meillo@120 3071 .Sw -list
meillo@120 3072 and
meillo@120 3073 .Sw -delete
meillo@120 3074 introduce modes of operation.
meillo@120 3075 Historically,
meillo@120 3076 .Pn anno
meillo@120 3077 had only one operation mode: adding header fields.
meillo@120 3078 With the extension, it got two moder modes:
meillo@120 3079 listing and deleting header fields.
meillo@120 3080 The structure of the code changes did not pay respect to this
meillo@120 3081 fundamental change to
meillo@120 3082 .Pn anno 's
meillo@120 3083 behavior.
meillo@120 3084 Neither the implementation nor the documentation did clearly
meillo@120 3085 define them as being exclusive modes of operation.
meillo@120 3086 Having identified the problem, I solved it by putting structure into
meillo@120 3087 .Pn anno
meillo@120 3088 and its documentation.
meillo@120 3089 .Ci d54c8db8bdf01e8381890f7729bc0ef4a055ea11
meillo@120 3090 .P
meillo@120 3091 The difference is visible in both, the code and the documentation.
meillo@121 3092 The following code excerpt:
meillo@120 3093 .VS
meillo@120 3094 int delete = -2; /* delete header element if set */
meillo@120 3095 int list = 0; /* list header elements if set */
meillo@120 3096 [...]
meillo@121 3097 case DELETESW: /* delete annotations */
meillo@121 3098 delete = 0;
meillo@121 3099 continue;
meillo@121 3100 case LISTSW: /* produce a listing */
meillo@121 3101 list = 1;
meillo@121 3102 continue;
meillo@120 3103 VE
meillo@121 3104 .LP
meillo@121 3105 was replaced by:
meillo@120 3106 .VS
meillo@120 3107 static enum { MODE_ADD, MODE_DEL, MODE_LIST } mode = MODE_ADD;
meillo@120 3108 [...]
meillo@121 3109 case DELETESW: /* delete annotations */
meillo@121 3110 mode = MODE_DEL;
meillo@121 3111 continue;
meillo@121 3112 case LISTSW: /* produce a listing */
meillo@121 3113 mode = MODE_LIST;
meillo@121 3114 continue;
meillo@120 3115 VE
meillo@120 3116 .LP
meillo@121 3117 The replacement code does not only reflect the problem's structure better,
meillo@121 3118 it is easier to understand as well.
meillo@121 3119 The same applies to the documentation.
meillo@120 3120 The man page was completely reorganized to propagate the same structure.
meillo@121 3121 This is visible in the Synopsis section:
meillo@120 3122 .VS
meillo@120 3123 anno [+folder] [msgs] [-component field] [-text body]
meillo@120 3124 [-append] [-date | -nodate] [-preserve | -nopreserve]
meillo@120 3125 [-Version] [-help]
meillo@120 3126
meillo@120 3127 anno -delete [+folder] [msgs] [-component field] [-text
meillo@120 3128 body] [-number num | all ] [-preserve | -nopreserve]
meillo@120 3129 [-Version] [-help]
meillo@120 3130
meillo@120 3131 anno -list [+folder] [msgs] [-component field] [-number]
meillo@120 3132 [-Version] [-help]
meillo@120 3133 VE
meillo@121 3134 .\" XXX think about explaining the -preserve rework?
meillo@118 3135
meillo@58 3136
meillo@58 3137
meillo@127 3138
meillo@121 3139 .H2 "Standard Libraries
meillo@22 3140 .P
meillo@121 3141 MH is one decade older than the POSIX and ANSI C standards.
meillo@121 3142 Hence, MH included own implementations of functions
meillo@121 3143 that are standardized and thus widely available today,
meillo@121 3144 but were not back then.
meillo@121 3145 Today, twenty years after the POSIX and ANSI C were published,
meillo@121 3146 developers can expect system to comply with these standards.
meillo@121 3147 In consequence, MH-specific replacements for standard functions
meillo@121 3148 can and should be dropped.
meillo@121 3149 Kernighan and Pike advise: ``Use standard libraries.''
meillo@121 3150 .[ [
meillo@121 3151 kernighan pike practice of programming
meillo@121 3152 .], p. 196]
meillo@121 3153 Actually, MH had followed this advice in history,
meillo@121 3154 but it had not adjusted to the changes in this field.
meillo@121 3155 The
meillo@121 3156 .Fu snprintf()
meillo@121 3157 function, for instance, was standardized with C99 and is available
meillo@121 3158 almost everywhere because of its high usefulness.
meillo@123 3159 In project's own implementation of
meillo@121 3160 .Fu snprintf()
meillo@123 3161 was dropped in March 2012 in favor for using the one of the
meillo@123 3162 standard library.
meillo@123 3163 .Ci 0052f1024deb0a0a2fc2e5bacf93d45a5a9c9b32
meillo@123 3164 Such decisions limit the portability of mmh
meillo@121 3165 if systems don't support these standardized and widespread functions.
meillo@123 3166 This compromise is made because mmh focuses on the future.
meillo@121 3167 .P
meillo@123 3168 I am not yet thirty years old and my C and Unix experience comprises
meillo@123 3169 only half a dozen years.
meillo@121 3170 Hence, I need to learn about the history in retrospective.
meillo@121 3171 I have not used those ancient constructs myself.
meillo@121 3172 I have not suffered from their incompatibilities.
meillo@121 3173 I have not longed for standardization.
meillo@121 3174 All my programming experience is from a time when ANSI C and POSIX
meillo@121 3175 were well established already.
meillo@121 3176 I have only read a lot of books about the (good) old times.
meillo@121 3177 This puts me in a difficult positions when working with old code.
meillo@123 3178 I need to freshly acquire knowledge about old code constructs and ancient
meillo@123 3179 programming styles, whereas older programmers know these things by
meillo@123 3180 heart from their own experience.
meillo@121 3181 .P
meillo@123 3182 Being aware of the situation, I rather let people with more historic
meillo@123 3183 experience replace ancient code constructs with standardized ones.
meillo@121 3184 Lyndon Nerenberg covered large parts of this task for the nmh project.
meillo@121 3185 He converted project-specific functions to POSIX replacements,
meillo@121 3186 also removing the conditionals compilation of now standardized features.
meillo@123 3187 Ken Hornstein and David Levine had their part in the work, too.
meillo@121 3188 Often, I only needed to pull over changes from nmh into mmh.
meillo@121 3189 These changes include many commits; these are among them:
meillo@121 3190 .Ci 768b5edd9623b7238e12ec8dfc409b82a1ed9e2d
meillo@121 3191 .Ci 0052f1024deb0a0a2fc2e5bacf93d45a5a9c9b32 .
meillo@102 3192 .P
meillo@123 3193 During my own work, I tidied up the \fIMH standard library\fP,
meillo@123 3194 .Fn libmh.a ,
meillo@123 3195 which is located in the
meillo@123 3196 .Fn sbr
meillo@123 3197 (``subroutines'') directory in the source tree.
meillo@123 3198 The MH library includes functions that mmh tools usually need.
meillo@123 3199 Among them are MH-specific functions for profile, context, sequence,
meillo@123 3200 and folder handling, but as well
meillo@123 3201 MH-independent functions, such as auxiliary string functions,
meillo@123 3202 portability interfaces and error-checking wrappers for critical
meillo@123 3203 functions of the standard library.
meillo@123 3204 .P
meillo@123 3205 I have replaced the
meillo@121 3206 .Fu atooi()
meillo@121 3207 function with calls to
meillo@123 3208 .Fu strtoul()
meillo@121 3209 with the third parameter \(en the base \(en set to eight.
meillo@121 3210 .Fu strtoul()
meillo@123 3211 is part of C89 and thus considered safe to use.
meillo@121 3212 .Ci c490c51b3c0f8871b6953bd0c74551404f840a74
meillo@102 3213 .P
meillo@121 3214 I did remove project-included fallback implementations of
meillo@121 3215 .Fu memmove()
meillo@121 3216 and
meillo@121 3217 .Fu strerror() ,
meillo@121 3218 although Peter Maydell had re-included them into nmh in 2008
meillo@121 3219 to support SunOS 4.
meillo@121 3220 Nevertheless, these functions are part of ANSI C.
meillo@121 3221 Systems that do not even provide full ANSI C support should not
meillo@121 3222 put a load on mmh.
meillo@121 3223 .Ci b067ff5c465a5d243ce5a19e562085a9a1a97215
meillo@121 3224 .P
meillo@121 3225 The
meillo@121 3226 .Fu copy()
meillo@121 3227 function copies the string in argument one to the location in two.
meillo@121 3228 In contrast to
meillo@121 3229 .Fu strcpy() ,
meillo@121 3230 it returns a pointer to the terminating null-byte in the destination area.
meillo@123 3231 The code was adjusted to replace
meillo@121 3232 .Fu copy()
meillo@123 3233 with
meillo@121 3234 .Fu strcpy() ,
meillo@121 3235 except within
meillo@121 3236 .Fu concat() ,
meillo@121 3237 where
meillo@121 3238 .Fu copy()
meillo@123 3239 was more convenient.
meillo@123 3240 Therefore, the definition of
meillo@121 3241 .Fu copy()
meillo@123 3242 was moved into the source file of
meillo@121 3243 .Fu concat()
meillo@123 3244 and its visibility is now limited to it.
meillo@121 3245 .Ci 552fd7253e5ee9e554c5c7a8248a6322aa4363bb
meillo@121 3246 .P
meillo@121 3247 The function
meillo@121 3248 .Fu r1bindex()
meillo@121 3249 had been a generalized version of
meillo@121 3250 .Fu basename()
meillo@121 3251 with minor differences.
meillo@121 3252 As all calls to
meillo@121 3253 .Fu r1bindex()
meillo@121 3254 had the slash (`/') as delimiter anyway,
meillo@121 3255 replacing
meillo@121 3256 .Fu r1bindex()
meillo@121 3257 with the more specific and better-named function
meillo@121 3258 .Fu basename()
meillo@121 3259 became desirable.
meillo@121 3260 Unfortunately, many of the 54 calls to
meillo@121 3261 .Fu r1bindex()
meillo@123 3262 depended on a special behavior,
meillo@121 3263 which differed from the POSIX specification for
meillo@121 3264 .Fu basename() .
meillo@121 3265 Hence,
meillo@121 3266 .Fu r1bindex()
meillo@121 3267 was kept but renamed to
meillo@123 3268 .Fu mhbasename() ,
meillo@123 3269 fixing the delimiter to the slash.
meillo@121 3270 .Ci 240013872c392fe644bd4f79382d9f5314b4ea60
meillo@121 3271 For possible uses of
meillo@121 3272 .Fu r1bindex()
meillo@121 3273 with a different delimiter,
meillo@121 3274 the ANSI C function
meillo@121 3275 .Fu strrchr()
meillo@121 3276 provides the core functionality.
meillo@121 3277 .P
meillo@121 3278 The
meillo@121 3279 .Fu ssequal()
meillo@121 3280 function \(en apparently for ``substring equal'' \(en
meillo@121 3281 was renamed to
meillo@121 3282 .Fu isprefix() ,
meillo@121 3283 because this is what it actually checks.
meillo@121 3284 .Ci c20b4fa14515c7ab388ce35411d89a7a92300711
meillo@121 3285 Its source file had included the following comments, no joke.
meillo@121 3286 .VS
meillo@121 3287 /*
meillo@121 3288 * THIS CODE DOES NOT WORK AS ADVERTISED.
meillo@121 3289 * It is actually checking if s1 is a PREFIX of s2.
meillo@121 3290 * All calls to this function need to be checked to see
meillo@121 3291 * if that needs to be changed. Prefix checking is cheaper, so
meillo@121 3292 * should be kept if it's sufficient.
meillo@121 3293 */
meillo@121 3294
meillo@121 3295 /*
meillo@121 3296 * Check if s1 is a substring of s2.
meillo@121 3297 * If yes, then return 1, else return 0.
meillo@121 3298 */
meillo@121 3299 VE
meillo@123 3300 Two months later, it was completely removed by replacing it with
meillo@123 3301 .Fu strncmp() .
meillo@123 3302 .Ci b0b1dd37ff515578cf7cba51625189eb34a196cb
meillo@121 3303
meillo@102 3304
meillo@102 3305
meillo@102 3306
meillo@118 3307 .H2 "Modularization
meillo@118 3308 .P
meillo@123 3309 The source code of the mmh tools is located in the
meillo@122 3310 .Fn uip
meillo@123 3311 (``user interface programs'') directory.
meillo@123 3312 Each tools has a source file with the same name.
meillo@122 3313 For example,
meillo@122 3314 .Pn rmm
meillo@122 3315 is built from
meillo@122 3316 .Fn uip/rmm.c .
meillo@123 3317 Some source files are used for multiple programs.
meillo@122 3318 For example
meillo@122 3319 .Fn uip/scansbr.c
meillo@123 3320 is used for both,
meillo@122 3321 .Pn scan
meillo@122 3322 and
meillo@122 3323 .Pn inc .
meillo@122 3324 In nmh, 49 tools were built from 76 source files.
meillo@123 3325 This is a ratio of 1.6 source files per program.
meillo@123 3326 32 programs depended on multiple source files;
meillo@123 3327 17 programs depended on one source file only.
meillo@122 3328 In mmh, 39 tools are built from 51 source files.
meillo@123 3329 This is a ratio of 1.3 source files per program.
meillo@123 3330 18 programs depend on multiple source files;
meillo@123 3331 21 programs depend on one source file only.
meillo@123 3332 (These numbers and the ones in the following text ignore the MH library
meillo@123 3333 as well as shell scripts and multiple names for the same program.)
meillo@122 3334 .P
meillo@123 3335 Splitting the source code of a large program into multiple files can
meillo@122 3336 increase the readability of its source code.
meillo@124 3337 Most of the mmh tools, however, are simple and straight-forward programs.
meillo@122 3338 With the exception of the MIME handling tools,
meillo@122 3339 .Pn pick
meillo@122 3340 is the largest tools.
meillo@122 3341 It contains 1\|037 lines of source code (measured with
meillo@122 3342 .Pn sloccount ), excluding the MH library.
meillo@122 3343 Only the MIME handling tools (\c
meillo@122 3344 .Pn mhbuild ,
meillo@122 3345 .Pn mhstore ,
meillo@122 3346 .Pn show ,
meillo@122 3347 etc.)
meillo@122 3348 are larger.
meillo@122 3349 Splitting programs with less than 1\|000 lines of code into multiple
meillo@123 3350 source files seldom leads to better readability.
meillo@123 3351 For such tools, splitting makes sense
meillo@122 3352 when parts of the code are reused in other programs,
meillo@122 3353 and the reused code fragment is not general enough
meillo@122 3354 for including it in the MH library,
meillo@124 3355 or, if the code has dependencies on a library that only few programs need.
meillo@122 3356 .Fn uip/packsbr.c ,
meillo@122 3357 for instance, provides the core program logic for the
meillo@122 3358 .Pn packf
meillo@122 3359 and
meillo@122 3360 .Pn rcvpack
meillo@122 3361 programs.
meillo@122 3362 .Fn uip/packf.c
meillo@122 3363 and
meillo@122 3364 .Fn uip/rcvpack.c
meillo@122 3365 mainly wrap the core function appropriately.
meillo@122 3366 No other tools use the folder packing functions.
meillo@123 3367 As another example,
meillo@123 3368 .Fn uip/termsbr.c
meillo@123 3369 provides termcap support, which requires linking with a termcap or
meillo@123 3370 curses library.
meillo@123 3371 Including
meillo@123 3372 .Fn uip/termsbr.c
meillo@123 3373 into the MH library would require every program to be linked with
meillo@123 3374 termcap or curses, although only few of the programs require it.
meillo@122 3375 .P
meillo@122 3376 The task of MIME handling is complex enough that splitting its code
meillo@122 3377 into multiple source files improves the readability.
meillo@122 3378 The program
meillo@122 3379 .Pn mhstore ,
meillo@122 3380 for instance, is compiled out of seven source files with 2\|500
meillo@122 3381 lines of code in summary.
meillo@122 3382 The main code file
meillo@122 3383 .Fn uip/mhstore.c
meillo@123 3384 consists of 800 lines; the other 1\|700 lines of code are reused in
meillo@123 3385 other MIME handling tools.
meillo@123 3386 It seems to be worthwhile to bundle the generic MIME handling code into
meillo@123 3387 a MH-MIME library, as a companion to the MH standard library.
meillo@122 3388 This is left open for the future.
meillo@122 3389 .P
meillo@123 3390 The work already done, focussed on the non-MIME tools.
meillo@122 3391 The amount of code compiled into each program was reduced.
meillo@123 3392 This eases the understanding of the code base.
meillo@122 3393 In nmh,
meillo@122 3394 .Pn comp
meillo@122 3395 was built from six source files:
meillo@122 3396 .Fn comp.c ,
meillo@122 3397 .Fn whatnowproc.c ,
meillo@122 3398 .Fn whatnowsbr.c ,
meillo@122 3399 .Fn sendsbr.c ,
meillo@122 3400 .Fn annosbr.c ,
meillo@122 3401 and
meillo@122 3402 .Fn distsbr.c .
meillo@122 3403 In mmh, it builds from only two:
meillo@122 3404 .Fn comp.c
meillo@122 3405 and
meillo@122 3406 .Fn whatnowproc.c .
meillo@123 3407 In nmh's
meillo@123 3408 .Pn comp ,
meillo@123 3409 the core function of
meillo@122 3410 .Pn whatnow ,
meillo@122 3411 .Pn send ,
meillo@122 3412 and
meillo@122 3413 .Pn anno
meillo@123 3414 were compiled into
meillo@122 3415 .Pn comp .
meillo@123 3416 This saved the need to execute these programs with
meillo@122 3417 .Fu fork()
meillo@122 3418 and
meillo@122 3419 .Fu exec() ,
meillo@122 3420 two expensive system calls.
meillo@122 3421 Whereis this approach improved the time performance,
meillo@122 3422 it interweaved the source code.
meillo@122 3423 Core functionalities were not encapsulated into programs but into
meillo@122 3424 function, which were then wrapped by programs.
meillo@122 3425 For example,
meillo@122 3426 .Fn uip/annosbr.c
meillo@122 3427 included the function
meillo@122 3428 .Fu annotate() .
meillo@122 3429 Each program that wanted to annotate messages, included the source file
meillo@123 3430 .Fn uip/annosbr.c
meillo@123 3431 and called
meillo@123 3432 .Fu annotate() .
meillo@123 3433 Because the function
meillo@123 3434 .Fu annotate()
meillo@123 3435 was used like the tool
meillo@123 3436 .Pn anno ,
meillo@123 3437 it had seven parameters, reflecting the command line switches of the tool.
meillo@122 3438 When another pair of command line switches was added to
meillo@122 3439 .Pn anno ,
meillo@122 3440 a rather ugly hack was implemented to avoid adding another parameter
meillo@122 3441 to the function.
meillo@122 3442 .Ci d9b1d57351d104d7ec1a5621f090657dcce8cb7f
meillo@122 3443 .P
meillo@122 3444 Separation simplifies the understanding of program code
meillo@122 3445 because the area influenced by any particular statement is smaller.
meillo@122 3446 The separating on the program-level is more strict than the separation
meillo@122 3447 on the function level.
meillo@122 3448 In mmh, the relevant code of
meillo@122 3449 .Pn comp
meillo@122 3450 comprises the two files
meillo@122 3451 .Fn uip/comp.c
meillo@122 3452 and
meillo@122 3453 .Fn uip/whatnowproc.c ,
meillo@123 3454 together 210 lines of code.
meillo@122 3455 In nmh,
meillo@122 3456 .Pn comp
meillo@122 3457 comprises six files with 2\|450 lines.
meillo@123 3458 Not all of the code in these six files was actually used by
meillo@122 3459 .Pn comp ,
meillo@123 3460 but the code reader needed to read all of the code first to know which
meillo@123 3461 parts were used.
meillo@122 3462 .P
meillo@123 3463 As I have read a lot in the code base during the last two years,
meillo@123 3464 I learned about the easy and the difficult parts.
meillo@123 3465 Code is easy to understand if:
meillo@123 3466 .BU
meillo@123 3467 The influenced code area is small
meillo@123 3468 .BU
meillo@124 3469 The boundaries are strictly defined
meillo@123 3470 .BU
meillo@123 3471 The code is written straight-forward
meillo@123 3472 .P
meillo@123 3473 .\" XXX move this paragraph somewhere else?
meillo@123 3474 Reading
meillo@122 3475 .Pn rmm 's
meillo@122 3476 source code in
meillo@122 3477 .Fn uip/rmm.c
meillo@122 3478 is my recommendation for a beginner's entry point into the code base of nmh.
meillo@122 3479 The reasons are that the task of
meillo@122 3480 .Pn rmm
meillo@122 3481 is straight forward and it consists of one small source code file only,
meillo@122 3482 yet its source includes code constructs typical for MH tools.
meillo@122 3483 With the introduction of the trash folder in mmh,
meillo@122 3484 .Pn rmm
meillo@122 3485 became a bit more complex, because it invokes
meillo@122 3486 .Pn refile .
meillo@122 3487 Still, it is a good example for a simple tool with clear sources.
meillo@122 3488 .P
meillo@122 3489 Understanding
meillo@122 3490 .Pn comp
meillo@122 3491 requires to read 210 lines of code in mmh, but ten times as much in nmh.
meillo@123 3492 Due to the aforementioned hack in
meillo@122 3493 .Pn anno
meillo@122 3494 to save the additional parameter, information passed through the program's
meillo@122 3495 source base in obscure ways.
meillo@123 3496 Thus, understanding
meillo@122 3497 .Pn comp ,
meillo@123 3498 required understanding the inner workings of
meillo@122 3499 .Fn uip/annosbr.c
meillo@122 3500 first.
meillo@123 3501 To be sure to fully understand a program, its whole source code needs
meillo@122 3502 to be examined.
meillo@123 3503 Not doing so is a leap of faith, assuming that the developers
meillo@122 3504 have avoided obscure programming techniques.
meillo@122 3505 By separating the tools on the program-level, the boundaries are
meillo@122 3506 clearly visible and technically enforced.
meillo@122 3507 The interfaces are calls to
meillo@122 3508 .Fu exec()
meillo@122 3509 rather than arbitrary function calls.
meillo@123 3510 .P
meillo@123 3511 But the real problem is another:
meillo@123 3512 Nmh violates the golden ``one tool, one job'' rule of the Unix philosophy.
meillo@123 3513 Understanding
meillo@122 3514 .Pn comp
meillo@123 3515 requires understanding
meillo@123 3516 .Fn uip/annosbr.c
meillo@123 3517 and
meillo@123 3518 .Fn uip/sendsbr.c
meillo@123 3519 because
meillo@123 3520 .Pn comp
meillo@123 3521 does annotate and send messages.
meillo@123 3522 In nmh, there surely exists the tool
meillo@122 3523 .Pn send ,
meillo@123 3524 which does (almost) only send messages.
meillo@123 3525 But
meillo@122 3526 .Pn comp
meillo@123 3527 and
meillo@122 3528 .Pn repl
meillo@122 3529 and
meillo@122 3530 .Pn forw
meillo@122 3531 and
meillo@122 3532 .Pn dist
meillo@122 3533 and
meillo@122 3534 .Pn whatnow
meillo@122 3535 and
meillo@123 3536 .Pn viamail ,
meillo@123 3537 they all (!) have the same message sending function included, too.
meillo@123 3538 In result,
meillo@123 3539 .Pn comp
meillo@123 3540 sends messages without using
meillo@123 3541 .Pn send .
meillo@123 3542 The situation is the same as if
meillo@123 3543 .Pn grep
meillo@123 3544 would page without
meillo@123 3545 .Pn more
meillo@123 3546 just because both programs are part of the same code base.
meillo@123 3547 .P
meillo@122 3548 The clear separation on the surface \(en the toolchest approach \(en
meillo@123 3549 is violated on the level below.
meillo@122 3550 This violation is for the sake of time performance.
meillo@122 3551 On systems where
meillo@122 3552 .Fu fork()
meillo@122 3553 and
meillo@122 3554 .Fu exec()
meillo@122 3555 are expensive, the quicker response might be noticable.
meillo@124 3556 In the old times, sacrificing readability and conceptional beauty for
meillo@124 3557 speed might even have been a must to prevent MH from being unusably slow.
meillo@122 3558 Whatever the reasons had been, today they are gone.
meillo@123 3559 No longer should we sacrifice readability or conceptional beauty.
meillo@122 3560 No longer should we violate the Unix philosophy's ``one tool, one job''
meillo@122 3561 guideline.
meillo@123 3562 No longer should we keep speed improvements that became unnecessary.
meillo@122 3563 .P
meillo@123 3564 Therefore, mmh's
meillo@123 3565 .Pn comp
meillo@123 3566 does no longer send messages.
meillo@123 3567 In mmh, different jobs are divided among separate programs that
meillo@122 3568 invoke each other as needed.
meillo@123 3569 In consequence,
meillo@123 3570 .Pn comp
meillo@123 3571 invokes
meillo@123 3572 .Pn whatnow
meillo@123 3573 which thereafter invokes
meillo@123 3574 .Pn send .
meillo@123 3575 The clear separation on the surface is maintained on the level below.
meillo@123 3576 Human users and the tools use the same interface \(en
meillo@123 3577 annotations, for example, are made by invoking
meillo@123 3578 .Pn anno ,
meillo@123 3579 no matter if requested by programs or by human beings.
meillo@123 3580 The decrease of tools built from multiple source files and thus
meillo@123 3581 the decrease of
meillo@123 3582 .Fn uip/*sbr.c
meillo@123 3583 files confirm the improvement.
meillo@123 3584 .P
meillo@123 3585 One disadvantage needs to be taken with this change:
meillo@123 3586 The compiler can no longer check the integrity of the interfaces.
meillo@123 3587 By changing the command line interfaces of tools, it is
meillo@123 3588 the developer's job to adjust the invocations of these tools as well.
meillo@123 3589 As this is a manual task and regression tests, which could detect such
meillo@124 3590 problems, are not available yet, it is prone to errors.
meillo@123 3591 These errors will not be detected at compile time but at run time.
meillo@123 3592 Installing regression tests is a task left to do.
meillo@123 3593 In the best case, a uniform way of invoking tools from other tools
meillo@123 3594 can be developed to allow automated testing at compile time.
meillo@122 3595
meillo@118 3596
meillo@118 3597
meillo@118 3598
meillo@126 3599 .H2 "User Data Locations
meillo@0 3600 .P
meillo@126 3601 In nmh, a personal setup consists of the MH profile and the MH directory.
meillo@126 3602 The profile is a file named
meillo@19 3603 .Fn \&.mh_profile
meillo@126 3604 in the user's home directory.
meillo@126 3605 It contains the static configuration.
meillo@126 3606 It also contains the location of the MH directory in the profile entry
meillo@126 3607 .Pe Path .
meillo@126 3608 The MH directory contains the mail storage and is the first
meillo@126 3609 place to search for personal forms, scan formats, and similar
meillo@126 3610 configuration files.
meillo@126 3611 The location of the MH directory can be chosen freely by the user.
meillo@126 3612 The default and usual name is a directory named
meillo@19 3613 .Fn Mail
meillo@126 3614 in the home directory.
meillo@19 3615 .P
meillo@126 3616 The way MH data is splitted between profile and MH directory is a legacy.
meillo@126 3617 It is only sensible in a situation where the profile is the only
meillo@126 3618 configuration file.
meillo@126 3619 Why else should the mail storage and the configuration files be intermixed?
meillo@126 3620 They are different kinds of data:
meillo@126 3621 The data to be operated on and the configuration to change how
meillo@126 3622 tools operate.
meillo@126 3623 Splitting the configuration between the profile and the MH directory
meillo@126 3624 is bad.
meillo@126 3625 Merging the mail storage and the configuration in one directory is bad
meillo@126 3626 as well.
meillo@126 3627 As the mail storage and the configuration were not separated sensibly
meillo@126 3628 in the first place, I did it now.
meillo@19 3629 .P
meillo@126 3630 Personal mmh data is grouped by type, resulting in two distinct parts:
meillo@126 3631 The mail storage and the configuration.
meillo@126 3632 In mmh, the mail storage directory still contains all the messages,
meillo@126 3633 but, in exception of public sequences files, nothing else.
meillo@126 3634 In difference to nmh, the auxiliary configuration files are no longer
meillo@126 3635 located there.
meillo@126 3636 Therefore, the directory is no longer called the user's \fIMH directory\fP
meillo@126 3637 but his \fImail storage\fP.
meillo@126 3638 Its location is still user-chosen, with the default name
meillo@19 3639 .Fn Mail ,
meillo@104 3640 in the user's home directory.
meillo@126 3641 In mmh, the configuration is grouped together in
meillo@126 3642 the hidden directory
meillo@19 3643 .Fn \&.mmh
meillo@19 3644 in the user's home directory.
meillo@126 3645 This \fImmh directory\fP contains the context file, personal forms,
meillo@126 3646 scan formats, and the like, but also the user's profile, now named
meillo@126 3647 .Fn profile .
meillo@126 3648 The location of the profile is no longer fixed to
meillo@126 3649 .Fn $HOME/.mh_profile
meillo@126 3650 but to
meillo@126 3651 .Fn $HOME/.mmh/profile .
meillo@126 3652 Having both, the file
meillo@126 3653 .Fn $HOME/.mh_profile
meillo@126 3654 and the configuration directory
meillo@126 3655 .Fn $HOME/.mmh
meillo@126 3656 appeared to be inconsistent.
meillo@126 3657 The approach chosen for mmh is consistent, simple, and familiar to
meillo@126 3658 Unix users.
meillo@19 3659 .P
meillo@126 3660 MH allows users to have multiiple MH setups.
meillo@126 3661 Therefore, it is necessary to select a different profile.
meillo@126 3662 The profile is the single entry point to access the rest of a
meillo@126 3663 personal MH setup.
meillo@126 3664 In nmh, the environment variable
meillo@19 3665 .Ev MH
meillo@126 3666 could be used to specifiy a different profile.
meillo@126 3667 To operate in the same MH setup with a separate context,
meillo@126 3668 the
meillo@19 3669 .Ev MHCONTEXT
meillo@126 3670 environment variable could be used.
meillo@126 3671 This allows having own current folders and current messages in
meillo@126 3672 each terminal, for instance.
meillo@126 3673 In mmh, three environment variables are used.
meillo@19 3674 .Ev MMH
meillo@126 3675 overrides the default location of the mmh directory (\c
meillo@126 3676 .Fn .mmh ).
meillo@19 3677 .Ev MMHP
meillo@19 3678 and
meillo@19 3679 .Ev MMHC
meillo@126 3680 override the paths to the profile and context files, respectively.
meillo@126 3681 This approach allows the set of personal configuration files to be chosen
meillo@126 3682 independently from the profile, context, and mail storage.
meillo@126 3683 .P
meillo@126 3684 The separation of the files by type is sensible and convenient.
meillo@126 3685 The new approach has no functional disadvantages,
meillo@126 3686 as every setup I can imagine can be implemented with both approaches,
meillo@126 3687 possibly even easier with the new approach.
meillo@126 3688 The main achievement of the change is the clear and sensible split
meillo@126 3689 between mail storage and configuration.
meillo@0 3690
meillo@49 3691
meillo@58 3692
meillo@131 3693 .H2 "Path Conversion
meillo@131 3694 .P
meillo@131 3695 FIXME! XXX
meillo@58 3696
meillo@58 3697
meillo@131 3698 commit d39e2c447b0d163a5a63f480b23d06edb7a73aa0
meillo@131 3699 Author: markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
meillo@131 3700 Date: Fri Dec 9 16:34:57 2011 +0100
meillo@58 3701
meillo@131 3702 Completely reworked the path convertion functions
meillo@131 3703 Moved everything (from sbr/getfolder.c and sbr/m_maildir.c) into
meillo@131 3704 sbr/path.c, but actually replaced the code almost completely.
meillo@131 3705 See h/prototypes.h for the function changes.
meillo@131 3706 sbr/path.c provides explaining comments on the functions.
meillo@131 3707 None of them allocates memory automatically.
meillo@131 3708
meillo@131 3709 Additionally:
meillo@131 3710 - Like for other ``files'', `inc -audit file' places file relative
meillo@131 3711 to the cwd, not relative to the mh-dir. This is for consistency.
meillo@131 3712 - Replaced add(foo, NULL) with getcpy(foo), which ist clearer.