Mercurial > docs > masqmail-cs
comparison masqmail.tex @ 4:1197518aa221
content about ch04
| author | meillo@marmaro.de |
|---|---|
| date | Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:40:07 +0100 |
| parents | 40968008fe7c |
| children | 282b52d9de09 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
| 3:40968008fe7c | 4:1197518aa221 |
|---|---|
| 334 | 334 |
| 335 \secframe{the thesis in short} | 335 \secframe{the thesis in short} |
| 336 | 336 |
| 337 | 337 |
| 338 | 338 |
| 339 \frame{\ft{planned was} | 339 %\frame{\ft{planned was} |
| 340 | 340 % |
| 341 1) purpose and structure of an MTA/of masqmail | 341 %1) purpose and structure of an MTA/of masqmail |
| 342 | 342 % |
| 343 2) security analysis | 343 %2) security analysis |
| 344 | 344 % |
| 345 3) code improvements | 345 %3) code improvements |
| 346 | 346 % |
| 347 4) documentation, test, distribution | 347 %4) documentation, test, distribution |
| 348 | 348 % |
| 349 With the goal to release a new version and get it into Debian | 349 %With the goal to release a new version and get it into Debian |
| 350 | 350 % |
| 351 } | 351 %} |
| 352 | 352 % |
| 353 | 353 % |
| 354 \frame{\ft{however, it resulted in} | 354 %\frame{\ft{however, it resulted in} |
| 355 | 355 % |
| 356 1) introduction | 356 %1) introduction |
| 357 | 357 % |
| 358 2) market analysis | 358 %2) market analysis |
| 359 | 359 % |
| 360 3) mail transfer agents | 360 %3) mail transfer agents |
| 361 | 361 % |
| 362 4) masqmail's present and future | 362 %4) masqmail's present and future |
| 363 | 363 % |
| 364 5) improvement plans | 364 %5) improvement plans |
| 365 | 365 % |
| 366 Became pretty theoretic (I don't worry) | 366 %Became pretty theoretic (I don't worry) |
| 367 | 367 % |
| 368 } | 368 %} |
| 369 | 369 |
| 370 | 370 |
| 371 | 371 |
| 372 | 372 |
| 373 | 373 |
| 471 | 471 |
| 472 | 472 |
| 473 | 473 |
| 474 \frame{\ft{market shares} | 474 \frame{\ft{market shares} |
| 475 | 475 |
| 476 FIXME | 476 \input{tbl/mta-market-share.tbl} |
| 477 | |
| 478 } | |
| 479 | |
| 480 | |
| 481 | |
| 482 \frame{\ft{comparison} | |
| 483 | |
| 484 \input{tbl/mta-comparison.tbl} | |
| 477 | 485 |
| 478 } | 486 } |
| 479 | 487 |
| 480 | 488 |
| 481 | 489 |
| 543 \secframe{in detail: ch04 present and future} | 551 \secframe{in detail: ch04 present and future} |
| 544 | 552 |
| 545 | 553 |
| 546 \frame{\ft{functional requirements} | 554 \frame{\ft{functional requirements} |
| 547 | 555 |
| 556 \input{tbl/func-requirements.tbl} | |
| 557 | |
| 548 } | 558 } |
| 549 | 559 |
| 550 \frame{\ft{non-functional requirements} | 560 \frame{\ft{non-functional requirements} |
| 551 | 561 |
| 552 } | 562 \input{tbl/nonf-requirements.tbl} |
| 553 | 563 |
| 554 \frame{\ft{architectural requirements} | 564 } |
| 555 | 565 |
| 556 } | 566 \frame{\ft{work tasks} |
| 557 | 567 |
| 558 \frame{\ft{fulfilled requirements} | 568 TODO\,1: Encryption |
| 559 | 569 |
| 560 } | 570 TODO\,2: Authentication |
| 561 | 571 |
| 562 \frame{\ft{work to do} | 572 TODO\,3: Security |
| 573 | |
| 574 TODO\,4: Reliability | |
| 575 | |
| 576 TODO\,5: Spam handling | |
| 577 | |
| 578 TODO\,6: Extendability | |
| 579 | |
| 563 | 580 |
| 564 } | 581 } |
| 565 | 582 |
| 566 | 583 |
| 567 \frame{\ft{further development} | 584 \frame{\ft{further development} |
| 568 | 585 |
| 569 } | 586 - improve existing code |
| 587 | |
| 588 - add wrappers and interposition filters | |
| 589 | |
| 590 - redesign and rewrite from scratch | |
| 591 | |
| 592 } | |
| 593 | |
| 594 | |
| 595 \frame{\ft{architecture} | |
| 596 | |
| 597 \begin{center} | |
| 598 \includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{fig/callgraph.eps} | |
| 599 \end{center} | |
| 600 | |
| 601 } | |
| 602 | |
| 570 | 603 |
| 571 | 604 |
| 572 \frame{\ft{the result} | 605 \frame{\ft{the result} |
| 573 | 606 |
| 574 ``one fits all'' is not possible | 607 ``one fits all'' is not possible |