1.1 --- a/masqmail.tex	Mon Mar 02 15:15:06 2009 +0100
     1.2 +++ b/masqmail.tex	Tue Mar 03 13:40:07 2009 +0100
     1.3 @@ -336,36 +336,36 @@
     1.4  
     1.5  
     1.6  
     1.7 -\frame{\ft{planned was}
     1.8 -
     1.9 -1) purpose and structure of an MTA/of masqmail
    1.10 -
    1.11 -2) security analysis
    1.12 -
    1.13 -3) code improvements
    1.14 -
    1.15 -4) documentation, test, distribution
    1.16 -
    1.17 -With the goal to release a new version and get it into Debian
    1.18 -
    1.19 -}
    1.20 -
    1.21 -
    1.22 -\frame{\ft{however, it resulted in}
    1.23 -
    1.24 -1) introduction
    1.25 -
    1.26 -2) market analysis
    1.27 -
    1.28 -3) mail transfer agents
    1.29 -
    1.30 -4) masqmail's present and future
    1.31 -
    1.32 -5) improvement plans
    1.33 -
    1.34 -Became pretty theoretic (I don't worry)
    1.35 -
    1.36 -}
    1.37 +%\frame{\ft{planned was}
    1.38 +%
    1.39 +%1) purpose and structure of an MTA/of masqmail
    1.40 +%
    1.41 +%2) security analysis
    1.42 +%
    1.43 +%3) code improvements
    1.44 +%
    1.45 +%4) documentation, test, distribution
    1.46 +%
    1.47 +%With the goal to release a new version and get it into Debian
    1.48 +%
    1.49 +%}
    1.50 +%
    1.51 +%
    1.52 +%\frame{\ft{however, it resulted in}
    1.53 +%
    1.54 +%1) introduction
    1.55 +%
    1.56 +%2) market analysis
    1.57 +%
    1.58 +%3) mail transfer agents
    1.59 +%
    1.60 +%4) masqmail's present and future
    1.61 +%
    1.62 +%5) improvement plans
    1.63 +%
    1.64 +%Became pretty theoretic (I don't worry)
    1.65 +%
    1.66 +%}
    1.67  
    1.68  
    1.69  
    1.70 @@ -473,7 +473,15 @@
    1.71  
    1.72  \frame{\ft{market shares}
    1.73  
    1.74 -FIXME
    1.75 +\input{tbl/mta-market-share.tbl}
    1.76 +
    1.77 +}
    1.78 +
    1.79 +
    1.80 +
    1.81 +\frame{\ft{comparison}
    1.82 +
    1.83 +\input{tbl/mta-comparison.tbl}
    1.84  
    1.85  }
    1.86  
    1.87 @@ -545,30 +553,55 @@
    1.88  
    1.89  \frame{\ft{functional requirements}
    1.90  
    1.91 +\input{tbl/func-requirements.tbl}
    1.92 +
    1.93  }
    1.94  
    1.95  \frame{\ft{non-functional requirements}
    1.96  
    1.97 -}
    1.98 -
    1.99 -\frame{\ft{architectural requirements}
   1.100 +\input{tbl/nonf-requirements.tbl}
   1.101  
   1.102  }
   1.103  
   1.104 -\frame{\ft{fulfilled requirements}
   1.105 +\frame{\ft{work tasks}
   1.106 +
   1.107 +TODO\,1: Encryption
   1.108 +
   1.109 +TODO\,2: Authentication
   1.110 +
   1.111 +TODO\,3: Security
   1.112 +
   1.113 +TODO\,4: Reliability
   1.114 +
   1.115 +TODO\,5: Spam handling
   1.116 +
   1.117 +TODO\,6: Extendability
   1.118 +
   1.119  
   1.120  }
   1.121  
   1.122 -\frame{\ft{work to do}
   1.123 +
   1.124 +\frame{\ft{further development}
   1.125 +
   1.126 +- improve existing code
   1.127 +
   1.128 +- add wrappers and interposition filters
   1.129 +
   1.130 +- redesign and rewrite from scratch
   1.131  
   1.132  }
   1.133  
   1.134  
   1.135 -\frame{\ft{further development}
   1.136 +\frame{\ft{architecture}
   1.137 +
   1.138 +\begin{center}
   1.139 +\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{fig/callgraph.eps}
   1.140 +\end{center}
   1.141  
   1.142  }
   1.143  
   1.144  
   1.145 +
   1.146  \frame{\ft{the result}
   1.147  
   1.148  ``one fits all'' is not possible