docs/cut

changeset 38:ec76f8926598

clarify a statement Thanks to Francesc for the suggestion.
author markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
date Tue, 06 Oct 2015 10:43:26 +0200
parents c338b706447b
children e294684cf338
files cut.en.ms
diffstat 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) [+]
line diff
     1.1 --- a/cut.en.ms	Mon Oct 05 06:48:17 2015 +0200
     1.2 +++ b/cut.en.ms	Tue Oct 06 10:43:26 2015 +0200
     1.3 @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
     1.4  selection specification is irrelevant; it doesn't even matter if
     1.5  fields occur multiple times. Thus, the invocation
     1.6  \f(CWcut -c 5-8,1,4-6\fP outputs the characters number
     1.7 -1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in exactly this order. The
     1.8 +1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in ascending order. The
     1.9  selection specification resembles mathematical set theory: Each
    1.10  specified field is part of the solution set. The fields in the
    1.11  solution set are always in the same order as in the input. To