# HG changeset patch # User markus schnalke # Date 1444121006 -7200 # Node ID ec76f8926598ed3a80417f19d1e31e432197a078 # Parent c338b706447b659de757446071e4263e257144ad clarify a statement Thanks to Francesc for the suggestion. diff -r c338b706447b -r ec76f8926598 cut.en.ms --- a/cut.en.ms Mon Oct 05 06:48:17 2015 +0200 +++ b/cut.en.ms Tue Oct 06 10:43:26 2015 +0200 @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ selection specification is irrelevant; it doesn't even matter if fields occur multiple times. Thus, the invocation \f(CWcut -c 5-8,1,4-6\fP outputs the characters number -1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in exactly this order. The +1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in ascending order. The selection specification resembles mathematical set theory: Each specified field is part of the solution set. The fields in the solution set are always in the same order as in the input. To