masqmail
annotate docs/howto-static-linking @ 237:5f9f3a65032e
refactoring: new function split_rcpts() replaces two others
split_rcpts() merges rcptlist_with_one_of_hostlist() and
rcptlist_with_addr_is_local() into one with hardly adding complexity
I'd actually say that the overall complexity decreased.
Have a look at the comment for split_rcpts() in route.c
| author | markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de> |
|---|---|
| date | Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:56:47 -0300 |
| parents | |
| children |
| rev | line source |
|---|---|
| meillo@202 | 1 Howto link masqmail statically? |
| meillo@202 | 2 ------------------------------- |
| meillo@202 | 3 |
| meillo@202 | 4 With gcc (don't know anything about other compilers), you simply |
| meillo@202 | 5 build masqmail with: |
| meillo@202 | 6 |
| meillo@202 | 7 LDFLAGS=-static make -e |
| meillo@202 | 8 |
| meillo@202 | 9 |
| meillo@202 | 10 On Debian GNU/Linux, I received a bunch warnings of that kind: |
| meillo@202 | 11 |
| meillo@202 | 12 interface.o: In function `init_sockaddr': |
| meillo@202 | 13 interface.c:55: warning: Using 'gethostbyname' in statically |
| meillo@202 | 14 linked applications requires at runtime the shared libraries |
| meillo@202 | 15 from the glibc version used for linking |
| meillo@202 | 16 |
| meillo@202 | 17 On NetBSD I no warnings were printed. |
| meillo@202 | 18 |
| meillo@202 | 19 I don't have enough knowledge to tell the reasons and implications. |
| meillo@202 | 20 Maybe you can. |
| meillo@202 | 21 |
| meillo@202 | 22 |
| meillo@202 | 23 |
| meillo@202 | 24 meillo |