masqmail
annotate docs/howto-static-linking @ 317:55b7bde95d37
reworked allowed and denied addrs for routes
The following refactorings had been made:
- allowed_mail_locals + allowed_return_paths -> allowed_senders
- not_allowed_mail_locals + not_allowed_return_paths -> denied_senders
- allowed_rcpt_domains -> allowed_recipients
- not_allowed_rcpt_domains -> denied_recipients
The new options allow more consistent and more flexible matching.
| author | meillo@marmaro.de |
|---|---|
| date | Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:55:06 +0200 |
| parents | |
| children |
| rev | line source |
|---|---|
| meillo@202 | 1 Howto link masqmail statically? |
| meillo@202 | 2 ------------------------------- |
| meillo@202 | 3 |
| meillo@202 | 4 With gcc (don't know anything about other compilers), you simply |
| meillo@202 | 5 build masqmail with: |
| meillo@202 | 6 |
| meillo@202 | 7 LDFLAGS=-static make -e |
| meillo@202 | 8 |
| meillo@202 | 9 |
| meillo@202 | 10 On Debian GNU/Linux, I received a bunch warnings of that kind: |
| meillo@202 | 11 |
| meillo@202 | 12 interface.o: In function `init_sockaddr': |
| meillo@202 | 13 interface.c:55: warning: Using 'gethostbyname' in statically |
| meillo@202 | 14 linked applications requires at runtime the shared libraries |
| meillo@202 | 15 from the glibc version used for linking |
| meillo@202 | 16 |
| meillo@202 | 17 On NetBSD I no warnings were printed. |
| meillo@202 | 18 |
| meillo@202 | 19 I don't have enough knowledge to tell the reasons and implications. |
| meillo@202 | 20 Maybe you can. |
| meillo@202 | 21 |
| meillo@202 | 22 |
| meillo@202 | 23 |
| meillo@202 | 24 meillo |