log client.c
| age |
author |
description |
| Wed, 06 Sep 2006 15:36:42 +0200 |
Anselm R. Garbe |
no this is better |
| Wed, 06 Sep 2006 15:30:28 +0200 |
Anselm R. Garbe |
does this preserve z order for anthony? |
| Wed, 06 Sep 2006 13:56:46 +0200 |
Anselm R. Garbe |
maybe this might work |
| Wed, 06 Sep 2006 11:54:16 +0200 |
Anselm R. Garbe |
sanders solution is convincing and elegant |
| Wed, 06 Sep 2006 11:46:35 +0200 |
Anselm R. Garbe |
seems to preserve floating client z-layer order (even with reorder() calls) |
| Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:21:17 +0200 |
Anselm R. Garbe |
moved transient_for tag inheritance to settags |
| Wed, 06 Sep 2006 09:13:31 +0200 |
Anselm R. Garbe |
no, reodering floating clients definately breaks the manage() policy which attaches all clients zoomed (otherwise higher-weight clients couldn't be attached zoomed, which sucks) |
| Tue, 05 Sep 2006 19:26:34 +0200 |
Anselm R. Garbe |
no, ordering floating clients at the end seems better |
