docs/unix-phil
diff unix-phil.ms @ 22:4c21f5b8d716
wrote about problems of MH (ch04)
author | meillo@marmaro.de |
---|---|
date | Tue, 02 Mar 2010 12:24:30 +0100 |
parents | ca929b042039 |
children | f0511a56416e |
line diff
1.1 --- a/unix-phil.ms Fri Feb 26 14:28:59 2010 +0100 1.2 +++ b/unix-phil.ms Tue Mar 02 12:24:30 2010 +0100 1.3 @@ -1017,10 +1017,29 @@ 1.4 .NH 2 1.5 Problems 1.6 .LP 1.7 -modern emailing 1.8 -MIME 1.9 -encodings 1.10 -largest problem: different feeling 1.11 +\s-1MH\s0, for sure is not without problems. 1.12 +There are two main problems: one technical, the other about human behavior. 1.13 +.PP 1.14 +\s-1MH\s0 is old and email today is very different to email in the time 1.15 +when \s-1MH\s0 was designed. 1.16 +\s-1MH\s0 adopted to the changes pretty well, but it is limited. 1.17 +For example in development resources. 1.18 +\s-1MIME\s0 support and support for different character encodings 1.19 +is available, but only on a moderate level. 1.20 +More active developers could quickly improve there. 1.21 +It is also limited by design, which is the larger problem. 1.22 +\s-1IMAP\s0, for example, conflicts with \s-1MH\s0's design to a large extend. 1.23 +These design conflicts are not easily solvable. 1.24 +Possibly, they require a redesign. 1.25 +.PP 1.26 +The other kind of problem is human habits. 1.27 +When in this world almost all \s-1MUA\s0s are monolithic, 1.28 +it is very difficult to convince people to use a toolbox style \s-1MUA\s0 1.29 +like \s-1MH\s0. 1.30 +The habits are so strong, that even people who understood the concept 1.31 +and advantages of \s-1MH\s0 do not like to switch. 1.32 +Unfortunately, the frontends to \s-1MH\s0, which can provide familiar look'n'feel, 1.33 +are not very appealing in contrast to what monolithic \s-1MUA\s0s offer. 1.34 1.35 .NH 2 1.36 Summary \s-1MH\s0