docs/master
changeset 134:edf46861132b
Wrote about path conversion; Dropped the idea to write about scan listings
author | markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 03 Jul 2012 22:30:20 +0200 |
parents | 02660c14f6a8 |
children | d8adac1ed7d8 |
files | discussion.roff |
diffstat | 1 files changed, 177 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) [+] |
line diff
1.1 --- a/discussion.roff Tue Jul 03 16:50:41 2012 +0200 1.2 +++ b/discussion.roff Tue Jul 03 22:30:20 2012 +0200 1.3 @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 -.H2 "\fLshow\fP and \fPmhshow\fP 1.8 +.H2 "Displaying Messages 1.9 .P 1.10 Since the very beginning, already in the first concept paper, 1.11 .Pn show 1.12 @@ -564,29 +564,18 @@ 1.13 But there is no chance; 1.14 supporting MIME demands for higher essential complexity. 1.15 1.16 +.ig 1.17 +XXX 1.18 +Consider including text on scan listings here 1.19 1.20 -.H2 "Scan Listings 1.21 -.P 1.22 -FIXME XXX 1.23 - 1.24 -.P 1.25 -commit c20e315f9fb9f0f0955749726dbf4fd897cd9f48 1.26 -Author: markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de> 1.27 -Date: Fri Dec 9 21:56:44 2011 +0100 1.28 - 1.29 - Adjusted the default scan listing: remove the body preview 1.30 - The original listing is still available as etc/scan.nmh 1.31 - 1.32 -commit 70b2643e0da8485174480c644ad9785c84f5bff4 1.33 -Author: markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de> 1.34 -Date: Mon Jan 30 16:16:26 2012 +0100 1.35 - 1.36 - Scan listings shall not contain body content. Hence, removed this feature. 1.37 - Scan listings shall operator on message headers and non-message information 1.38 - only. Displaying the beginning of the body complicates everything too much. 1.39 - That's no surprise, because it's something completely different. If you 1.40 - want to examine the body, then use show(1)/mhshow(1). 1.41 - Changed the default scan formats accordingly. 1.42 +Scan listings shall not contain body content. Hence, removed this feature. 1.43 +Scan listings shall operator on message headers and non-message information 1.44 +only. Displaying the beginning of the body complicates everything too much. 1.45 +That's no surprise, because it's something completely different. If you 1.46 +want to examine the body, then use show(1)/mhshow(1). 1.47 +Changed the default scan formats accordingly. 1.48 +.Ci 70b2643e0da8485174480c644ad9785c84f5bff4 1.49 +.. 1.50 1.51 1.52 1.53 @@ -3108,25 +3097,171 @@ 1.54 1.55 .U3 "Path Conversion 1.56 .P 1.57 -FIXME! XXX 1.58 - 1.59 - 1.60 -commit d39e2c447b0d163a5a63f480b23d06edb7a73aa0 1.61 -Author: markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de> 1.62 -Date: Fri Dec 9 16:34:57 2011 +0100 1.63 - 1.64 - Completely reworked the path convertion functions 1.65 - Moved everything (from sbr/getfolder.c and sbr/m_maildir.c) into 1.66 - sbr/path.c, but actually replaced the code almost completely. 1.67 - See h/prototypes.h for the function changes. 1.68 - sbr/path.c provides explaining comments on the functions. 1.69 - None of them allocates memory automatically. 1.70 - 1.71 - Additionally: 1.72 - - Like for other ``files'', `inc -audit file' places file relative 1.73 - to the cwd, not relative to the mh-dir. This is for consistency. 1.74 - - Replaced add(foo, NULL) with getcpy(foo), which ist clearer. 1.75 - 1.76 +Four kinds of path names can appear in MH: 1.77 +.IP (1) 1.78 +Absolute Unix directory paths, like 1.79 +.Fn /etc/passwd . 1.80 +.IP (2) 1.81 +Relative Unix directory paths, like 1.82 +.Fn ./foo/bar . 1.83 +.IP (3) 1.84 +Absolute MH folder paths, like 1.85 +.Fn +friends/phil . 1.86 +.IP (4) 1.87 +Relative MH folder paths, like 1.88 +.Fn @subfolder . 1.89 +.P 1.90 +The last type, relative MH folder paths, are hardly documented. 1.91 +Nonetheless, they are useful for large mail storages. 1.92 +The current mail folder is specified as `\c 1.93 +.Fn @ ', 1.94 +just like the current directory is specified as `\c 1.95 +.Fn . '. 1.96 +.P 1.97 +To allow MH tools to understand all four notations, 1.98 +they need to convert between them. 1.99 +In nmh, these path name conversion functions were located in the files 1.100 +.Fn sbr/path.c 1.101 +(``return a pathname'') and 1.102 +.Fn sbr/m_maildir.c 1.103 +(``get the path for the mail directory''). 1.104 +The seven functions in the two files were documented with no more 1.105 +than two comments, which described obvious information. 1.106 +The function signatures were neither explaining: 1.107 +.VS 1.108 +char *path(char *, int); 1.109 +char *pluspath(char *); 1.110 +char *m_mailpath(char *); 1.111 +char *m_maildir(char *); 1.112 +VE 1.113 +.P 1.114 +My investigation provides the following description: 1.115 +.BU 1.116 +The second parameter of 1.117 +.Fu path() 1.118 +defines the type of path given as first parameter. 1.119 +Directory paths are converted to absolute directory paths. 1.120 +Folder paths are converted to absolute folder paths. 1.121 +Folder paths must not include a leading `@' character. 1.122 +Leading plus characters are preserved. 1.123 +The result is a pointer to newly allocated memory. 1.124 +.BU 1.125 +.Fu pluspath() 1.126 +is a convenience-wrapper to 1.127 +.Fu path() , 1.128 +to convert folder paths only. 1.129 +This function can not be used for directory paths. 1.130 +An empty string parameter causes a buffer overflow. 1.131 +.BU 1.132 +.Fu m_mailpath() 1.133 +converts directory paths to absolute directory paths. 1.134 +The characters `+' or `@' at the beginning of the path name are 1.135 +treated literal, i.e. as the first character of a relative directory path. 1.136 +Hence, this function can not be used for folder paths. 1.137 +In any case, the result is an absolute directory path. 1.138 +The result is a pointer to newly allocated memory. 1.139 +.BU 1.140 +.Fu m_maildir() 1.141 +returns the parameter unchanged if it is an absolute directory path 1.142 +or begins with the entry `.' or `..'. 1.143 +All other strings are prepended with the current working directory. 1.144 +Hence, this functions can not be used for folder paths. 1.145 +The result is either an absolute directory path or a relative 1.146 +directory path, starting with a dot. 1.147 +In contrast to the other functions, the result is a pointer to 1.148 +static memory. 1.149 +.P 1.150 +The situation was obscure, irritating, error-prone, and non-orthogonal. 1.151 +No clear terminology was used to name the different kinds of path names. 1.152 +The first argument of 1.153 +.Fu m_mailpath() , 1.154 +for instance, was named 1.155 +.Ar folder , 1.156 +though 1.157 +.Fu m_mailpath() 1.158 +can not be used for MH folders. 1.159 +.P 1.160 +I reworked the path name conversion completely, introducing clarity. 1.161 +First of all, the terminology needed to be defined. 1.162 +A path name is either in the Unix domain, then it is called 1.163 +\fIdirectory path\fP, `dirpath' for short, or it is in the MH domain, 1.164 +then it is called \fIfolder path\fP, `folpath' for short. 1.165 +The two terms need to be used with strict distinction. 1.166 +Having a clear terminology is often an indicator of having understood 1.167 +the problem itself. 1.168 +Second, I exploited the concept of path type indicators. 1.169 +By requesting every path name to start with a clear type identifier, 1.170 +conversion between the types can be fully automated. 1.171 +Thus the tools can accept paths of any type from the user. 1.172 +Therefore, it was necessary to require relative directory paths to be 1.173 +prefixed with a dot character. 1.174 +In consequence, the dot character could no longer be an alias for the 1.175 +current message. 1.176 +.Ci cff0e16925e7edbd25b8b9d6d4fbdf03e0e60c01 1.177 +Third, I created three new functions to replace the previous mess: 1.178 +.BU 1.179 +.Fu expandfol() 1.180 +converts folder paths to absolute folder paths, 1.181 +without the leading plus character. 1.182 +Directory paths are simply passed through. 1.183 +This function is to be used for folder paths only, thus the name. 1.184 +The result is a pointer to static memory. 1.185 +.BU 1.186 +.Fu expanddir() 1.187 +converts directory paths to absolute directory paths. 1.188 +Folder paths are treated as relative directory paths. 1.189 +This function is to be used for directory paths only, thus the name. 1.190 +The result is a pointer to static memory. 1.191 +.BU 1.192 +.Fu toabsdir() 1.193 +converts any type of path to an absolute directory path. 1.194 +This is the function of choice for path conversion. 1.195 +Absolute directory paths are the most general representation of a 1.196 +path name. 1.197 +The result is a pointer to static memory. 1.198 +.P 1.199 +The new functions have names that indicate their use. 1.200 +Two of the functions convert relative to absolute path names of the 1.201 +same type. 1.202 +The third function converts any path name type to the most general one, 1.203 +the absolute directory path. 1.204 +All of the functions return pointers to static memory. 1.205 +All three functions are implemented in 1.206 +.Fn sbr/path.c . 1.207 +.Fn sbr/m_maildir.c 1.208 +is removed. 1.209 +.P 1.210 +Along with the path conversion rework, I also replaced 1.211 +.Fu getfolder(FDEF) 1.212 +with 1.213 +.Fu getdeffol() 1.214 +and 1.215 +.Fu getfolder(FCUR) 1.216 +with 1.217 +.Fu getcurfol() , 1.218 +which is only a convenience wrapper for 1.219 +.Fu expandfol("@") . 1.220 +This code was moved from 1.221 +.Fn sbr/getfolder.c 1.222 +to 1.223 +.Fn sbr/path.c . 1.224 +.P 1.225 +The related function 1.226 +.Fu etcpath() 1.227 +was moved to 1.228 +.Fn sbr/path.c , 1.229 +too. 1.230 +Previously, it had been located in 1.231 +.Fn config/config.c , 1.232 +for whatever reasons. 1.233 +.P 1.234 +.Fn sbr/path.c 1.235 +now contains all path handling code. 1.236 +Only 173 lines of code were needed to replace the previous 252 lines. 1.237 +The readability of the code is highly improved. 1.238 +Additionally, each of the six exported and one static functions 1.239 +is introduced by an explaining comment. 1.240 +.Ci d39e2c447b0d163a5a63f480b23d06edb7a73aa0 1.241 1.242 1.243