1.1 --- a/discussion.roff	Thu Jul 05 15:58:40 2012 +0200
     1.2 +++ b/discussion.roff	Thu Jul 05 16:39:01 2012 +0200
     1.3 @@ -2772,9 +2772,12 @@
     1.4  of the charset name.
     1.5  .P
     1.6  More important than using active names is using descriptive names.
     1.7 -Renaming the obscure function
     1.8 +.VS
     1.9 +m_unknown(in);  /* the MAGIC invocation... */
    1.10 +VE
    1.11 +Renaming the obscure
    1.12  .Fu m_unknown()
    1.13 -was a delightful event.
    1.14 +function was a delightful event, although it made the code less funny.
    1.15  .Ci 611d68d19204d7cbf5bd585391249cb5bafca846
    1.16  .P
    1.17  Magic numbers are generally considered bad style.
    1.18 @@ -3910,6 +3913,7 @@
    1.19  .Fn uip/*sbr.c
    1.20  files confirm the improvement.
    1.21  .P
    1.22 +.\" XXX move this paragraph up somewhere
    1.23  One disadvantage needs to be taken with this change:
    1.24  The compiler can no longer check the integrity of the interfaces.
    1.25  By changing the command line interfaces of tools, it is
    1.26 @@ -3920,3 +3924,21 @@
    1.27  Installing regression tests is a task left to do.
    1.28  In the best case, a uniform way of invoking tools from other tools
    1.29  can be developed to allow automated testing at compile time.
    1.30 +
    1.31 +
    1.32 +.ig 
    1.33 +XXX consider writing about mhl vs. mhlproc
    1.34 +
    1.35 +sbr/showfile.c
    1.36 +
    1.37 +    23          /*
    1.38 +    24          ** If you have your lproc listed as "mhl",
    1.39 +    25          ** then really invoked the mhlproc instead
    1.40 +    26          ** (which is usually mhl anyway).
    1.41 +    27          */
    1.42 +
    1.43 +Sat Nov 24 19:09:14 1984  /mtr (agent: Marshall Rose) <uci@udel-dewey>
    1.44 +
    1.45 +        sbr/showfile.c: if lproc is "mhl", use mhlproc for consistency
    1.46 +        (Actually, user should use "lproc: show", "showproc: mhl".)
    1.47 +..