meillo@58: .H0 "Discussion
meillo@0: .P
meillo@58: This main chapter discusses the practical work done in the mmh project.
meillo@58: It is structured along the goals to achieve. The concrete work done
meillo@58: is described in the examples of how the general goals were achieved.
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: .H1 "Stream-lining
meillo@58: 
meillo@0: .P
meillo@58: MH had been considered an all-in-one system for mail handling.
meillo@58: The community around nmh has a similar understanding.
meillo@58: In fundamental difference, I believe that mmh should be a MUA but
meillo@58: nothing more. I believe that all-in-one mail systems are not the way
meillo@58: to go. There are excellent specialized MTAs, like Postfix;
meillo@58: there are specialized MDAs, like Procmail; there are specialized
meillo@58: MRAs, like Fetchmail. I believe it's best to use them instead of
meillo@58: providing the same function ourselves. Doing something well requires to
meillo@58: focus on this particular aspect or a small set of aspects. The more
meillo@58: it is possible to focus, the better the result in this particular
meillo@58: area will be. The limiting resource in Free Software community development
meillo@58: usually is human power. If the low development power is even parted
meillo@58: into multiple development areas, it will hardly be possible to 
meillo@58: compete with the specialists in the various fields. This is even
meillo@58: increased, given the small community \(en developers and users \(en
meillo@58: that MH-based mail systems have. In consequence, I believe that the
meillo@58: available resources should be concentrated at the point where MH is
meillo@58: most unique. This is clearly the MUA part.
meillo@58: .P
meillo@60: The goal for mmh was to remove peripheral parts and stream-line
meillo@60: it for the MUA task.
meillo@60: 
meillo@60: 
meillo@60: .H2 "Removal of Mail Transfer Facilities
meillo@60: .P
meillo@60: In contrast to nmh, which also provides mail submission and mail retrieval
meillo@60: facilities, mmh is a MUA only.
meillo@66: This general difference in the view on the character of nmh
meillo@66: strongly supported the development of mmh.
meillo@66: Removing the mail transfer facilities had been the first work task
meillo@66: for the mmh project.
meillo@60: .P
meillo@66: The MSA is called \fIMessage Transfer Service\fP (MTS) in nmh.
meillo@60: The facility establishes TCP/IP connections and speaks SMTP to submit
meillo@60: messages for relay to the outside world.
meillo@60: This part is implemented in the
meillo@60: .Pn post
meillo@60: command.
meillo@60: Demanded by the changes in
meillo@60: emailing, this part of nmh required changes in the last years.
meillo@60: Encrypted connections needed to be supported, hence SASL was introduced
meillo@60: into nmh. This added complexity to the nmh without improving it in
meillo@60: its core functions. Also, keeping up with recent developments in
meillo@60: this field needs requires development power and specialists.
meillo@60: Mmh cuts this whole facility off and depends on an external MTA instead.
meillo@60: The only outgoing interface available to mmh is the
meillo@60: .Pn sendmail
meillo@60: command.
meillo@60: Almost any MTA provides a
meillo@60: .Pn sendmail
meillo@60: command.
meillo@60: It not, any program can be substituted if it reads the
meillo@60: message from the standard input, extracts the recipient addresses
meillo@60: from the message header and does not conflict
meillo@60: with sendmail-specific command line arguments.
meillo@60: .P
meillo@60: To retrieve mail, the
meillo@60: .Pn inc
meillo@60: command in nmh has the ability to establish TCP/IP connections
meillo@60: and speaks POP3 to retrieve mail from remote servers.
meillo@60: As with mail submission, here encrypted connections are required
meillo@60: today, thus SASL support was added.
meillo@60: As POP3 is superseded by IMAP more and more, support for message
meillo@60: retrieval through IMAP will become necessary to be added soon.
meillo@60: Mmh has no support for retrieving mail from remote locations.
meillo@60: It depends on an external tool to cover this task.
meillo@60: There are two ways for messages to enter mmh's mail storage:
meillo@60: Incorporate them with
meillo@60: .Pn inc
meillo@60: from the system maildrop, or with
meillo@60: .Pn rcvstore
meillo@60: from the standard input.
meillo@66: In consequence, mmh has not any longer networking code
meillo@66: and thus does no more need to do transfer encryption and authentication.
meillo@66: Two large functional units are removed.
meillo@60: .P
meillo@60: With the removal of the MSA and MRA, mmh converted from an all-in-one
meillo@66: mail system to being only a MUA.
meillo@60: Following the Unix philosophy, it focuses on one job and to do that well.
meillo@60: Now, of course, mmh depends on third-party software.
meillo@60: An external MTA/MSA is required to transfer mail to the outside world;
meillo@60: an external MRA is required to retrieve mail from remote machines.
meillo@60: There exist excellent implementations of such software,
meillo@60: which do this specific task likely much better than the internal
meillo@60: versions of nmh do it. Also, this provides the choice for the best
meillo@60: suiting one of the available implementation.
meillo@60: .P
meillo@60: As it had already been possible to use an external MSA or MRA,
meillo@60: why not keep the internal version for convenience?
meillo@60: If this would question the sense in having a fall-back pager in all
meillo@60: the command line tools, in case
meillo@60: .Pn more
meillo@60: or
meillo@60: .Pn less
meillo@60: wouldn't be available, the answer is intuitively seen.
meillo@60: Now, an MSA or MRA is clearly more complex than a text pager, but
meillo@60: still the concept holds: If programs become complex, split them;
meillo@60: if projects become complex, split them.
meillo@60: Complexity is demanded by the problem to solve. Decades ago,
meillo@60: emailing had been small and simple.
meillo@60: (Remember,
meillo@60: .Pn /bin/mail
meillo@66: had once covered anything there was to email and still had been small.)
meillo@60: As the complexity in emailing increased, MH remainded mostly unchanged.
meillo@60: Nontheless, in nmh the POP server, which the original MH had included,
meillo@60: was removed. Now is the time to take one step further and remove
meillo@60: the MSA and MRA.
meillo@60: Not only does it decrease the code amount of the project,
meillo@60: but more important, it removes the whole field of message transfer
meillo@60: with all its implications from the project.
meillo@60: .P
meillo@66: If a project needs some kind of function, there's always the choice
meillo@66: between implementing the the function in the project directly or
meillo@66: depending on a library that provides the function or depending on
meillo@66: a program that provides the function.
meillo@66: Whereas adding the function directly to the project increases the
meillo@66: code size most, it makes the project most independent.
meillo@66: On the other end, interfacing external programs keeps the interface
meillo@66: smallest, but the depencency highest.
meillo@66: Using a library is in the middle.
meillo@66: Adding the function directly to the project is a bad choice for
meillo@66: any function of higher complexity, unless it's not available in other ways.
meillo@66: Hence, the dependencies only change in kind, not in their existence.
meillo@66: In mmh, library dependencies on
meillo@66: .Pn libsasl2
meillo@66: and
meillo@66: .Pn libcrypto /\c
meillo@66: .Pn libssl
meillo@66: were treated against program dependencies on an MSA and an MRA.
meillo@66: Besides program dependencies providing the stronger separation
meillo@66: and being more flexible, they also allowed
meillo@66: over 6\|000 lines of code to be removed from mmh.
meillo@66: This made mmh's code base about 12\|% smaller.
meillo@66: Reducing the projects code size by such an amount without actually
meillo@66: losing function is a convincing argument.
meillo@66: .P
meillo@66: Users of MH should have not problem to set up an external MSA and MRA.
meillo@60: Also, the popular MSAs and MRAs have large communities and a lot
meillo@60: of documentation available.
meillo@60: .P
meillo@60: Choices for MSAs range from the full-featured
meillo@60: .I Postfix
meillo@60: over mid-size solutions like
meillo@60: .I masqmail
meillo@60: and
meillo@60: .I dma
meillo@60: to small forwarders like
meillo@60: .I ssmtp
meillo@60: and
meillo@60: .I nullmailer .
meillo@60: Choices for MRAs include
meillo@60: .I fetchmail ,
meillo@60: .I getmail ,
meillo@60: .I mpop
meillo@60: and
meillo@60: .I fdm .
meillo@60: 
meillo@60: 
meillo@60: .H2 "Removal of non-MUA Tools
meillo@60: .P
meillo@62: Some of nmh's tools were removed from mmh because they didn't
meillo@58: match the main focus of adding to the MUA's task.
meillo@62: .BU
meillo@58: .Pn conflict
meillo@58: was removed because it is a mail system maintenance tool.
meillo@62: Besides, it even checks
meillo@58: .Fn /etc/passwd
meillo@58: and
meillo@58: .Fn /etc/group
meillo@62: for consistency, which has nothing at all to do with emailing.
meillo@58: The tool might be useful, but it should not be shipped with mmh.
meillo@62: .BU
meillo@58: .Pn rcvtty
meillo@58: was removed because its usecase of writing to the user's terminal
meillo@58: on receiving of mail is hardly wanted today. If users like to be
meillo@58: informed of new mail, then using the shell's
meillo@58: .Ev MAILPATH
meillo@62: variable or graphical notifications are likely more
meillo@62: appealing.
meillo@62: Writing directly to a terminals is hardly ever wanted today.
meillo@62: If though one wants to have it this way, the standard tool
meillo@58: .Pn write
meillo@58: can be used in a way similar to:
meillo@58: .DS
meillo@58: scan -file - | write `id -un`
meillo@58: .DE
meillo@62: .BU
meillo@58: .Pn viamail
meillo@62: was removed when the new attachment system was introduced, because
meillo@58: .Pn forw
meillo@62: could can now the task itself.
meillo@62: The program
meillo@58: .Pn sendfiles
meillo@62: was rewritten as a shell script wrapper around
meillo@58: .Pn forw .
meillo@62: .BU
meillo@58: .Pn msgchk
meillo@62: was removed, because it lost its usefulness when POP support was removed.
meillo@58: .Pn msgchk
meillo@62: provides hardly more information than:
meillo@58: .DS
meillo@58: ls -l /var/mail/meillo
meillo@58: .DE
meillo@62: It does separate between old and new mail, but that's merely a detail
meillo@62: and can be done with
meillo@58: .Pn stat (1)
meillo@62: too.
meillo@62: A very small shell script could be written to output the information
meillo@62: in a convenient way, if truly necessary.
meillo@58: As mmh's inc only incorporates mail from the user's local maildrop
meillo@62: and thus no data transfers over slow networks are involved,
meillo@62: there's hardly need to check for new mail before incorporating it.
meillo@62: .BU
meillo@58: .Pn msh
meillo@62: was removed because the tool was in conflict with the
meillo@58: philosophy of MH. It provided an interactive shell to access the
meillo@58: features of MH. One major feature of MH is being a tool chest.
meillo@58: .Pn msh
meillo@58: wouldn't be just another shell, tailored to the needs of mail
meillo@58: handling, but one large program to have the MH tools built in.
meillo@58: It's main use was for accessing Bulletin Boards, which have seized to
meillo@62: be popular.
meillo@62: .P
meillo@62: Removing
meillo@58: .Pn msh ,
meillo@62: together with the truly obsolete code relicts
meillo@58: .Pn vmh
meillo@58: and
meillo@58: .Pn wmh ,
meillo@62: saved more than 7\|000 lines of C code \(en
meillo@66: about 15\|% of the project's original source code amount.
meillo@63: Having the same functionality in less code (with equal readability,
meillo@63: of course) is an advantage.
meillo@63: Less code means less bugs and less maintenance work.
meillo@63: If
meillo@63: .Pn rcvtty
meillo@63: and
meillo@63: .Pn msgchk
meillo@63: are rarely used and can be implemented in different ways,
meillo@63: then why should one keep them?
meillo@63: .Pn viamail 's
meillo@63: use case is now partly obsolete and partly covered by
meillo@63: .Pn forw ,
meillo@63: hence there's no reason to still have
meillo@63: .Pn viamail
meillo@63: around.
meillo@63: .Pn conflict
meillo@63: is not related with the mail client, and
meillo@63: .Pn msh
meillo@63: conflicts with the basic concept of MH.
meillo@63: Both tools could still be useful, but not as part of mmh.
meillo@63: .P
meillo@63: It is a design goal of mmh to remove those parts that are rarely used.
meillo@63: The project shall become more stream-lined.
meillo@63: Rarely used and loosely related tools distract from the lean appearance.
meillo@63: They require maintenance cost without adding to the core task.
meillo@63: Therefore they were removed.
meillo@0: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@62: .H2 "Merge of \f(CWshow\fP and \f(CWmhshow\fP
meillo@58: .P
meillo@69: Since the very beginning \(en already in the first concept paper \(en
meillo@58: .Pn show
meillo@62: had been MH's message display program.
meillo@58: .Pn show
meillo@58: found out which pathnames the relevant messages had and invoked
meillo@58: .Pn mhl
meillo@62: then to have the content formated.
meillo@58: With the advent of MIME, this approach wasn't sufficient anymore.
meillo@58: MIME messages can consist of multiple parts, some of which aren't
meillo@62: directly displayable, and text content might be encoded in
meillo@58: foreign charsets.
meillo@58: .Pn show 's
meillo@58: simple approach and
meillo@58: .Pn mhl 's
meillo@58: limited display facilities couldn't cope with the task any longer.
meillo@62: .P
meillo@69: Instead of extending these tools, additional ones were written from scratch
meillo@58: and then added to the MH tool chest. Doing so is encouraged by the
meillo@58: tool chest approach. The new tools could be added without interfering
meillo@62: with the existing ones. This is great. The ease of adding new tools
meillo@62: even made MH the first MUA to implement MIME.
meillo@58: .P
meillo@62: First, the new MIME features were added in form of the single program
meillo@58: .Pn mhn .
meillo@58: The command
meillo@62: .Cl "mhn \-show 42
meillo@58: would show the MIME message numbered 42.
meillo@58: With the 1.0 release of nmh in February 1999, Richard Coleman finished
meillo@58: the split of
meillo@58: .Pn mhn
meillo@58: into a set of specialized programs, which together covered the
meillo@62: multiple aspects of MIME. One of these resulting tools was
meillo@69: .Pn mhshow ,
meillo@69: which replaced the
meillo@62: .Cl "mhn \-show
meillo@62: call.
meillo@62: .P
meillo@69: From then on, two message display tools were part of nmh.
meillo@69: Because it should not require user actions to invoke the right tool
meillo@69: whether the message uses MIME or not,
meillo@69: .Pn show
meillo@69: was extended to automatically hand the job over to
meillo@69: .Pn mhshow
meillo@69: if displaying the message would be beyond
meillo@69: .Pn show 's
meillo@69: abilities.
meillo@69: For convenience,
meillo@69: .Pn show
meillo@69: would still display MIME messages if they contained only a single text
meillo@69: part.
meillo@69: In consequence, the user would invoke
meillo@69: .Pn show
meillo@69: (possibly through
meillo@69: .Pn next
meillo@69: or
meillo@69: .Pn prev )
meillo@69: and get the message printed with either
meillo@69: .Pn show
meillo@69: or
meillo@69: .Pn mhshow ,
meillo@69: whatever was more appropriate.
meillo@69: (There was also a switch for
meillo@69: .Pn show
meillo@69: to never invoke
meillo@69: .Pn mhshow .)
meillo@69: .P
meillo@69: Having two similar tools for essentially the same task is redundant.
meillo@69: Both programs needed to be developed syncronously as they were
meillo@69: used as a single tool by the user. Thus they needed to act in a
meillo@69: similar way to not distract the user.
meillo@69: .P
meillo@69: Today, non-MIME messages are rather seen to be a special case of
meillo@69: MIME messages, than MIME messages are seen to be an extension to
meillo@69: original mail.
meillo@69: As
meillo@69: .Pn mhshow
meillo@69: had already be able to display non-MIME messages, it was natural
meillo@69: to drop
meillo@69: .Pn show
meillo@69: in favor of using
meillo@69: .Pn mhshow
meillo@69: exclusively.
meillo@72: .Ci 4c1efddfd499300c7e74263e57d8aa137e84c853
meillo@69: This decision follows the idea of orthogonal design.
meillo@69: .P
meillo@69: To allow this replacement,
meillo@69: .Pn mhshow
meillo@69: was reworked to behave more like
meillo@69: .Pn show
meillo@69: first.
meillo@69: Section XXX describes this rework from a different perspective.
meillo@69: Once the tools behaved similar, the replacing became a natural decision.
meillo@69: In mmh,
meillo@69: .Pn show
meillo@69: is the one single message display program again, but it handles
meillo@69: MIME messages as well as non-MIME messages.
meillo@69: There's only one program to maintain and users don't need to deal
meillo@69: with the existance of two display programs.
meillo@69: .P
meillo@69: Though, there's one reason why removing the old
meillo@69: .Pn show
meillo@69: hurts: It had been such a simple program.
meillo@69: Its lean elegance is missing to
meillo@69: .Pn mhshow ,
meillo@69: i.e. the new
meillo@69: .Pn show .
meillo@69: But there is no chance, because supporting MIME causes essentially
meillo@69: higher complexity.
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: .H2 "Removal of Configure Options
meillo@58: .P
meillo@72: Choice is a double-edged sword.
meillo@72: It allows customization and thus better suiting solutions,
meillo@72: but that comes with costs.
meillo@72: First, there is the cost of code complexity to have choice.
meillo@72: Second, there is the cost of less tested setups, because there are
meillo@72: more possible setups and especially corner-cases.
meillo@72: Third, there is the cost of choice itself.
meillo@72: The code complexity affects the developers.
meillo@72: Less tested code affects both, users and developers.
meillo@72: The problem of choice affects the users, for once simply by having to
meillo@72: choose but also by complexer interfaces that require more documentation.
meillo@72: Whenever options add little advantages, they should be considered for
meillo@72: removal.
meillo@72: .P
meillo@72: I have reduced the number of project-specific configure options from 
meillo@72: fifteen to three.
meillo@74: 
meillo@74: .U3 "Mail Transfer Facility Options
meillo@74: .P
meillo@72: With the removal of the mail transfer facilities five option vanished:
meillo@72: .IP \f(CW--with-mts=[smtp|sendmail]\fP
meillo@72: Specified the default mail transport service, which now is sendmail always.
meillo@72: .IP \f(CW--with-smtpservers=[server1...]\fP
meillo@72: Specified the default SMTP servers for the smtp mail transfer service.
meillo@72: .Ci 128545e06224233b7e91fc4c83f8830252fe16c9
meillo@72: .IP \f(CW--with-cyrus-sasl\fP
meillo@72: Enabled SASL support for mail transfer.
meillo@72: .IP \f(CW--with-tls\fP
meillo@72: Enabled TLS support for mail transfer.
meillo@72: .IP \f(CW--enable-pop\fP
meillo@72: Enabled the message retrieval facility.
meillo@72: 
meillo@74: .U3 "Backup Prefix
meillo@74: .P
meillo@72: The default backup prefix, i.e. the string that was prepended to message
meillo@72: filenames to tag them as deleted, had been the comma `\f(CW,\fP'.
meillo@72: There was a configure option to change the default to the hash symbol
meillo@72: `\f(CW#\fP':
meillo@72: .CW --with-hash-backup .
meillo@72: The implication of the hash symbol is that it introduces a comment
meillo@72: in the Unix shell.
meillo@72: Thus, the command line
meillo@72: .Cl "rm #13 #15
meillo@72: calls
meillo@72: .Pn rm
meillo@72: without arguments because the first hash symbol starts the comment
meillo@72: that reaches until the end of the line.
meillo@72: To delete the backup files,
meillo@72: .Cl "rm ./#13 ./#15"
meillo@72: needs to be used.
meillo@72: .\" XXX check historical background
meillo@72: Besides this effect, the choice was personal preference.
meillo@72: I removed the configure option but added the profile entry
meillo@72: .Pe backup-prefix ,
meillo@72: which allows to specify an arbitrary string as backup prefix.
meillo@72: .Ci 6c40d481d661d532dd527eaf34cebb6d3f8ed086
meillo@72: This did not remove the choice but moved it to a location where
meillo@72: it suited better.
meillo@72: Profile entries are the common method to change mmh's behavior.
meillo@72: The name of the
meillo@72: .Fn .mh-sequences ,
meillo@72: for instance, is specified there, too.
meillo@72: Moving the specification of the backup prefix there, appears to be right.
meillo@72: Eventually, the new trash folder obsoleted the concept of the
meillo@72: backup prefix completely.
meillo@72: (Well, there still are corner-cases to remove until the backup
meillo@72: prefix can be layed to rest, eventually.)
meillo@72: .\" FIXME: Do this work in the code!
meillo@74: .P
meillo@74: The two configure options
meillo@74: .CW --with-editor=EDITOR
meillo@74: .CW --with-pager=PAGER
meillo@74: were used to specify the default editor and pager at configure time.
meillo@74: Doing so at configure time made sense in the Eighties,
meillo@74: when the available editors and pagers varied more across different systems.
meillo@74: Today, the situation is much more homegenic.
meillo@74: The programs
meillo@74: .Pn vi
meillo@74: and
meillo@74: .Pn more
meillo@74: can be expected to be available anywhere on every Unix system,
meillo@74: as they are specified by POSIX since two decades.
meillo@74: (The specifications for
meillo@74: .Pn vi
meillo@74: and
meillo@74: .Pn more
meillo@74: appeared in
meillo@74: .[
meillo@74: posix 1987
meillo@74: .]
meillo@74: and,
meillo@74: .[
meillo@74: posix 1992
meillo@74: .]
meillo@74: respectively.)
meillo@74: As a first step, these two tools were hard-coded as defaults.
meillo@74: .Ci 5d43a99db70c12a673028c7758c20cbe3e13ef5f
meillo@74: Not changed were the
meillo@74: .Pe editor
meillo@74: and
meillo@74: .Pe moreproc
meillo@74: profile entries, which allowed the user to change the default
meillo@74: by personal preference.
meillo@74: Later, the concept was reworked to respect the standard environment
meillo@74: variables
meillo@74: .Ev VISUAL
meillo@74: and
meillo@74: .Ev PAGER
meillo@74: if they were set.
meillo@74: Today, mmh determines the editor to use in the following order,
meillo@74: taking the first available and non-empty item:
meillo@74: .IP (1)
meillo@74: Environment variable
meillo@74: .Ev MMHEDITOR
meillo@74: .IP (2)
meillo@74: Profile entry
meillo@74: .Pe Editor
meillo@74: .IP (3)
meillo@74: Environment variable
meillo@74: .Ev VISUAL
meillo@74: .IP (4)
meillo@74: Environment variable
meillo@74: .Ev EDITOR
meillo@74: .IP (5)
meillo@74: Command
meillo@74: .Pn vi .
meillo@74: .P
meillo@74: The pager to use is deteminded in the following order,
meillo@74: also taking the first available and non-empty item:
meillo@74: .IP (1)
meillo@74: Environment variable
meillo@74: .Ev MMHPAGER
meillo@74: .IP (2)
meillo@74: Profile entry
meillo@74: .Pe Pager
meillo@74: (replaces
meillo@74: .Pe moreproc )
meillo@74: .IP (3)
meillo@74: Environment variable
meillo@74: .Ev PAGER
meillo@74: .IP (4)
meillo@74: Command
meillo@74: .Pn more .
meillo@74: .P
meillo@74: .Ci f85f4b7ae62e3d05a945dcd46ead51f0a2a89a9b
meillo@74: .Ci 0c4214ea2aec6497d0d67b436bbee9bc1d225f1e
meillo@74: .P
meillo@74: The new behavior confirms better to the common behavior on Unix
meillo@74: systems, as
meillo@74: .Ev VISUAL /\c
meillo@74: .Ev EDITOR
meillo@74: and
meillo@74: .Ev PAGER
meillo@74: are respected.
meillo@74: Additionally, the new approach is more uniform and
meillo@74: without surprise for users.
meillo@72: 
meillo@74: .U3 "Locale
meillo@74: .P
meillo@74: The configure option
meillo@74: .Sw --disable-locale
meillo@74: was removed because today there's hardly any need to disable locale
meillo@74: support.
meillo@74: .Ci ccf4f175ef4c4e7522f9510a4a1149c15d810dd9
meillo@72: 
meillo@74: .U3 "\fLslocal\fP Supress Duplicates
meillo@72: .P
meillo@74: .Pn slocal
meillo@74: is an MDA included in mmh.
meillo@74: This is a violation of the idea that mmh is a MUA only.
meillo@74: .Pn slocal
meillo@74: should become a separate project.
meillo@74: Nonetheless, ouf of convenience and due to lack of convincement,
meillo@74: yet it remains being part of mmh.
meillo@74: This is likely to change in the future.
meillo@74: Already,
meillo@74: .Pn slocal was stripped down.
meillo@74: It used to depend on
meillo@74: .I ndbm ,
meillo@74: a database library.
meillo@74: The database is used to store the message ids of all messages delivered.
meillo@74: This enables
meillo@74: .Pn slocal
meillo@74: to suppress delivering the same message to the same user twice.
meillo@74: (This features was enabled by the
meillo@74: .Sw -suppressdup
meillo@74: switch.)
meillo@74: .P
meillo@74: A variety of version of the database library exist.
meillo@74: Complicated autoconf code was needed to detect them correctly.
meillo@74: Further more, the configure switches
meillo@74: .Sw --with-ndbm=ARG
meillo@74: and
meillo@74: .Sw --with-ndbmheader=ARG
meillo@74: were added to help with difficult setups that would
meillo@74: not be detected automatically.
meillo@74: .P
meillo@74: By removing the suppress duplicates feature of
meillo@74: .Pn slocal ,
meillo@74: the dependency on
meillo@74: .I ndbm
meillo@74: was removed and 120 lines of complex autoconf could be saved.
meillo@74: .Ci ecd6d6a20cb7a1507e3a20d6c4cb3a1cf14c6bbf
meillo@74: The change removed funtionality too, but the value it would have added
meillo@74: is minor to the weight loss by dropping the dependency and 
meillo@74: the complex autoconf code.
meillo@72: 
meillo@74: .U3 "mh-e Support
meillo@72: .P
meillo@74: The configure option
meillo@74: .Sw --disable-mhe
meillo@74: was removed when the mh-e support was reworked. 
meillo@74: Mh-e is the Emacs front-end to MH.
meillo@74: It requires MH to act different in some minor ways.
meillo@74: The configure option could switch the extension off.
meillo@74: After removing support for old versions of mh-e,
meillo@74: only the
meillo@74: .Sw -build
meillo@74: switches for
meillo@74: .Pn forw
meillo@74: and
meillo@74: .Pn repl
meillo@74: are left to be mh-e-specific.
meillo@74: They are now always available because they add little code and complexity.
meillo@74: This change was first done in nmh and thereafter merged into mmh.
meillo@74: The interface changes in mmh require mh-e to be adjusted to use mmh
meillo@74: as the back-end. This requires minor changes to mh-e, though removing
meillo@74: the
meillo@74: .Sw -build
meillo@74: switches would require larger adjustments.
meillo@74: The
meillo@74: .Sw --disable-mhe
meillo@74: configure option was removed and the remaining support for mh-e is always
meillo@74: built in.
meillo@72: .Ci a7ce7b4a580d77b6c2c4d980812beb589aa4c643
meillo@74: Removing the option removed a second code setup that would have
meillo@74: needed to be tested.
meillo@72: 
meillo@74: .U3 "Masquerading
meillo@72: .P
meillo@74: The configure option
meillo@74: .Sw --enable-masquerade
meillo@74: could take up to three items: draft_from, mmailid, username_extension.
meillo@74: They activated different types of address masquerading.
meillo@74: All of them were implemented in the SMTP-speaking
meillo@74: .Pn post
meillo@74: command.
meillo@74: Mmh no longer speaks SMTP and the replacing
meillo@74: .Pn spost
meillo@74: command no longer does MTA jobs like this one.
meillo@74: Because address masquerading is an MTA's task and mmh does not cover
meillo@74: this field anymore, the funtion needs to be implemented in the
meillo@74: external MTA used.
meillo@74: .P
meillo@74: The
meillo@74: .I mmailid
meillo@74: masquerading type is the oldest one of the three and the only one
meillo@74: available in the original MH.
meillo@74: It provided a
meillo@74: .I username
meillo@74: to
meillo@74: .I fakeusername
meillo@74: mapping, based on the value of the password file's GECOS field.
meillo@74: The man page
meillo@74: .Mp mh-tailor(5)
meillo@74: described the use case as being the following:
meillo@74: .QP
meillo@74: This is useful if you want the messages you send to always
meillo@74: appear to come from the name of an MTA alias rather than your
meillo@74: actual account name.  For instance, many organizations set up
meillo@74: `First.Last' sendmail aliases for all users.  If this is
meillo@74: the case, the GECOS field for each user should look like:
meillo@74: ``First [Middle] Last <First.Last>''
meillo@74: .P
meillo@74: As mmh sends outgoing mail via the local MTA only,
meillo@74: it is the best location to do such global rewrites.
meillo@74: Besides, the MTA is conceptionally the right location because it
meillo@74: does the reverse mapping for incoming mail (aliasing), too.
meillo@74: The masquerading set up there is set up once for all
meillo@74: mail software on the system.
meillo@74: .Ci 0836c8000ccb34b59410ef1c15b1b7feac70ce5f
meillo@74: .P
meillo@74: The
meillo@74: .I username_extension
meillo@74: masquerading type did not replace the username but could append a suffix
meillo@74: to it.
meillo@74: The suffix needed to be specified by the
meillo@74: .Ev USERNAME_EXTENSION
meillo@74: environment variable.
meillo@74: It provided support for the
meillo@74: .I user-extension
meillo@74: feature of qmail and the similar
meillo@74: .I "plussed user
meillo@74: processing of sendmail.
meillo@74: The decision to remove this username_extension masquerading was
meillo@74: motivated by the fact that
meillo@74: .Pn spost
meillo@74: hadn't supported it.
meillo@74: .Ci 2abae0bfd0ad5bf898461e50aa4b466d641f23d9_username_extension
meillo@74: Mmh now provides a more general, though in this case less convenient,
meillo@74: kind of masquerading.
meillo@74: .P
meillo@74: The
meillo@74: .I draft_from
meillo@74: masquerading type instructed
meillo@74: .Pn post
meillo@74: to use the value of the `From:' header as SMTP envelope sender.
meillo@74: This allowes to replace the sender address completely.
meillo@74: .Ci b14ea6073f77b4359aaf3fddd0e105989db9
meillo@74: Mmh now offers a kind of masquerading similar in effect, but
meillo@74: with technical differences.
meillo@74: As mmh does not transfer messages itself, the local MTA has full control
meillo@74: over the sending address. Any masquerading mmh introduces may be reverted
meillo@74: by the MTA. In times of pedantic spam checking, an MTA will likely do so
meillo@74: to keep its own reputation up.
meillo@74: Nonetheless, the MUA can set the `From:' header and thus propose
meillo@74: a sender address to be used to the MTA.
meillo@74: The MTA may then decide to take that one or generate the canonical sender
meillo@74: address for use as envelope sender address.
meillo@74: .P
meillo@74: In mmh, the MTA will always extract the recipient and sender from the
meillo@74: headers (\c
meillo@74: .Pn sendmail 's
meillo@74: .Sw -t
meillo@74: switch).
meillo@74: The `From:' header of the draft may be set arbitrary by the user.
meillo@74: If it is missing, the canonical sender address will be generated by the MTA.
meillo@74: 
meillo@74: .U3 "Remaining Options
meillo@74: .P
meillo@74: Two configure options remain in mmh.
meillo@74: One is the locking method to use:
meillo@74: .Sw --with-locking=[dot|fcntl|flock|lockf] .
meillo@74: Removing all other methods except the portable dot locking and having
meillo@74: that as default is appealing, but requires deeper investigation into the
meillo@74: topic.
meillo@74: The other,
meillo@74: .Sw --enable-debug ,
meillo@74: compiles the programs with debugging symbols and does not strip them.
meillo@74: This option is likely to stay.
meillo@72: 
meillo@72: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@63: 
meillo@58: .H2 "Removal of switches
meillo@58: .P
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@74: .H1 "Modernizing
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: .H2 "Removal of Code Relicts
meillo@0: .P
meillo@51: The code base of mmh originates from the late Seventies,
meillo@51: had been extensively
meillo@51: worked on in the mid Eighties, and had been partly reorganized and extended
meillo@51: in the Nineties. Relicts of all those times had gathered in the code base.
meillo@12: My goal was to remove any ancient code parts. One part of the task was
meillo@12: converting obsolete code constructs to standard constructs, the other part
meillo@12: was dropping obsolete functions.
meillo@12: .P
meillo@12: As I'm not even thirty years old and have no more than seven years of
meillo@51: Unix experience, I needed to learn about the history in retrospective.
meillo@51: Older people likely have used those ancient constructs themselves
meillo@51: and have suffered from their incompatibilities and have longed for
meillo@12: standardization. Unfortunately, I have only read that others had done so.
meillo@12: This put me in a much more difficult positions when working on the old
meillo@12: code. I needed to recherche what other would have known by heart from
meillo@12: experience. All my programming experience comes from a time past ANSI C
meillo@12: and past POSIX. Although I knew about the times before, I took the
meillo@51: current state implicitly for granted most of the time.
meillo@12: .P
meillo@12: Being aware of
meillo@12: these facts, I rather let people with more historic experience solve the 
meillo@12: task of converting the ancient code constructs to standardized ones.
meillo@12: Luckily, Lyndon Nerenberg focused on this task at the nmh project.
meillo@12: He converted large parts of the code to POSIX constructs, removing
meillo@12: the conditionals compilation for now standardized features.
meillo@12: I'm thankful for this task being solved. I only pulled the changes into
meillo@12: mmh.
meillo@12: .P
meillo@20: The other task \(en dropping ancient functionality to remove old code \(en
meillo@12: I did myself, though. My position to strip mmh to the bare minimum of
meillo@12: frequently used features is much more revolutional than the nmh community
meillo@20: likes it. Without the need to justify my decisions, I was able to quickly
meillo@20: remove functionality I considered ancient.
meillo@20: The need to discuss my decisions with
meillo@20: peers likely would have slowed this process down. Of course, I researched
meillo@12: if a particular feature really should be dropped. Having not had any
meillo@12: contact to this feature within my computer life was a first indicator to
meillo@12: drop it, but I also asked others and searched the literature for modern
meillo@12: usage of the feature. If it appeared to be truly ancient, I dropped it.
meillo@12: The reason for dropping is always part of the commit message in the
meillo@12: version control system. Thus, it is easy for others to check their
meillo@12: view on the topic with mine and possibly to argue for reinclusion.
meillo@12: 
meillo@12: .U2 "MMDF maildrop support
meillo@12: .P
meillo@12: I did drop any support for the MMDF maildrop format. This type of format
meillo@12: is conceptionally similar to the mbox format, but uses four bytes with
meillo@12: value 1 (\fL^A^A^A^A\fP) as message delimiter,
meillo@18: instead of the string ``\fLFrom\ \fP''.
meillo@12: Due to the similarity and mbox being the de-facto standard maildrop
meillo@12: format on Unix, but also due to the larger influence of Sendmail than MMDF,
meillo@12: the MMDF maildrop format had vanished.
meillo@12: .P
meillo@12: The simplifications within the code were only moderate. Switches could
meillo@12: be removed from tools like
meillo@12: .L packf ,
meillo@12: which generate packed mailboxes. Only one packed mailbox format remained:
meillo@12: mbox.
meillo@12: The most important changes affect the equally named mail parsing routine in
meillo@12: .L sbr/m_getfld.c .
meillo@12: The direct MMDF code had been removed, but as now only one packed mailbox
meillo@12: format is left, code structure simplifications are likely possible.
meillo@12: The reason why they are still outstanding is the heavily optimized code
meillo@18: of
meillo@18: .Fu m_getfld() .
meillo@18: Changes beyond a small local scope \(en
meillo@12: which restructuring in its core is \(en cause a high risk of damaging
meillo@12: the intricate workings of the optimized code. This problem is know
meillo@12: to the developers of nmh, too. They also avoid touching this minefield
meillo@12: if possible.
meillo@12: 
meillo@12: .U2 "UUCP Bang Paths
meillo@12: .P
meillo@12: More questionably than the former topic is the removal of support for the
meillo@12: UUCP bang path address style. However, the user may translate the bang
meillo@12: paths on retrieval to Internet addresses and the other way on posting
meillo@12: messages. The former can be done my an MDA like procmail; the latter
meillo@12: by a sendmail wrapper. This would ensure that any address handling would
meillo@12: work as expected. However, it might just work well without any
meillo@12: such modifications, as mmh does not touch addresses much, in general.
meillo@12: But I can't ensure as I have never used an environment with bang paths.
meillo@12: Also, the behavior might break at any point in further development.
meillo@12: 
meillo@12: .U2 "Hardcopy terminal support
meillo@12: .P
meillo@12: More of a funny anecdote is the remaining of a check for printing to a
meillo@12: hardcopy terminal until Spring 2012, when I finally removed it.
meillo@12: I surely would be very happy to see such a terminal in action, maybe
meillo@12: actually being able to work on it, but I fear my chances are null.
meillo@12: .P
meillo@12: The check only prevented a pager to be placed between the outputting
meillo@18: program (\c
meillo@18: .Pn mhl )
meillo@18: and the terminal. This could have been ensured with
meillo@18: the
meillo@18: .Sw \-nomoreproc
meillo@18: at the command line statically, too.
meillo@12: 
meillo@12: .U2 "Removed support for header fields
meillo@12: .P
meillo@12: The `Encrypted' header had been introduced by RFC\^822, but already
meillo@12: marked legacy in RFC 2822. It was superseded by FIXME.
meillo@12: Mmh does no more support this header.
meillo@12: .P
meillo@21: Native support for `Face' headers
meillo@21: had been removed, as well.
meillo@21: The feature is similar to the `X-Face' header in its intent,
meillo@21: but takes a different approach to store the image.
meillo@21: Instead of encoding the image data directly into the header,
meillo@21: the the header contains the hostname and UDP port where the image
meillo@21: date could be retrieved.
meillo@21: Neither `X-Face' nor the here described `Face' system
meillo@21: \**
meillo@21: .FS
meillo@21: There is also a newer but different system, invented 2005,
meillo@21: using `Face' headers.
meillo@21: It is the successor of `X-Face' providing colored PNG images.
meillo@21: .FE
meillo@21: became well used in the large scale.
meillo@21: It's still possible to use a Face systems,
meillo@21: although mmh does not provide support for any of the different systems
meillo@21: anymore. It's fairly easy to write a small shell script to 
meillo@21: extract the embedded or fetch the external Face data and display the image.
meillo@21: Own Face headers can be added into the draft template files.
meillo@21: .P
meillo@12: `Content-MD5' headers were introduced by RFC\^1864. They provide only
meillo@12: a verification of data corruption during the transfer. By no means can
meillo@12: they ensure verbatim end-to-end delivery of the contents. This is clearly
meillo@12: stated in the RFC. The proper approach to provide verificationability
meillo@12: of content in an end-to-end relationship is the use of digital cryptography
meillo@12: (RFCs FIXME). On the other hand, transfer protocols should ensure the
meillo@12: integrity of the transmission. In combinations these two approaches
meillo@12: make the `Content-MD5' header field useless. In consequence, I removed
meillo@12: the support for it. By this removal, MD5 computation is not needed
meillo@12: anywhere in mmh. Hence, over 500 lines of code were removed by this one
meillo@12: change. Even if the `Content-MD5' header field is useful sometimes,
meillo@12: I value its usefulnes less than the improvement in maintainability, caused
meillo@12: by the removal.
meillo@12: 
meillo@20: .U2 "Prompter's Control Keys
meillo@20: .P
meillo@20: The program
meillo@20: .Pn prompter
meillo@20: queries the user to fill in a message form. When used by
meillo@20: .Pn comp
meillo@20: as:
meillo@20: .DS
meillo@20: comp \-editor prompter
meillo@20: .DE
meillo@20: the resulting behavior is similar to
meillo@20: .Pn mailx .
meillo@51: Apparently,
meillo@20: .Pn prompter
meillo@20: hadn't been touched lately. Otherwise it's hardly explainable why it
meillo@20: still offered the switches
meillo@20: .Sn \-erase \fUchr\fP
meillo@20: and
meillo@20: .Sn \-kill \fUchr\fP
meillo@20: to name the characters for command line editing.
meillo@21: The times when this had been necessary are long time gone.
meillo@20: Today these things work out-of-the-box, and if not, are configured
meillo@20: with the standard tool
meillo@20: .Pn stty .
meillo@20: 
meillo@21: .U2 "Vfork and Retry Loops
meillo@21: .P
meillo@51: MH creates many processes, which is a consequence of the tool chest approach.
meillo@21: In earlier times
meillo@21: .Fu fork()
meillo@21: had been an expensive system call, as the process's whole image needed
meillo@21: to be duplicated. One common case is replacing the image with
meillo@21: .Fu exec()
meillo@21: right after having forked the child process.
meillo@21: To speed up this case, the
meillo@21: .Fu vfork()
meillo@21: system call was invented at Berkeley. It completely omits copying the
meillo@21: image. If the image gets replaced right afterwards then unnecessary
meillo@21: work is omited. On old systems this results in large speed ups.
meillo@21: MH uses
meillo@21: .Fu vfork()
meillo@21: whenever possible.
meillo@21: .P
meillo@21: Memory management units that support copy-on-write semantics make
meillo@21: .Fu fork()
meillo@21: almost as fast as
meillo@21: .Fu vfork()
meillo@21: in the cases when they can be exchanged.
meillo@21: With
meillo@21: .Fu vfork()
meillo@51: being more error-prone and hardly faster, it's preferable to simply
meillo@21: use
meillo@21: .Fu fork()
meillo@21: instead.
meillo@21: .P
meillo@21: Related to the costs of
meillo@21: .Fu fork()
meillo@21: is the probability of its success.
meillo@21: Today on modern systems, the system call will succeed almost always.
meillo@51: In the Eighties on heavy loaded systems, as they were common at
meillo@21: universities, this had been different. Thus, many of the
meillo@21: .Fu fork()
meillo@21: calls were wrapped into loops to retry to fork several times in
meillo@21: short intervals, in case of previous failure.
meillo@21: In mmh, the program aborts at once if the fork failed.
meillo@21: The user can reexecute the command then. This is expected to be a
meillo@21: very rare case on modern systems, especially personal ones, which are
meillo@21: common today.
meillo@21: 
meillo@12: 
meillo@58: .H2 "Attachments
meillo@22: .P
meillo@58: MIME
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: .H2 "Digital Cryptography
meillo@22: .P
meillo@58: Signing and encryption.
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: .H2 "Good Defaults
meillo@22: .P
meillo@58: foo
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: .H1 "Code style
meillo@22: .P
meillo@58: foo
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: .H2 "Standard Code
meillo@22: .P
meillo@58: POSIX
meillo@22: 
meillo@22: 
meillo@58: .H2 "Separation
meillo@14: 
meillo@58: .U2 "MH Directory Split
meillo@0: .P
meillo@19: In MH and nmh, a personal setup had consisted of two parts:
meillo@19: The MH profile, named
meillo@19: .Fn \&.mh_profile
meillo@19: and being located directly in the user's home directory.
meillo@19: And the MH directory, where all his mail messages and also his personal
meillo@19: forms, scan formats, other configuration files are stored. The location
meillo@19: of this directory could be user-chosen. The default was to name it
meillo@19: .Fn Mail
meillo@19: and have it directly in the home directory.
meillo@19: .P
meillo@19: I've never liked the data storage and the configuration to be intermixed.
meillo@19: They are different kinds of data. One part, are the messages,
meillo@19: which are the data to operate on. The other part, are the personal
meillo@19: configuration files, which are able to change the behavior of the operations.
meillo@19: The actual operations are defined in the profile, however.
meillo@19: .P
meillo@19: When storing data, one should try to group data by its type.
meillo@19: There's sense in the Unix file system hierarchy, where configuration
meillo@19: file are stored separate (\c
meillo@19: .Fn /etc )
meillo@19: to the programs (\c
meillo@19: .Fn /bin
meillo@19: and
meillo@19: .Fn /usr/bin )
meillo@19: to their sources (\c
meillo@19: .Fn /usr/src ).
meillo@19: Such separation eases the backup management, for instance.
meillo@19: .P
meillo@19: In mmh, I've reorganized the file locations.
meillo@19: Still there are two places:
meillo@19: There's the mail storage directory, which, like in MH, contains all the
meillo@19: messages, but, unlike in MH, nothing else.
meillo@19: Its location still is user-chosen, with the default name
meillo@19: .Fn Mail ,
meillo@19: in the user's home directory. This is much similar to the case in nmh.
meillo@19: The configuration files, however, are grouped together in the new directory
meillo@19: .Fn \&.mmh
meillo@19: in the user's home directory.
meillo@19: The user's profile now is a file, named
meillo@19: .Fn profile ,
meillo@19: in this mmh directory.
meillo@19: Consistently, the context file and all the personal forms, scan formats,
meillo@19: and the like, are also there.
meillo@19: .P
meillo@19: The naming changed with the relocation.
meillo@19: The directory where everything, except the profile, had been stored (\c
meillo@19: .Fn $HOME/Mail ),
meillo@19: used to be called \fIMH directory\fP. Now, this directory is called the
meillo@19: user's \fImail storage\fP. The name \fImmh directory\fP is now given to
meillo@19: the new directory
meillo@19: (\c
meillo@19: .Fn $HOME/.mmh ),
meillo@19: containing all the personal configuration files.
meillo@19: .P
meillo@19: The separation of the files by type of content is logical and convenient.
meillo@19: There are no functional differences as any possible setup known to me
meillo@19: can be implemented with both approaches, although likely a bit easier
meillo@19: with the new approach. The main goal of the change had been to provide
meillo@19: sensible storage locations for any type of personal mmh file.
meillo@19: .P
meillo@19: In order for one user to have multiple MH setups, he can use the
meillo@19: environment variable
meillo@19: .Ev MH
meillo@19: the point to a different profile file.
meillo@19: The MH directory (mail storage plus personal configuration files) is
meillo@19: defined by the
meillo@19: .Pe Path
meillo@19: profile entry.
meillo@19: The context file could be defined by the
meillo@19: .Pe context
meillo@19: profile entry or by the
meillo@19: .Ev MHCONTEXT
meillo@19: environment variable.
meillo@19: The latter is useful to have a distinct context (e.g. current folders)
meillo@19: in each terminal window, for instance.
meillo@19: In mmh, there are three environment variables now.
meillo@19: .Ev MMH
meillo@19: may be used to change the location of the mmh directory.
meillo@19: .Ev MMHP
meillo@19: and
meillo@19: .Ev MMHC
meillo@19: change the profile and context files, respectively.
meillo@19: Besides providing a more consistent feel (which simply is the result
meillo@19: of being designed anew), the set of personal configuration files can
meillo@19: be chosen independently from the profile (including mail storage location)
meillo@19: and context, now. Being it relevant for practical use or not, it
meillo@19: de-facto is an improvement. However, the main achievement is the
meillo@19: split between mail storage and personal configuration files.
meillo@17: 
meillo@0: 
meillo@58: .H2 "Modularization
meillo@0: .P
meillo@58: whatnowproc
meillo@0: .P
meillo@49: The \fIMH library\fP
meillo@49: .Fn libmh.a
meillo@49: collects a bunch of standard functions that many of the MH tools need,
meillo@49: like reading the profile or context files.
meillo@49: This doesn't hurt the separation.
meillo@49: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: .H2 "Style
meillo@58: .P
meillo@58: Code layout, goto, ...
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: .H1 "Concept Exploitation/Homogeniety
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: .H2 "Draft Folder
meillo@58: .P
meillo@58: Historically, MH provided exactly one draft message, named
meillo@58: .Fn draft
meillo@58: and
meillo@58: being located in the MH directory. When starting to compose another message
meillo@58: before the former one was sent, the user had been questioned whether to use,
meillo@58: refile or replace the old draft. Working on multiple drafts at the same time
meillo@58: was impossible. One could only work on them in alteration by refiling the
meillo@58: previous one to some directory and fetching some other one for reediting. 
meillo@58: This manual draft management needed to be done each time the user wanted
meillo@58: to switch between editing one draft to editing another.
meillo@58: .P
meillo@58: To allow true parallel editing of drafts, in a straight forward way, the
meillo@58: draft folder facility exists. It had been introduced already in July 1984
meillo@58: by Marshall T. Rose. The facility was deactivated by default.
meillo@58: Even in nmh, the draft folder facility remained deactivated by default.
meillo@58: At least, Richard Coleman added the man page
meillo@58: .Mp mh-draft(5)
meillo@58: to document
meillo@58: the feature well.
meillo@58: .P
meillo@58: The only advantage of not using the draft folder facility is the static
meillo@58: name of the draft file. This could be an issue for MH frontends like mh-e.
meillo@58: But as they likely want to provide working on multiple drafts in parallel,
meillo@58: the issue is only concerning compatibility. The aim of nmh to stay compatible
meillo@58: prevented the default activation of the draft folder facility.
meillo@58: .P
meillo@58: On the other hand, a draft folder is the much more natural concept than
meillo@58: a draft message. MH's mail storage consists of folders and messages,
meillo@58: the messages named with ascending numbers. A draft message breaks with this
meillo@58: concept by introducing a message in a file named
meillo@58: .Fn draft .
meillo@58: This draft
meillo@58: message is special. It can not be simply listed with the available tools,
meillo@58: but instead requires special switches. I.e. corner-cases were
meillo@58: introduced. A draft folder, in contrast, does not introduce such
meillo@58: corner-cases. The available tools can operate on the messages within that
meillo@58: folder like on any messages within any mail folders. The only difference
meillo@58: is the fact that the default folder for
meillo@58: .Pn send
meillo@58: is the draft folder,
meillo@58: instead of the current folder, like for all other tools.
meillo@58: .P
meillo@58: The trivial part of the change was activating the draft folder facility
meillo@58: by default and setting a default name for this folder. Obviously, I chose
meillo@58: the name
meillo@58: .Fn +drafts .
meillo@58: This made the
meillo@58: .Sw \-draftfolder
meillo@58: and
meillo@58: .Sw \-draftmessage
meillo@58: switches useless, and I could remove them.
meillo@58: The more difficult but also the part that showed the real improvement,
meillo@58: was updating the tools to the new concept.
meillo@58: .Sw \-draft
meillo@58: switches could
meillo@58: be dropped, as operating on a draft message became indistinguishable to
meillo@58: operating on any other message for the tools.
meillo@58: .Pn comp
meillo@58: still has its
meillo@58: .Sw \-use
meillo@58: switch for switching between its two modes: (1) Compose a new
meillo@58: draft, possibly by taking some existing message as a form. (2) Modify
meillo@58: an existing draft. In either case, the behavior of
meillo@58: .Pn comp is
meillo@58: deterministic. There is no more need to query the user. I consider this
meillo@58: a major improvement. By making
meillo@58: .Pn send
meillo@58: simply operate on the current
meillo@58: message in the draft folder by default, with message and folder both
meillo@58: overridable by specifying them on the command line, it is now possible
meillo@58: to send a draft anywhere within the storage by simply specifying its folder
meillo@58: and name.
meillo@58: .P
meillo@58: All theses changes converted special cases to regular cases, thus
meillo@58: simplifying the tools and increasing the flexibility.
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: .H2 "Trash Folder
meillo@58: .P
meillo@58: Similar to the situation for drafts is the situation for removed messages.
meillo@58: Historically, a message was deleted by renaming. A specific
meillo@58: \fIbackup prefix\fP, often comma (\c
meillo@58: .Fn , )
meillo@58: or hash (\c
meillo@58: .Fn # ),
meillo@58: being prepended to the file name. Thus, MH wouldn't recognize the file
meillo@58: as a message anymore, as only files whose name consists of digits only
meillo@58: are treated as messages. The removed messages remained as files in the
meillo@58: same directory and needed some maintenance job to truly delete them after
meillo@58: some grace time. Usually, by running a command similar to
meillo@58: .DS
meillo@58: find /home/user/Mail \-ctime +7 \-name ',*' | xargs rm
meillo@58: .DE
meillo@58: in a cron job. Within the grace time interval
meillo@58: the original message could be restored by stripping the
meillo@58: the backup prefix from the file name. If however, the last message of
meillo@58: a folder is been removed \(en say message
meillo@58: .Fn 6
meillo@58: becomes file
meillo@58: .Fn ,6
meillo@58: \(en and a new message enters the same folder, thus the same
meillo@58: numbered being given again \(en in our case
meillo@58: .Fn 6
meillo@58: \(en, if that one
meillo@58: is removed too, then the backup of the former message gets overwritten.
meillo@58: Thus, the ability to restore removed messages does not only depend on
meillo@58: the ``sweeping cron job'' but also on the removing of further messages.
meillo@58: This is undesirable, because the real mechanism is hidden from the user
meillo@58: and the consequences of further removals are not always obvious.
meillo@58: Further more, the backup files are scattered within the whole mail
meillo@58: storage, instead of being collected at one place.
meillo@58: .P
meillo@58: To improve the situation, the profile entry
meillo@58: .Pe rmmproc
meillo@58: (previously named
meillo@58: .Pe Delete-Prog )
meillo@58: was introduced, very early.
meillo@58: It could be set to any command, which would care for the mail removal
meillo@58: instead of taking the default action, described above.
meillo@58: Refiling the to-be-removed files to some garbage folder was a common
meillo@58: example. Nmh's man page
meillo@58: .Mp rmm(1)
meillo@58: proposes
meillo@58: .Cl "refile +d
meillo@58: to move messages to the garbage folder and
meillo@58: .Cl "rm `mhpath +d all`
meillo@58: the empty the garbage folder.
meillo@58: Managing the message removal this way is a sane approach. It keeps
meillo@58: the removed messages in one place, makes it easy to remove the backup
meillo@58: files, and, most important, enables the user to use the tools of MH
meillo@58: itself to operate on the removed messages. One can
meillo@58: .Pn scan
meillo@58: them,
meillo@58: .Pn show
meillo@58: them, and restore them with
meillo@58: .Pn refile .
meillo@58: There's no more
meillo@58: need to use
meillo@58: .Pn mhpath
meillo@58: to switch over from MH tools to Unix tools \(en MH can do it all itself.
meillo@58: .P
meillo@58: This approach matches perfect with the concepts of MH, thus making
meillo@58: it powerful. Hence, I made it the default. And even more, I also
meillo@58: removed the old backup prefix approach, as it is clearly less powerful.
meillo@58: Keeping unused alternative in the code is a bad choice as they likely
meillo@58: gather bugs, by not being constantly tested. Also, the increased code
meillo@58: size and more conditions crease the maintenance costs. By strictly
meillo@58: converting to the trash folder approach, I simplified the code base.
meillo@58: .Pn rmm
meillo@58: calls
meillo@58: .Pn refile
meillo@58: internally to move the to-be-removed
meillo@58: message to the trash folder (\c
meillo@58: .Fn +trash
meillo@58: by default). Messages
meillo@58: there can be operated on like on any other message in the storage.
meillo@58: The sweep clean, one can use
meillo@58: .Cl "rmm \-unlink +trash a" ,
meillo@58: where the
meillo@58: .Sw \-unlink
meillo@58: switch causes the files to be truly unliked instead
meillo@58: of moved to the trash folder.
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: .H2 "Path Notations
meillo@58: .P
meillo@58: foo
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: .H2 "MIME Integration
meillo@58: .P
meillo@58: user-visible access to whole messages and MIME parts are inherently
meillo@58: different
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: 
meillo@58: .H2 "Of One Cast
meillo@58: .P