docs/master
diff future.roff @ 132:8c56dac46efe
Renamed Summary to Future of mmh; added some text fragments there.
author | markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 03 Jul 2012 11:28:45 +0200 |
parents | summary.roff@9f672d3a25f9 |
children | d8adac1ed7d8 |
line diff
1.1 --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 1.2 +++ b/future.roff Tue Jul 03 11:28:45 2012 +0200 1.3 @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ 1.4 +.H0 "Future of mmh 1.5 +.P 1.6 + 1.7 + 1.8 +.U2 "Summary 1.9 +.P 1.10 + 1.11 +.P 1.12 +The far most difficult improvements, but at the same time the most 1.13 +valuable ones. 1.14 + 1.15 +.P 1.16 +Although I did only a small part of the draft handling improvement, 1.17 +I value it as an important part. 1.18 + 1.19 +.QS 1.20 +It seems that perfection is attained not when there is nothing 1.21 +more to add, but when there is nothing more to remove. 1.22 +.QE 1.23 +.[ 1.24 +antoine de saint exupery: Wind, Sand and Stars (1939) 1.25 +.] 1.26 + 1.27 + 1.28 + 1.29 + 1.30 + 1.31 +.U2 "Outlook 1.32 +.P 1.33 + 1.34 +.P 1.35 +MIME Integration: 1.36 +user-visible access to whole messages and MIME parts are inherently 1.37 +different 1.38 + 1.39 + 1.40 + 1.41 + 1.42 +.U2 "Relationship to nmh 1.43 +.P 1.44 +.P 1.45 +Because of several circumstances, my experimental version is rather 1.46 +a fork today, although this may change again in the future. 1.47 + 1.48 +.P 1.49 +Although mmh bases on nmh, it is likely seen as a step backward. 1.50 +I agree. 1.51 +However, this step backward actually is a step forward, 1.52 +although in a different direction. 1.53 + 1.54 + 1.55 +.P 1.56 +.\" Top candidate for the final sentence: 1.57 +This enabled me to follow my vision straightly and thus produce 1.58 +a result of greater pureness.