docs/master

diff future.roff @ 132:8c56dac46efe

Renamed Summary to Future of mmh; added some text fragments there.
author markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
date Tue, 03 Jul 2012 11:28:45 +0200
parents summary.roff@9f672d3a25f9
children d8adac1ed7d8
line diff
     1.1 --- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
     1.2 +++ b/future.roff	Tue Jul 03 11:28:45 2012 +0200
     1.3 @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
     1.4 +.H0 "Future of mmh
     1.5 +.P
     1.6 +
     1.7 +
     1.8 +.U2 "Summary
     1.9 +.P
    1.10 +
    1.11 +.P
    1.12 +The far most difficult improvements, but at the same time the most
    1.13 +valuable ones.
    1.14 +
    1.15 +.P
    1.16 +Although I did only a small part of the draft handling improvement,
    1.17 +I value it as an important part.
    1.18 +
    1.19 +.QS
    1.20 +It seems that perfection is attained not when there is nothing
    1.21 +more to add, but when there is nothing more to remove.
    1.22 +.QE
    1.23 +.[
    1.24 +antoine de saint exupery: Wind, Sand and Stars (1939)
    1.25 +.]
    1.26 +
    1.27 +
    1.28 +
    1.29 +
    1.30 +
    1.31 +.U2 "Outlook
    1.32 +.P
    1.33 +
    1.34 +.P
    1.35 +MIME Integration:
    1.36 +user-visible access to whole messages and MIME parts are inherently
    1.37 +different
    1.38 +
    1.39 +
    1.40 +
    1.41 +
    1.42 +.U2 "Relationship to nmh
    1.43 +.P
    1.44 +.P
    1.45 +Because of several circumstances, my experimental version is rather
    1.46 +a fork today, although this may change again in the future.
    1.47 +
    1.48 +.P
    1.49 +Although mmh bases on nmh, it is likely seen as a step backward.
    1.50 +I agree.
    1.51 +However, this step backward actually is a step forward,
    1.52 +although in a different direction.
    1.53 +
    1.54 +
    1.55 +.P
    1.56 +.\" Top candidate for the final sentence:
    1.57 +This enabled me to follow my vision straightly and thus produce
    1.58 +a result of greater pureness.