1.1 --- a/thesis/tex/2-MailTransferAgents.tex	Sun Nov 16 17:28:25 2008 +0100
     1.2 +++ b/thesis/tex/2-MailTransferAgents.tex	Sun Nov 16 22:29:51 2008 +0100
     1.3 @@ -4,6 +4,10 @@
     1.4  
     1.5  The chosen programs will be presented to the reader in a short overview and with the most important facts. The next chapter will show a comparison of these programs in several disciplines.
     1.6  
     1.7 +\section{Advantages of \MTA{}s}
     1.8 +
     1.9 +<< why are they important? >> %FIXME
    1.10 +
    1.11  
    1.12  \section{Types of \MTA{}s}
    1.13  ``Mail transfer agent'' is a term covering a variety of programs. One thing is common to them: they transfer email from one \emph{thing} to another. These \emph{things} can be hosts, meaning independent machines, or protocols like \NAME{SMTP} and \NAME{UUCP}, between which mail is transfered.\footnote{\sendmail{}'s initial purpose was moving mail between \NAME{UUCP}, \NAME{SMTP}, and \name{Berknet}.}
    1.14 @@ -219,34 +223,39 @@
    1.15  
    1.16  
    1.17  
    1.18 -1) complexity
    1.19 +\subsection{complexity}
    1.20  
    1.21 -2) security
    1.22 +\subsection{security}
    1.23  
    1.24 -3) simplicity of configuration and administration
    1.25 +\subsection{simplicity of configuration and administration}
    1.26  
    1.27 -4) flexibility of configuration and administration
    1.28 +\subsection{flexibility of configuration and administration}
    1.29  
    1.30 -5) code size
    1.31 +\subsection{code size}
    1.32  
    1.33 -6) code quality
    1.34 +\subsection{code quality}
    1.35  
    1.36 -7) documentation (amount and quality)
    1.37 +\subsection{documentation (amount and quality)}
    1.38  
    1.39 -8) community (amount and quality)
    1.40 +\subsection{community (amount and quality)}
    1.41  
    1.42 -9) used it myself
    1.43 +\subsection{used it myself}
    1.44  
    1.45 -10) had problems with it
    1.46 +\subsection{ had problems with it}
    1.47  
    1.48  
    1.49  
    1.50  
    1.51 -% quality criteria
    1.52 -% standards of any kind
    1.53 -% how to compare?
    1.54 -% (bewertungsmatrix) objectivity
    1.55 -% how many criterias for ``good''?
    1.56 +<< quality criteria >> %FIXME
    1.57 +
    1.58 +<< standards of any kind >> %FIXME
    1.59 +
    1.60 +<< how to compare? >> %FIXME
    1.61 +
    1.62 +<< (bewertungsmatrix) objectivity >> %FIXME
    1.63 +
    1.64 +<< how many criterias for ``good''? >> %FIXME
    1.65 +
    1.66  
    1.67  
    1.68  

     2.1 --- a/thesis/tex/4-MasqmailsFuture.tex	Sun Nov 16 17:28:25 2008 +0100
     2.2 +++ b/thesis/tex/4-MasqmailsFuture.tex	Sun Nov 16 22:29:51 2008 +0100
     2.3 @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
     2.4  \chapter{\masqmail's future}
     2.5  
     2.6 -% plans to get masqmail more popular again (if that is the goal)
     2.7 +<<  plans to get masqmail more popular again (if that is the goal) >> %FIXME
     2.8  
     2.9 -% concrete decisions based on results of the last 2 chapters
    2.10 +<<  concrete decisions based on results of the last 2 chapters >> %FIXME
    2.11  
    2.12  \section{Existing features}
    2.13  This overview regards \masqmail version 0.2.21, the state this document starts off.
    2.14 @@ -23,22 +23,31 @@
    2.15  \subsection{\masqmail\ in five years}
    2.16  \label{sec:masqmail-in-5-years}
    2.17  Now how could \masqmail\ be like in, say, five years?
    2.18 -%requirements
    2.19 -%which parts to do
    2.20 -%how to make masqmail future-safe
    2.21  
    2.22 -%how to advertise masqmail
    2.23 -%difference for free software
    2.24 -%why is it worth to revive masqmail?
    2.25 +<< requirements >> %FIXME
    2.26 +
    2.27 +<< which parts to do >> %FIXME
    2.28 +
    2.29 +<< how to make masqmail future-safe >> %FIXME
    2.30 +
    2.31 +<< how to advertise masqmail >> %FIXME
    2.32 +
    2.33 +<< difference for free software >> %FIXME
    2.34 +
    2.35 +<< why is it worth to revive masqmail? >> %FIXME
    2.36  
    2.37  
    2.38  \subsection{A design from scratch}
    2.39 -%what would be needed
    2.40 -%would one create it at all?
    2.41 +
    2.42 +<< what would be needed (effort) >> %FIXME
    2.43 +
    2.44 +<< would one create it at all? >> %FIXME
    2.45 +
    2.46 +<< should it be done? >> %FIXME
    2.47  
    2.48  
    2.49  
    2.50  \section{Work to do}
    2.51  
    2.52 +<< which parts to take out and do within the thesis >> %FIXME
    2.53  
    2.54 -