docs/diploma
changeset 403:b357dfc509b5
remove fixmes that will not get fixed
author | meillo@marmaro.de |
---|---|
date | Sun, 08 Feb 2009 23:13:12 +0100 |
parents | e57129f57faa |
children | f0fa40e30dfb |
files | thesis/tex/2-MarketAnalysis.tex thesis/tex/3-MailTransferAgents.tex |
diffstat | 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) [+] |
line diff
1.1 --- a/thesis/tex/2-MarketAnalysis.tex Sun Feb 08 22:51:42 2009 +0100 1.2 +++ b/thesis/tex/2-MarketAnalysis.tex Sun Feb 08 23:13:12 2009 +0100 1.3 @@ -140,8 +140,6 @@ 1.4 \section{Electronic mail} 1.5 \index{email} 1.6 1.7 -%fixme: add short summery: where exactly is masqmail's position within e-comm? 1.8 - 1.9 After viewing the whole market of electronic communication, a zoom into the market of electronic mail follows. Email is an asynchronous communication technology that focuses on the transport of textual information. The market situation for email is important, because this thesis is about an \MTA. Interesting questions are: Is email future-safe? How will electronic mail change? Will it change at all? Which are the critical parts? These questions matter when deciding the directions for further development of an \MTA. They are discussed in this section. 1.10 1.11 1.12 @@ -185,7 +183,7 @@ 1.13 1.14 The increasing integration of communication channels is an opportunity for the market. But deciding whether it is a weakness or strength of email is difficult. Due to the impossibility to integrate synchronous stream data and large binary data, it is a weakness. But it is also a strength, because arbitrary asynchronous communication data already can be integrated. On the other hand, the integration might be a threat too, because integration often leads to complexity of software. Complex software is more error prone and thus less reliable. This, however, could again be a strength of electronic mail because its modular design decreases complexity. 1.15 1.16 -Figure~\ref{fig:email-swot} displays the \NAME{SWOT} analysis in a handy overview. It is obvious to see, that the opportunities outweigh. This is an indicator for a still increasing market. %fixme: ref 1.17 +Figure~\ref{fig:email-swot} displays the \NAME{SWOT} analysis in a handy overview. It is obvious to see, that the opportunities outweigh. This is an indicator for a still increasing market. 1.18 \index{swot analysis} 1.19 1.20 \begin{figure} 1.21 @@ -222,7 +220,7 @@ 1.22 1.23 \subsubsection*{Provider independence} 1.24 1.25 -Today's email structure is heavily dependent on email providers. This means, most people have email addresses from some provider. These can be providers that offer email accounts in addition to their regular services, for example online connections. \NAME{AOL} and \name{T\mbox{-}On\-line} for instance do so. Or specialized email providers that commonly offer free mail as well as enhanced mail services for which one has to pay. Examples for specialized email providers are \NAME{GMX} and \name{Yahoo}. %fixme: check for non-breakable dash 1.26 +Today's email structure is heavily dependent on email providers. This means, most people have email addresses from some provider. These can be providers that offer email accounts in addition to their regular services, for example online connections. \NAME{AOL} and \name{T-Online} for instance do so. Or specialized email providers that commonly offer free mail as well as enhanced mail services for which one has to pay. Examples for specialized email providers are \NAME{GMX} and \name{Yahoo}. 1.27 \index{mail provider} 1.28 1.29 Outgoing mail is send either with the web mail client of the provider or by using an \MUA\ which sends it to the provider for relay. Incoming mail is read with the web mail client or retrieved from the provider via \NAME{POP3} or \NAME{IMAP} to the local computer to be read using the \MUA. This means all mail sending and receiving work is done by the provider.
2.1 --- a/thesis/tex/3-MailTransferAgents.tex Sun Feb 08 22:51:42 2009 +0100 2.2 +++ b/thesis/tex/3-MailTransferAgents.tex Sun Feb 08 23:13:12 2009 +0100 2.3 @@ -173,7 +173,6 @@ 2.4 2.5 The program was first released with \NAME{BSD} 4.1c in 1983. The latest version is 8.14.3 from May 2008. The program is distributed under the \name{Sendmail License} as both, free and proprietary software. 2.6 \index{bsd} 2.7 -%fixme: write about its importance and about sendmail-compat 2.8 2.9 Further development will go into the project \name{MeTA1} which succeeds \sendmail. The former name of this new project was \name{sendmail~X}. 2.10 \index{sendmail!meta1}