# HG changeset patch # User meillo@marmaro.de # Date 1223383543 -7200 # Node ID e150e6406019ef8c1cc03501f4283f6680365c26 # Parent 2a191e20b4aa98b01a9e6cd39cc9c074013a6856 sections from external MTA comparisons diff -r 2a191e20b4aa -r e150e6406019 docs/mta-comparison-external.txt --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/docs/mta-comparison-external.txt Tue Oct 07 14:45:43 2008 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ +from ``Life with qmail'' +======================== +(november 2007) +1.9. Comparison with other MTA's + +A book could be written about this topic, but it would be tedious reading. Here's a quick comparison of qmail with some of the most common UNIX MTA's. + +┌────────┬────────┬────────┬────────┬───────────┬───────────┬───────┐ +│MTA │Maturity│Security│Features│Performance│Sendmailish│Modular│ +├────────┼────────┼────────┼────────┼───────────┼───────────┼───────┤ +│qmail │medium │high │high │high │addons │yes │ +├────────┼────────┼────────┼────────┼───────────┼───────────┼───────┤ +│Sendmail│high │low │high │low │x │no │ +├────────┼────────┼────────┼────────┼───────────┼───────────┼───────┤ +│Postfix │medium │high │high │high │yes │yes │ +├────────┼────────┼────────┼────────┼───────────┼───────────┼───────┤ +│exim │medium │low │high │medium │yes │no │ +├────────┼────────┼────────┼────────┼───────────┼───────────┼───────┤ +│Courier │low │medium │high │medium │optional │yes │ +└────────┴────────┴────────┴────────┴───────────┴───────────┴───────┘ + +Sendmailish means the MTA behaves like Sendmail in some ways that would make a switch from Sendmail to the alternative MTA more user-transparent, such as the use of .forward files, /etc/aliases, and delivery to /var/spool/mail. + +Jonathan de Boyne Pollard has reviews of many Unix MTAs at http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/Reviews/UnixMTSes/. +Another detailed comparison is available at http://www.geocities.com/mailsoftware42/. + + + + +from ``open source mail server comparison'' +=========================================== +(november 2003) + + This is a comparison between all the free open-source mail software solutions actually avalaible. I want to thanks all the sofware developers for developing such a great software for the open source community. + + COURIER-MTA EXIM POSTFIX SENDMAIL QMAIL + + Version: Courier-0.44.x Exim Version Postfix Version Sendmail qmail-1.03 + 4.2x 2.0 Patchlevel x 8.12.x + + Managing Imap Exim: The Mail Postfix Sendmail The qmail + Transfer Agent Handbook + + Licence: GPL GPL IBM Public ? Especial + License + + + Authenticated SMTP Login/CRAM-MD5 Login/Plain/ yes (using SASL) yes(using patch + CRAM-MD5 SASL) + + SMTP over SSL/TLS yes ? ? ? patch + + STARTTLS extension yes yes ? yes patch + + POP before SMTP no ? Yes ? addon + + Virtual Domains support yes yes yes yes yes + + Supported Backends Ldap / MySQL / PostgreSQL Ldap / MySQL Ldap / MySQL Ldap Ldap patch/ + MySQL patch + + IPv6 support yes yes no (patch) yes patch + + Included POP server yes (SSL support, Apop not no no no yes + included, SASL included) + + Included IMAP server yes (SSL included) no no no no + Mailbox Format: Maildir /mbox/Maildir ++ Maildir/mbox/ Maildir/mbox mbox Maildir/mbox + mbx? + + Quota support yes yes patch no patch / + addons + + Mailing list manager couriermlm no ? ? ezmlm + + Configurable + Deliver-Status-Notification yes yes no? ? no + (DSN) + + Log analysing utilities no yes yes yes yes + + Verbosity logging options: no yes yes ? yes + + Web-based Administration yes no yes / no yes/no yes / no + + + + SUBJECTIVE CHARACTERISTICS: + + COURIER-MTA EXIM POSTFIX SENDMAIL QMAIL + + Security: ? low-medium high low high / very high + + Installation: medium medium easy - easy medium-difficult + medium + + Configuration: medium easy-medium easy difficult easy + + Performance: ? medium high low high + + Maturity/status low low medium high medium + : + + Documentation: low high medium-high high high (but sometimes confusing) + + Features: high medium-high medium high low (There are many patches available for adding + Features) +