# HG changeset patch
# User meillo@marmaro.de
# Date 1232275984 -3600
# Node ID 822a4b135dd25573ff1358c066af2962b2320bdc
# Parent  975769c6c5a5203c767f5f1e7363bce2a1b5f393
added a label

diff -r 975769c6c5a5 -r 822a4b135dd2 thesis/tex/2-MarketAnalysis.tex
--- a/thesis/tex/2-MarketAnalysis.tex	Sat Jan 17 22:35:32 2009 +0100
+++ b/thesis/tex/2-MarketAnalysis.tex	Sun Jan 18 11:53:04 2009 +0100
@@ -256,6 +256,7 @@
 
 
 \section{Conclusion}
+\label{sec:market-analysis-conclusion}
 It seems as if electronic mail or a similar technology has good chances to survive the next decades.
 
 It is assumed that it always will be important to send information messages. Those can be notes from people or notifications from systems. No other, current available, communication technology is as suitable for this kind of information transfer, as email, \NAME{SMS}, voice mail, and other asynchronous communication technologies. Synchronous communication, in contrast, is focused on dialog and normally interrupts people. The here needed kind of messages should not interrupt people, unless urgent, and they do not need two-way information exchange. Although synchronous communication could be used for transferring messages, it is not the best choice. The best choice is an asynchronous technology. Thus at least one asynchronous communication technology is likely to survive.