docs/diploma

diff thesis/tex/3-MailTransferAgents.tex @ 211:f2b8481789f6

find changesets by author, revision, files, or words in the commit message
better diagrams and other small changes
author meillo@marmaro.de
date Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:28:40 +0100
parents 013a13ee0a5f
children d645ac015c3b
line diff
     1.1 --- a/thesis/tex/3-MailTransferAgents.tex	Sun Jan 04 10:27:30 2009 +0100
     1.2 +++ b/thesis/tex/3-MailTransferAgents.tex	Sun Jan 04 10:28:40 2009 +0100
     1.3 @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
     1.4  
     1.5  \subsection{The four major Free Software MTAs}
     1.6  
     1.7 -Now follows a small introduction to the five programs chosen for comparison, except \masqmail\ which already was introduced in chapter \ref{chap:introduction}. Longer introductions, including analysis and comparison, were written by Jonathan de \person{Boyne Pollard} \cite{jdebp}.
     1.8 +Now follows a small introduction to the five programs chosen for comparison, except \masqmail\ which already was introduced in chapter \ref{chap:introduction}. Longer introductions, including analysis and comparison, were written by Jonathan \person{de Boyne Pollard} \cite{jdebp}.
     1.9  
    1.10  
    1.11  
    1.12 @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
    1.13  \subsubsection*{Architecture}
    1.14  
    1.15  Architecture is most important when comparing \MTA{}s. Many other properties of a program depend on its architecture. %fixme: add ref?
    1.16 -Munawar \person{Hafiz} \cite{hafiz05} discusses in detail on \mta\ architecture, comparing \sendmail, \qmail, \postfix, and \name{sendmail X}. Jonathan de \person{Boyne Pollard}'s \MTA\ review \cite{jdebp} is a source too.
    1.17 +Munawar \person{Hafiz} \cite{hafiz05} discusses in detail on \mta\ architecture, comparing \sendmail, \qmail, \postfix, and \name{sendmail X}. Jonathan \person{de Boyne Pollard}'s \MTA\ review \cite{jdebp} is a source too.
    1.18  
    1.19  Two different architecture types show off: monolithic and modular \mta{}s.
    1.20