1.1 --- a/thesis/tex/5-Improvements.tex	Sat Jan 31 10:49:39 2009 +0100
     1.2 +++ b/thesis/tex/5-Improvements.tex	Sat Jan 31 10:50:02 2009 +0100
     1.3 @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
     1.4  \begin{quote}
     1.5  %None of these add-ons is an ideal solution. They require additional code compiled into your existing daemons that may then require special write accesss to system files. They also require additional work for busy system administrators. If you cannot use any of the nonauthenticating alternatives mentioned earlier, or your business requirements demand that all of your users' mail pass through your system no matter where they are on the Internet, SASL is probably the solution that offers the most reliable and scalable method to authenticate users.
     1.6  None of these [authentication methods] is an ideal solution. They require additional code compiled into your existing daemons that may then require special write access to system files. They also require additional work for busy system administrators. If you cannot use any of the nonauthenticating alternatives mentioned earlier, or your business requirements demand that all of your users' mail pass through your system no matter where they are on the Internet, \NAME{SASL} is probably the solution that offers the most reliable and scalable method to authenticate users.
     1.7 -\hfill\cite[page 44]{dent04}
     1.8 +\hfill\cite[page~44]{dent04}
     1.9  \end{quote}
    1.10  
    1.11  These days is \NAME{SMTP-AUTH}---defined in \RFC\,2554---supported by most email clients. If encryption is used then even insecure authentication methods like \NAME{PLAIN} and \NAME{LOGIN} become secure.