docs/diploma
diff thesis/tex/3-MailTransferAgents.tex @ 201:013a13ee0a5f
subsections to unnumbered subsubsections
author | meillo@marmaro.de |
---|---|
date | Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:41:13 +0100 |
parents | ee687abf386c |
children | f2b8481789f6 |
line diff
1.1 --- a/thesis/tex/3-MailTransferAgents.tex Wed Dec 31 17:28:42 2008 +0100 1.2 +++ b/thesis/tex/3-MailTransferAgents.tex Wed Dec 31 17:41:13 2008 +0100 1.3 @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ 1.4 \end{table} 1.5 1.6 1.7 -\subsection{Architecture} 1.8 +\subsubsection*{Architecture} 1.9 1.10 Architecture is most important when comparing \MTA{}s. Many other properties of a program depend on its architecture. %fixme: add ref? 1.11 Munawar \person{Hafiz} \cite{hafiz05} discusses in detail on \mta\ architecture, comparing \sendmail, \qmail, \postfix, and \name{sendmail X}. Jonathan de \person{Boyne Pollard}'s \MTA\ review \cite{jdebp} is a source too. 1.12 @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 -\subsection{With focus on the future} 1.17 +\subsubsection*{With focus on the future} 1.18 1.19 Section \ref{sec:what-will-be-important} tried to figure out the importances for future \MTA{}s. The four programs are compared on these (possible) future requirements now. 1.20