Mercurial > docs > diploma
comparison thesis/input/mta-market-share.tex @ 222:ab9b90152ca4
updated market share analysis: correct share for mail sec layers
author | meillo@marmaro.de |
---|---|
date | Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:50:29 +0100 |
parents | 74151e26ba6a |
children |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
221:6d21f55323b8 | 222:ab9b90152ca4 |
---|---|
4 Bernstein & 2001 & | 4 Bernstein & 2001 & |
5 O'ReillyNet & 2007 & | 5 O'ReillyNet & 2007 & |
6 MailRadar & \\ | 6 MailRadar & \\ |
7 \hline \hline | 7 \hline \hline |
8 1 & | 8 1 & |
9 \textbf{sendmail} & 42.3\% & | 9 \textbf{sendmail} & 42.3\,\% & |
10 \textbf{sendmail} & 12.3\% & | 10 \textbf{sendmail} & 12.3\,\% & |
11 \textbf{sendmail} & 24\% \\ | 11 \textbf{sendmail} & 24\,\% \\ |
12 \hline | 12 \hline |
13 2 & | 13 2 & |
14 Microsoft Exchange & 18.4\% & | 14 Microsoft Exchange & 18.4\,\% & |
15 \textbf{postfix} & 8.6\% & | 15 \textbf{postfix} & 8.6\,\% & |
16 \textbf{postfix} & 20\% \\ | 16 \textbf{postfix} & 20\,\% \\ |
17 \hline | 17 \hline |
18 3 & | 18 3 & |
19 \textbf{qmail} & 17.4\% & | 19 \textbf{qmail} & 17.4\,\% & |
20 Microsoft Exchange & 7.6\% & | 20 Microsoft Exchange & 7.6\,\% & |
21 \textbf{qmail} & 17\% \\ | 21 \textbf{qmail} & 17\,\% \\ |
22 \hline | 22 \hline |
23 4 & | 23 4 & |
24 IMail & 5.9\% & | 24 IMail & 5.9\,\% & |
25 \textbf{qmail} & 5.3\% & | 25 \textbf{qmail} & 5.3\,\% & |
26 Microsoft Mail & 15\% \\ | 26 Microsoft Mail & 15\,\% \\ |
27 \hline | 27 \hline |
28 5 & | 28 5 & |
29 \textbf{postfix} & 1.6\% & | 29 \textbf{postfix} & 1.6\,\% & |
30 \textbf{exim} & 5.0\% & | 30 \textbf{exim} & 5.0\,\% & |
31 \textbf{exim} & 13\% \\ | 31 \textbf{exim} & 13\,\% \\ |
32 \hline | 32 \hline |
33 6 & | 33 6 & |
34 \textbf{exim} & 1.5\% & | 34 \textbf{exim} & 1.5\,\% & |
35 Cisco & 3.0\% & | 35 Cisco & 3.0\,\% & |
36 IMail & 2\% \\ | 36 IMail & 2\,\% \\ |
37 \hline | 37 \hline |
38 7 & | 38 7 & |
39 NTMail & 1.3\% & | 39 NTMail & 1.3\,\% & |
40 Barracuda & 2.8\% & | 40 Barracuda & 2.8\,\% & |
41 Microsoft Exchange & 1\% \\ | 41 Microsoft Exchange & 1\,\% \\ |
42 % \hline | 42 % \hline |
43 % 8 & | 43 % 8 & |
44 %NetWin Dmail & 0.8\% & | 44 %NetWin Dmail & 0.8\,\% & |
45 % & & | 45 % & & |
46 %mail security layers & 1\% \\ | 46 %mail security layers & 1\,\% \\ |
47 % \hline | 47 % \hline |
48 % 9 & | 48 % 9 & |
49 %Software.com Post.Office & 0.6\% & | 49 %Software.com Post.Office & 0.6\,\% & |
50 % & & | 50 % & & |
51 %InterMail & 1\% \\ | 51 %InterMail & 1\,\% \\ |
52 % \hline | 52 % \hline |
53 % 10 & | 53 % 10 & |
54 % & & | 54 % & & |
55 % & & | 55 % & & |
56 %Lotus Domino & 1\% \\ | 56 %Lotus Domino & 1\,\% \\ |
57 % \hline | 57 % \hline |
58 \hline \hline | 58 \hline \hline |
59 & | 59 & |
60 \textit{mail security layers} & \textgreater 2\% & %smap 2.4 | 60 \textit{mail security layers} & $\approx$ 4\,\% & %smap 2.4 and some small ones |
61 \textit{mail security layers} & \textgreater 22\% & | 61 \textit{mail security layers} & $\approx$ 22\,\% & |
62 \textit{mail security layers} & \textgreater 1\% \\ % symantec 1 | 62 \textit{mail security layers} & $\approx$ 2\,\% \\ % symantec 1 |
63 \hline | 63 \hline |
64 \end{tabular} | 64 \end{tabular} |
65 | 65 |
66 | 66 |
67 | 67 |
68 %\begin{tabular}[hbt]{| r || p{0.16\textwidth} r | p{0.16\textwidth} r | p{0.16\textwidth} r |} | 68 %\begin{tabular}[hbt]{| r || p{0.16\textwidth} r | p{0.16\textwidth} r | p{0.16\textwidth} r |} |
69 % \hline | 69 % \hline |
70 % \# & O'ReillyNet & 2007 & MailRadar & YYYY & Bernstein & 2001 \\ | 70 % \# & O'ReillyNet & 2007 & MailRadar & YYYY & Bernstein & 2001 \\ |
71 % \hline \hline | 71 % \hline \hline |
72 % 1 & \textbf{sendmail} & 12.3\% & \textbf{sendmail} & 24\% & \textbf{sendmail} & 42.3\% \\ | 72 % 1 & \textbf{sendmail} & 12.3\,\% & \textbf{sendmail} & 24\,\% & \textbf{sendmail} & 42.3\,\% \\ |
73 % \hline | 73 % \hline |
74 % 2 & \textbf{postfix} & 8.6\% & \textbf{postfix} & 20\% & Microsoft Exchange & 18.4\% \\ | 74 % 2 & \textbf{postfix} & 8.6\,\% & \textbf{postfix} & 20\,\% & Microsoft Exchange & 18.4\,\% \\ |
75 % \hline | 75 % \hline |
76 % 3 & Postini & 8.5\% & \textbf{qmail} & 17\% & \textbf{qmail} & 17.4\% \\ | 76 % 3 & Postini & 8.5\,\% & \textbf{qmail} & 17\,\% & \textbf{qmail} & 17.4\,\% \\ |
77 % \hline | 77 % \hline |
78 % 4 & Microsoft Exchange & 7.6\% & Microsoft Mail & 15\% & IMail & 5.9\% \\ | 78 % 4 & Microsoft Exchange & 7.6\,\% & Microsoft Mail & 15\,\% & IMail & 5.9\,\% \\ |
79 % \hline | 79 % \hline |
80 % 5 & MXLogic & 6.0\% & \textbf{exim} & 13\% & smap & 2.4\% \\ | 80 % 5 & MXLogic & 6.0\,\% & \textbf{exim} & 13\,\% & smap & 2.4\,\% \\ |
81 % \hline | 81 % \hline |
82 % 6 & \textbf{qmail} & 5.3\% & IMail & 2\% & \textbf{postfix} & 1.6\% \\ | 82 % 6 & \textbf{qmail} & 5.3\,\% & IMail & 2\,\% & \textbf{postfix} & 1.6\,\% \\ |
83 % \hline | 83 % \hline |
84 % 7 & \textbf{exim} & 5.0\% & Microsoft Exchange & 1\% & \textbf{exim} & 1.5\% \\ | 84 % 7 & \textbf{exim} & 5.0\,\% & Microsoft Exchange & 1\,\% & \textbf{exim} & 1.5\,\% \\ |
85 % \hline | 85 % \hline |
86 % 8 & Concentric Hosting & 4.5\% & Symantec Mail Security & 1\% & NTMail & 1.3\% \\ | 86 % 8 & Concentric Hosting & 4.5\,\% & Symantec Mail Security & 1\,\% & NTMail & 1.3\,\% \\ |
87 % \hline | 87 % \hline |
88 % 9 & Cisco & 3.0\% & InterMail & 1\% & NetWin Dmail & 0.8\% \\ | 88 % 9 & Cisco & 3.0\,\% & InterMail & 1\,\% & NetWin Dmail & 0.8\,\% \\ |
89 % \hline | 89 % \hline |
90 % 10 & Barracuda & 2.8\% & Lotus Domino & 1\% & Software.com Post.Office & 0.6\% \\ | 90 % 10 & Barracuda & 2.8\,\% & Lotus Domino & 1\,\% & Software.com Post.Office & 0.6\,\% \\ |
91 % \hline | 91 % \hline |
92 %\end{tabular} | 92 %\end{tabular} |
93 | 93 |