Mercurial > docs > diploma
comparison thesis/tex/4-MasqmailsFuture.tex @ 323:82496704f747
added labels
author | meillo@marmaro.de |
---|---|
date | Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:51:19 +0100 |
parents | 426ad56236ce |
children | d13bddf0f994 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
322:1adee5512ab9 | 323:82496704f747 |
---|---|
461 | 461 |
462 | 462 |
463 | 463 |
464 | 464 |
465 \subsection{Discussion} | 465 \subsection{Discussion} |
466 \label{sec:discussion-further-devel} | |
466 | 467 |
467 | 468 |
468 \subsubsection*{Quality improvements} | 469 \subsubsection*{Quality improvements} |
469 | 470 |
470 Most quality properties can hardly be added to a software afterwards. Hence, if reliability, extendability, or maintainability shall be improved, a redesign of \masqmail\ is the best way to take. The wish to improve quality inevitably point towards a modular architecture. Modularity with internal and external interfaces is highly preferred from the architectural point of view (see section \ref{sec:discussion-mta-arch}). The need for further features, especially ones that require changes in \masqmail's structure, support the decision for a new design too. Hence a rewrite is favored if \masqmail\ should become a modern \MTA, with good quality properties. | 471 Most quality properties can hardly be added to a software afterwards. Hence, if reliability, extendability, or maintainability shall be improved, a redesign of \masqmail\ is the best way to take. The wish to improve quality inevitably point towards a modular architecture. Modularity with internal and external interfaces is highly preferred from the architectural point of view (see section \ref{sec:discussion-mta-arch}). The need for further features, especially ones that require changes in \masqmail's structure, support the decision for a new design too. Hence a rewrite is favored if \masqmail\ should become a modern \MTA, with good quality properties. |