comparison thesis/tex/4-MasqmailsFuture.tex @ 323:82496704f747

added labels
author meillo@marmaro.de
date Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:51:19 +0100
parents 426ad56236ce
children d13bddf0f994
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
322:1adee5512ab9 323:82496704f747
461 461
462 462
463 463
464 464
465 \subsection{Discussion} 465 \subsection{Discussion}
466 \label{sec:discussion-further-devel}
466 467
467 468
468 \subsubsection*{Quality improvements} 469 \subsubsection*{Quality improvements}
469 470
470 Most quality properties can hardly be added to a software afterwards. Hence, if reliability, extendability, or maintainability shall be improved, a redesign of \masqmail\ is the best way to take. The wish to improve quality inevitably point towards a modular architecture. Modularity with internal and external interfaces is highly preferred from the architectural point of view (see section \ref{sec:discussion-mta-arch}). The need for further features, especially ones that require changes in \masqmail's structure, support the decision for a new design too. Hence a rewrite is favored if \masqmail\ should become a modern \MTA, with good quality properties. 471 Most quality properties can hardly be added to a software afterwards. Hence, if reliability, extendability, or maintainability shall be improved, a redesign of \masqmail\ is the best way to take. The wish to improve quality inevitably point towards a modular architecture. Modularity with internal and external interfaces is highly preferred from the architectural point of view (see section \ref{sec:discussion-mta-arch}). The need for further features, especially ones that require changes in \masqmail's structure, support the decision for a new design too. Hence a rewrite is favored if \masqmail\ should become a modern \MTA, with good quality properties.