Mercurial > docs > diploma
comparison thesis/tex/1-Introduction.tex @ 31:2a191e20b4aa
minor stuff
author | meillo@marmaro.de |
---|---|
date | Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:44:22 +0200 |
parents | 6c4b50b44d05 |
children | f789b659f094 |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
30:6c4b50b44d05 | 31:2a191e20b4aa |
---|---|
11 | 11 |
12 As generally known, the early development of \unix\ was not only made in the \name{Bell Labratories} of \NAME{AT\&T}. But also the \name{Univerity of California at Berkeley} worked on their version of a \unix\ operating system, called \NAME{UCB} \unix, or \name{Berkeley} \unix. | 12 As generally known, the early development of \unix\ was not only made in the \name{Bell Labratories} of \NAME{AT\&T}. But also the \name{Univerity of California at Berkeley} worked on their version of a \unix\ operating system, called \NAME{UCB} \unix, or \name{Berkeley} \unix. |
13 | 13 |
14 This lead to a second \NAME{MUA} from Berkeley: \name{Mail} (with a capital `M'). Also, no \NAME{UUCP} network was set up at Berkeley but an own creation called \name{BerkNet} was used. | 14 This lead to a second \NAME{MUA} from Berkeley: \name{Mail} (with a capital `M'). Also, no \NAME{UUCP} network was set up at Berkeley but an own creation called \name{BerkNet} was used. |
15 %FIXME: why? license issues? closed source? | 15 %FIXME: why? license issues? closed source? |
16 %TODO: what about `mailx'? | |
16 | 17 |
17 Further more there was a third network type: the \NAME{ARPAnet}, based on the \name{transmission control protocol} (\NAME{TCP}). | 18 Further more there was a third network type: the \NAME{ARPAnet}, based on the \name{transmission control protocol} (\NAME{TCP}). |
18 %FIXME: where did it came from? | 19 %FIXME: where did it came from? |
19 | 20 |
20 Each of the three network types could transfer email between different machines. The file transfer itself was made using \NAME{FTP}, but the higher layered logic of the transfer was different in each. For example was the addressing schema not the same: \NAME{UUCP} used a flat-style schema, while \NAME{ARPAnet} was hierachical. | 21 Each of the three network types could transfer email between different machines. The file transfer itself was made using \NAME{FTP}, but the higher layered logic of the transfer was different in each. For example was the addressing schema not the same: \NAME{UUCP} used a flat-style schema, while \NAME{ARPAnet} was hierachical. |
29 %FIXME: add books and websites here | 30 %FIXME: add books and websites here |
30 | 31 |
31 | 32 |
32 | 33 |
33 \section{Transporting mail} | 34 \section{Transporting mail} |
35 %TODO: include definitions from others here (cites) | |
36 %TODO: when was the term ``mail transfer agent'' established? | |
34 The basic job of a \name{mail transfer agent} (or \name{mail transport agent}, short \NAME{MTA}) is to transfer/transport \name{electronic mail} (short \name{email}) from one host to another. | 37 The basic job of a \name{mail transfer agent} (or \name{mail transport agent}, short \NAME{MTA}) is to transfer/transport \name{electronic mail} (short \name{email}) from one host to another. |
35 | 38 |
36 % TODO: include definitions from others here (cites) | |
37 | 39 |
38 | 40 |
39 | 41 |
40 \section{sendmail} | 42 \section{sendmail} |
41 \name{sendmail} is the defacto-standard for \name{mail transfer agents}. | 43 \name{sendmail} is the de facto standard for \name{mail transfer agents}. |
42 | 44 |
43 % FIXME: is that true? | 45 % FIXME: is that true? |
44 It was the first \NAME{MTA} and had no real alternative for a long time. | 46 It was the first \NAME{MTA} and had no real alternative for a long time. |
45 | 47 |
46 All other existing substitutes, which are mainly \name{postfix}, \name{exim}, \name{qmail} and the here regarded \name{masqmail}, mimic \name{sendmail}'s behavior. Especially, they all create a symbolic link named ``sendmail'' pointing to their own executable. This is because a lot of programs assume there is an executable called ``sendmail'' on every computer system. | 48 All other existing substitutes, which are mainly \name{postfix}, \name{exim}, \name{qmail} and the here regarded \name{masqmail}, mimic \name{sendmail}'s behavior. Especially, they all create a symbolic link named ``sendmail'' pointing to their own executable. This is because a lot of programs assume there is an executable called ``sendmail'' on every computer system. |