docs/cut

changeset 40:e294684cf338

find changesets by author, revision, files, or words in the commit message
merge
author markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
date Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:09:04 +0100
parents 7608a7416bc0 ec76f8926598
children e2961496d097
files cut.en.ms
diffstat 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) [+]
line diff
     1.1 --- a/cut.en.ms	Thu Nov 05 17:27:04 2015 +0100
     1.2 +++ b/cut.en.ms	Tue Nov 10 21:09:04 2015 +0100
     1.3 @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
     1.4  selection specification is irrelevant; it doesn't even matter if
     1.5  fields occur multiple times. Thus, the invocation
     1.6  \f(CWcut -c 5-8,1,4-6\fP outputs the characters number
     1.7 -1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in exactly this order. The
     1.8 +1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in ascending order. The
     1.9  selection specification resembles mathematical set theory: Each
    1.10  specified field is part of the solution set. The fields in the
    1.11  solution set are always in the same order as in the input. To
    1.12 @@ -472,7 +472,7 @@
    1.13  It is noteworthy that the GNU coreutils in all versions
    1.14  describe the performed action as a removal of parts of the
    1.15  input, although the user clearly selects the parts that then
    1.16 -consistute the output. Probably the words ``cut out'' are too
    1.17 +constitute the output. Probably the words ``cut out'' are too
    1.18  misleading. HP-UX tried to be more clear.
    1.19  .PP
    1.20  Different terms are also used for the part being