Mercurial > docs > cut

changeset 40:e294684cf338

Find changesets by keywords (author, files, the commit message), revision number or hash, or revset expression.
merge
author markus schnalke <meillo@marmaro.de>
date Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:09:04 +0100
parents 7608a7416bc0 (current diff) ec76f8926598 (diff)
children e2961496d097
files cut.en.ms
diffstat 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) [+]
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/cut.en.ms	Thu Nov 05 17:27:04 2015 +0100
+++ b/cut.en.ms	Tue Nov 10 21:09:04 2015 +0100
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
 selection specification is irrelevant; it doesn't even matter if
 fields occur multiple times. Thus, the invocation
 \f(CWcut -c 5-8,1,4-6\fP outputs the characters number
-1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in exactly this order. The
+1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 in ascending order. The
 selection specification resembles mathematical set theory: Each
 specified field is part of the solution set. The fields in the
 solution set are always in the same order as in the input. To
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@
 It is noteworthy that the GNU coreutils in all versions
 describe the performed action as a removal of parts of the
 input, although the user clearly selects the parts that then
-consistute the output. Probably the words ``cut out'' are too
+constitute the output. Probably the words ``cut out'' are too
 misleading. HP-UX tried to be more clear.
 .PP
 Different terms are also used for the part being