1.1 --- a/dev.c	Thu Jul 13 12:35:46 2006 +0200
     1.2 +++ b/dev.c	Thu Jul 13 14:33:22 2006 +0200
     1.3 @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
     1.4  	{ Mod1Mask, XK_k, sel, "prev" }, 
     1.5  	{ Mod1Mask, XK_j, sel, "next" }, 
     1.6  	{ Mod1Mask, XK_t, tiling, NULL }, 
     1.7 -	{ Mod1Mask, XK_f, tiling, NULL }, 
     1.8 +	{ Mod1Mask, XK_f, floating, NULL }, 
     1.9  	{ Mod1Mask, XK_m, max, NULL }, 
    1.10  	{ Mod1Mask | ShiftMask, XK_c, ckill, NULL }, 
    1.11  	{ Mod1Mask | ShiftMask, XK_q, quit, NULL },

     2.1 --- a/dwm.html	Thu Jul 13 12:35:46 2006 +0200
     2.2 +++ b/dwm.html	Thu Jul 13 14:33:22 2006 +0200
     2.3 @@ -28,9 +28,9 @@
     2.4  		and all this hype about remote control through a 9P service, I only
     2.5  		want to manage my windows in a simple, but dynamic way. wmii never got
     2.6  		finished because I listened to users, who proposed arbitrary ideas I
     2.7 -		considered useful. This resulted in an extreme <a href="http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html">CADT model</a>
     2.8 -		of developmentwhich was basically my mistake. Thus the philosophy of
     2.9 -		dwm is to fit my needs. That's it.
    2.10 +		considered useful. This resulted in an extreme <a href="http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html">CADT</a>
    2.11 +		development model, which was a mistake. Thus the philosophy of
    2.12 +		dwm is simply <i>to fit my needs</i> (maybe yours as well). That's it.
    2.13  		</p>
    2.14  		<h3>Differences to wmii</h3	
    2.15  		<p>